popliteal artery

骶动脉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    股动脉卡压综合征仍难以诊断。同时,我们有限的知识和理解使治疗决策变得复杂。劳力性腿部疼痛的鉴别诊断范围很广。通常,患者表现出混淆和共存的诊断。然而,准确、快速地诊断pop动脉卡压综合征对于减少对the动脉的潜在持续损害至关重要。结合临床病史,体检,踝臂指数,随着动态和静态成像,如双工超声,计算机断层扫描血管造影,磁共振血管造影,艾滋病诊断。手术治疗可能是决定性的,取决于the动脉卡压综合征的类型。但是最近在血管内超声诊断和A型肉毒杆菌毒素非手术治疗方面取得了进展,需要进一步的研究来标准化诊断标准,发现创新的诊断方法,并验证有希望的非手术治疗方案。
    UNASSIGNED: Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome remains difficult to diagnose. Meanwhile, our limited knowledge and understanding make treatment decisions complex. The list of differential diagnoses for exertional leg pain is broad. Oftentimes, patients exhibit confounding and coexisting diagnoses. However, accurate and rapid diagnosis of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome is essential to reduce potential lasting damage to the popliteal artery. A combination of clinical history, physical examination, ankle-brachial index, along with dynamic and static imaging such as duplex ultrasound, computed tomography angiogram, and magnetic resonance angiography, aids diagnosis. Surgical treatment may be definitive depending on the type of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome, but there have been recent advances in diagnostics with intravascular ultrasound and nonsurgical treatment with botulinum toxin type A. Further research is needed to standardize diagnostic criteria, uncover innovative diagnostic methods, and validate promising nonoperative treatment options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    pop动脉卡压综合征(PAES)是一种经常被低估的疾病,应在下肢有劳力性间歇性跛行的成年人中进行研究。如果早期发现,它是年轻人腿部跛行的可手术治疗的原因。PAES可以通过肌肉肥大遗传或获得,文献根据解剖类型将其分为六类(I-VI)。我们打算报告2例II型PAES患者的磁共振成像(MRI)发现及其治疗。
    Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) is a frequently underdiagnosed condition that should be investigated in adults who experience exertional intermittent claudication in the lower limbs. If detected early, it is a surgically treatable cause of leg claudication in young individuals. PAES can be inherited or acquired through muscular hypertrophy, and the literature classifies it into six categories (I-VI) based on anatomical type. We intend to report the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of two cases with type II PAES and their management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    就结果而言,全膝关节置换(TKR)是一种常见的成功手术。TKR的常见并发症是关节感染,深静脉血栓形成(DVT),伤口并发症,术后膝关节不稳定.动脉并发症并不常见。我们正在介绍一名61岁的男子,他接受了左TKR。术后定期随访,患者出现DVT症状和临床表现.然而,初次双工超声检查DVT阴性.重复双工超声检查显示pop动脉假性动脉瘤,诊断通过计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影证实。pop动脉假性动脉瘤是原发性TKR后的罕见并发症。我们的患者接受了血管内血管成形术和左pop动脉假性动脉瘤的支架置入术。患者完成了三年零六个月的随访,过程顺利。我们选择分享这个罕见病例的经验,因为pop动脉的假性动脉瘤是TKR后的罕见并发症,通常会出现类似DVT的症状,如急性下肢肿胀,小腿肌肉疼痛,和疼痛与被动的踝关节背屈。双重超声检查是首选的第一诊断工具,需要CT血管造影(CTA)来确认诊断和计划治疗。经过三年以上的随访,血管内支架治疗被证明是安全和成功的,没有感染风险或需要修改康复方案。
    Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common successful surgery in terms of the outcomes. The common complications of TKR are joint infection, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), wound complication, and postoperative knee instability. Arterial complications are not common. We are presenting a 61-year-old man who underwent left TKR. Upon postoperative regular follow-up, the patient developed symptoms and clinical presentation for DVT. However, initial duplex ultrasonography was negative for DVT. Repeated duplex ultrasonography showed a pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery, and the diagnosis was confirmed with computed tomography (CT) angiography. Pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery is a rare complication following primary TKR. Our patient underwent endovascular angioplasty and stenting of the pseudoaneurysm of the left popliteal artery. The patient completed three years and six months of follow-up with an uneventful course. We selected to share our experience of this rare case because pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery is a rare complication after TKR, which is usually present with symptoms that can mimic DVT, such as acute lower limb swelling, calf muscle pain, and pain with passive ankle dorsiflexion. Duplex ultrasonography is the preferred first diagnostic tool, and CT angiography (CTA) is needed to confirm the diagnosis and to plan treatment. Treatment with endovascular stent proved to be safe and successful with no infection risk or need for modifying rehabilitation protocol after more than three years of follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估药物涂层药物(DCB)血管成形术治疗老年慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)患者股pop骨长发病变的长期临床疗效。在这项多中心回顾性研究中,我们纳入了119例因跨大西洋社会共识(TASCII)C/D股pop病变而接受DCB血管成形术的CLTI患者.共纳入119例122肢患者(TASCIIC=67,54.9%;TASCIID=55,45.1%)。在36个月的随访中,初级通畅,辅助初级通畅,二级通畅,靶病变血运重建的自由度为47.3%,49.8%,59.5%,和62.7%,分别,卢瑟福级(P<.001)和踝肱指数测量值(P<.001)与基线相比有显著改善。复杂靶病变(P=.017)和1个无狭窄流出血管(P=.001)是临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的风险预测因子。复杂靶病变(P=.044),糖尿病(P=0.007),1个无狭窄流出血管(P=0.003)是再狭窄的风险预测因子。2个月时,溃疡愈合率为96.3%(26/27)。36个月时,保肢率和成活率分别为85.8%和83.3%,分别。DCB血管成形术是安全和有效的老年患者CLTI归因于股popTASCIIC/D病变。
    This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of drug-coated drug (DCB) angioplasty for long femoropopliteal lesions in older patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). In this multi-center retrospective study, we enrolled 119 patients with CLTI due to Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASCII) C/D femoropopliteal lesions who underwent DCB angioplasty. A total of 119 patients with 122 limbs (TASCII C = 67, 54.9%; TASCII D = 55, 45.1%) were enrolled. At 36-month follow-up, primary patency, assisted primary patency, secondary patency, and freedom from target lesion revascularization were 47.3%, 49.8%, 59.5%, and 62.7%, respectively, and there was a significant improvement over baseline in Rutherford class (P < .001) and ankle-brachial index measurements (P < .001). Complex target lesions (P = .017) and 1 stenosis-free outflow vessel (P = .001) were risk predictors of freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Complex target lesions (P = .044), diabetes (P = .007), and 1 stenosis-free outflow vessel (P = .003) were risk predictors of restenosis. At 2 months, the ulcer healing rate was 96.3% (26/27). At 36 months, the limb salvage and survival rates were 85.8% and 83.3%, respectively. DCB angioplasty were safe and effective for older patients with CLTI attributable to femoropopliteal TASCII C/D lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较粥样斑块切除术后一年的结果,血管内碎石术与普通球囊血管成形术前应用药物涂层球囊治疗股动脉粥样硬化性疾病。
    方法:MEDLINE,EMBASE,和Cochrane图书馆在2023年5月之前进行了随机对照试验的筛选。
    方法:这是一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析。纳入标准为跛行患者和危重肢体威胁性缺血患者,所有长度的病变特征,狭窄,钙化,和闭塞。主要结果是在一年时无靶病变再干预。次要结果是救助支架置入率,严重截肢,和一年的全因死亡率。用标准随机效应模型计算汇集点估计值。用混合治疗贝叶斯模型完成进一步的敏感性分析。通过修订的Cochrane偏差风险工具2(RoB2)评估偏差风险,并通过建议分级评估证据的确定性,评估,发展,和评估(等级)框架。
    结果:包含549例患者的四个RCT(两项研究评估了定向粥样斑块切除术,一个评估旋转旋磨,包括一项针对普通球囊血管成形术的评估血管内碎石术)。股pop病变的加权平均长度为103.4±6.67mm。混合治疗贝叶斯分析的结果与所有结局的汇总分析一致。靶病变血运重建的自由度没有显着差异(GRADE,高)(RoB2,低),大截肢术(年级,低),或死亡率(等级,中度)。与普通球囊血管成形术相比,血管内碎石术和粥样斑块切除术的支架置入率显著降低(RR0.25,95%CI0.07-0.89)(GRADE,中等)(RoB2,低)。
    结论:本综述发现,血管内碎石术或粥样斑块切除术在避免靶病变血运重建方面似乎没有显著的统计学优势,严重截肢,或者一年的死亡率。有证据表明,血管内碎石术和动脉粥样硬化切除术后,救助支架的植入显着减少。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare one year outcomes after atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy vs. plain balloon angioplasty before application of drug coated balloons for treating femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.
    METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were screened until May 2023 for randomised controlled trials.
    METHODS: This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were patients with claudication and those with critical limb threatening ischaemia with lesion characteristics of all lengths, stenosis, calcification, and occlusions. The primary outcome was freedom from target lesion re-intervention at one year. Secondary outcomes were rate of bailout stenting, major amputation, and all cause mortality at one year. Pooled point estimates were calculated with a standard random effects model. Further sensitivity analyses were completed with a mixed treatment Bayesian model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 (RoB2) and certainty of evidence assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
    RESULTS: Four RCTs comprising 549 patients (two studies evaluating directional atherectomy, one evaluating rotational atherectomy, one evaluating intravascular lithotripsy against plain balloon angioplasty) were included. The weighted mean length of femoropopliteal lesions was 103.4 ± 6.67 mm. Results of the mixed treatment Bayesian analysis were consistent with pooled analysis for all outcomes. There were no significant differences in freedom from target lesion revascularisation (GRADE, high) (RoB2, low), major amputation (GRADE, low), or mortality (GRADE, moderate). Bailout stenting rates were significantly reduced with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy compared with plain balloon angioplasty (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.89) (GRADE, moderate) (RoB2, low).
    CONCLUSIONS: This review found that intravascular lithotripsy or atherectomy did not appear to incur a statistically significant advantage in freedom from target lesion revascularisation, major amputation, or mortality rate at one year. There was moderate certainty of evidence that bailout stenting is significantly reduced after vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血管内治疗已成为治疗股pop外周动脉疾病的重要策略,与开放手术搭桥相比,提供可接受的安全性和有效性。与裸金属支架相比,紫杉醇洗脱支架和肝素结合覆膜支架均表现出增强的临床效果。然而,目前缺乏比较紫杉醇洗脱支架和肝素结合覆盖支架安全性和有效性的I级证据.因此,本研究的主要目的是系统评价这两种支架的疗效和安全性.
    方法:ELITE试验是一项前瞻性试验,多中心,平行,随机对照试验。总共将招募450名患者。研究的主要终点包括索引程序后1年的主要通畅性。
    背景:本研究获得四川大学华西医院伦理委员会的伦理批准(批准号:2023-1186)。结果将提交给主要的临床杂志进行同行评审和出版。
    背景:ELITE试验于2023年9月27日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2300076236)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy has emerged as a prominent strategy for managing femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease, offering acceptable safety and efficacy compared with open surgical bypass. Both paclitaxel-eluting stents and heparin-bonded covered stents have exhibited enhanced clinical outcomes compared with bare metal stents. However, there is currently a lack of level I evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents and heparin-bonded covered stents. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes of these two types of stents.
    METHODS: The ELITE trial is a prospective, multicentre, parallel, randomised controlled trial. A total of 450 patients will be recruited. The primary endpoints of the study include primary patency at 1 year post-index procedure.
    BACKGROUND: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (approval number: 2023-1186). The results will be submitted to a major clinical journal for peer review and publication.
    BACKGROUND: ELITE trial was registered on 27 September 2023 in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300076236).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于膝下(BTK)外周动脉疾病(PAD)的血管内治疗,比较非支架(球囊血管成形术或PTA和辅助治疗)伴或不伴同侧股pop动脉(FP)介入治疗的独立判定的真实世界结局很少.
    方法:纳入了2006-2021年间来自多中心XLPAD注册中心的1060名患者,这些患者采用了基于非支架的BTKPAD干预。
    方法:主要肢体不良事件(男性)的1年发生率,全因死亡的复合,任何截肢,或临床驱动的重复血运重建。
    结果:566例患者接受了BTK和494例BTK+FP干预;72%为男性,平均年龄68.4±10.9岁。糖尿病在仅BTK组中更为普遍(76.5%vs.69%,p=0.006)。平均卢瑟福等级4.2±1.18;BTK组中慢性威胁肢体缺血更为常见(55.3%vs.49%,p=0.040)。BTK+FP中至重度钙化较高(21.2%vs.27.1%,p=0.024),病变长度(110.6±77.3vs.135.4±86.3毫米;p<0.001)。几乎,81%的病变用PTA治疗。DCB(1.6%对14%,p<0.001)和粥样斑块切除术(38%vs.58.5%;p<0.001)在BTK+FP中的使用量更大。BTK+FP组的手术成功率更高(86%与91%,p=0.009),截肢是最常见的并发症,为3.3%≤30天。一年男性(21.2%vs.22.3%,p=0.675)和死亡率(4.6%与3.4%;p=0.3)在BTK和BTK+FP组中相似。
    结论:与单独的BTK干预相比,BTKPAD的非支架治疗伴随FP干预可导致较高的手术成功率和1年男性相似率。
    结论:绝大多数膝下(BTK)外周动脉疾病(PAD)的干预是通过球囊血管成形术进行的。在接受BTK干预的患者中存在流入股pop(FP)PAD会影响手术的结果。本报告探讨了对孤立的BTK和接受其他FPPAD干预的人进行球囊血管成形术治疗后1年的直接手术成功和主要不良肢体事件。
    For endovascular treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) peripheral artery disease (PAD), independently adjudicated real-world outcomes comparing non-stent-based balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) and adjunctive treatments with or without a concomitant ipsilateral femoropopliteal (FP) artery intervention are scarce. A total of 1,060 patients from the multicenter XLPAD registry who underwent non-stent-based BTK PAD intervention between 2006 and 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the 1-year incidence of major adverse limb events (MALEs), a composite of all-cause death, any amputation, or clinically driven repeat revascularization. A total of 566 patients underwent BTK and 494 BTK + FP interventions; 72% were men, with a mean age of 68.4 ± 10.9 years. Diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in the BTK-only group (76.5% vs 69%, p = 0.006). Mean Rutherford class was 4.2 ± 1.18; chronic limb-threatening ischemia was more frequent in the BTK group (55.3% vs 49%, p = 0.040). Moderate to severe calcification was more frequent in the BTK + FP group (21.2% vs 27.1%, p = 0.024), as was lesion length (110.6 ± 77.3 vs 135.4 ± 86.3 mm, p <0.001). Nearly 81% of lesions were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Drug-coated balloon (1.6% vs 14%, p <0.001) and atherectomy (38% vs 58.5%, p <0.001) use was more frequent in the BTK + FP group. The rate of procedural success was higher in the BTK + FP group (86% vs 91%, p = 0.009), with amputation being the most common complication at 3.3% within 30 days after the procedure. The rates of 1-year MALE (21.2% vs 22.3%, p = 0.675) and mortality (4.6% vs 3.4%, p = 0.3) were similar between the BTK and BTK + FP groups. Nonstent treatment for BTK PAD with concomitant FP intervention leads to high procedural success and similar rates of 1-year MALE compared with isolated BTK intervention. Condensed Abstract: The vast majority of below-the-knee (BTK) peripheral artery disease (PAD) interventions are performed with balloon angioplasty. Presence of inflow femoropopliteal PAD in patients who undergo BTK interventions can affect the outcome of the procedure. This report explores immediate procedural success and major adverse limb events at 1 year after balloon angioplasty treatment for isolated BTK PAD and in patients who underwent an additional femoropopliteal PAD intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于血管内介入医生来说,理解动脉内解剖结构和动脉(PA)末端的变化越来越重要,整形外科医生,血管外科医生,和整形外科医生,由于栓子切除术等手术的增加,血管移植,游离腓骨皮瓣手术,胫骨高位截骨术.很少有来自印度的研究报道了PA终止的变异解剖学,没有人使用128层层析成像。本研究旨在使用128层计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)观察PA的末端分支模式及其末端分支的形态,并分析其与性别和侧向性的关系。
    方法:回顾性分析了来自100例患者(男性137例,女性44例)的181例下肢的CTA图像,5至75岁,进行了。
    结果:在75.69%的病例中发现了常见的I-A型模式,而24.31%表现出变异模式。III型是观察到的最常见的变异(19.34%),其中III-A型是最普遍的(11.05%)。未观察到II-B和II-C型。在84例双边检查的病例中,19.05%有单侧变异,15.48%有双侧变异,8.33%表现出两侧相似的变化,7.14%表现出不同的变化。性别或侧面之间的分枝模式没有显着差异。I-A型胫骨-腓骨干(TPT)的平均长度为3.00±0.99cm(右侧:3.21±1.02cm;左侧:2.82±0.93cm;男性:2.9±1.00cm;女性:3.37±0.85cm),双方和性别之间有统计学上的显著差异。在II-A型模式中,平均TPT长度为7.16±3.75cm。在一个III-B模式的情况下注意到异常长的TPT(12.97cm)。
    结论:PA的终止模式存在高度变异。了解这些变化对于该区域的任何干预措施至关重要,以避免术后血管并发症并减少患者痛苦。
    BACKGROUND: Comprehension of the intrucate anatomy and variations in the termination of the popliteal artery (PA) is increasingly essential for endovascular interventionists, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, and orthopedic surgeons, due to the rise in procedures like embolectomy, vascular grafting, free fibular flap surgery, and high-tibial osteotomy. Few studies from India have reported on the variant anatomy of PA termination, and none have used 128-slice tomography. This study aimed to observe the terminal branching pattern of the PA and the morphology of its terminal branches using 128-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to analyze its relation to gender and laterality.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of CTA images of 181 lower extremities from 100 patients (137 males and 44 females), aged five to 75 years, was conducted.
    RESULTS: The usual type I-A pattern was found in 75.69% of cases, while 24.31% exhibited variant patterns. Type III was the most common variation observed (19.34%), with type III-A being the most prevalent (11.05%). Types II-B and II-C were not observed. Among 84 bilaterally examined cases, 19.05% had unilateral variations and 15.48% had bilateral variations, with 8.33% showing bilaterally similar variations and 7.14% dissimilar variations. No significant difference in branching patterns was found between genders or sides. The mean length of the tibial-peroneal trunk (TPT) in the type I-A pattern was 3.00 ± 0.99 cm (right side: 3.21 ± 1.02 cm; left side: 2.82 ± 0.93 cm; males: 2.9 ± 1.00 cm; females: 3.37 ± 0.85 cm), with statistically significant differences between sides and genders. In the type II-A pattern, the mean TPT length was 7.16 ± 3.75 cm. An exceptionally long TPT (12.97 cm) was noted in one case of the III-B pattern.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of variation in the termination pattern of the PA. Knowledge of these variations is crucial for any interventions in this region to avoid postoperative vascular complications and reduce patient suffering.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价超声辅助矢状位逆行穿刺法治疗股pop动脉(PA)P2段病变的安全性和有效性。
    方法:对连续的患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者接受了逆行穿刺the动脉(PA)以进行股pop病变的再通。在23例中,对PA的P2或P3段进行了逆行。10例(8名男性;平均年龄68±9岁),使用长轴在平面内的方法进行超声引导逆行PA(P2段)穿刺,13例(11名男性;平均年龄69±5岁),行血管造影引导下逆行PA(P3段)穿刺.比较两组患者术前、术后的临床资料。
    结果:所有闭塞病变均通过双通道介入成功再通。P2组穿刺成功率为100%(10/10),P3组为92.3%(12/13)(p>0.05)。与P3组相比,P2组的平均穿刺时间明显缩短(4.70±0.95分钟vs11.33±6.37分钟;p<0.05)。两组平均止血时间无差异(6.11±2.20分钟vs8.46±3.76分钟;p>0.05)。所有患者均无院内死亡。P2组穿刺相关并发症发生率为10%,P3组为15%(p>0.05)。在P3组中的一个病例中观察到低流量AVF。在平均随访11.3±5.5个月时,没有患者报告任何与通路相关的并发症。
    结论:超声辅助矢状视图逆行穿刺PA的P2段至少与血管造影引导逆行穿刺P3段治疗股pop病变一样安全。此外,这种技术似乎更适合于串联髂股动脉闭塞的患者,因为它允许创建一个逆行访问。
    BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-assisted sagittal view for retrograde puncture of the P2 segment of popliteal artery (PA) for treating femoropopliteal lesions.
    METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent retrograde puncture of the PA for the recanalization of femoropopliteal lesions. A retrograde access was made to either the P2 or P3 segment of the PA in 23 cases. In 10 cases (8 men; mean age 68 ± 9 years), ultrasound-guided retrograde PA (P2 segment) puncture using the long-axis in-the-plane approach was performed, and in 13 cases (11 men; mean age 69 ± 5 years), angiography-guided retrograde PA (P3 segment) puncture was performed. Clinical data was compared preintraoperatively and postoperatively in the 2 groups.
    RESULTS: All occluded lesions were successfully recanalized via dual channel intervention. Puncture success were 100% (10/10) in the P2 group compared with 92.3% (12/13) in the P3 group (P > 0.05). The mean puncture time in the P2 group was significantly shorter when compared to the P3 group (4.70 ± 0.95 mins vs 11.33 ± 6.37 mins; P < 0.05). There was no difference in mean hemostasis time between the 2 groups (6.11 ± 2.20 mins vs 8.46 ± 3.76 mins; P > 0.05). There were no in-hospital deaths in all patients. The occurrence of puncture-related complications in the P2 group was 10% compared with 15% in the P3 group (P > 0.05). A low-flow arteriovenous fistula was observed in one case in the P3 group. None of the patients reported any access-related complication at a mean follow-up of 11.3 ± 5.5 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-assisted sagittal view for retrograde puncture of the P2 segment of PA is at least as safe as angiography-guided retrograde puncture of the P3 segment for femoropopliteal lesions. Furthermore, this technique appears to be more suitable for patients with tandem iliofemoral artery occlusion, as it allows for the creation of a retrograde access.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胫骨高位截骨术通常伴有严重的术后疼痛。内收肌管阻滞(ACB)和the动脉和后膝囊之间的间隙(IPACK)已被描述为有效的阻滞技术,可在膝关节手术后提供镇痛。在楔形截骨病例中很少有比较。我们的目的是比较先前提到的两种阻滞技术在胫骨截骨术患者中的术后镇痛情况。
    方法:本随机前瞻性试验纳入60例患者(30例接受IPACK,30例接受ACB)。2mL利多卡因2%浸润后,在脊髓麻醉前安装两个模块。两种方法均使用20mL0.25%的布比卡因与地塞米松混合作为麻醉佐剂。比较两组患者术后镇痛情况。
    结果:IPACK组术后疼痛评分较低,在术后的前10小时内,这种下降是明显的。此外,在相同的阻滞下,镇痛持续时间明显延长(487.50±82.39vs.301.93±92.06分钟,使用ACB)。术后镇痛消耗量显着下降(1.27±0.45vs.1.8±0.61gm,P=0.000),且步行距离显著增加(19.10±0.60vs.17.73±0.45米,P=0.000),住院时间显着下降(43.27±7.61vs.与ACB组相比,IPACK组的时间为54±8.35小时)。
    结论:IPACK在胫骨高位截骨术患者术后镇痛方面优于ACB,步行距离,两组患者对不良事件发生率低的患者满意度。
    A high tibial osteotomy is usually associated with severe postoperative pain. Both adductor canal block (ACB) and interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) have been described as effective block techniques for providing analgesia after knee surgeries, with few comparisons in wedge osteotomy cases. We aim to compare the postoperative analgesic profile of the previously mentioned two block techniques in patients undergoing tibial osteotomies.
    Sixty patients were enrolled in this randomized prospective trial (30 received IPACK and 30 received ACB). Both blocks were installed before the spinal anesthesia after infiltration of 2 mL lidocaine 2%. Twenty mL of bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with dexamethasone as anesthetic adjuvant were used for both blocks. The postoperative analgesic profiles were compared between the two groups.
    Postoperative pain scores were lower in the IPACK group, and that decrease was evident throughout the first 10 hours postoperatively. Additionally, the duration of analgesia was much prolonged with the same block (487.50±82.39 vs. 301.93±92.06 minutes with ACB). There was a significant decline in postoperative analgesic consumption (1.27±0.45 vs. 1.8±0.61 gm, P=0.000), and a significant increase in the ambulation distance (19.10±0.60 vs. 17.73±0.45 m, P=0.000) with a significant decline in the duration of hospitalization (43.27±7.61 vs. 54±8.35 hours) in the IPACK group compared to the ACB group.
    IPACK is a superior block technique compared to ACB in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy regarding postoperative analgesia, ambulation distance, and patient satisfaction with little rate of adverse events in both groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号