OBJECTIVE: To calculate the prevalence of physical restraint (PR) use in Spanish PICUs and (2) to analyze the correlation between the prevalence of PR use and the sociodemographic, clinical variables of the patients and the PICU structural and organizational variables.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prevalence study from January 2022 to January 2023 in Spanish PICUs. The method of data collection was by direct observation, review of the patient\'s medical history, and asking the professionals involved in the patient\'s care. Three weekly 24-hour prevalence observations (morning, afternoon, and night) were conducted for 6 months.
RESULTS: A total of 336 patients were included in the study, obtaining an overall crude prevalence of PR use of 16 % (95 %CI: 15 %-17.7 %). Pediatric patients with respiratory pathology received the highest number of hours of PR, with significant differences observed when comparing respiratory cases with post-surgical cases. Statistical significance was also observed when comparing the mean scores of hours of PR according to admission diagnosis (p = 0.01), with respiratory patients being the ones who were restrained the longest (24 h [20-24]) and infectious patients the least (15 h [14-20]). Patients who receive PR upon admission remain in this situation for more hours (24 h [15-24] and in the PICUs that specifically recorded PR application, fewer hours of PR occurred (20 h [4-24]).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PR is still present in the PICUs analyzed, with a crude prevalence of 16%. Factors such as the reason for admission, the use of respiratory support, and the reason for application of PR were linked to the hours of use of PR.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the prevalence of PR use will make professionals aware that it is still necessary to implement policies that avoid its use to prevent the side effects they have in pediatric patients.

UNASSIGNED: Physical restraints (PRs) are frequently used in adult critical care units to protect staff and prevent self-harm, despite the fact that they represent significant safety risks. Restraint complications may have an impact on the patient\'s long- and short-term outcomes. This integrative review aimed to meticulously evaluate existing evidence pertaining to physical restraint practices in adult critical care settings. The review was specifically geared towards examining the prevalence of PR, identifying influential factors, elucidating the role of nurses in PR implementation, exploring nurses\' experiences in caring for patients under restraint, and scrutinizing the complications associated with PR application.
UNASSIGNED: This integrative review included the studies published between January 2009 and December 2019 and the literature search was conducted in July 2020. The databases searched included EBSCOhost, Ovid, ProQuest, PubMed, Wiley Online Library, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect. The keywords included in the search were restraint, critical care, intensive care, ICU, mechanical ventilation, intubation, nursing, and experience. A checklist based on the CASP checklist and the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality.
UNASSIGNED: The findings were evaluated and summarized into seven key topics after twenty-one publications were found to be evaluated. i) High prevalence of PR application in adult critical care unit; ii) determinants of PR applications; iii) types of PR in adult critical care units; iv) decision maker of PR; v) moral and ethical dilemma in PR application; vi) awareness and guidelines for PR applications; vii) common complications and use of sedation, analgesics, antipsychotic drugs in PR application.
UNASSIGNED: The number of days PR is used is related to the risk of an adverse event. In order to standardize nursing practice, ICU nurses require greater training on the ideas of PR use. Evidence-based recommendations will assist critical care nurses in making the best judgments possible concerning the use of PR.

OBJECTIVE: Older adults may present to the emergency department (ED) with agitation, a symptom often resulting in chemical sedation and physical restraint use which carry significant risks and side effects for the geriatric population. To date, limited literature describes the patterns of differential restraint use in this population.
METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used electronic health records data from ED visits by older adults (age ≥65 years) ranging 2015-2022 across nine hospital sites in a regional hospital network. Logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between patient-level characteristics and the primary outcomes of chemical sedation and physical restraint.
RESULTS: Among 872,587 ED visits during the study period, 11,875 (1.4%) and 32,658 (3.7%) encounters involved the use of chemical sedation and physical restraints respectively. The populations aged 75-84, 85-94, 95+ years had increasingly higher odds of chemical sedation [adjusted odds ratios (AORs) 1.35 (95% CI 1.29-1.42); 1.82 (1.73-1.91); 2.35 (2.15-2.57) respectively] as well as physical restraint compared to the 65-74 group [AOR 1.31 (1.27-1.34); 1.55 (1.50-1.60); 1.69 (1.59-1.79)]. Compared to the White Non-Hispanic group, the Black Non-Hispanic and Hispanic/Latinx groups had significantly higher odds of chemical sedation [AOR 1.26 (1.18-1.35); AOR 1.22 (1.15-1.29)] and physical restraint [AOR 1.12 (95% CI 1.07-1.16); 1.22 (1.18-1.26)].
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in 20 ED visits among older adults resulted in chemical sedation or physical restraint use. Minoritized group status was associated with increasing use of chemical sedation and physical restraint, particularly among the oldest old. These results may indicate the need for further research in agitation management for historically marginalized populations in older adults.

Physical restraints are widely used and accepted as protective measures during treatment in intensive care unit (ICU). This review of the literature summarizes the adverse events and outcomes associated with physical restraint use, and the risk factors associated with their use during treatment in the ICU. The PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were screened using predefined search terms to identify studies pertaining to adverse events and/or outcomes associated with physical restraint use, and the factors associated with their use in adult patients admitted to the ICU. A total of 24 articles (including 6126 patients) that were published between 2006 and 2022 were identified. The described adverse events associated with physical restraint use included skin injuries, subsequent delirium, neurofunctional impairment, and a higher rate of post-traumatic stress disorder. Subsequent delirium was the most frequent adverse event to be reported. No alternative measures to physical restraints were discussed, and only one study reported a standardized protocol for their use. Although physical restraint use has been reported to be associated with adverse events (including neurofunctional impairment) in the literature, the available evidence is limited. Although causality cannot be confirmed, a definite association appears to exist. Our findings suggest that it is essential to improve awareness regarding their adverse impact and optimize approaches for their detection, management, and prevention using protocols or checklists.

BACKGROUND: Physical restraint of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) has an estimated prevalence of 50%. Many medical centres do not have specific protocols for physical restraint, and the decision of whether to physically restrain a patient is up to the nursing staff. Disadvantages of physical restraint include injuries, exacerbation of agitation and an increased risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
OBJECTIVE: To report prevalence and outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality of physical restraint in general ICU patients in an 800-bed secondary medical centre.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 647 patients admitted to a general ICU in an 800-bed secondary medical centre in Kfar Saba, Israel, between January and December 2020. Data included demographics, medical history, length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation, number of ventilation days, 28-day mortality, reason for admission, agitation rate assessed by Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) score, need for physical restraint and need for anti-psychotics.
RESULTS: Among the patients, 40% (256 of 647) required physical restraint. Older adult patients had a greater likelihood of being physically restrained along with those admitted because of sepsis or acute respiratory failure. Among the study sample, 11% (71 of 647) required anti-psychotics. Patients who were restrained had longer duration of ventilation (5.9 ± 8.2 vs. 0.36 ± 1.4 days; p < .001) and higher 28-day mortality (0.26 ± 0.45 vs. 0.07 ± 0.25, Z = 6.86, p < .001). There was no difference in medical history, except for chronic drug abuse, which was more frequent in the restraint group (18 [6.9%] vs. 11 [2.8%], respectively; p = .019), as well as the use of anti-psychotic medications (24 [9.3%] vs. 19 [4.8%], respectively; p = .034) and anti-depressants (55 [21.2%] vs. 59 [14.8%], respectively; p = .042). The restraint group had higher disease severity scores, as reflected in requirements for vasopressor support (174 [67.2%] vs. 69 [17.3%], respectively; p < .001) and need for dialysis (39 [15.1%] vs. 19 [4.8%], respectively; p < .001); higher frequency of in-hospital anti-psychotic treatment (60 [23.2%] vs. 11 [2.8%], respectively; p < .001); a greater tendency for agitation events and more severe agitation scores (episodes of RASS above zero [1.7 ± 4.0 vs. 0.04 ± 0.27, respectively; p < .001] and maximum RASS score [0.19 ± 1.6 vs. 0.01 ± 0.54, respectively; p < .001]). Overall, advanced age, number of ventilation days and need for dialysis were associated with increased 28-day mortality. In the restraint group, advanced age, chronic use of diuretics and the use of dialysis during ICU admission were associated with increased mortality risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Restrained patients tended to have higher morbidity and mortality during ICU and hospital stays, as well as a greater tendency for agitation events and more severe agitation scores, with an increased need for in-hospital anti-psychotic treatment. These findings regarding patient characteristics might be used to formulate treatment plans to reduce the rate of physical restraint in the ICU.
CONCLUSIONS: Because restrained ICU patients tend to have higher morbidity and mortality, treatment plans should be formulated to reduce the rate of physical restraint in the ICU.
BACKGROUND: NCT04771793.

BACKGROUND: Nurses in neurointensive care units (NCUs) commonly use physical restraint (PR) to prevent adverse events like unplanned removal of devices (URDs) or falls. However, PR use should be based on evidenced decisions as it has drawbacks. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research-based PR protocol to support decision-making for nurses, especially for neurocritical patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study developed a restraint decision tree for neurocritical patients (RDT-N) to assist nurses in making PR decisions. We assessed its effectiveness in reducing PR use and adverse events.
METHODS: This study employed a baseline and post-intervention test design at a NCU with 19 beds and 45 nurses in a tertiary hospital in a metropolitan city in South Korea. Two-hundred and thirty-seven adult patients were admitted during the study period. During the intervention, nurses were trained on the RDT-N. PR use and adverse events between the baseline and post-intervention periods were compared.
RESULTS: Post-intervention, total number of restrained patients decreased (20.7%-16.3%; χ2 = 7.68, p = .006), and the average number of PR applied per restrained patient decreased (2.42-1.71; t = 5.74, p < .001). The most frequently used PR type changed from extremity cuff to mitten (χ2 = 397.62, p < .001). No falls occurred during the study periods. On the other hand, URDs at baseline were 18.67 cases per 1000 patient days in the high-risk group and 5.78 cases per 1000 patient days in the moderate-risk group; however, no URD cases were reported post-intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: The RDT-N effectively reduced PR use and adverse events. Its application can enhance patient-centred care based on individual condition and potential risks in NCUs.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses can use the RDT-N to assess the need for PR in caring for neurocritical patients, reducing PR use and adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Physical restraint is used to prevent agitation, to continue treatments and to ensure safety in intensive care patients. Physical restraint has negative effects on physical and psychological health, and physical restraint should not be used unless necessary.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the development of vascular complications in extremities of physically restrained patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the associated factors.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study. The study was conducted between September 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023 in eight ICUs of a hospital located in the inner regions of Türkiye. The development of vascular complications (discolouration, distemperature, variations in capillary refill time, fluctuations in peripheral pulse, skin ulceration and oedema in the area of physical restraint) rate in patients hospitalized in the ICUs who were physically restrained. Independent sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson-χ2 test were used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: During the study, 2409 patients were admitted to ICUs. Physical restraint was applied to 209 of these patients. Of the 209 patients, 112 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The physical restraint site of the patients was evaluated an average of 230.12 times and physical restraint was terminated in 9.8% of the patients (n = 112) because of vascular complications that developed in the physical restraint site. The rate of vascular complications at the site of physical restraint was higher in patients with endotracheal tubes (p < .05), lower GCS scores (p < .05) and higher INR values (p < .05). Patients with skin ulceration at the restraint site received more massages and cream applications (%95CL = 1. 1.692-34.734, OR = 7.667, p = .032). It was determined that more massage was applied to patients with changes in skin temperature at the restraint site (%95Cl = 1.062-11.599, OR = 3.510, p = .032).
CONCLUSIONS: Vascular complications may develop at the restraint site in patients hospitalized in the ICU. This may be more common in ICU patients with endotracheal tube, lower GCS score and higher INR values.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses should closely monitor ICUs patients with endotracheal tube, lower GCS score and higher INR values, and implement care interventions to prevent the development of vascular complications.

International directives all recommend that using restraints on psychiatric patients should be avoided, yet scientific literature shows that such practices are still largely in use. This article aims to lay out strategies that could be put in place in order to gradually discard the use of restraints, particularly through a \"restraint-free\" approach, nursing, logistic-environmental pathways, and locally centered health care provision. All such tools have proven valuable for the purpose of safeguarding the health of psychiatric patients. Hence, the failure to put in place such measures may lead to litigation and lawsuits against physicians and particularly health care facilities. Undoubtedly, the ability to effectively implement such methods largely depends on the financial resources available, which in countries such as Italy are poorer than in others. Still, the risk of being sued and held professionally liable may constitute a factor in raising awareness among operators, facilities, and public health care management, leading to the implementation of policy changes aimed at minimizing the use of restraints.

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding against a patient\'s consent is an intervention that clinicians working in specialist mental health in-patient units may need to implement from time to time. Little research has explored clinician, patient and carer perspectives on good practice.
OBJECTIVE: To use qualitative data from people with lived experience (PWLE), parents/carers and clinicians, to identify components of best practice when this intervention is required.
METHODS: PWLE and parents/carers were recruited via BEAT UK\'s eating disorder charity. Clinicians were recruited via a post on The British Eating Disorders Society\'s research page. Semi-structured interviews were administered, transcribed and thematically analysed.
RESULTS: Thirty-six interviews took place and overlapping themes were identified. Participants spoke in relation to three themes: first, the significance of individualised care; second, the importance of communication; third, the impact of staff relationships. Sub-themes were identified and explored.
CONCLUSIONS: Good care evolved around positive staff relationships and individualised care planning rather than standard processes. The centrality of trust as an important mediator of outcome was identified, and this should be acknowledged in any service that delivers this intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the intention to use physical restraint (PR) and the relationship with sociodemographic and professional variables of the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) nurses.
UNASSIGNED: A multicentre and correlational study was carried out from October 2021 to December 2023 in five paediatric intensive care units from five maternal and child hospitals in Spain. The Paediatric Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire was provided. Moreover, sociodemographic and employment variables were registered.
RESULTS: A total of 230 paediatric nurses participated in the study. A total of 87.7 % were females with an average age of 35.5 ± 9.7 years and working experience of 10.5 ± 8.4 years. The mean scores obtained were 21.1 ± 3.8 for attitude, 13.1 ± 5.0 for subjective norms, 14.4 ± 4.3 for perceived behavioural control and 28.0 ± 6.0 for intention. The nurses apply more physical restraint to anxious patients, with scarce analgesics and sedation, those affected with pharmacological withdrawal symptoms and those with a high risk of accidental removal of vital support devices or fall from bed. The sex (p = 0.007) and type of employment contract (p = 0.01) are the variables that are significantly correlated with the intention to use of PR.
CONCLUSIONS: The paediatric nurses analysed had a moderate attitude, social pressure and perceived behavioural control towards the use of PR.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to know the factors that influence the intention to use physical restraint in order to standardise safe practice for critically ill paediatric and to ensure that patients\' rights are respected by obtaining informed consent and assessing the prescription, continuation and removal of physical restraint.