OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare three methods for estimating stay-level Medicare facility (Part A) costs using claims and cost-report data for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and long-term care hospitals (LTCHs), the two hospital-based post-acute care providers.
METHODS: We calculated stay-level facility costs using different methods. Method 1 used routine costs per day and ancillary cost-to-charge ratios. Method 2 used routine and ancillary cost-to-charge ratios (freestanding IRFs and LTCHs only). Method 3 used facility-specific operating cost-to-charge ratios from the Provider Specific File. For each method, we compared the costs to payments and charges at the claim and facility levels and examined facility margins.
METHODS: Data are from 1,619 providers, including 266 freestanding IRFs, 909 IRF units, and 444 LTCHs.
METHODS: The analyses included 239,284 claims from 2014, of which 86,118 claims were from freestanding IRFs, 92,799 claims were from IRF units, and 60,367 claims were from LTCHs.
METHODS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Costs and payments in 2014 United States Dollars RESULTS: For freestanding IRFs, the mean facility stay-level costs were calculated to be $13,610 (Method 1), $13,575 (Method 2) and $13,783 (Method 3). For IRF units, the mean facility stay-level costs were $17,385 (Method 1) and $19,093 (Method 3). For LTCHs, the mean facility stay-level costs were $36,362 (Method 1), $36,407 (Method 2), $37,056 (Method 3).
CONCLUSIONS: The three methods resulted in small differences in facility mean stay-level costs. Using the facility-level cost-to-charge ratio (Method 3) is the least resource intensive method. While more resource intensive, using routine cost per day and ancillary cost-to-to-charge ratios (Method 1) for cost calculations allows differentiation in costs across patients based on differences in the mix of service use. As policymakers consider post-acute care payment reforms, cost, rather than charge or payment data, need to be calculated and the results of the methods compared.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the results of post-acute care (PAC) rehabilitation for persons living with dementia (PLWD).
METHODS: Systematic review of published literature without date restrictions through April 2023.
METHODS: PLWD undergoing rehabilitation in PAC facilities after an acute care hospitalization.
METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Included studies were peer-reviewed, available in English, and focused on PLWD admitted to rehabilitation facilities following hospitalization in the US and international settings. Studies on long-term care and acute inpatient rehabilitation units were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened articles and conducted a quality appraisal of selected studies. A narrative synthesis approach was used for analysis of results with rehabilitation themes encompassing \"outcomes\" and \"experiences.\"
RESULTS: Forty-one articles met inclusion criteria, with a heterogeneity of study designs including observational (n = 33), randomized clinical trials (n = 3), and qualitative studies (n = 5). Narrative synthesis demonstrated that PAC rehabilitation for PLWD contained themes of \"outcomes,\" including health service utilization and physical and cognitive function, providing evidence for a lower likelihood to return home and achieving less functional improvement compared to individuals without cognitive impairment. The second theme, \"experiences,\" included health care transitions, knowledge and education, goal alignment, and care models. Findings detailed poor communication around care transitions, lack of dementia knowledge among health care workers, goal alignment strategies, and innovative rehabilitation models specific for PLWD.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this systematic review covers a breadth of literature across time and international settings on PAC rehabilitation for PLWD. The findings highlight the importance of rehabilitation models specific for dementia care, with a need for personalized approaches around care transitions, goal setting, and increased dementia education. Addressing these aspects of rehabilitative care for PLWD may enhance the delivery of PAC and improve health care outcomes and experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate disparities in admissions to highly rated skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) between Medicare beneficiaries with and without opioid use disorder (OUD).
METHODS: Nationwide, retrospective observational cohort.
METHODS: Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged ≥18 years admitted to SNFs following hospitalization during 2016-2020 (n = 30,922 with OUD and n = 137,454 without OUD).
METHODS: Data used were 100% Medicare inpatient claims, nursing home administrative databases, and Nursing Home Compare. We identified hospitalized patients with and without OUD and matched them on age, sex, Part D low-income subsidy (LIS), and residential county. We compared the overall and component (quality, staffing, and health inspections) star ratings of SNFs that beneficiaries entered. Beneficiary-level regression models were conducted adjusting for race and ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual status, comorbidity score, hospital length of stay, and state and year fixed effects.
RESULTS: The overall study sample had a mean (SD) age of 71.4 (11.4) years, 63.9% were female, and 57.4% had LIS. Among beneficiaries with OUD, 50.3% entered SNFs with above-average (4 or 5) overall rating compared with 51.3% among those without OUD. Distributions of above-average ratings among beneficiaries with and without OUD were as follows: 63.9% vs 62.2% for quality, 32.8% vs 34.9% for health inspections, and 46.2% vs 45.0% for staffing, respectively. Adjusted regression models indicated that beneficiaries with OUD were less likely to be admitted to facilities with above-average overall (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.92), health inspection (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92), and staffing (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.89-0.94) ratings compared with beneficiaries without OUD, whereas quality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01) ratings did not differ.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite mixed results on component ratings, our findings suggest a concerning disparity in the overall quality of SNFs admitting Medicare beneficiaries with OUD. Enhancing equitable access to high-quality SNF care for individuals with OUD is imperative amid rising demand and legal protections under the American Disabilities Act.

OBJECTIVE: Early rehospitalization of frail older adults after hospital discharge is harmful to patients and challenging to hospitals. Mobile integrated health (MIH) programs may be an effective solution for delivering community-based transitional care. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and implementation of an MIH transitional care program.
METHODS: Pilot clinical trial of a transitional home visit conducted by MIH paramedics within 72 hours of hospital discharge.
METHODS: Patients aged ≥65 years discharged from an urban hospital with a system-adapted eFrailty index ≥0.24 were eligible to participate.
METHODS: Participants were enrolled after hospital discharge. Demographic and clinical information were recorded at enrollment and 30 days after discharge from the electronic health record. Data from a comparison group of patients excluded from enrollment due to geographical location was also abstracted. Primary outcomes were intervention feasibility and implementation, which were reported descriptively. Exploratory clinical outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits and rehospitalization within 30 days. Categorical and continuous group comparisons were conducted using χ2 tests and Kruskal-Wallis testing. Binomial regression was used for comparative outcomes.
RESULTS: One hundred of 134 eligible individuals (74.6%) were enrolled (median age 81, 64% female). Forty-seven participants were included in the control group (median age 80, 55.2% female). The complete protocol was performed in 92 (92.0%) visits. Paramedics identified acute clinical problems in 23 (23.0%) visits, requested additional services for participants during 34 (34.0%) encounters, and detected medication errors during 34 (34.0%). The risk of 30-day rehospitalization was lower in the Paramedic-Assisted Community Evaluation after Discharge (PACED) group compared with the control (RR, 0.40; CI, 0.19-0.84; P = .03); there was a trend toward decreased risk of 30-day ED visits (RR, 0.61; CI, 0.37-1.37; P = .23).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study of an MIH transition care program was feasible with high protocol fidelity. It yields preliminary evidence demonstrating a decreased risk of rehospitalization in frail older adults.

OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on post-acute care (PAC) use and disparities related to race and ethnicity and rurality in the United States over the past 2 decades among individuals who underwent major joint replacement (MJR).
METHODS: Systematic review.
METHODS: We included studies that examined US PAC trends and racial and ethnic and/or urban vs rural differences among individuals who are aged ≥18 years with hospitalization after MJR.
METHODS: We searched large academic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed, English language articles from January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2022.
RESULTS: Seventeen studies were reviewed. Studies (n = 16) consistently demonstrated that discharges post-MJR to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or nursing homes (NHs) decreased over time, whereas evidence on discharges to inpatient rehab facilities (IRFs), home health care (HHC), and home without HHC services were mixed. Most studies (n = 12) found that racial and ethnic minority individuals, especially Black individuals, were more frequently discharged to PAC institutions than white individuals. Demographic factors (ie, age, sex, comorbidities) and marital status were not only independently associated with discharges to institutional PAC, but also among racial and ethnic minority individuals. Only one study found urban-rural differences in PAC use, indicating that urban-dwelling individuals were more often discharged to both SNF/NH and HHC than their rural counterparts.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite declines in institutional PAC use post-MJR over time, racial and minority individuals continue to experience higher rates of institutional PAC discharges compared with white individuals. To address these disparities, policymakers should consider measures that target multimorbidity and the lack of social and structural support among socially vulnerable individuals. Policymakers should also consider initiatives that address the economic and structural barriers experienced in rural areas by expanding access to telehealth and through improved care coordination.

Challenges to recruitment of family caregivers exist and are amplified when consent must occur in the context of chaotic healthcare circumstances, such as the transition from hospital to home. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic during our randomized controlled trial provided an opportunity for a natural experiment exploring and examining different consent processes for caregiver recruitment. The purpose of this publication is to describe different recruitment processes (in-person versus virtual) and compare diversity in recruitment rates in the context of a care recipient\'s hospitalization. We found rates of family caregiver recruitment for in-person versus virtual were 28% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.01). Differences existed across groups with family caregivers recruited virtually being more likely to be younger, white, have greater than high school education, and not be a spouse or significant other to the care recipient, such as a child. Future work is still needed to identify the modality and timing of family caregiver recruitment to maximize rates and enhance the representativeness of the population for equitable impact.

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) has been rapidly growing. We examined whether MA enrollment affects the outcomes of post-acute nursing home care among patients with Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD). We exploited year-to-year changes in MA penetration rates within counties from 2012 through 2019. After adjusting for patient-level characteristics and county fixed effects, we found that MA enrollment was not associated with days spent at home, nursing home days, likelihood of becoming a long-stay resident, hospital days, hospital readmission, or 1-year mortality. There was a modest increase in successful discharge to the community by 0.73 percentage points (relative increase of 2.4%) associated with a 10-percentage-point increase in MA enrollment. The results are consistent among racial/ethnic subgroups and dual-eligible patients. These findings suggest an imperative need to monitor and improve quality of managed care among enrollees with ADRD.

Although research suggests that less than half of individuals who have surgical procedures report effective postoperative pain alleviation, the majority of patients endure acute postoperative discomfort. To lessen and manage postoperative pain, a variety of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative treatments and management methods are available. For several years an opioid called buprenorphine has become an effective tool to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) in patients across many different demographics. It has however endured barriers to its usage which can be seen when treating patients with chronic pain or postoperative pain, who also have an OUD. While buprenorphine may be underutilized within the clinical setting, the significantly low rates of chronic abuse when using the drug allow it to be an attractive treatment option for patients. This paper aims to explore a wide range of studies that examine buprenorphine as an analgesic and how it can be used for preoperative pain and postoperative pain. This paper will give an in-depth analysis of buprenorphine and its use in patients with chronic pain as well as OUD. A systematic literature review was performed by identifying studies through the database PubMed. The data from various publications were gathered with preference being given to publications within the last three years. We reviewed studies that examined the pain level of the patients after having buprenorphine. Despite long-available pharmacologic evidence and clinical research, buprenorphine has maintained a mystique as an analgesic. Its usage in the treatment of OUD was further influenced by its well-known safety benefits and relative lack of psychomimetic side effects compared to other opioids. For patients accustomed to long-term, high-dose opioids who may be experiencing hyperalgesia but have not been informed about this phenomenon by their doctors or the potential for buprenorphine to resolve it, buprenorphine\'s pronounced antihyperalgesic effect is a compelling pharmacologic characteristic that makes it particularly attractive as an option. When used in pre-, peri-, and postoperative circumstances, buprenorphine provides various pain-management benefits and patients can still benefit from effective pain management from mu-opioid agonists while remaining on buprenorphine. Buprenorphine can be continued at a reduced dose as needed to avoid withdrawal symptoms and to improve the analgesic efficiency of mu-opioid agonists used in combination with acute postoperative pain in light of the evidence at hand. Buprenorphine administration needs a patient-centered, multidisciplinary strategy that considers the benefits and drawbacks of the many perioperative therapy options to have the best chance of success.

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, home health agencies (HHAs) discharges following acute hospitalizations increased. This study examined whether racial and ethnic minoritized and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients (ie, Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligible) were differentially discharged to below-average quality HHAs before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focused on post-acute patients with Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD), who are generally frail and have high care needs.
METHODS: Cohort study.
METHODS: We linked 2019 to 2021 Medicare data with Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Home Health Compare, and COVID-19 infection data. We included Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD who were hospitalized for non-COVID-19 conditions and discharged to HHAs between January 2019 and November 2021. The final analytical sample included 426,766 qualified hospitalization events.
METHODS: The outcome variable was whether a patient received care from a below-average quality HHA, defined by an average Quality of Patient Care Star Rating lower than 3.0. Key independent variables included individual race, ethnicity, and Medicare-Medicaid dual status. Linear probability models with county fixed effects were estimated, sequentially adjusting for the individual- and community-level covariates. Sensitivity analysis using various definitions of below-average quality HHAs was conducted.
RESULTS: Before the pandemic, Black and Hispanic individuals had significantly higher probabilities of discharge to below-average quality HHAs compared with white individuals (3.4 and 3.9 percentage points, respectively). Dual-eligible individuals were also 2.5 percentage points more likely to be discharged to below-average quality HHAs. During the pandemic, disparities in being discharged to below-average quality HHAs persisted among racial and ethnic minoritized patients and increased among duals. Findings were consistent with and without adjusting for individual covariates and across different definitions of below-average quality HHA.
CONCLUSIONS: Persistent disparities were observed in being discharged to below-average quality HHAs by race, ethnicity, and dual status. Further research is needed to identify factors contributing to these ongoing inequalities.

An increase in respiratory rate (RR) can be an early indicator of clinical deterioration, yet it remains an often-neglected vital sign. The most common way of measuring RR is by manually counting chest-wall movements, a time-consuming and error-prone process. Staffing and funding shortages, particularly in post-acute and long-term care, mean these RR measurements are often infrequent, potentially leading to missed diagnoses and preventable readmissions. Here we present a case series from skilled nursing facilities, highlighting how continuous respiratory monitoring using a contactless remote patient monitoring (RPM) system can support clinicians in initiating timely interventions, potentially reducing preventable hospitalizations, mortality, and associated financial implications.