pig production

生猪生产
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    仔猪断奶前的表现显著影响动物福利和生猪生产的盈利能力。了解仔猪断奶前性能影响因素是提高动物福利的关键,减少损失,并提高盈利能力。这项研究旨在评估平价的影响,出生季节,和性别对F1大白×长白猪凋落物内变化和断奶前性能的影响。
    关于总产仔数的信息,活着出生的人数,死产数量,仔猪出生时的体重,死亡率,从农场数据库(2022年4月至2023年2月)获得了断奶F1大型白×长白猪的数量。2602名女性和2882名男性,总共使用了5484只仔猪,有360头母猪的记录.计算了产仔中仔猪出生体重的变异系数(CV)。MiniTab17中的一般线性模型分析用于评估数据,Fisher的最小显著性差异检验(p<0.05)用于平均分离和皮尔逊矩相关系数计算来评估生存率之间的关系,死亡率,垫料大小,出生体重,出生体重CV。
    平价对产仔数有统计学上的显着影响,出生体重,生存率(p<0.05)。母猪的产次对活产或断奶仔猪的数量没有显着影响(p>0.05)。多产母猪出生时产仔数明显大于初产母猪(p<0.05)。第2、4和5的产仔数没有显着差异(p>0.05),平均20.95、20.74和20.03公斤,分别。约91.29%是第2次记录的最高存活率(p<0.05)。生命的第一周记录了8.02%的死亡率。在第1周,第3-5组的死亡率显着(p<0.05)高于其他组(11.90%)(第1组:6.79%,平价2:5.74%,平价3-5:8.54和9.21%)。秋季(17.34)和春季(17.72)产仔数显著大于夏季(16.47)和冬季(16.83)(p<0.05)。在秋天和春天,生存率(83.15%和85.84%,分别)与夏季(88.40%)和冬季(89.07%)相比显着降低(p<0.05)。在所有的季节,产仔数无显著差异(p>0.05)。出生体重CV在夏季(20.11%)显着(p<0.05)低于春季(22.43%),秋季(23.71%),和冬季(21.69%)。出生季候对活仔猪数量无显著影响(p>0.05)。出生时雄性(1.34kg)比雌性(1.30kg)重(p<0.05)。值得注意的是,男性(22.43%)和女性(22.52%)的出生体重CV相似。凋落物大小与平均凋落物重呈正相关(rp=0.576,p<0.001),出生体重CV(rp=0.244,p<0.001),和死亡率(rp=0.378,p<0.001)。平均产仔数和出生体重CV(rp=-0.028,p>0.05)与存活率(rp=-0.032,p>0.05)之间无明显关系。
    在F1大型白×长白猪中,仔猪的出生均匀性随着产仔数的增大而下降。在奇偶校验3-5中,多胎母猪产仔的均匀性降低。随着垃圾数量的增加,仔猪出生时的均匀性恶化。更大的产仔数和更大的仔猪出生体重变化与更高的断奶前死亡率有关。生产者需要一种平衡的选择方法来增加产仔数,并且必须仔细剔除老化的母猪以引入更年轻的母猪,更有生产力的女性。
    UNASSIGNED: A piglet\'s pre-weaning performance significantly influences both animal welfare and profitability in pig production. Understanding piglet pre-weaning performance influencing factors is key to enhancing animal welfare, reducing losses, and boosting profitability. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of parity, season of birth, and sex on within-litter variation and pre-weaning performance of F1 Large White × Landrace pigs.
    UNASSIGNED: Information regarding total litter size, number of born alive, number of stillbirths, piglet weight at birth, mortality, and count of weaned F1 Large White × Landrace piglets was acquired from the farm database (April 2022-February 2023). 2602 females and 2882 males, a total of 5484 piglets were utilized, with records from 360 sows. The coefficient of variation (CV) of birth weights among piglets within a litter was calculated. The general linear model analysis in MiniTab 17 was used to evaluate the data, with Fisher\'s least significant difference test (p < 0.05) used for mean separation and Pearson\'s moment correlation coefficient calculated to assess relationships between survival rates, mortality rates, litter size, birth weight, and birth weight CV.
    UNASSIGNED: Parity had a statistically significant impact on litter size, birth weight, and survival rate (p < 0.05). The sow\'s parity did not significantly (p > 0.05) impact the number of piglets born alive or weaned. Multiparous sows had a significantly larger litter size (p < 0.05) than primiparous sows at birth. The litter weights for parities 2, 4, and 5 did not significantly differ (p > 0.05), with averages of 20.95, 20.74, and 20.03 kg, respectively. About 91.29% was the highest survival rate recorded in parity 2 (p < 0.05). The 1st week of life recorded an 8.02% mortality rate. The mortality rate in parity 3-5 group was significantly (p < 0.05) higher (11.90%) in week 1 than in the other groups (parity 1: 6.79%, parity 2: 5.74%, parity 3-5: 8.54 and 9.21%). The litter sizes in autumn (17.34) and spring (17.72) were significantly larger (p < 0.05) than those in summer (16.47) and winter (16.83). In autumn and spring, the survival rate (83.15 and 85.84%, respectively) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared to summer (88.40%) and winter (89.07%). In all seasons, the litter weights did not significantly differ (p > 0.05). The birth weight CV was significantly (p < 0.05) lower during summer (20.11%) than during spring (22.43%), autumn (23.71%), and winter (21.69%). The season of birth had no significant effect (p > 0.05) on the number of live piglets. Males (1.34 kg) were heavier (p < 0.05) than females (1.30 kg) at birth. Notably, the birth weight CV was similar between males (22.43%) and females (22.52%). Litter size was positively correlated with average litter weight (rp = 0.576, p < 0.001), birth weight CV (rp = 0.244, p < 0.001), and mortality rate (rp = 0.378, p < 0.001). An insignificant relationship was observed between average litter weight and birth weight CV (rp = -0.028, p > 0.05) and survival rate (rp = -0.032, p > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: In F1 Large White × Landrace pigs, birth uniformity among piglets declines as litter size grows larger. In parity 3-5, multiparous sows yield litters with reduced uniformity. With an increase in litter size, uniformity among piglets at birth worsens. A larger litter size and greater piglet birth weight variation are linked to a higher pre-weaning mortality rate. Producers need a balanced selection approach to boost litter size and must cull aging sows carefully to introduce younger, more productive females.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    甲型流感病毒(IAV)是巴西猪群的重要病原,监测病毒循环对于控制和减少传播至关重要。IAV的监视程序通常基于个别仔猪的水平采样,评估可用的诊断工具对于评估牛群的IAV循环至关重要。因此,比较了巴西南部猪群的两种样品收集方法,以通过RT-qPCR检测IAV:鼻拭子(NS)和鼻擦拭(NW)。为两个测试和两个总体设置了贝叶斯潜在类模型(BLCM)。使用的NW和NS比敏感的更特异(两者都高于95%)。对NW的灵敏度低于NS,84.14%(70%-95%;后验概率区间(PPI):95%)和87.15%(73%-97%;PPI:95%),分别,特异性为95%(90%-99%;PPI:95%)和99%(96%-100%;PPI:95%),分别。尽管与鼻拭子相比,擦拭样品收集失去了敏感性和特异性,测试性能的差异非常有限,PPI在很大程度上重叠。因此,NW也可以被认为是有价值的工具。关于使用这两种技术的决定应该基于它们的性能限制和日常监测的可行性之间的权衡。
    Influenza A virus (IAV) is an important pathogen in Brazilian swine herds, and monitoring the viral circulation is essential to control and reduce the transmission. Surveillance programs for IAV are often based on individual piglets level sampling, making the evaluation of the available diagnostic tools crucial to assessing IAV circulation in herds. Thus, two sample collection methodologies were compared in pig herds in southern Brazil to detect IAV by RT-qPCR: nasal swab (NS) and nasal wipe (NW). A Bayesian latent class model (BLCM) was set for two tests and two populations. The NW and NS used are more specific (higher than 95 % for both) than sensitive. The sensitivity for NW was lower than the NS, 84.14 % (70 % - 95 %; posterior probability interval (PPI): 95 %) and 87.15 % (73 % - 97 %; PPI: 95 %), respectively, and the specificity was 95 % (90 % - 99 %; PPI: 95 %) and 99 % (96 % - 100 %; PPI: 95 %), respectively. Although the wipe sample collection loses both sensitivity and specificity compared with nasal swab, differences in test performance were very limited and PPIs largely overlapped. Therefore NW can also be considered a valuable tool. The decision about the use of both techniques should be based on the trade-off between their performance limitations and feasibility in routine monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    配制猪饮食的传统方法仅基于在满足营养需求的同时最小化成本,因此不考虑与生产饲料成分相关的环境影响。为减少猪肉生产对环境的整体影响,饲料原料可以被认为是制定环境友好的饮食。然而,它们对养猪生产性能的潜在影响可能会降低农场门口的环境效益。这项研究的目的是量化这种生态友好型猪饮食对氮(N)和能量(E)平衡的影响,产热(HP)的组成部分和生长猪的性能。干物质消化率系数(84.5%vs88.2%,P<0.01)和N(80.4%vs86.3%,P<0.01)明显低于对照饮食(法国使用的商业饮食)。饲喂生态友好型饮食的猪组的粪便中的N排泄显着高于饲喂对照饮食的组(9.8vs6.9g/d,分别,P=0.01),而N保留率往往较低(27.8比30.3g/d,分别为;P=0.06)。可代谢的E:可消化的E比例在饮食之间没有差异,但是生态友好饮食组的总HP显着低于对照饮食组(1340vs1388kJ/kg体重(BW)0.60/d,分别,P=0.03)。使用对环境影响较小的饲料原料,例如本地生产的蛋白质或小麦加工的副产品,是减少养猪生产对环境影响的有效途径。然而,这些环保成分的营养成分可能被高估了,特别是氨基酸的真正消化率。这表明需要更好地估计和考虑生态友好型饮食的真正消化率,以减少畜牧业生产对环境的影响,而不降低动物生产性能。
    The traditional approach to formulating pig diets is based only on minimizing cost while meeting nutritional requirements and thus does not consider the environmental impacts associated with producing feed ingredients. To reduce the overall environmental impact of pork production, feed ingredients can be considered to formulate environmentally friendly diets. However, their potential effects on pig performance could decrease environmental benefits at the farm gate. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of such eco-friendly pig diets on nitrogen (N) and energy (E) balances, the components of heat production (HP), and the performance of growing pigs. Digestibility coefficients of dry matter (84.5% vs. 88.2%, P < 0.01) and N (80.4% vs. 86.3%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower for the eco-friendly diet than the Control-diet (a commercial diet used in France). N excretion in feces was significantly higher for the group of pigs fed the eco-friendly diet than for the group fed the Control-diet (9.8 vs. 6.9 g/d, respectively, P = 0.01), while the N retention tended to be lower (27.8 vs. 30.3 g/d, respectively; P = 0.06). The metabolizable E:digestible E ratio did not differ between diets, but total HP was significantly lower for the eco-friendly diet group than for the Control-diet group (1,340 vs. 1,388 kJ/kg body weight0.60/d, respectively, P = 0.03). Using feed ingredients with lower environmental impacts, such as locally produced protein or co-products from wheat processing, is an effective way to decrease the environmental impacts of pig production. However, the nutritional composition of these eco-friendly ingredients could be overestimated, in particular the true digestibility of amino acids. This indicates the need to better estimate and consider the true digestibility of eco-friendly diets to decrease environmental impacts of livestock production without decreasing animal performance.
    Livestock production is a significant contributor to global environmental change. In pig production, animal feed contributes to 55% to 75% of climate change impacts, 70% to 90% of nonrenewable energy use, and 85% to 100% of land occupation. To reduce the overall environmental impact of pork production, feed ingredients can be considered to formulate environmentally friendly diets. These feeding strategies that minimized environmental impacts contained lower proportions of cereals and oilseeds and a higher proportion of high-protein crops and co-products from wheat processing which have lower impacts. The use of these eco-friendly ingredients could influence performance due to their variability in energy, fiber, or protein contents, with an overestimation of their nutritional composition. Thus, decreasing environmental impacts of livestock production without decreasing animal performance requires better characterizing the ingredients that have lower environmental impacts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    养猪的严格规定,如抗生素控制和禁止某些添加剂和消毒剂,使疾病控制工作复杂化。尽管室内环境中微生物群落的进化,他们多年来保持稳定,表现出每种生产类型特有的特征,在某些情况下,特定公司或农场生产类型特有的。此外,一些传染病在特定的农场复发,虽然其他农场从未出现过这些疾病,表明这些微生物在动物或其环境中的存在之间的联系。因此,这项研究的目的是表征高和低卫生状况的农场的环境微生物组,建立两者之间的关系,健康状况,环境微生物生态学及其功能。
    为此,对6个猪场进行了环境采样。农场隶属于一家生产公司,该公司处理在西班牙屠宰的大多数猪。本研究使用高通量16SrRNA基因测序研究了高健康和低健康状态农场之间的关系。此外,根据获得的16SrRNA基因序列鉴定生态相关功能和潜在病原体,用原核TAXa(FAPROTAX)进行功能注释。
    这项研究揭示了有持续健康问题的农场和有良好健康结果的农场之间的微生物群落存在显著差异。建议需要针对特定挑战量身定制的协议。农场之间微生物种群的变化强调了对特定和生态友好的清洁和消毒方案的需求。这些措施是提高畜牧业可持续性的关键,确保产品更安全,提高市场竞争优势。
    UNASSIGNED: Stringent regulations in pig farming, such as antibiotic control and the ban on certain additives and disinfectants, complicate disease control efforts. Despite the evolution of microbial communities inside the house environment, they maintain stability over the years, exhibiting characteristics specific to each type of production and, in some cases, unique to a particular company or farm production type. In addition, some infectious diseases are recurrent in specific farms, while other farms never present these diseases, suggesting a connection between the presence of these microorganisms in animals or their environment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterise environmental microbiomes of farms with high and low sanitary status, establishing the relationships between both, health status, environmental microbial ecology and its functionality.
    UNASSIGNED: For this purpose, 6 pig farms were environmentally sampled. Farms were affiliated with a production company that handle the majority of the pigs slaughtered in Spain. This study investigated the relationship among high health and low health status farms using high throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. In addition, to identify ecologically relevant functions and potential pathogens based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained, functional Annotation with PROkaryotic TAXa (FAPROTAX) was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: This study reveals notable differences in microbial communities between farms with persistent health issues and those with good health outcomes, suggesting a need for protocols tailored to address specific challenges. The variation in microbial populations among farms underscores the need for specific and eco-friendly cleaning and disinfection protocols. These measures are key to enhancing the sustainability of livestock farming, ensuring safer products and boosting competitive edge in the market.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)基因型3是欧洲猪场中流行的人畜共患病原体,主要通过食源性途径构成重大公共卫生风险。该研究旨在确定有效的生物安全措施,以控制猪场的HEV传播。解决当前知识中的一个关键差距。利用横截面设计,来自后备母猪的粪便样本,干母猪,在9个欧洲国家的所有农场类型的231个养猪场收集育肥者。使用实时RT-PCR来测试这些样品的HEV。同时,一份全面的生物安全问卷收集了控制HEV的各种潜在措施的数据。因变量是HEV风险,根据每个农场的阳性汇集粪便样品的百分比(25%截止值)分类为较低或较高。使用广义线性模型(一个用于整理样本,一个用于所有样本)对数据进行了分析,并将国家和农场类型作为先验固定因素。最终多变量模型的结果确定了与较低HEV风险相关的关键生物安全措施,在饲养中使用卫生图(OR:0.06,p=0.001)和/或清洁后的育肥区域(OR:0.21,p=0.019),隔离区的存在(OR:0.29,p=0.025),对购买的饲料进行沙门氏菌的测试和/或处理(OR:0.35,p=0.021),农场上有其他牲畜物种,并有五个或更少的人负责猪。与预期相反,一些生物安全措施与较高的HEV风险相关,例如,在育肥区域清洁后3天或更长时间的停机时间(OR:3.49,p=0.005)或更换谷仓部分时对农场人员强制洗手(OR:3.4,p=0.026)。这项新颖的研究揭示了有效控制欧洲养猪场HEV的生物安全措施的重要见解。确定保护性和风险相关措施有助于改进HEV管理策略,并强调养猪业生物安全的复杂性。
    Hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 is a prevalent zoonotic pathogen in European pig farms, posing a significant public health risk primarily through the foodborne route. The study aimed to identify effective biosecurity measures for controlling HEV transmission on pig farms, addressing a critical gap in current knowledge. Utilizing a cross-sectional design, fecal samples from gilts, dry sows, and fatteners were collected on 231 pig farms of all farm types across nine European countries. Real-time RT-PCR was employed to test these samples for HEV. Simultaneously, a comprehensive biosecurity questionnaire captured data on various potential measures to control HEV. The dependent variable was HEV risk, categorized as lower or higher based on the percentage of positive pooled fecal samples on each farm (25% cut-off). The data were analyzed using generalized linear models (one for finisher samples and one for all samples) with a logit link function with country and farm type as a priori fixed factors. The results of the final multivariable models identified key biosecurity measures associated with lower HEV risk, which were the use of a hygienogram in the breeding (OR: 0.06, p = 0.001) and/or fattening area after cleaning (OR: 0.21, p = 0.019), the presence of a quarantine area (OR: 0.29, p = 0.025), testing and/or treating purchased feed against Salmonella (OR: 0.35, p = 0.021), the presence of other livestock species on the farm, and having five or fewer persons in charge of the pigs. Contrary to expectations, some biosecurity measures were associated with higher HEV risk, e.g., downtime of 3 days or longer after cleaning in the fattening area (OR: 3.49, p = 0.005) or mandatory handwashing for farm personnel when changing barn sections (OR: 3.4, p = 0.026). This novel study unveils critical insights into biosecurity measures effective in controlling HEV on European pig farms. The identification of both protective and risk-associated measures contributes to improving strategies for managing HEV and underscores the complexity of biosecurity in pig farming.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fvets.2024.1328284。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1328284.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在表征和量化去除哺乳母猪的原因,并确定与延长泌乳长度(ELL)相关的去除。在2016-2022年期间,从美国中西部的53头母猪群中总共分析了100,756头被移走的护士母猪。繁殖失败是影响P1,P2和P3母猪最常见的去除原因(χ2=8748.421,p<0.001)。受孕失败和无发情期是影响P1,P2母猪和P1,P5母猪繁殖失败的主要原因(χ2=352.480,p<0.001),分别。当P2和P6母猪的ELL为0-7d时,由于受孕失败和未能恢复热量,他们面临很高的机会(χ2=13.312,p=0.021),分别。当P2和P5母猪的ELL为8-14d时,由于未能受孕和表现出热量,他们极易被移除(χ2=59.847,p<0.001),分别。最后,当ELL在15-21天时,P4和P5哺乳母猪更有可能(χ2=41.751,p<0.001)由于无法表达热量而被移除,而同时,P2和P3母猪由于未能怀孕而经历了相同的去除威胁。这些结果可以帮助生产者管理护士母猪系统。
    This study aimed to characterize and quantify reasons for the removal of nurse sows and identify the removal associated with their extended lactation length (ELL). A total of 100,756 removed nurse sows within a period of 2016-2022 from 53 sow herds in the Midwest USA were analyzed. Reproductive failure was the most common removal reason (χ2 = 8748.421, p < 0.001) affecting P1, P2, and P3 nurse sows. Failure to conceive and absence of estrus were the main causes of reproductive failure (χ2 = 352.480, p < 0.001) affecting P1 and P2 nurse sows and P1 and P5 nurse sows, respectively. When P2 and P6 nurse sows had an ELL of 0-7 d, they faced a high chance (χ2 = 13.312, p = 0.021) of removal due to conception failure and failure to return to heat, respectively. When P2 and P5 nurse sows had an ELL of 8-14 d, they were highly vulnerable (χ2 = 59.847, p < 0.001) to removal due to failure to conceive and showing heat, respectively. Finally, when ELL was at 15-21 days, P4 and P5 nurse sows were more likely (χ2 = 41.751, p < 0.001) to be removed due to failure to express heat, whereas at the same time, P2 and P3 nurse sows experienced the same removal threat due to failing to conceive. These results could help producers manage nurse sow systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    科西嘉岛的养猪业以广泛的养殖系统为基础,主要以传统的广泛做法为特征,有利于家庭和野生个体之间的接触。怀疑这些接触会影响两个人群之间共同传染病的维持和传播。因此,重要的是开发允许理解和预测其发生的方法。对这些交互进行建模需要关于存在的准确数据,养猪场土地的位置和使用以及养殖实践,但是这些数据往往是不可用的,不完整或过时。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种收集和分析养猪信息的方法,该方法结合了社会科学和流行病学的方法,并能够在科西嘉地区的市级上对野猪和家猪之间的潜在相互作用指数(IPI)进行空间表示。作为这个过程的第一步,进行了采访,以收集来自103个养猪场的信息。然后,使用分层聚类,我们确定了5种不同的生猪养殖方法,并由当地专家使用参与式工具进行了评估和验证。将五个猪养殖集群及其各自与野猪的直接和间接相互作用的估计水平与猪密度的线性方程结合起来,以估计155个城市的假设潜在相互作用指数(IPI)。我们的结果揭示了科西嘉岛上养猪方式的多样性,并指出了潜在的互动热点。我们的方法被证明是收集和更新有关养猪场的存在和类型的信息的有效方法,有可能更新官方的牲畜生产统计数据。科西嘉地区野猪和家猪之间IPI的空间表示可以帮助设计区域疾病管理策略和政策,以改善对科西嘉养猪场中某些共享猪病原体的控制。
    The pig sector in Corsica is based by a wide range of farming systems, mainly characterized on traditional extensive practices, which favor contacts between domestic and wild individuals. These contacts are suspected to influence the maintenance and the transmission of shared infectious diseases between both populations. Therefore, it is important to develop methods that allow to understand and anticipate their occurrence. Modeling these interactions requires accurate data on the presence, location and use of land on pig farms and farming practices, but such data are often unavailable, incomplete or outdated. In this study, we suggest a method to collect and analyze pig farming information that combines approaches from social sciences and epidemiology and enables a spatial representation of an index of potential interaction (IPI) between wild and domestic pigs at municipality level in the Corsican territory. As a first step of the process, interviews were conducted to gather information from 103 pig farms. Then, using hierarchical clustering, we identified five different clusters of pig farming practices which were evaluated and validated by local experts using participatory tools. The five pig farming clusters with their respective estimated levels of direct and indirect interactions with wild boars were combined in a linear equation with pig density to estimate a hypothetical index of potential interaction (IPI) in 155 municipalities. Our results revealed the diversity of pig farming practices across the island of Corsica and pointed out potential hotspots of interaction. Our method proved to be an effective way to collect and update information on the presence and typology of pig farms which has the potential to update official livestock production statistics. The spatial representation of an IPI between wild boars and domestic pigs in the Corsican territory could help design regional disease management strategies and policies to improve the control of certain shared pig pathogens in pig farms from Corsica.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    畜牧业对环境有不利影响,因为它会产生大量的气体排放。在养猪方面,饲料的使用是欧盟动物农场排放的重要来源之一。然而,使用低膳食粗蛋白质(LCP)可以减少养猪对环境的影响,并提供多样化的生态系统服务(ESs)。同时,这些猪的饮食替代品可能比传统的更昂贵,这可能会对农民采用这些替代方案的意愿产生负面影响。公民支付ESs可能是激励农民实施更可持续的猪饮食的可行策略。这项研究的主要目的是评估加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)公民愿意为养猪生产中实施LCP饮食产生的ESs支付的程度。为了实现这个目标,我们在501位公民中进行了在线调查,包括离散选择实验。参与者评估了三种Feed场景,他们的选择使用条件logit模型进行审查。结果显示,市民更喜欢新的猪饮食,包括LCP和非常LCP(VLCP)饮食,传统的猪饮食。然而,对VLCP饮食有明显的偏好,因为他们愿意支付67欧元/年/成人(WTP)。
    Livestock farming has a detrimental effect on the environment since it generates a lot of gas emissions. In pig farming, the use of feed is among the substantial sources of animal farm emissions among the European Union. Nevertheless, the use of Low Dietary Crude Protein (LCP) may reduce the environmental impacts of pig farming and provide diverse ecosystem services (ESs). Concurrently, these pig diets alternatives may result more expensive than the conventional ones, which may negatively affect farmers\' intention to adopt these alternatives. Citizens\' payment for ESs may be a viable strategy to motivate farmers to implement more sustainable pig diets. The primary objective of this study is to assess the extent to which citizens of Catalonia (Spain) are willing to pay for the ESs generated by the implementation of a LCP diet in pig production. In pursuit of this goal, we conducted an online survey among 501 citizens, including a Discrete Choice Experiment. Participants evaluated three feed scenarios, and their choices were scrutinized using conditional logit model. Results revealed that citizens prefer the new pig diets, including both LCP and Very LCP (VLCP) diets, over the conventional pig diet. However, there is a clear preference toward the VLCP diet justified by their willingness to pay (WTP) of €67/year/adult.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    猪肉是全球生产和消费最广泛的肉类。随着技术的进步,遗传学,和管理,生猪供应链的结构已经从传统的从出生到屠宰的饲养方式转变为纳入四个主要的专业化操作:育种,分娩,托儿所,和发胖。育肥,约占市场猪整个生命周期的70%,严重依赖资源,尤其是在饲料消费方面。尽管通过农业合同将饲料生产与养猪整合在现代工业设施中,两个阶段的生产计划的单独决策过程通常会导致整体效率低下。本研究提出了一种基于优化的方法来计划生产,以实现三个供应链梯队的垂直集成设置:饲料厂,育肥农场,还有屠宰场.关键的协调决策包括在饲料厂为特定的饲料配方制定生产计划,并在育肥场组织耕作周期以满足屠宰场的需求。目的是优化猪的生长,同时最大程度地降低总成本。该方法包括生猪供应链的混合整数线性规划模型,和拉格朗日启发式方法作为协调生产计划的制定方法。计算实验是使用基于Thatland生猪供应链的不同案例研究数据进行的。与使用商业软件的结果相比,Lingo\的单纯形法,我们提出的启发式方法可以为较小的问题实例更快地找到最佳解决方案,并为较大的场景在有限的时间范围内产生更有效的可行解决方案。
    Pork stands out as the most extensively produced and consumed meat globally. With advancements in technology, genetics, and management, the structure of the pig supply chain has transformed from the traditional birth-to-slaughter raising method to incorporate four primary specialized operations: breeding, farrowing, nursery, and fattening. Fattening, constituting approximately 70% of a market pig\'s entire life cycle, heavily relies on resources, notably in feed consumption. Despite the integration of feed production with pig farming in modern industrial setups through farming contracts, separate decision-making processes for production planning in both stages often result in overall inefficiency. This research proposes an optimization-based methodology to plan production for a vertically integrated setting of three supply chain echelons: a feed mill, fattening farms, and a slaughterhouse. Key coordinated decisions include creating production plans for specific feed formulations at the feed mill and organizing farming cycles at fattening farms to meet the demand of the slaughterhouse The aim is to optimize pig growth while minimizing the overall costs. The methodology includes a mixed-integer linear programming model for the pig supply chain, and a Lagrangian heuristic as method to make coordinated production plans. Computational experiments were conducted using diverse case-study data based on pig supply chains in Thatland. Compared with the results using a commercial software, Lingo\'s Simplex method, our proposed heuristic could find optimal solutions quicker for smaller problem instances and produce more effective feasible solutions within limited time frames for larger scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号