UNASSIGNED: Complications following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for ARM are well known. In this article, we present our experience of managing five patients who required major redo surgeries for complications resulting from previous attempts to correct ARM.
UNASSIGNED: We reviewed all patients who underwent major redo surgeries in our hospital for complications from previous repairs for ARM, from June 2013 to June 2019. Data was obtained from hospital records and analysed.
UNASSIGNED: Five patients whose ages ranged from 5 months to 14 years were included in the study. Four were boys and 1 was a girl. All patients had undergone PSARP in other hospitals. The presentations were retained distal bowel causing urinary retention and constipation (n=1), pulled through proximal urethra and bladder neck presenting as passage of urine from neo-anus (n=1), retained common channel (of cloaca) causing a \'H\' type configuration (n=1), mispositioned neo-anus (n=1) following a primary PSARP and lastly undivided recto-urethral fistula causing fecaluria (n=1). All of them underwent redo repairs by posterior sagittal approach with documented improvement in their symptoms. Two of them required total bowel management to remain clean.
UNASSIGNED: All the complications reported here have been described in literature nevertheless, this report will add to the body of experience. Posterior sagittal approach (PSA) has proved to be very successful technique in correcting these complications.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the laparoscopic treatment (LT) and the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty treatment (ST) of the rectovaginal fistulas (RvaF) in a single center. We have previously reported feasibility and results of LT in this rare variety of anorectal malformations (ARM) [1-3].
METHODS: 19 patients were treated between February 2000 and November 2020. Nine underwent a LT and 10 a ST. Both surgical techniques were previously described. [2][4][5] The distal posterior wall of the vagina was kept intact in the LT. A technical change was introduced in the ST for that purpose. The fistula was treated from the inside of the rectum, avoiding the opening of the distal vagina as described for the treatment of a urethra rectal bulbar fistula in males. Age at operation, associated anomalies, sacral ratio index (SR), complications, urinary continence, presence of spontaneous intestinal movements, constipation, soiling and requirements of bowel management program (BMP) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Associated anomalies occurred in 17 patients (89.5 %), 63 % of which were urological. Five (26 %) had a SR below 0.4; 4 in the LT group and 1 in the ST group. The mean age at the time of operation was 23.2 (8-59) in ST and 17.6 months (4-32) in LT. Average operative time was 190.4 min for ST (120-334) and 195.8 min (90-270) for LT (p 0.13). One patient in the LT group presented a mild rectal prolapse and 2 a partial wound dehiscence after the ST. Only 15 patients were evaluable for functional results (8 in ST and 7 in LT). Mean follow up was 83 months (12-197). All patients are clean with a bowel management program. Five of the 7 patients undergoing a LT had a bad prognosis (SR < 0,4). Three (43 %) are clean with diet or any treatment, 3 (43 %) using laxatives or enemas and 1 (14 %) with a trans anal irrigation system. Only 1 of the 8 patients in the STgroup had a bad prognosis. Six (40 %) needed a diet; 4 (50 %) laxatives or enemas and 1 (10 %) a cecostomy button for antegrade enemas.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RvaF had a high index of associated anomalies. The difference of operative time was not statistically significative. No differences in functional results between both groups were observed. LT is a valid option to treat RvaF.

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are managed classically in three stages - colostomy at birth, anorectal pull-through after 2-3 months, and stoma closure. Single-stage pull-through has been contemplated in neonatal age aimed to reduce the number of procedures, better long-term continence, the better psycho-social status of the child, and reduced cost of treatment, especially in resource-strained countries. We conducted a systematic review comparing neonatal single-stage pull-through with stage pull-through and did a meta-analysis for the outcome and complications. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched and RevMan 5.4.1 was used for the meta-analysis. Fourteen comparative studies including one randomized controlled trial were included in the systematic review for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 1845 patients including 866 neonates undergoing single-stage pull-through. There was no statistically significant difference for the occurrence of surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-2.83), urinary tract injury (OR 1.82, 95% CI: 0.85-3.89), rectal prolapse (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.21-5.04), anal stenosis/stricture, voluntary bowel movements (OR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.25-3.73), constipation (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.61-1.67), soiling (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.51), mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.04-39.74), or other complications. However, continence was seen to be better among patients undergoing neonatal pull-through (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.12-2.38). Thus, we can recommend single-stage pull-through for managing patients with ARMs in the neonatal age.

OBJECTIVE: After conducting a nationwide survey of persistent cloaca (PC), we assessed whether or not the timing of definitive anorectoplasty affects the long-term bowel function of patients with PC.
METHODS: Patient information was obtained via questionnaire, and a total of 169 PC patients who underwent posterior sagittal anorectourethrovaginoplasty (PSARUVP) were enrolled in this study. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on their operative period, which was analyzed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: the early group (EG) underwent anorectoplasty at ≤ 18 months old (n = 106), and the late group (LG) underwent anorectoplasty at > 18 months old (n = 63). The bowel function was evaluated using the evacuation score of the Japan Society of Anorectal Malformation Study Group. We also examined the postoperative results of vaginoplasty.
RESULTS: The total evacuation score was significantly higher in the EG than in the LG (5.2 ± 1.7 vs. 4.2 ± 1.8, p = 0.003). The frequency of bowel movement and the constipation scores were significantly higher in the EG than in the LG (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.2 ± 0.7, p < 0.05, 2.4 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative vaginal stenosis was observed in 18 cases (10.7%), of which 16 could be reconstructed transperineally.
CONCLUSIONS: PSARUVP should be performed in early infancy and facilitate vaginal reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal malformations (ARM) are associated with neurogenic bladder. The traditional surgical ARM repair is a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), which is believed to have a minimal effect on bladder dynamics. However, little is known about the effects of reoperative PSARP (rPSARP) on bladder function. We hypothesized that a high rate of bladder dysfunction existed in this cohort.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of ARM patients undergoing rPSARP at a single institution from 2008 to 2015. Only patients with Urology follow-up were included in our analysis. Data was collected regarding original level of ARM, coexisting spinal anomalies and indications for reoperation. We assessed urodynamic variables and bladder management (voiding, CIC or diverted) before and after rPSARP.
RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were identified, of which 85 met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 23.9 months (IQR, 5.9-43.8 months). Thirty-six patients had spinal cord anomalies. Indications for rPSARP included mislocation (n = 42), posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD; n = 16), stricture (n = 19) and rectal prolapse (n = 8). Within 1 year following rPSARP, 11 patients (12.9%) had a negative change in bladder management, defined as need for beginning intermittent catheterization or undergoing urinary diversion, which increased to 16 patients (18.8%) at last follow-up. Postoperative bladder management changed in rPSARP patients with mislocation (p < 0.0001) and stricture (p 0.005) but not for rectal prolapse (p 0.143).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo rPSARP warrant especially close attention for bladder dysfunction as we observed a negative postoperative change in bladder management in 18.8% of our series.
METHODS: Level IV.

UNASSIGNED: Anal dilation with Hegar dilator is recommended as part of the post-operative management following surgical correction of anorectal malformation (ARM) in children to prevent strictures. Parents usually continue dilation at home with a personal set of dilators. However, in low-resource settings, many parents cannot afford the Hegar dilator. Devices that have been improvised as dilators include appropriately sized candles, spigot from Foley catheter, rounded ball pen ends and mothers\' fingers. We aimed to report our preliminary experience with the use of candle as an improvised anal dilator following surgeries for ARM in our practice.
UNASSIGNED: A review of records of children who had surgery for ARMs and commenced on candle dilation between February 2018 and July 2019 at our centre was done. Relevant demographic information, type of anomaly, duration of dilation, availability of health insurance coverage, complications and parents\' acceptance of improvised dilator (evaluated during scheduled follow up visits) were retrieved. The data were analysed using SPPSS version 21 (Chicago, Illinois).
UNASSIGNED: Nineteen patients underwent anal dilation with improvised candles during the period. Rectobulbar and rectovestibular fistulas were most frequent anomaly in boys and girls, respectively. The median age at surgery was 6 months. The median duration of dilation (completed in 9 patients) was 7 months. Candle dilation was well tolerated, and all parents were comfortable using the device.
UNASSIGNED: The candle as an improvised anal dilator following anorectal surgeries in children is a useful alternative to the conventional dilator. It is more affordable and gives satisfactory results.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a high-fidelity, animal tissue-based model for the advanced surgical simulation of a Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty (PSARP) for rectovestibular fistula in anorectal malformation (ARM).
METHODS: A chicken cadaver was used to assess the feasibility of simulating a PSARP for rectovestibular fistula in ARM. No modification was required to implement the surgical simulation.
RESULTS: A detailed description of the high-fidelity surgical simulation model is provided. The PSARP can be simulated while providing realistic anatomy (e.g. common wall between rectovestibular fistula and vagina), adequate rectal size, location and placement of the rectovestibular fistula, and proximity to the vagina. Haptic conditions of the tissue resemble human tissue and operative conditions as well.
CONCLUSIONS: Concerning the decreased exposure of index cases of pediatric surgical trainees and pediatric surgeons in practice, simulation-based training can provide means to acquire or maintain the necessary skills to perform complex surgical procedures [1-5] Surgical simulation models for ARM are limited. Few low-cost trainers are available with predominant artificial and mostly unrealistic tissue [6-8] Animal models have the advantage of realistic multilayer tissue haptic feedback [6].
CONCLUSIONS: We provide a low-cost, high-fidelity model for correcting a rectovestibular fistula in a child with ARM, a complex operative procedure with low incidence but high-stake outcomes. The described tissue model utilizing the chicken cloaca anatomy provides a high-fidelity model for operative correction of rectovestibular ARM. For simulation purposes in the treatment of ARM, this model appears to be promising in terms of providing realistic pathology and haptic feedback in pediatric dimensions.
METHODS: V.

BACKGROUND: Wound dehiscence of the anocutaneous anastomosis and/or reconstructed perineal body is a feared perioperative complication after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). Dehiscence of the perineal body can have long-term negative implications for fecal continence, sexual intimacy, obstetrical outcomes, and the need for reoperative surgery. We describe a modification to the traditional PSARP for repair of an imperforate anus with a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula by sparing the perineal body, eliminating postoperative perineal body dehiscence and potentially improving long-term functional outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective review of female patients with a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula who underwent PSARP with sparing of the perineal body was performed.
RESULTS: Six patients underwent PSARP with sparing of the perineal body between 2019 and 2022. There were no perioperative complications. At follow-up, all patients are having regular bowel function without difficulty and have an excellent appearance of their perineal body.
CONCLUSIONS: PSARP for a rectovestibular, perineal, or absent fistula can be safely performed with a more limited incision to avoid disruption of the perineal body. This eliminates the need for perineal body reconstruction during the procedure, thereby preventing wound dehiscence. Given the significant long-term adverse sequelae of wound dehiscence and resultant inadequate perineal body, we believe this modification to the PSARP warrants strong consideration.

UNASSIGNED: High and intermediate types of anorectal malformations (ARMs) may be managed by either open posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) or by laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP). Most of the literature favours one approach over the other based on retrospective analysis. We performed this study with the aim to compare the short-term outcomes of both procedures.
UNASSIGNED: All paediatric patients with high and intermediate ARM were enrolled and randomised into two groups: open PSARP group and LAARP group. Outcome parameters such as faecal continence using Kelly\'s scoring system, anal manometric parameters and post-operative complications were compared between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 16 patients were included with equal distribution in the open PSARP and LAARP group. Patient\'s variables were comparable in both the groups. Five patients developed immediate post-operative complications, three in the LAARP and two in the open group. The mean Kelly\'s score was 3.63 ± 1.6 versus 2.57 ± 1.9 (P = 0.132) for LAARP and PSARP group, respectively. The mean resting pressure was 34.71 ± 6.26 cm of H2O and 35 ± 6.16 cm of H2O (P = 0.384) in LAARP and open group, respectively. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was demonstrated in 6/7 patients in LAARP group and 5/7 patients in open group.
UNASSIGNED: Faecal continence in patients undergoing either of the procedure is comparable. However, wound-related complications are lesser in LAARP procedure.

Anorectal necrosis is an uncommon lethal disease in children, characterized by necrosis of the mucosa of the anus and rectum. The difference between anorectal necrosis and Fournier\'s gangrene is that anorectal necrosis does not affect the genital organs. The treatment for anorectal necrosis includes debridement of the anus, colostomy, and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, anorectal necrosis may lead to anal stricture, anal malfunction, or even acquired atresia of the anus. There is no consensus on the treatment for acquired imperforate anus. Herein, we report a case of a four-month-old boy with acquired imperforate anus complicated by anorectal necrosis. We describe our experience performing posterior sagittal anorectoplasty to reconstruct a neo-anus in such a rare case.