OBJECTIVE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a modern concept that aims to improve the perioperative patient care by implementing an evidence-based, patient-centered team approach. This paper aims to analyze the outcome, variations and limits of the ERAS-protocols used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic review on PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science to document the outcomes of applying various ERAS protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers, totaling 1453 patients that underwent LC, were included in the qualitative analysis. ERAS-protocols applied in those studies include various pre-, intra- and postoperative measures intended to boost the surgical recovery of the patients and shorten their hospital stay, without exposing them to hazardous encounters. Results: Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within an ERAS-specific protocol are proven to have lower levels of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, with no statistically significant risk of postoperative complications. The postoperative results show that ERAS-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, that may shorten the postoperative recovery after LC. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to establish a consensus regarding the perioperative protocol, before implementing ERAS for LC in clinical routine.

Background: This non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of two pharmacological treatments, \"around-the-clock\" analgesic treatment (ACAT) and \"on-demand\" analgesic treatment (ODAT), for managing postoperative pain following hemorrhoidectomy. Material and Methods: The study, conducted from July 2016 to December 2020, included 5335 hemorrhoidectomy patients. Participants were divided into ACAT (3767) and ODAT (1568) groups. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04953182). Results: Patients had a mean age of 47.47 years, with 59.98% males. Postoperatively, 14.13% reported severe pain, 36.49% moderate, 34.28% mild, and 15.09% no pain. ACAT group\'s maximum pain was 3.04 (VAS), ODAT 4.95 (p; average pain was 0.79 (ACAT) and 1.45 (ODAT). Discharge pain was 0.42 (ACAT) and 0.63 (ODAT) VAS. The ACAT group consistently reported lower levels of pain across all measured instances. Higher BMI and younger age were pain risk factors (p=.049, p .001 respectively). ACAT administration resulted in reduced opioid usage, with meperidine showing a 68.38% decrease, morphine 43.57% less, tramadol 46.82% less, oxycodone reduced by 38.74%, and codeine by 53.40%. Additionally, the use of non-opioid analgesics was notably lower in the ACAT group, ranging from 16% to 59% less compared to the ODAT group. Conclusion: Hemorrhoidectomy induces moderate postoperative pain, with only 14% experiencing severe pain. A fixed schedule multimodal pain regimen, regardless of procedure and anesthesia type, reduces pain from moderate to mild post-hemorrhoidectomy. This approach also decreases opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements. Higher BMI and younger age are identified as risk factors for elevated postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVE: Primary aim of the present article was to determine the relationship between mesh fixation methods and the occurrence of postoperative pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Materials and Methods: 101 patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia benefited from elective laparoscopic treatment of the abdominal wall defect. Follow up was realized at one and three months after surgical intervention. The followed details contained clinical, surgical and pain-related data. Results: Multivariable analysis resulted young adults (OR=4.226; p=0.0467), recurrent hernia (OR=4.862; p=0.0415) and use of fixation requiring surgical mesh (OR=4.226; p=0.0467) as significant risk factors in the development of chronic postoperative pain. During the follow up period, patients who benefitted of mesh fixation complained about significantly higher pain sensation (pain index at one month: SG=10.27; CG=5.07; p=0.0080; pain index at three months: SG=5.02; CG=1.42; p=0.0406). Concerning chronic postoperative pain syndrome, six patients from SG (12.76%) and only a single patient from CG complained after three months about pain index greater than 18.5 points, concluding that mesh fixation significantly increases the possibility of chronic postoperative pain syndrome (p=0.0455). Conclusions: Mesh fixation methods during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair seem to contribute to the development of chronic postoperative pain. Avoiding traumatizing mesh fixation methods could be a suitable option for surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for postoperative pain after laparoscopic appendectomy compared with sham electroacupuncture (SEA) and no acupuncture treatment.
UNASSIGNED: This study is a protocol for a three-arm, randomised, patient-assessor-blinded (to the type of acupuncture treatment), controlled, parallel trial. 138 participants diagnosed with appendicitis and scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy will be randomly assigned to the EA group (n=46), SEA group (n=46) or control group (n=46). The EA group will receive acupuncture treatment at both regional and distal acupuncture points with electrostimulation. The SEA group will receive sham acupuncture treatment with mock electrostimulation. Both EA and SEA groups will receive a total of four treatments 1 hour preoperative, 1 hour postoperative and during the morning and afternoon the day after surgery with the same routine postoperative pain control. The control group will receive only routine postoperative pain control. The primary outcome is the 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) at 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes are the PI-NRS, analgesic consumption, opioid-related side effects, time to first passing flatus, quality of life and adverse events evaluated 6, 12, 24 and 36 hours and 7 days after surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The study was planned in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the Korean Good Clinical Practice Guidelines to protect the participants and was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KMC IRB-1427-02). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.
BACKGROUND: Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0001328).