portal pressure

门脉压力
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:门静脉压(PVP)的测量已被广泛研究,主要通过间接方法。然而,超声引导经皮经肝穿刺PVP测量作为一种直接方法的潜力在很大程度上尚未被探索.本研究旨在调查准确性,安全,这种方法的可行性。
    方法:体外,实验旨在选择一种可以准确传递压力的针头,内径小,适合肝穿刺,对20只健康的新西兰白兔进行了实验。进行超声引导下经皮经肝门静脉穿刺以测量PVP。此外,在数字减影血管造影(DSA)下测量游离肝静脉压(FHVP)和楔形肝静脉压(WHVP)。评估了两种方法之间的相关性。从2023年10月18日至2023年11月11日,以书面知情同意书登记研究参与者。5例患者术前在超声引导下测量PVP,以确定该测量方法的可行性。
    结果:使用9种不同类型的针头获得的结果没有显着差异(P>0.05)。这证明了良好的可重复性(P<0.05)。内径小的22G千叶针,允许准确的压力传输和适合肝穿刺,用于经皮经肝穿刺PVP测量。PVP与HVPG呈正相关(r=0.881),PVP和WHVP(r=0.709),HVPG和WHVP(r=0.729),IVCP和FHVP(r=0.572)。在5例肝段切除术患者中准确,安全地测量了PVP。术后超声检查未发现并发症。
    结论:超声引导下经皮肝穿刺门静脉穿刺准确,测量门静脉压力是安全可行的。
    背景:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ChiCTR2300076751。
    OBJECTIVE: The measurement of portal venous pressure (PVP) has been extensively studied, primarily through indirect methods. However, the potential of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic PVP measurement as a direct method has been largely unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy, safety, and feasibility of this approach.
    METHODS: In vitro, the experiment aimed to select a needle that could accurately transmit pressure, had a small inner diameter and was suitable for liver puncture, and performed on 20 healthy New Zealand white rabbits. An ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic portal vein puncture was undertaken to measure PVP. Additionally, free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) and wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) were measured under digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The correlation between the two methods was assessed. Enroll study participants from October 18, 2023 to November 11, 2023 with written informed consent. Five patients were measured the PVP under ultrasound guidance before surgery to determine the feasibility of this measurement method.
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the results obtained using 9 different types of needles (P > 0.05). This demonstrated a great repeatability (P < 0.05). The 22G chiba needle with small inner diameter, allowing for accurate pressure transmission and suitable for liver puncture, was utilized for percutaneous transhepatic PVP measurement. There were positive correlations between PVP and HVPG (r = 0.881), PVP and WHVP (r = 0.709), HVPG and WHVP (r = 0.729), IVCP and FHVP (r = 0.572). The PVP was accurately and safely measured in 5 patients with segmental hepatectomy. No complications could be identified during postoperative ultrasound.
    CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transhepatic portal venous puncture under ultrasound guidance is accurate, safe and feasible to measure portal venous pressure.
    BACKGROUND: This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR2300076751.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议使用非选择性β受体阻滞剂治疗具有临床意义的门静脉高压症(CSPH)的患者(即,卡维地洛)通过更新BavenoVII共识来预防第一次肝失代偿事件。CSPH定义为肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)≥10mmHg;然而,HVPG测量由于其侵入性而未被广泛采用。肝硬度(LS)≥25kPa可用作HVPG≥10mmHg的替代品,以统治CSPH,在大多数患者病因中有90%的阳性预测值。一个令人信服的论据是存在使用LS≥25kPa来诊断CSPH,然后开始卡维地洛患者代偿期肝硬化,在此诊断标准下,约5%-6%的患者可能无法从卡维地洛获益,并且有降低心率和平均动脉压的风险.关于使用卡维地洛预防LS诊断的CSPH中肝脏失代偿的随机对照试验仍有待阐明。因此,我们旨在调查LS≥25kPa的代偿性肝硬化患者是否可以从卡维地洛治疗中获益.
    方法:这项研究是一项随机的,双盲,安慰剂对照,多中心试验。我们将随机分配446名成人代偿性肝硬化患者,LS≥25kPa,没有任何先前的失代偿期事件,也没有高风险的胃食管静脉曲张。患者随机分为两组,A组223名受试者,B组223名受试者,A组为卡维地洛干预组,B组为安慰剂组。两组中的所有患者都将接受病因治疗,并以6个月的间隔进行随访。肝硬化相关和肝脏相关死亡失代偿性事件的3年发生率是主要结果。次要结果包括门静脉高压症的每种并发症的发展(腹水,静脉曲张出血或明显的肝性脑病),自发性细菌性腹膜炎和其他细菌感染的发展,新静脉曲张的发展,小静脉曲张生长为大静脉曲张,LS和脾僵硬的δ变化,通过Child-Pugh和终末期肝病评分模型评估肝功能障碍的变化,血小板计数的变化,肝细胞癌的发展,3年随访门静脉血栓形成和不良事件的发展。将执行预定义的中期分析以确保计算是合理的。
    背景:研究方案已获得沈阳市第六人民医院伦理委员会(2023-05-003-01)和中大医院临床研究独立伦理委员会的批准,隶属于东南大学(2023ZDSYLL433-P01)。该试验的结果将提交在同行评审的期刊上发表,并将在国际会议上发表。
    背景:ChiCTR2300073864。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are recommended to be treated with non-selective beta-blockers (ie, carvedilol) to prevent the first hepatic decompensation event by the renewing Baveno VII consensus. CSPH is defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG)≥10 mm Hg; however, the HVPG measurement is not widely adopted due to its invasiveness. Liver stiffness (LS)≥25 kPa can be used as a surrogate of HVPG≥10 mm Hg to rule in CSPH with 90% of the positive predicting value in majority aetiologies of patients. A compelling argument is existing for using LS≥25 kPa to diagnose CSPH and then to initiate carvedilol in patients with compensated cirrhosis, and about 5%-6% of patients under this diagnosis criteria may not be benefited from carvedilol and are at risk of lower heart rate and mean arterial pressure. Randomised controlled trial on the use of carvedilol to prevent liver decompensation in CSPH diagnosed by LS remains to elucidate. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if compensated cirrhosis patients with LS≥25 kPa may benefit from carvedilol therapy.
    METHODS: This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. We will randomly assign 446 adult compensated cirrhosis patients with LS≥25 kPa and without any previous decompensated event and without high-risk gastro-oesophageal varices. Patients are randomly divided into two groups, with 223 subjects in group A and 223 subjects in group B. Group A is a carvedilol intervention group, while group B is a placebo group. All patients in both groups will receive aetiology therapies and are followed up at an interval of 6 months. The 3-year incidences of decompensated events of cirrhosis-related and liver-related death are the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes include development of each complication of portal hypertension individually (ascites, variceal bleeding or overt hepatic encephalopathy), development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and other bacterial infections, development of new varices, growth of small varices to large varices, delta changes in LS and spleen stiffness, change in hepatic dysfunction assessed by Child-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease score, change in platelet count, development of hepatocellular carcinoma, development of portal vein thrombosis and adverse events with a 3-year follow-up. A predefined interim analysis will be performed to ensure that the calculation is reasonable.
    BACKGROUND: The study protocol has been approved by the ethics committees of the Sixth People\'s Hospital of Shenyang (2023-05-003-01) and independent ethics committee for clinical research of Zhongda Hospital, affiliated to Southeast University (2023ZDSYLL433-P01). The results from this trial will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at international conferences.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300073864.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)的测量有效地反映了门静脉高压(PH)的严重程度,并提供了对肝病预后的有价值的见解。包括代偿失调和死亡的风险。此外,HVPG提供有关非选择性β受体阻滞剂和其他药物治疗反应的重要信息,在PH患者的临床试验中证明了其实用性。尽管非侵入性测试的广泛传播和验证,HVPG在肝病学中仍然具有重要作用。治疗肝病患者的医师应了解HVPG测量程序,其应用,以及如何解释结果和潜在的陷阱。
    Measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) effectively mirrors the severity of portal hypertension (PH) and offers valuable insights into prognosis of liver disease, including the risk of decompensation and mortality. Additionally, HVPG offers crucial information about treatment response to nonselective beta-blockers and other medications, with its utility demonstrated in clinical trials in patients with PH. Despite the widespread dissemination and validation of noninvasive tests, HVPG still holds a significant role in hepatology. Physicians treating patients with liver diseases should comprehend the HVPG measurement procedure, its applications, and how to interpret the results and potential pitfalls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是一项回顾性研究,重点是经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)手术后的再补偿。作者证实,根据BavenoVII,TIPS可以治疗肝硬化患者的再补偿。该论文确定年龄和TIPS后门静脉压力梯度是TIPS后失代偿性肝硬化患者再补偿的独立预测因子。这些结果需要在更大的前瞻性队列中进行验证。
    This is a retrospective study focused on recompensation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure. The authors confirmed TIPS could be a treatment for recompensation of patients with cirrhosis according to Baveno VII. The paper identified age and post-TIPS portal pressure gradient as independent predictors of recompensation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis after TIPS. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:门脉高压(PHT),主要由肝硬化引起,表现出影响患者生存的严重症状。尽管经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是治疗PHT的关键干预措施,它有肝性脑病等风险,从而影响患者生存预后。据我们所知,PHT患者TIPS后生存的现有预后模型未能解释各种预后因素对结局的相互作用和共同影响.因此,创新建模方法的发展对于解决这一限制至关重要。
    目的:开发并验证基于贝叶斯网络(BN)的生存预测模型,用于肝硬化诱导的PHT患者经历TIPS。
    方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2022年5月在重庆医科大学附属第二医院行TIPS手术的393例肝硬化PHT患者的临床资料。使用Cox和最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归方法选择变量,建立并评估了基于BN的模型,以预测接受TIPS手术的PHT患者的生存率。
    结果:变量选择揭示了以下是影响生存的关键因素:年龄,腹水,高血压,提示的指示,术后门静脉压力(PVP后),天冬氨酸转氨酶,碱性磷酸酶,总胆红素,前白蛋白,Child-Pugh年级,和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分。根据上述变量,构建了基于BN的2年生存预后预测模型,确定了以下与生存时间直接相关的因素:年龄,腹水,提示的指示,并发高血压,post-PVP,Child-Pugh年级,和MELD得分。贝叶斯信息标准为3589.04,10倍交叉验证表明平均对数似然损失为5.55,标准偏差为0.16。模型的准确性,精度,召回,F1评分分别为0.90、0.92、0.97和0.95,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积为0.72。
    结论:本研究成功开发了基于BN的生存预测模型,具有良好的预测能力。它为接受TIPS手术的PHT患者的治疗策略和预后评估提供了有价值的见解。
    BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension (PHT), primarily induced by cirrhosis, manifests severe symptoms impacting patient survival. Although transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a critical intervention for managing PHT, it carries risks like hepatic encephalopathy, thus affecting patient survival prognosis. To our knowledge, existing prognostic models for post-TIPS survival in patients with PHT fail to account for the interplay among and collective impact of various prognostic factors on outcomes. Consequently, the development of an innovative modeling approach is essential to address this limitation.
    OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a Bayesian network (BN)-based survival prediction model for patients with cirrhosis-induced PHT having undergone TIPS.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 393 patients with cirrhosis-induced PHT who underwent TIPS surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 2015 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Variables were selected using Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression methods, and a BN-based model was established and evaluated to predict survival in patients having undergone TIPS surgery for PHT.
    RESULTS: Variable selection revealed the following as key factors impacting survival: age, ascites, hypertension, indications for TIPS, postoperative portal vein pressure (post-PVP), aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, prealbumin, the Child-Pugh grade, and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. Based on the above-mentioned variables, a BN-based 2-year survival prognostic prediction model was constructed, which identified the following factors to be directly linked to the survival time: age, ascites, indications for TIPS, concurrent hypertension, post-PVP, the Child-Pugh grade, and the MELD score. The Bayesian information criterion was 3589.04, and 10-fold cross-validation indicated an average log-likelihood loss of 5.55 with a standard deviation of 0.16. The model\'s accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were 0.90, 0.92, 0.97, and 0.95 respectively, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being 0.72.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully developed a BN-based survival prediction model with good predictive capabilities. It offers valuable insights for treatment strategies and prognostic evaluations in patients having undergone TIPS surgery for PHT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:失代偿期肝硬化包括不同预后的几个阶段,比如出血,腹水和出血加腹水。进一步失代偿的发展恶化了生存,而非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBB)可以改变风险。然而,这如何适用于每个阶段是不确定的。我们的目的是调查,在失代偿期肝硬化的每个阶段,进一步失代偿对死亡率的影响以及NSBBs下门静脉压力(HVPG)的变化是否会影响这些结局.
    方法:连续纳入静脉曲张破裂出血患者,将单纯出血患者与腹水患者区分开来。还调查了被称为初级预防的腹水和高危静脉曲张患者。在NSBB下进行基线血液动力学研究并在1-3个月后重复。结果是通过竞争风险进行调查的。
    结果:共有103例患者单独出血,186例出血加腹水和187例仅腹水。平均随访时间为32个月(IQR,12-60).出血加腹水的患者的HVPG更高,并且比单独的腹水患者和单独的出血患者更具高动力。在每个阶段,在进一步失代偿的患者中,死亡风险是两倍以上。那些没有(p<.001)。在每个阶段,与基线MELD相比,NSBBs下的HVPG降低显示出更好的辨别力,以预测进一步的失代偿,Child-Pugh或HVPG,通过时间依赖性ROC曲线(c统计量>70%)。在每个阶段,没有HVPG-减少的患者,基线≥10%或≥20%,有更高的风险进一步失代偿(sHR从2.43到6.73,p<0.01)和较差的生存率。
    结论:在失代偿期肝硬化的每个阶段,死亡风险显著和非常显著增加与进一步失代偿。HVPG对NSBB无反应可能充分分层进一步代偿和死亡的风险,在每个阶段。这表明在每个阶段HVPG无反应者中先发制人疗法的潜在益处。
    OBJECTIVE: Decompensated-cirrhosis encompasses several stages with different prognosis, such as bleeding, ascites and bleeding-plus-ascites. Development of further-decompensation worsens survival, while non-selective β-blockers (NSBBs) can modify the risk. However, how this applies to each stage is uncertain. We aimed to investigate, in each stage of decompensated-cirrhosis, the influence of further-decompensation on mortality and whether changes in portal-pressure (HVPG) under NSBBs influence these outcomes.
    METHODS: Patients with variceal bleeding were consecutively included differentiating those with bleeding-alone from those who also had ascites. Patients with ascites and high-risk varices referred for primary-prophylaxis were also investigated. A baseline haemodynamic study was performed and was repeated after 1-3-months under NSBBs. Outcomes were investigated by competing-risk.
    RESULTS: Totally 103 patients had bleeding-alone, 186 bleeding-plus-ascites and 187 ascites-alone. Mean follow-up was 32-months (IQR, 12-60). Patients with bleeding-plus-ascites had higher HVPG and were more hyperdynamic than patients with ascites-alone and these than those with bleeding-alone. At each stage, the mortality risk was more than twice in patients developing further-decompensation vs. those without (p < .001). In each stage, HVPG-decrease under NSBBs showed better discrimination to predict further-decompensation than the baseline MELD, Child-Pugh or HVPG, by time-dependent ROC-curves (c-statistic >70%). At each stage, patients without HVPG-decreases, either ≥10% or ≥20% from the baseline, had higher risk of further-decompensation (sHR from 2.43 to 6.73, p < .01) and worse survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: In each stage of decompensated cirrhosis, mortality risk significantly and very markedly increase with further-decompensation. HVPG-non-response to NSBBs may adequately stratify the risk of further decompensation and death, in each stage. This suggests potential benefit with pre-emptive therapies in HVPG-non-responders at each-stage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术是一种通过介入放射学进行的治疗方式。目的是降低门静脉压力在特殊情况下失代偿性肝病合并门静脉高压症的患者。它代表了治疗模式的潜在补充,可以根据BavenoVII标准在那些患者中实现肝再补偿。
    Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a therapeutic modality done through interventional radiology. It is aimed to decrease portal pressure in special situations for patients with decompensated liver disease with portal hypertension. It represents a potential addition to the therapeutic modalities that could achieve hepatic recompensation in those patients based on Baveno VII criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:门静脉高压(PH)促使肝硬化进展为代偿失调和死亡。肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量是PH定量的标准,HVPG≥10mmHg定义临床显著PH(CSPH)。我们进行了基于蛋白质组学的血清分析,以寻找患者的蛋白质组学特征的CSPH代偿性晚期慢性肝病(cACLD)。
    方法:前瞻性地纳入了组织学证实为cACLD和HVPG测量结果的连续患者。根据CSPH的存在/不存在合并血清样品,并通过液相色谱-质谱分析。进行基因集富集分析,其次是全面的文献综述,以鉴定出组间差异最大的蛋白质。
    结果:我们包括48例患者(30例,和18没有CSPH)。蛋白CD44,参与炎症反应,血管内皮生长因子C(VEGF-C)和淋巴管内皮透明质酸受体-1(LYVE-1),两者均参与淋巴管生成,仅在CSPH组发现.尽管在两组中都被确定,参与中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NET)形成的蛋白质,以及肌腱C,在CSPH中,介导血管收缩力和淋巴管生成的自分泌运动蛋白和nephronectin更为丰富。
    结论:我们建议改变炎症反应,包括网络形成,血管收缩性和新淋巴管的形成是PH发育的关键步骤。蛋白质如CD44,VEGF-C,LYVE-1,肌腱C,纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1,Nephronectin,杀菌通透性增加蛋白,Autotaxin,髓过氧化物酶和具有血小板反应蛋白基序样蛋白4的整合素和金属蛋白酶可能被认为是cACLD中CSPH的潜在治疗靶标和候选生物标志物。
    BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension (PH) drives the progression of liver cirrhosis to decompensation and death. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is the standard of PH quantification, and HVPG≥10 mmHg defines clinically significant PH (CSPH). We performed proteomics-based serum profiling to search for a proteomic signature of CSPH in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD).
    METHODS: Consecutive patients with histologically confirmed cACLD and results of HVPG measurements were prospectively included. Serum samples were pooled according to the presence/absence of CSPH and analysed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed, followed by comprehensive literature review for proteins identified with the most striking difference between the groups.
    RESULTS: We included 48 patients (30 with, and 18 without CSPH). Protein CD44, involved in the inflammatory response, vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) and lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1), both involved in lymphangiogenesis were found solely in the CSPH group. Although identified in both groups, proteins involved in neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation, as well as tenascin C, autotaxin and nephronectin which mediate vascular contractility and lymphangiogenesis were more abundant in CSPH.
    CONCLUSIONS: We propose that altered inflammatory response, including NET formation, vascular contractility and formation of new lymph vessels are key steps in PH development. Proteins such as CD44, VEGF-C, LYVE-1, tenascin C, Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, Nephronectin, Bactericidal permeability-increasing protein, Autotaxin, Myeloperoxidase and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-like protein 4 might be considered for further validation as potential therapeutic targets and candidate biomarkers of CSPH in cACLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对肝硬化门脉高压症的门脉静脉(OPV)闭塞的影响知之甚少。探讨其在胆汁性肝硬化门脉高压中的作用及其机制。我们使用二维(2D)组织病理学评估了胆道闭锁患者肝脏外植体的OPV(BA,n=63),原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC,n=18),和乙型肝炎相关的肝硬化(Hep-B肝硬化,n=35)。然后,在胆管结扎(BDL)或四氯化碳(CCl4)给药后,在两个平行模型中通过X射线相衬CT测量大鼠的三维(3D)OPV,代表胆汁性肝硬化和坏死后肝硬化,分别。还在两个模型中测量了门静脉压力。最后,研究了增生性胆管对OPV的影响。我们发现OPV在胆汁性肝硬化患者中明显更常见,包括BA(78.57±16.45%)和PBC(60.00±17.15%),比Hep-B肝硬化患者(29.43±14.94%,p<0.001)。OPV发生较早,Kasai手术(KP)的配对肝活检证明,即使在BA患者中成功进行KP后也是不可逆的。OPV在BDL模型中也比在CCl4模型中明显更频繁,如2D和3D定量分析所示。BDL模型的门静脉压力明显高于CCl4模型。随着胆管的增生,门静脉小静脉被压缩并不可逆地闭塞,有助于早期和更高的门静脉压力在胆汁性肝硬化。OPV,作为前正弦分量,在胆汁性肝硬化门脉高压的发病机制中起着关键作用。增殖的胆管和胆管逐渐占据最初归于门脉的“领土”并压缩门脉。这可能导致胆汁性肝硬化的OPV。©2024英国和爱尔兰病理学会。
    The effects of the obliteration of portal venules (OPV) in cirrhotic portal hypertension are poorly understood. To investigate its contribution to portal hypertension in biliary cirrhosis and its underlying mechanism, we evaluated OPV using two-dimensional (2D) histopathology in liver explants from patients with biliary atresia (BA, n = 63), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC, n = 18), and hepatitis B-related cirrhosis (Hep-B-cirrhosis, n = 35). Then, three-dimensional (3D) OPV was measured by X-ray phase-contrast CT in two parallel models in rats following bile duct ligation (BDL) or carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) administration, representing biliary cirrhosis and post-necrotic cirrhosis, respectively. The portal pressure was also measured in the two models. Finally, the effects of proliferative bile ducts on OPV were investigated. We found that OPV was significantly more frequent in patients with biliary cirrhosis, including BA (78.57 ± 16.45%) and PBC (60.00 ± 17.15%), than that in Hep-B-cirrhotic patients (29.43 ± 14.94%, p < 0.001). OPV occurred earlier, evidenced by the paired liver biopsy at a Kasai procedure (KP), and was irreversible even after a successful KP in the patients with BA. OPV was also significantly more frequent in the BDL models than in the CCl4 models, as shown by 2D and 3D quantitative analysis. Portal pressure was significantly higher in the BDL model than that in the CCl4 model. With the proliferation of bile ducts, portal venules were compressed and irreversibly occluded, contributing to the earlier and higher portal pressure in biliary cirrhosis. OPV, as a pre-sinusoidal component, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in biliary cirrhosis. The proliferated bile ducts and ductules gradually take up the \'territory\' originally attributed to portal venules and compress the portal venules, which may lead to OPV in biliary cirrhosis. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜手术用于犬先天性肝外门体分流术(CEHPSS)。然而,同时进行门静脉血管造影和门静脉压力测量以减弱或完全闭塞犬分流血管的腹腔镜手术的结果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜门体分流术(LAPSSO)对CEHPSS的疗效和并发症。
    在2014年6月至2021年3月之间,从医院记录中收集了接受玻璃纸绑扎(CB)和腹腔镜治疗的先天性肝外分流口完全闭塞的狗的数据。腹腔镜完全闭塞的病例,或用于逐渐闭塞的CB被包括在内。共有36只狗(14只雄性;中位年龄32.5个月[范围,5-99]中等体重,4.2kg[范围,1.5-7.9])包括接受LAPSSO治疗CEHPSS的患者。所有的狗都接受了CT血管造影(CTA),收集血液和放射学检查的数据。使用CTA发现对分流血管形态进行分类。30例和6例通过进入肠系膜和脾静脉进行门静脉压力测量和门静脉造影,分别。
    最常见的分流类型是脾-膈分流16/36(44.4%),其次是脾奇9/36(25.0%),脾腔4/36(11.1%),右胃腔6/36(16.6%),右侧胃腔静脉有尾环分流1/36(2.7%)。完全闭塞后的中位门静脉压为11.5mmHg(范围,4-16);两只进行CB衰减的狗的门静脉压为22和24mmHg。右卧位(n=25)和左卧位(n=11)的狗的中位手术时间为55分钟(范围,28-120)和54分钟(范围,28-88),分别。一只狗由于隔膜受伤而发生气胸。另一只狗出现术后高钠血症,并在术后5小时死亡。然而,没有其他狗在72小时内表现出门脉高压的迹象。术后1-2个月进行的血液检查和腹部超声检查显示没有残留的分流。
    LAPSSO,结合门静脉压力测量和门静脉血管造影,被证明是促进CEHPSS成功闭塞的安全有效方法。需要对围手术期并发症进行进一步的大规模前瞻性研究和分析。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic surgery is used for canine congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (CEHPSS). However, outcomes of laparoscopic surgery involving simultaneous portal vein angiography and portal pressure measurement to attenuate or completely occlude the shunt vessel in canines remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and complications of laparoscopic portosystemic shunt occlusion (LAPSSO) for CEHPSS.
    UNASSIGNED: Between June 2014 and March 2021, data on dogs undergoing cellophane banding (CB) and complete occlusion of laparoscopically treated congenital extrahepatic port shunts were collected from hospital records. Cases in which complete occlusion was laparoscopically performed, or a CB was used for gradual occlusion were included. A total of 36 dogs (14 males; median age 32.5 months [range, 5-99] with median body weight, 4.2 kg [range, 1.5-7.9]) that underwent LAPSSO for CEHPSS were included. All the dogs underwent computed tomographic angiography (CTA), and data on blood and radiological examinations were collected. Shunt vessel morphology was categorized using CTA findings. Portal pressure measurements and portal angiography were performed by accessing mesenteric and splenic veins in 30 and 6 cases, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The most common shunt types were spleno-phrenic shunts 16/36 (44.4%), followed by spleno-azygos 9/36 (25.0%), spleno-caval 4/36 (11.1%), right gastric-caval 6/36 (16.6%), and right gastric-caval with caudal loop shunts 1/36 (2.7%). The median portal pressure after complete occlusion was 11.5 mmHg (range, 4-16); portal pressures in the two dogs undergoing CB attenuation were 22 and 24 mmHg. The median operating time in the dogs with right (n = 25) and left (n = 11) recumbent positioning was 55 min (range, 28-120) and 54 min (range, 28-88), respectively. One dog had pneumothorax due to injury to the diaphragm. Another dog developed postoperative hypernatremia and succumbed 5 h post-procedure. Nevertheless, no other dogs exhibited signs of portal hypertension within 72 h. Blood tests and abdominal ultrasounds performed 1-2 months postoperatively revealed no residual shunts.
    UNASSIGNED: LAPSSO, coupled with portal pressure measurement and portal angiography, was shown as safe and effective approach that facilitated successful occlusion of CEHPSS. Further large-scale prospective studies and analyses of perioperative complications are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号