podiatry

足病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自2015年以来,澳大利亚和新西兰大学的足病入学率下降了17.3%,这威胁到该行业的可持续性以及澳大利亚和新西兰人民和社区的健康和福祉。由于影响职业选择的因素证据不足,导致这种下降的原因尚不清楚。这项研究的首要目的是确定在澳大利亚和新西兰研究足病的动机和障碍。
    方法:本研究采用了收敛混合方法设计。参加(i)足病和(ii)相关非足病健康的学生,九所澳大利亚大学和一所新西兰大学的体育或科学课程,被邀请参加在线调查。一年级足病学生也被邀请参加在线研讨会。使用描述性统计和线性/逻辑回归模型分析定量数据。三名独立评估员对定性数据使用了归纳主题分析。
    结果:总体而言,278名足科学生(平均年龄24.9±8.5岁,65.1%的女性)和553名非足病学生(平均年龄24.8±8.2岁,75.4%的女性;来自理疗的32.2%和来自职业治疗的29.1%)对调查做出了回应。对健康相关职业的兴趣,想要改变人们的健康,照顾不同背景/年龄组的人的机会是足病学生的关键激励因素。28.1%的足科学生遇到了学习足科的障碍。专题分析确定了关于职业选择的七个主题,以下是:(i)对专业和实践范围的认识;(ii)对专业的陈规定型观念和负面看法;(iii)对职业道路的认识;(iv)工作前景和赚钱潜力;(v)与人合作并建立关系;(vi)足病不是首选;(vii)限制学生入学的障碍。
    结论:有多种因素激励和影响学生学习足病,然而,利他主义的理由评价最高。专职健康学生对足病的实践和职业机会的范围了解有限。此外,足病行业经常面临负面的刻板印象。需要进一步的工作来扭转对足病的负面刻板印象和看法,并建立对专业实践范围的了解,职业道路/机会,就业前景和收入潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Podiatry enrolments at Australian and New Zealand universities have decreased by 17.3% since 2015, which threatens the profession\'s sustainability and the health and wellbeing of Australian and New Zealand people and communities. Reasons for this decline remain unclear due to insufficient evidence on factors influencing career choices. The overarching aim of this study was to identify motivators and barriers for studying podiatry in Australia and New Zealand.
    METHODS: This study used a convergent mixed methods design. Students enrolled in (i) podiatry and (ii) relevant non-podiatry health, sport or science programs at nine Australian and one New Zealand university, were invited to participate in an online survey. First-year podiatry students were also invited to participate in an online workshop. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and linear/logistic regression models. Three independent assessors used inductive thematic analysis for the qualitative data.
    RESULTS: Overall, 278 podiatry students (mean age 24.9 ± 8.5 years, 65.1% female) and 553 non-podiatry students (mean age 24.8 ± 8.2 years, 75.4% female; 32.2% from physiotherapy and 29.1% from occupational therapy) responded to the survey. Interest in a health-related career, wanting to make a difference to people\'s health, and opportunity to care for people from different backgrounds/age groups were key motivating factors among podiatry students. Barriers to studying podiatry were encountered by 28.1% of podiatry students. Thematic analysis identified seven themes concerning career choice, which are as follows: (i) awareness of profession and scope of practice; (ii) stereotypes and negative perceptions of the profession; (iii) awareness of career pathways; (iv) job prospects and earning potential; (v) working with people and building relationships; (vi) podiatry is not the first preference; and (vii) barriers which limit student enrolment.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are a variety of factors that motivate and influence students to study podiatry, however, altruistic reasons are most highly rated. Allied health students have limited understanding of the scope of practice and career opportunities in podiatry. Additionally, the podiatry profession often faces negative stereotypes. Further work is required to reverse the negative stereotypes and perceptions of podiatry and build knowledge of the profession\'s scope of practice, career pathways/opportunities, job prospects and earning potential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究评估了临床医生专业治疗对第2区第五跖骨骨折的治疗效果。
    这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为急性第2区第五跖骨骨折患者,城市,2012年12月至2022年4月之间的学术医学中心。区域2是斜射线照片上第四和第五meta骨关节与第五meta骨基部接壤的区域。在接受整形外科医生和足病医生治疗的患者之间,比较了受伤后立即允许承受体重的患者比例。评估了无限制负重和脚和/或踝关节固定对临床愈合的影响。共纳入487例2区骨折患者(平均年龄53.5岁(SD16.9),平均BMI27.2kg/m2(SD6.0)),平均随访时间为2.57年(SD2.64)。
    总的来说,281例(57.7%)接受骨科医师治疗,和206例患者(42.3%)的足科医生。当控制年龄时,性别,以及症状发作和表现之间的时间,接受足病医生治疗时,接受手术治疗的可能性显著更大(比值比(OR)2.9(95%CI1.2~8.2);p=0.029).接受整形外科医生治疗的患者中,有更大比例的患者被允许立即在受伤的脚上负重(70.9%(178/251)对47.3%(71/150);p<0.001)。足病医生治疗的患者固定时间明显更长(平均8.4周(SD5.7)vs6.8周(SD4.3);p=0.002),平均临床愈合时间明显更长(12.1(SD10.6)vs9.0周(SD7.3),p=0.003)。
    尽管2区裂缝管理之间存在相当大的异质性,与足科医生相比,整形外科医生不太可能对患者进行手术治疗,更可能允许早期完全负重。
    UNASSIGNED: This study evaluated the effect of treating clinician speciality on management of zone 2 fifth metatarsal fractures.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute zone 2 fifth metatarsal fractures who presented to a single large, urban, academic medical centre between December 2012 and April 2022. Zone 2 was the region of the fifth metatarsal base bordered by the fourth and fifth metatarsal articulation on the oblique radiograph. The proportion of patients allowed to bear weight as tolerated immediately after injury was compared between patients treated by orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists. The effects of unrestricted weightbearing and foot and/or ankle immobilization on clinical healing were assessed. A total of 487 patients with zone 2 fractures were included (mean age 53.5 years (SD 16.9), mean BMI 27.2 kg/m2 (SD 6.0)) with a mean follow-up duration of 2.57 years (SD 2.64).
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 281 patients (57.7%) were treated by orthopaedic surgeons, and 206 patients (42.3%) by podiatrists. When controlling for age, sex, and time between symptom onset and presentation, the likelihood of undergoing operative treatment was significantly greater when treated by a podiatrist (odds ratio (OR) 2.9 (95% CI 1.2 to 8.2); p = 0.029). A greater proportion of patients treated by orthopaedic surgeons were allowed to immediately bear weight on the injured foot (70.9% (178/251) vs 47.3% (71/150); p < 0.001). Patients treated by podiatrists were immobilized for significantly longer (mean 8.4 weeks (SD 5.7) vs 6.8 weeks (SD 4.3); p = 0.002) and experienced a significantly longer mean time to clinical healing (12.1 (SD 10.6) vs 9.0 weeks (SD 7.3), p = 0.003).
    UNASSIGNED: Although there was considerable heterogeneity among zone 2 fracture management, orthopaedic surgeons were less likely to treat patients operatively and more likely to allow early full weightbearing compared to podiatrists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:足痛可能是患者的重大负担。定制足部矫形器(CFO)一直是足部疼痛治疗和改善足部功能的主要方法。然而,关于足病医生处方首席财务官的经验或患者使用足部矫形器(FOs)的经验知之甚少,包括首席财务官,脚痛。
    方法:2022年11月,在一家私人足病诊所中,与三名FOs用户(女性=2和男性=1)进行了焦点小组(FG)讨论。该小组代表来自当地普通人群的非专家,这些人患有现有或先前的脚痛,他们亲自使用过非处方药FOs或CFO。2022年12月,还与五名肌肉骨骼(MSK)专业足病医生(女性=2,男性=3)进行了在线FG讨论。该小组代表具有足部生物力学专业知识和CFO提供临床经验的足病医生。记录了FG讨论,分别持续了49和57分钟。转录数据是手动编码的,并进行了专题分析,以确定所收集数据中的模式。
    结果:患者FG的参与者详细介绍了处方过程和CFO的混合经验,有报道称他们的处方参与/投入有限,需要频繁的调整和高昂的成本。对鞋类选择的影响,还强调了CFO在不同类型的鞋子和技术中的可复制性和可转移性,以帮助设计。在FG足病医生中,对设计和制造过程缺乏信心,处方形式语言,与制造商的关系和沟通建设,发布的CFO的可变性以及在CFO规定中对学生进行更好教育的需求成为关键主题。
    结论:患者和足病医生对CFO的规定有相似的看法,即与制造商的沟通不畅,导致对规定的CFO不满,从而对患者体验产生负面影响。足病医生呼吁在注册阶段接受更多教育,以增加新的足病医生在CFO设计和制造方面的知识,并与制造公司更好地合作。
    BACKGROUND: Foot pain can be a significant burden for patients. Custom foot orthoses (CFOs) have been a mainstay in podiatry treatment for foot pain management and improving foot function. However, little is known about podiatrists\' experience of prescribing CFOs or patient experience of using foot orthoses (FOs), including CFOs, for foot pain.
    METHODS: A focus group (FG) discussion with three FOs users (Female = 2 and Male = 1) was conducted in November 2022 within a private podiatry practice. This group represented non-experts from the general local population of individuals with existing or previous foot pain who have personally experienced using either over-the-counter FOs or CFOs. An online FG discussion with five musculoskeletal (MSK) specialist podiatrists (Female = 2 and Male = 3) was also conducted in December 2022. This group represented podiatrists with specialist knowledge in foot biomechanics and clinical experience in CFO provision. The FG discussions were recorded and lasted 49 and 57 min respectively. Transcribed data was manually coded, and a thematic analysis was undertaken to identify patterns within the collected data.
    RESULTS: The participants in the patient FG detailed mixed experiences of the prescription process and CFOs received, with reports of limited involvement/input in their prescription, the need for frequent adjustments and high costs. The impact on footwear choices, replicability and transferability of CFOs into different types of shoes and technologies to aid design were also highlighted. In the podiatrist FG, lack of confidence in design and manufacture processes, prescription form language, relationship and communication building with manufacturers, variability in the CFOs issued and the need for better student education in CFO provision emerged as key themes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients and podiatrists shared similar views on CFO provision, namely poor communication with manufacturers leading to dissatisfaction with the CFOs prescribed causing negative impacts on patient experiences. Podiatrists called for greater education at registration level to increase new graduate podiatrist knowledge in CFO design and manufacture and better collaboration with manufacturing companies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病足感染是糖尿病的重要并发症,对发病率有很大贡献,死亡率,全球医疗支出。准确的诊断依赖于综合临床评估的综合评估,影像学检查,和微生物分析。管理需要多学科的方法,包括手术干预,抗菌治疗,和先进的伤口护理策略。预防措施在减少发病率和严重程度方面至关重要,强调病人的教育,定期足部检查,早期干预。
    研究人员使用PUBMEDMESH关键词对文献进行了系统回顾。此外,该研究已在审查和传播中心的国际前瞻性系统审查登记册中注册,约克大学(CRD42021277788)。这篇综述提供了在糖尿病足感染中观察到的微生物谱和抗生素敏感性模式的全面概述。
    通过对数据库的搜索,最终确定了2021年至2023年共有2545名患者的13篇文章。总的来说,分离出的主要革兰氏阳性微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌,粪肠球菌,化脓性链球菌,无乳链球菌,和表皮葡萄球菌.而主要的革兰氏阴性包括大肠杆菌,肺炎克雷伯菌,奇异变形杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。
    糖尿病足感染是一个复杂和多方面的临床实体,需要一种整体的诊断方法,管理,和预防。关于成果和指南建议有效性的高质量研究数据有限,对更新和完善现有DFI管理指南提出了挑战。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021277788,标识符CRD42021277788。
    UNASSIGNED: Diabetic foot infection represents a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, contributing substantially to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure worldwide. Accurate diagnosis relies on a comprehensive assessment integrating clinical evaluation, imaging studies, and microbiological analysis. Management necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing surgical intervention, antimicrobial therapy, and advanced wound care strategies. Preventive measures are paramount in reducing the incidence and severity, emphasizing patient education, regular foot screenings, and early intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: The researchers performed a systematic review of literature using PUBMED MESH keywords. Additionally, the study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews at the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York (CRD42021277788). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the microbial spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility patterns observed in diabetic foot infections.
    UNASSIGNED: The search through the databases finally identified 13 articles with 2545 patients from 2021 to 2023. Overall, the predominant Gram-positive microbial species isolated were Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus fecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Whereas the predominant Gram-negative included Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    UNASSIGNED: Diabetic foot infections represent a complex and multifaceted clinical entity, necessitating a holistic approach to diagnosis, management, and prevention. Limited high-quality research data on outcomes and the effectiveness of guideline recommendations pose challenges in updating and refining existing DFI management guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021277788, identifier CRD42021277788.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对该主题有什么了解?卫生人力和卫生任务存在很大争议,并且主要受法规控制。自19世纪中叶引入医疗法规以来,手术的实践主要由受过医学训练的外科医生主导。一小群澳大利亚足病医生通过建立自己的培训学院并说服政府和监管机构在外科实践中的安全性和有效性来无视这些历史界限。澳大利亚足病委员会委托对澳大利亚足病外科医生的监管和监管实践进行独立审查。本文补充了什么?本文讨论了对足病外科医生的角色进行监管审查对职业角色界限的影响。对实践者有什么影响?尽管历史上的角色界限和定义,经过适当的培训,regulation,和融资,可以以不同的方式动员卫生人力来满足人口需求,克服职业对角色的垄断。
    What is known about the topic?  The health workforce and health tasks are highly contested and largely controlled by regulation. Since the introduction of medical regulation in the mid-19th century, the practice of surgery has been largely dominated by medically trained surgeons. A small group of Australian podiatrists have defied these historic boundaries by creating their own colleges of training and convincing government and regulators of their safety and efficacy in surgical practice. The Podiatry Board of Australia commissioned an independent review of the regulation and regulatory practices of podiatric surgeons in Australia. What does this paper add? This paper discusses the implications of a regulatory review of the role of podiatric surgeons for professional role boundaries. What are the implications for practitioners? Despite historic role boundaries and definitions, with appropriate training, regulation, and financing, the health workforce can be mobilised in different ways to meet population needs, overcoming a professional monopoly over roles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:指甲切除适用于甲癣和指甲针状突起。他们在技术上要求很高,需要一套精致的技能。我们旨在描述美国供应商进行指甲切除的实践模式。
    方法:我们对医疗保险提供者的使用和支付数据进行了回顾性分析,D部分,对于部分或完全的指甲/指甲基质切除有/没有指甲板移除/破坏的所有索赔(当前程序术语代码11750)。高绩效者被定义为每年进行指甲切除的提供者比平均值高出2个标准偏差。我们分析了指甲切除高绩效人群的人口危险因素,包括练习地点,多年的经验,家庭收入中位数,实践类型,和提供者的性别。在SASv9.4中进行统计学分析,P<0.05的值被认为具有统计学意义。
    结果:提供者(n=32,279)和高绩效者(n=942)每年平均进行34.7和173次指甲切除。毫不奇怪,足病医生占所有指甲切除者的99.7%。南部、中西部和东北部的供应商更经常是指甲切除高绩效者(赔率比[OR],1.95;P<.0001,OR,1.46;P<.0001)。独奏与团体从业者的可能性更大,分别,做指甲切除的表演者(或者,2.15;P<.0001)。通过线性回归分析,提供商经验每增加10年,每个提供者每年增加1.2例指甲切除(P<0.0001).执业地点的家庭收入中位数每增加100,000美元,每个提供者每年减少9.9例指甲切除.
    结论:南方足病医生,有多年经验的足病医生,独奏从业者,那些在家庭收入中位数较低的地区执业的人更有可能进行更多的指甲切除术。确定足病医生的表现趋势可以帮助足病医生了解他们的指甲切除表现与全国其他足病医生相比如何。
    BACKGROUND: Nail excisions are indicated for onychocryptosis and nail spicules. They are technically demanding and require a refined skill set. We aimed to characterize practice patterns of US providers performing nail excisions.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare provider use and payment data, part D, for all claims of partial or complete nail/nail matrix excision with/without nail plate removal/destruction (current procedural terminology code 11750). High performers were defined as providers performing annual nail excisions 2 standard deviations above the mean. We analyzed demographic risk factors for nail excision high performers, including practice location, years of experience, household median income, practice type, and provider gender. Statistical analysis was conducted in SAS v9.4, with values of P < .05 considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: Providers (n = 32,279) and high performers (n = 942) performed mean 34.7 and 173 nail excisions annually. Unsurprisingly, podiatrists constituted 99.7% of all nail excision performers. Providers in the South versus Midwest and Northeast were more often nail excision high performers (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; P < .0001, and OR, 1.46; P < .0001). Solo versus group practitioners were more likely, respectively, to be nail excision high performers (OR, 2.15; P < .0001). With linear regression analysis, for every 10-year increase in years of provider experience, there was an increase of 1.2 nail excisions annually per provider (P < .0001). For every $100,000 increase in household median income of practice location, there was a decrease of 9.9 nail excisions annually per provider.
    CONCLUSIONS: Southern podiatrists, podiatrists with more years of experience, solo practitioners, and those practicing in regions with lower household median incomes were more likely to perform higher numbers of nail excisions. Identifying performance trends among podiatrists can help podiatrists understand how their performance of nail excisions compares to other podiatrists across the country.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全世界都有证据表明,护理,医学和牙科学生在学习期间遭受锐器伤害。然而,缺乏与其他医疗保健专业的许多学生可能会遇到锐器仪器有关的证据和研究。
    这项研究的目的是确定程度,预注册医疗保健学生遭受的锐器伤害的类型和影响。
    对英国一所大学的3372名医疗保健学生进行了一项在线调查。
    一些医护专业学生,医疗和牙科遭受了锐器伤害。最常见的装置是玻璃安瓿。常见的原因是设备和粗心。一些医疗保健学生在锐器受伤后受到心理影响。
    锐器伤在一些医疗保健学生中很常见,并且有可能对这些学生群体进行更多与风险有关的教育,安全处理,报告和预防锐器损伤。
    UNASSIGNED: There is evidence available worldwide that nursing, medical and dental students sustain sharps injuries during their programmes of study. However, there is lack of evidence and research relating to the many students of other healthcare professions who may encounter sharps instruments.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to identify the extent, type and impact of sharps injuries sustained by pre-registration healthcare students.
    UNASSIGNED: An online survey was administered to 3372 healthcare students at a University in the United Kingdom.
    UNASSIGNED: Some healthcare students other than nursing, medical and dentistry had sustained a sharps injury. The most common device involved were glass ampoules. The common causes were equipment and carelessness. Some healthcare students sustained psychological impacts following the sharps injury.
    UNASSIGNED: Sharps injuries are common amongst some healthcare students and there is scope for more education for these groups of students relating to the risks, safe handling, reporting and prevention of sharps injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号