在阿根廷,所谓的“包容性语言”旨在避免特定性别或性别和对象对语法二元系统(女性-男性)的偏见。虽然在大多数西班牙语国家,包容性语言仅限于激进主义的领域,性别研究和某种类型的公共行政,在阿根廷,它的使用已经扩展到不同的社会领域,主要是城市。考虑到这种背景,这项工作旨在调查西班牙语的包容性语言,并在2018年至2020年在阿根廷发行的一系列公共文本中描述其最相关的资源。一方面,它的起源被解释,将其与非性别歧视语言区分开来,并揭示了围绕包容性语言的不同理论立场。另一方面,从对话方法到论证和复调,本文提出将包容性语言资源作为主观性和复调标记来解决,这些标记证明了父权制话语的某些方面,对此有异议;因此,包容性语言资源显示了曾经被沉默和拒绝的观点。为此,讨论了各种演讲的语料库,由户外城市铭文组成,传单(广告),视听信息演讲和数字新闻,用包容的语言写的,在2018年至2020年之间。整篇论文都警告说,包容性的语言标志,例如-e和x,是反对语法二元论的“异质性”的痕迹,并传达主题对自己的说明的评论,暗指他们不同意的先前性别歧视和父权制话语的形象。分析显示,采用包容性语言资源的单词或表达(-e和x)可以作为骚扰身份的痕迹,并由说话者自己表达。这边,这项研究表明,性别包容性语言具有冲突的语言标记,这些标记指向历史上否认的异议形式,与性别认同和集体权利的主张有关。最后,本文旨在,一方面,有助于描述阿根廷西班牙语,另一方面,促进反思有利于语言教育。毫无疑问,关于这一主题的公开辩论实例可以对语言反思的深化和对促进建立更平等社会的演讲者的培训产生影响,一个包容和尊重差异的人。
In Argentina, the so-called \"inclusive language\" aims at avoiding the bias for a particular sex or gender and objects to a grammatical binary system (feminine - masculine). Although in most Spanish-speaking countries, inclusive language has been limited to the realms of activism, gender studies and a certain type of public administration, in Argentina, its use has been extended to different social spheres, mostly urban. Considering such context, this work aims to investigate the inclusive language in Spanish and characterize its most relevant resources in a series of public texts that circulated in Argentina between 2018 and 2020. On the one hand, its origin is explained, differentiating it from non-sexist language and the different theoretical positions around inclusive language are exposed. On the other hand, from the Dialogical Approach to Argumentation and
Polyphony, this paper proposes to address inclusive language resources as subjectivity and
polyphony marks which evidence certain aspects of the discourse of patriarchy, with respect to which there is dissent; therefore, inclusive language resources show viewpoints that were once silenced and rejected. For this, a corpus of various speeches is addressed, made up of outdoor urban inscriptions, flyers (advertisements), audiovisual informative speeches and digital press, written in inclusive language, between 2018 and 2020. Throughout the paper it is warns that the inclusive language marks, such as -e and x, are traces of the \"heterogeneity shown marked\" that object to grammatical binarism and convey comments by the subject about their own enunciation, alluding to the image of previous sexist and patriarchal discourses with whom they disagree. The analysis reveals that the words or expressions in which inclusive language resources are employed (-e and x) work as traces of harassed identities and manifest comments by the speaker on their own enunciation. This way, this research shows that gender inclusive language holds conflict linguistic marks which point to historically denied dissidence forms, linked to gender identity and the assertion of collective rights. Finally, this article aims at, on the one hand, contributing to the description of Argentinean Spanish, and on the other, promoting reflection in favor of linguistic education. Undoubtedly, opening instances of debate on the subject can have an impact on the deepening of linguistic reflection and the training of speakers who contribute to forging a more egalitarian society, one which is inclusive and respectful of differences.