背景:提出了许多关于美丽臀部概念的理论,但是几乎没有被证明,尤其是亚洲集团。
目的:分析中国人群对审美愉悦特征的审美偏好。
方法:在调查中,我们通过Photoshop软件(AdobePhotoshopCS5;AdobeSystems,Inc.,圣何塞,Calif),臀部有和没有四个特征。进行了在线问卷调查,对最美观的臀部进行排名。使用Pearson卡方检验比较了各个人口统计学组的数据。p<0.05的值用于统计显著性。
结果:总计,收集了2348个响应。超过一半的受访者更喜欢没有上黄体花盆(56.9%),V形折痕(60.4%)和侧向凹陷(90.1%)。最吸引人的黄体折叠选择是短型(34.9%),其次是中位黄体下褶皱(32.7%)和长黄体下褶皱(32.4%)。黄体上的人工林,在年轻人中,更喜欢中位或长的黄体下褶皱和V形折痕。
结论:Supraglutealfossettes,超过一半的受访者不喜欢V形折痕和横向凹陷。审美偏好受性别和年龄的影响。整形外科医生在建立臀部美观的美学目标时应考虑上述变化。
方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
BACKGROUND: Many theories referring to the conception of a beautiful buttock have been put forward, but little has been proved, especially in the Asian group.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the aesthetic preference for aesthetically pleasing characteristics in the Chinese population.
METHODS: In the survey, we computerized the buttock image of a Chinese female through the Photoshop software (Adobe Photoshop CS5; Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, Calif), and buttocks with and without four features were attained. An online questionnaire was made to rank the most aesthetic buttocks. The data for the various demographic groups were compared using the Pearson Chi-square test. A value of p < 0.05 was used for statistical significance.
RESULTS: In total, 2348 responses were collected. Over half of the respondents prefer without supragluteal fossettes (56.9%), V-shaped crease (60.4%) and lateral depression (90.1%). The most attractive infragluteal fold option was short type (34.9%), followed by median infragluteal fold (32.7%) and long infragluteal fold (32.4%). Supragluteal fossettes, median or long infragluteal fold and V-shaped crease were more preferred among young people.
CONCLUSIONS: Supragluteal fossettes, V-shaped crease and lateral depressions were not preferred in over half of the respondents. The aesthetic preference was influenced by the gender and age. The plastic surgeons should consider the variabilities above when establishing aesthetic aim for beautiful buttocks in gluteoplasty.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.