OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to provide recommendations in order to facilitate communication between dental professionals and surgeons who are collaborating in the field of dentofacial esthetics.
METHODS: Smile esthetics are beyond the scope, both of the surgeons who are collaborating with facial esthetics and of the dentists, as a wide range of treatment options from both sides is available. It can be difficult for the surgeon or the dentist that first comes in contact with the patient to conduct an individualized global treatment plan, in order to find out how the various phases of the treatment can be sequenced, as a workflow for an efficient interaction between facial surgery and dentistry still does not exist in the scientific literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Facial cosmetic procedures and dental treatment have to be planned as individual elements of the whole dentofacial esthetic rehabilitation. The treatment has to be initiated with the design of the smile and the intraoral mock-up, followed by the required surgical interventions, and to be finished with the delivery of the definitive dental restoration.
CONCLUSIONS: Dentofacial esthetics require comprehensive communication between surgeons and dentists. Following the proposed recommendations, an individualized interdisciplinary treatment plan can be conducted, defining the role of each specialty.

Apart from listening to the cry of a healthy newborn, it is the declaration by the attending paediatrician in the labour room that the child is normal which brings utmost joy to parents. The global incidence of children born with congenital anomalies has been reported to be 3%-6% with more than 90% of these occurring in low- and middle-income group countries. The exact percentages/total numbers of children requiring surgical treatment cannot be estimated for several reasons. These children are operated under several surgical disciplines, viz, paediatric-, plastic reconstructive, neuro-, cardiothoracic-, orthopaedic surgery etc. These conditions may be life-threatening, e.g., trachea-oesophageal fistula, critical pulmonary stenosis, etc. and require immediate surgical intervention. Some, e.g., hydrocephalus, may need intervention as soon as the patient is fit for surgery. Some, e.g., patent ductus arteriosus need \'wait and watch\' policy up to a certain age in the hope of spontaneous recovery. Another extremely important category is that of patients where the operative intervention is done based on their age. Almost all the congenital anomalies coming under care of a plastic surgeon are operated as elective surgery (many as multiple stages of correction) at appropriate ages. There are advantages and disadvantages of intervention at different ages. In this article, we present a review of optimal timings, along with reasoning, for surgery of many of the common congenital anomalies which are treated by plastic surgeons. Obstetricians, paediatricians and general practitioners/family physicians, who most often are the first ones to come across such children, must know to guide the parents appropriately and convincingly impress upon the them as to why their child should not be operated immediately and also the consequences of too soon or too late.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is commonly used within the specialties of orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, spine surgery, and general surgery, and offers several benefits over general anesthesia (GA). However, SA is used much less frequently in plastic surgery. This review analyzed currently existing data on SA use across various surgical specialties and compared the benefits and complications of SA to those of GA, to assess its utility and potential for more widespread use in plastic surgery.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to evaluate the utility of SA in plastic surgery. Indications, contraindications, and data on the use of SA across various surgical specialties were reviewed. Benefits, complications, and cost-effectiveness were also assessed. Finally, the utility of SA in plastic surgery was evaluated based on the available literature.
RESULTS: SA has been shown to yield several benefits and fewer risks than GA, including a higher possibility of early discharge, decreased costs, better pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting control, and decreased risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
CONCLUSIONS: Although commonly used for procedures across various surgical specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology, urology, and orthopedic surgery, SA is less frequently used within plastic surgery. Plastic surgery procedures that would benefit from the use of SA include those below the umbilicus such as liposuction, lower extremity procedures, and perineal procedures, and owing to its benefits, we recommend that SA be used more often within plastic surgery under appropriate clinical circumstances.

In the U.S., diagnostic errors are common across various healthcare settings due to factors like complex procedures and multiple healthcare providers, often exacerbated by inadequate initial evaluations. This study explores the role of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically OpenAI\'s ChatGPT-4 and Google Gemini, in improving emergency decision-making in plastic and reconstructive surgery by evaluating their effectiveness both with and without physical examination data. Thirty medical vignettes covering emergency conditions such as fractures and nerve injuries were used to assess the diagnostic and management responses of the models. These responses were evaluated by medical professionals against established clinical guidelines, using statistical analyses including the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results showed that ChatGPT-4 consistently outperformed Gemini in both diagnosis and management, irrespective of the presence of physical examination data, though no significant differences were noted within each model\'s performance across different data scenarios. Conclusively, while ChatGPT-4 demonstrates superior accuracy and management capabilities, the addition of physical examination data, though enhancing response detail, did not significantly surpass traditional medical resources. This underscores the utility of AI in supporting clinical decision-making, particularly in scenarios with limited data, suggesting its role as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, comprehensive clinical evaluation and expertise.

Background and Objectives: Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as valuable tools in plastic surgery, potentially reducing surgeons\' cognitive loads and improving patients\' outcomes. This study aimed to assess and compare the current state of the two most common and readily available LLMs, Open AI\'s ChatGPT-4 and Google\'s Gemini Pro (1.0 Pro), in providing intraoperative decision support in plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures. Materials and Methods: We presented each LLM with 32 independent intraoperative scenarios spanning 5 procedures. We utilized a 5-point and a 3-point Likert scale for medical accuracy and relevance, respectively. We determined the readability of the responses using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score. Additionally, we measured the models\' response time. We compared the performance using the Mann-Whitney U test and Student\'s t-test. Results: ChatGPT-4 significantly outperformed Gemini in providing accurate (3.59 ± 0.84 vs. 3.13 ± 0.83, p-value = 0.022) and relevant (2.28 ± 0.77 vs. 1.88 ± 0.83, p-value = 0.032) responses. Alternatively, Gemini provided more concise and readable responses, with an average FKGL (12.80 ± 1.56) significantly lower than ChatGPT-4\'s (15.00 ± 1.89) (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the FRE scores (p = 0.174). Moreover, Gemini\'s average response time was significantly faster (8.15 ± 1.42 s) than ChatGPT\'-4\'s (13.70 ± 2.87 s) (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Although ChatGPT-4 provided more accurate and relevant responses, both models demonstrated potential as intraoperative tools. Nevertheless, their performance inconsistency across the different procedures underscores the need for further training and optimization to ensure their reliability as intraoperative decision-support tools.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by cardiometabolic abnormalities such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. This study aims to evaluate the association of MetS on the postoperative outcomes of ventral, umbilical, and epigastric hernia repair using component separation.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent ventral, umbilical, and epigastric hernia repair with component separation between 2015 and 2021. MetS status was defined as patients receiving medical treatment for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2. Propensity matching was performed to generate two balanced cohorts with and without MetS. T-tests and Fisher\'s Exact tests assessed group differences. Logistic regression models evaluated complications between the groups.
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 3930 patients were included in the analysis, with 1965 in each group (MetS versus non-MetS). Significant differences were observed in the severity and clinical presentation of hernias between the groups. The MetS cohort had higher rates of incarcerated hernia (39.1% versus 33.2%; P < 0.001), and recurrent ventral hernia (42.7% versus 36.5%; P < 0.001) compared to the non-MetS cohort. The MetS group demonstrated significantly increased rates of renal insufficiency (P = 0.026), unplanned intubation (P = 0.003), cardiac arrest (P = 0.005), and reoperation rates (P = 0.002) than the non-MetS cohort. Logistic regression models demonstrated higher likelihood of postoperative complications in the MetS group, including mild systemic complications (OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.030-1.518; P = 0.024), severe systemic complications (OR 1.63; 95%CI 1.248-2.120; P < 0.001), and reoperation (OR 1.47; 95%CI 1.158-1.866; P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the rates of 30-d wound complications between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of metabolic derangement appears to be associated with adverse postoperative medical outcomes and increased reoperation rates after hernia repair with component separation. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing preoperative comorbidities as surgeons counsel patients with MetS.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Genital burns are rare injuries. Reconstruction of penile skin defects should consider cosmetic and functional outcomes. Skin grafts can develop scar contractures and carry hair follicles, causing unwanted results. These downsides remain unsolved issues. This work aimed to describe a new foreskin advancement flap method for completely reconstructing penile shaft skin defects in severely burned patients.
METHODS: From 2021 to 2023, four patients with third-degree burns in the genital area were enrolled in this investigation. We describe a series of cases with deep burns to the penile shaft and surrounding area that needed debridement and reconstruction using a novel technique called \"reverse circumcision,\" which consists of tangential excision of the penis and a foreskin advancement flap without longitudinal cuts with less morbidity, preservation of function, and a better aesthetic appearance. The patients had an average follow-up of nine months.
RESULTS: The reverse circumcision technique was established for patients with severe burns in the genital area. The four patients were satisfied with the postoperative results and the aesthetic results of the procedure without reporting any complications. No scarring or contractures were observed on the glans or penile shaft after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other flap methods, the use of a reverse circumcision foreskin advancement flap was more straightforward, feasible, and effective. In adults, the foreskin tissue completely covers the penile shaft skin defect. It is a viable reconstructive surgical technique that is easily reproducible and has excellent aesthetic and functional results. For this surgical technique, tissue transfers, bulky regional flaps, or skin grafts were not needed.

UNASSIGNED: The advent of 3D printing has revolutionized plastic surgery and prosthetic devices, providing personalized solutions for patients with traumatic injuries, deformities, and appearance-related conditions. This review offers a comprehensive overview of 3D printing\'s applications, advantages, limitations, and future prospects in these fields.
UNASSIGNED: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies on 3D printing in plastic surgery.
UNASSIGNED: 3D printing has significantly contributed to personalized medical interventions, with benefits like enhanced design flexibility, reduced production time, and improved patient outcomes. Using computer-aided design (CAD) software, precise models tailored to a patient\'s anatomy can be created, ensuring better fit, functionality, and comfort. 3D printing allows for intricate geometries, leading to improved aesthetic outcomes and patient-specific prosthetic limbs and orthoses. The historical development of 3D printing, key milestones, and breakthroughs are highlighted. Recent progress in bioprinting and tissue engineering shows promising applications in regenerative medicine and transplantation. The integration of AI and automation with 3D printing enhances surgical planning and outcomes. Emerging trends in patient-specific treatment planning and precision medicine are potential game-changers. However, challenges like technical considerations, economic implications, and ethical issues exist. Addressing these challenges and advancing research in materials, design processes, and long-term outcomes are crucial for widespread adoption.
UNASSIGNED: The review underscores the increasing adoption of 3D printing in healthcare and its impact on plastic surgery and prosthetic devices. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating the current state and addressing knowledge gaps through future research to foster further advancements.

Background The quest to identify parameters deemed optimal for breast aesthetics holds paramount significance in both aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. The definition of ideal breast beauty, however, is subject to cultural variations and diverse standards, necessitating a detailed understanding. Objective This study delves into the perspectives of the Brazilian population regarding the aesthetics of the female breast. Methods A selection of images portraying variations in the distribution of upper and lower pole ratios across four distinct proportion models (35:65, 45:55, 50:50, and 55:45) was presented to participants. Through a meticulously crafted questionnaire administered via Google Forms, respondents were tasked with identifying the images they deemed most beautiful and attractive. Comprehensive demographic data of the study participants were gathered and subsequently correlated with their group-specific opinions. Results A total of 3744 questionnaire responses were collected 228 of which were from plastic surgeons/residents. The average age was 35 years, with 55.3% being women. Notably, breasts featuring a ratio of 45:55 emerged as the consensus choice for the epitome of beauty, garnering preference from 73% of the general population, 68% of women, 78% of men, and an equal 78% of plastic surgeons. This preference was consistent across all regions of the country. Conclusion Breasts with a ratio of 45:55 were universally deemed the most aesthetically pleasing. Similarly, breasts with a 50:50 ratio of breast tissue emerged as the next preferred choice. These insights contribute valuable perspectives on aesthetic considerations in breast surgery within the unique cultural context of Brazil.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .