phonology

音位学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:语音障碍在患有言语和/或语言障碍的儿童中普遍存在,并可能妨碍他们以后的语言结果和学业成绩。这些儿童通常在言语和语言治疗师的案件量中占很大比例。缺乏有关基于证据的干预措施的信息,以提高患有言语和语言障碍的儿童和青少年的语音技能。
    目的:本系统文献综述和荟萃分析的目的是系统地研究不同干预方法对言语和语言障碍儿童的言语产生准确性和语音表征能力的影响。
    方法:完成了预注册的系统评价(国际前瞻性系统评价注册ID:CRD42017076075),遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。七个电子数据库(PubMed,WebofScience,ERIC,心理信息,科克伦图书馆,SCOPUS和语言学与语言行为摘要)搜索了2006年1月至2022年8月发表的与发育性言语和/或语言障碍(平均年龄3-18岁)儿童的口头语言干预有关的研究。纳入的文章报告了采用小组设计的干预研究,其中语音产生的准确性是结果衡量标准。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具对研究进行了评估,并且在有足够数据的情况下,使用标准化均值差异计算个体效应大小。进行荟萃分析,获得平均标准化平均差d。异质性,探讨了可能的调节变量和发表偏倚的影响。
    结果:符合纳入标准的23项研究呈现低-中等偏倚风险。从这些研究中的七项获得了九种效应大小,这些研究采用对照组设计进行了前后测试。在语音精度方面发现了中高平均效应大小。在个体效应大小之间发现了异质性。未检测到显著的调节变量和发表偏倚。
    结论:这项荟萃分析的结果表明对语音产生准确性有积极影响。基于这篇综述,在开发实践证据基础时,需要进一步提高干预研究的报告质量.
    结论:关于该主题的已知内容越来越多的干预措施可用于患有发育性言语和/或语言障碍的儿童和青少年。先前的评论表明,以语音作为结果指标的干预措施的证据水平相对较低。本文对现有知识的补充本综述和荟萃分析总结了大量小组设计研究的干预证据,表明一系列具有语音结果的干预措施的积极结果。它强调需要系统地实施和复制不同的干预程序,以了解将最大限度地提高积极成果的因素,并为最佳实践增加证据基础。这项研究的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?各种方法在提高患有发育性言语和/或语言障碍的儿童和青少年的言语表达准确性技能方面的有效性正在出现初步证据。
    BACKGROUND: Phonological difficulties are prevalent in children with speech and/or language disorders and may hamper their later language outcomes and academic achievements. These children often form a significant proportion of speech and language therapists\' caseloads. There is a shortage of information on evidence-based interventions for improving phonological skills in children and adolescents with speech and language disorder.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis was to systematically examine the effects of different intervention approaches on speech production accuracy and phonological representation skills in children with speech and language disorders.
    METHODS: A preregistered systematic review (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42017076075) adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was completed. Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ERIC, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts) were searched for studies related to oral language interventions with children with developmental speech and/or language disorder (mean age ranging from 3-18 years) published between January 2006 and August 2022. The included articles reported intervention studies with a group design in which speech production accuracy was the outcome measure. Studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and individual effect sizes were calculated using standardised means differences when enough data was available. A meta-analysis was conducted obtaining the average standardised mean difference d. Heterogeneity, influence of possible moderator variables and publication bias were explored.
    RESULTS: The 23 studies that met the inclusion criteria presented low-medium risk of bias. Nine effect sizes were obtained from seven of these studies that presented a pre-post-test with a control group design. Medium-high average effect sizes were found in phonological accuracy. Heterogeneity was found between individual effect sizes. Significant moderator variables and publication bias were not detected.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate positive effects on speech production accuracy. Based on this review, further improvements in the quality of reporting for intervention research are required in developing the evidence base for practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject An increasing number of interventions is available for children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorders. Previous reviews suggest relatively low levels of evidence of interventions having phonology as an outcome measure. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This review and meta-analysis summarise the intervention evidence from a substantial body of group design studies, indicating positive results from a range of interventions with phonological outcomes. It highlights the need to systematically implement and replicate different intervention procedures to understand factors that will maximise positive outcomes and to grow the evidence base for best practice. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this study? Tentative evidence is emerging for the effectiveness of various approaches in enhancing speech production accuracy skills of children and adolescents with developmental speech and/or language disorder.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中风后语法性失语症(PSA-G)的语言产生缺陷往往是由左额下回(LIFG)的病变引起的,其特征是三联症状:零散的句子,功能形态学错误,缺乏动词.尽管经过几十年的研究,PSA-G生产模式的潜在机制很难表征。进步的两个主要障碍可能是认为这是一种纯粹的形态句法障碍,以及在没有提供心理语言学证据的情况下(有时过于热心)应用语言学理论。在本文中,研究了经验证据,以呈现PSA-G中语言产生的综合肖像,并评估了特定语法综合征的假设。根据现有的证据,有人提出,语法语言的产生是由形态句法的组合产生的,感觉运动,和处理能力限制,导致在清晰规划时累积的处理瓶颈。提出的PSA-G协同处理瓶颈模型为未来的研究提供了可测试的框架。本文最后对PSA-G的未来研究提出了建议。
    The language production deficit in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia (PSA-G) tends to result from lesions to the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and is characterized by a triad of symptoms: fragmented sentences, errors in functional morphology, and a dearth of verbs. Despite decades of research, the mechanisms underlying production patterns in PSA-G have been difficult to characterize. Two major impediments to progress may have been the view that it is a purely morphosyntactic disorder and the (sometimes overzealous) application of linguistic theory without interceding psycholinguistic evidence. In this paper, empirical evidence is examined to present an integrated portrait of language production in PSA-G and to evaluate the assumption of a syntax-specific syndrome. In light of extant evidence, it is proposed that agrammatic language production results from a combination of morphosyntactic, phonomotor, and processing capacity limitations that cause a cumulative processing bottleneck at the point of articulatory planning. This proposed Synergistic Processing Bottleneck model of PSA-G presents a testable framework for future research. The paper ends with recommendations for future research on PSA-G.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的队列中,语言能力方面存在相当大的差异。在过去,人们认为,与其他语言领域相比,患有ASD的儿童要么发音和语音技能延迟,要么在这些领域表现出色。关于瑞典ASD学龄前儿童的语音能力与语言能力和非语言能力的关系知之甚少。
    目的:当前的研究旨在描述一组4-6岁ASD儿童的语言变异,专注于深入分析有和没有非语音语言障碍和伴随的非语言延迟的语音错误模式。
    方法:我们检查并分析了语音技能(包括辅音清单,正确辅音和语音错误模式的百分比)与接受语言技能有关的学龄前儿童样本,这些儿童在2.5岁时进行了基于人群的筛查,对ASD呈阳性。73名被诊断为ASD的儿童参加了比赛,并根据他们的接受语言分为亚组(即,非语音语言)和非语言能力。
    结果:亚组划分显示29名儿童(40%)有语言延迟/障碍,没有并发非语言一般认知延迟(ALD),27名儿童(37%)有语言延迟/障碍与非语言一般认知延迟(AGD),17名儿童(23%)的语言和非语言能力在正常范围内(ALN)。结果显示,与ALN儿童相比,ALD儿童和AGD儿童的非典型性语音错误模式明显更高。
    结论:这项研究表明,许多在3岁之前筛查出ASD阳性的儿童-有或没有非语言的一般认知延迟-在语言和语音能力方面都有缺陷。然而,个体差异很大。我们的结果表明,语音错误模式是ASD学龄前儿童语言问题(障碍/延迟)的潜在临床标志。
    结论:关于该主题的已知知识自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童在社交交流方面存在缺陷,有限的利益和重复的行为。它们在接受和表达语言能力上都表现出很大的差异。以前,ASD儿童的发音和语音被视为延迟或优于其他(非语音)语言领域。本文对现有知识的补充患有ASD和语言障碍的儿童也存在语音错误模式的问题。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?大约75%的ASD儿童经历语言延迟/障碍,以及语音问题,与语音错误模式有关。理解/承认这些语音模式及其含义可以帮助诊断和干预ASD儿童的语音障碍。针对语音的直接干预可能会导致语言增益,但是需要更多的研究。
    BACKGROUND: Within cohorts of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) there is considerable variation in terms of language ability. In the past, it was believed that children with ASD either had delayed articulation and phonology skills or excelled in those areas compared to other language domains. Very little is known about speech sound ability in relation to language ability and non-verbal ability in Swedish preschool children with ASD.
    OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to describe language variation in a group of 4-6-year-old children with ASD, focusing on in-depth analyses of speech sound error patterns with and without non-phonological language disorder and concomitant non-verbal delays.
    METHODS: We examined and analysed the speech sound skills (including consonant inventory, percentage of correct consonants and speech sound error patterns) in relation to receptive language skills in a sample of preschool children who had screened positive for ASD in a population-based screening at 2.5 years of age. Seventy-three children diagnosed with ASD participated and were divided into subgroups based on their receptive language (i.e., non-phonological language) and non-verbal abilities.
    RESULTS: The subgroup division revealed that 29 children (40%) had language delay/disorder without concurrent non-verbal general cognitive delay (ALD), 27 children (37%) had language delay/disorder with non-verbal general cognitive delay (AGD), and 17 children (23%) had language and non-verbal abilities within the normal range (ALN). Results revealed that children with ALD and children with AGD both had atypical speech sound error patterns significantly more often than the children with ALN.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that many children who had screened positive for ASD before age 3 years - with or without non-verbal general cognitive delays - had deficits in language as well as in speech sound ability. However, individual differences were considerable. Our results point to speech sound error patterns as a potential clinical marker for language problems (disorder/delay) in preschool children with ASD.
    CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have deficits in social communication, restricted interests and repetitive behaviour. They show very considerable variation in both receptive and expressive language abilities. Previously, articulation and phonology were viewed as either delayed in children with ASD or superior compared with other (non-phonological) language domains. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Children with ASD and language disorders also have problems with speech sound error patterns. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? About 75% of children with ASD experience language delays/disorders, as well as speech sound problems, related to speech sound error patterns. Understanding/acknowledging these phonological patterns and their implications can help in the diagnosis and intervention of speech sound disorders in children with ASD. Direct intervention targeting phonology might lead to language gains, but more research is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    语音幅度包络携带语音清晰度所需的重要声学信息,并包含感觉线索(幅度上升时间,ARTs)在感觉节律感知和神经语音编码中起关键作用。通过时间抽样理论,儿童对ART的敏感性的个体差异与儿童跨语言的语音处理技能的发展有关。ARTs的处理障碍也是阅读障碍儿童的特征。然而,不同的研究采用了不同的ART任务,在不同的语言中,在不同的年龄。这里,我们比较了三种常用的ART任务的灵敏度(基于合成音节,正弦音调,和语音噪声)在对有或没有阅读障碍的英语儿童的纵向研究中。儿童辨别频率上升的能力,持续时间,强度也进行了测试。所有3项任务中的ART歧视均显着相互关联,但是在不同的年龄,不同的ART任务与语音和素养有不同的关系。特别是,经常使用的正弦音调和语音噪声ART任务在年龄较大的儿童中显示出更高的灵敏度,而合成音节任务(/ba/rise)在年幼儿童中显示出更高的敏感性。对频率上升的敏感性也与不同年龄的语音和读写能力有关。数据是根据发展性阅读障碍的时间抽样理论进行解释的。
    The speech amplitude envelope carries important acoustic information required for speech intelligibility and contains sensory cues (amplitude rise times, ARTs) that play a key role in both sensory rhythm perception and neural speech encoding. Individual differences in children\'s sensitivity to ARTs have been related to the development of children\'s phonological processing skills across languages by the Temporal Sampling theory. Impaired processing of ARTs also characterises children with dyslexia. However, different ART tasks have been employed in different studies, in different languages, and at different ages. Here, we compare the sensitivity of three frequently used ART tasks (based on synthetic syllables, sine tones, and speech-shaped noise) in a longitudinal study of English-speaking children with and without dyslexia. Children\'s ability to discriminate rising frequency, duration, and intensity was also tested. ART discrimination in all 3 tasks was significantly inter-related, but different relations to phonology and literacy were found for different ART tasks at different ages. In particular, the often-used sine tone and speech-shaped noise ART tasks showed greater sensitivity in older children, while the synthetic syllable task (/ba/ rise) showed greater sensitivity in younger children. Sensitivity to rising frequency was also related to phonology and literacy across ages. The data are interpreted with respect to the Temporal Sampling theory of developmental dyslexia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者中,单词发现困难很普遍,但知之甚少。
    目的是调查我们的假设,即RRMS患者的语音处理能力低于预期,并且与单词发现困难有关。
    分析了RRMS(n=50)患者报告的单词发现困难(PR-WFD)和韦克斯勒个人成就测试的客观表现的数据,第四版(WIAT-4)语音能力(PP;词内音素分析),单词阅读(WR;病前识字和言语能力的代理),和句子重复(SR;单词级信息的听觉处理)。
    性能(平均值(95%置信区间))可靠地低于PP的规范预期(-0.41(-0.69,-0.13)),但不低于WR(0.02(-0.21,0.25))或SR(0.08(-0.15,0.31)。受试者内PP的表现比WR(t(49)=4.00,p<0.001,d=0.47)和SR(t(49)=3.76,p<0.001,d=0.54)均差。较差的PR-WFD与较低的PP(F2,47=6.24,p=0.004,η2=0.21)特别相关;PR-WFD下的PP性能通常(n=13;-1.16(-1.49,-0.83))比有时(n=17;-0.14(-0.68,0.41))或很少(n=20;-0.16(-0.58,0.27)。PR-WFD与WR或SR无关(ps>0.25)。
    语音处理低于预期,并且与RRMS中的单词查找困难有关。研究结果与颞上/上半区域早期疾病相关的皮质改变一致。结果为我们开发的多发性硬化症相关单词查找困难模型提供了信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Word-finding difficulty is prevalent but poorly understood in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
    UNASSIGNED: The objective was to investigate our hypothesis that phonological processing ability is below expectations and related to word-finding difficulty in patients with RRMS.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were analyzed from patients with RRMS (n = 50) on patient-reported word-finding difficulty (PR-WFD) and objective performance on Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Fourth Edition (WIAT-4) Phonemic Proficiency (PP; analysis of phonemes within words), Word Reading (WR; proxy of premorbid literacy and verbal ability), and Sentence Repetition (SR; auditory processing of word-level information).
    UNASSIGNED: Performance (mean (95% confidence interval)) was reliably lower than normative expectations for PP (-0.41 (-0.69, -0.13)) but not for WR (0.02 (-0.21, 0.25)) or SR (0.08 (-0.15, 0.31). Within-subjects performance was worse on PP than on both WR (t(49) = 4.00, p < 0.001, d = 0.47) and SR (t(49) =3.76, p < 0.001, d = 0.54). Worse PR-WFD was specifically related to lower PP (F2,47 = 6.24, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.21); worse PP performance at PR-WFD Often (n = 13; -1.16 (-1.49, -0.83)) than Sometimes (n = 17; -0.14 (-0.68, 0.41)) or Rarely (n = 20; -0.16 (-0.58, 0.27). PR-WFD was unrelated to WR or SR (ps > 0.25).
    UNASSIGNED: Phonological processing was below expectations and specifically linked to word-finding difficulty in RRMS. Findings are consistent with early disease-related cortical changes within the posterior superior temporal/supramarginal region. Results inform our developing model of multiple sclerosis-related word-finding difficulty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乌尔都语是巴基斯坦的通用语言和民族语言,并且是全球第十大口语语言,拥有超过2.3亿的使用者。在过去的几十年中,对乌尔都语语音系统进行了检查。然而,系统一直在发展。本文旨在回顾研究乌尔都语语音系统各个方面的可用研究,并揭示这些研究之间的差异。
    找到了21项研究乌尔都语语音系统的研究。这些研究在辅音方面进行了综述,宝石,辅音簇,元音,双音,音节结构,语音控制约束,和压力。
    研究结果表明,38个辅音,23个元音,在当代乌尔都语中使用了15个双音。大多数辅音以中间的双词形式存在。有六个音节结构。辅音簇仅被限制在尾音位置,短元音不能存在于单词final位置。像其他音节定时语言一样,压力在乌尔都语中并不突出。
    基于此评论,提出了当代乌尔都语音素和音节结构清单。这将为进一步的收购研究和临床实践提供参考。
    UNASSIGNED: Urdu is the lingua franca and national language of Pakistan, and is the 10th most-spoken language worldwide with over 230 million speakers. The Urdu phonological system has been examined over the past decades. However, the system has been evolving. This paper aimed to review the available studies investigating various aspects of the Urdu phonological system and to reveal the variations noted among these studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-one studies examining the phonological system of Urdu were located. The studies were reviewed in terms of consonants, geminates, consonant clusters, vowels, diphthongs, syllable structure, phonotactic constraints, and stress.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings indicated that 38 consonants, 23 vowels, and 15 diphthongs are used in contemporary Urdu. Most consonants exist as geminates word medially. There are six syllable structures. The consonant clusters are constrained to the coda position only, and short vowels cannot exist in the word-final position. Like other syllable-timed languages, stress is not prominent in Urdu.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on this review, a contemporary Urdu phonemic and syllable structure inventory has been proposed. This will serve as a reference for use in further acquisition research and clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对失语症中命名错误模式的探索提供了对命名性能基础的认知过程的见解。我们调查了语义和语音能力如何相关,以及它们如何影响失语症中的命名表现。数据来自296名失语症患者,来自莫斯失语症心理语言学项目数据库,使用结构方程模型进行了分析。该模型结合了语义和语音的潜在变量以及用于命名准确性和错误模式的清单变量。在控制总体失语症严重程度后,语义和语音之间存在中度正相关。语义和语音能力都会影响命名准确性。语义能力与语义负相关,混合,无关的错误,没有回应。有趣的是,语音对语义错误有积极影响。此外,语音能力与每个语音和新词错误都呈负相关。这些结果强调了语义和语音技能在失语症中命名表现中的作用,并揭示了这些认知过程之间的关系。
    The exploration of naming error patterns in aphasia provides insights into the cognitive processes underlying naming performance. We investigated how semantic and phonological abilities correlate and how they influence naming performance in aphasia. Data from 296 individuals with aphasia, drawn from the Moss Aphasia Psycholinguistics Project Database, were analyzed using a structural equation model. The model incorporated latent variables for semantics and phonology and manifest variables for naming accuracy and error patterns. There was a moderate positive correlation between semantics and phonology after controlling for overall aphasia severity. Both semantic and phonological abilities influenced naming accuracy. Semantic abilities negatively related to semantic, mixed, unrelated errors, and no responses. Interestingly, phonology positively affected semantic errors. Additionally, phonological abilities negatively related to each of phonological and neologism errors. These results highlight the role of semantic and phonological skills on naming performance in aphasia and reveal a relationship between these cognitive processes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于小学生来说,学习在不一致的拼字系统中拼写是一个真正的挑战。以前的实证研究强调了这一学习过程中涉及的三种主要技能:语音技能,形态学技能,和儿童对笔迹规律性的敏感性。然而,文献表明,在学习过程的不同阶段,每种技能的贡献的确切性质存在矛盾。所以,我们研究的目的是测试这套技能在词汇拼写习得中的贡献,作为儿童年级的函数。为此,我们在从1年级到5年级的1101名法语儿童的横截面样本中评估了这些维度。使用数据驱动的探索性网络建模进行分析。结果表明(a)在学习开始时语音技能的主要作用,随着学校教育的发展,其倾向于减少;(b)形态学技能从1年级到5年级的贡献越来越大,而4年级的贡献下降,这是5年级继续增加的唯一贡献;(c)对绘画规则性的敏感性的贡献在4年级之前趋于稳定,直到5年级下降。我们的发现表明了所有三种技能在学习拼写的动态过程中的重要性。根据学习拼写的多种模式模型的集成,讨论了这些结果的含义。
    Learning to spell in an inconsistent orthographic system is a true challenge for primary school children. Previous empirical studies have highlighted three main skills involved in this learning process: phonological skills, morphological skills, and children\'s sensitivity to graphotactic regularities. However, the literature shows contradictions in the exact nature of the contribution of each skill at different stages of the learning process. So, the aim of our study was to test the contribution of this set of skills in the acquisition of lexical spelling as a function of children\'s grade level. For this purpose, we assessed these dimensions in a cross-sectional sample of 1101 French-speaking children from Grade 1 to Grade 5. The analyses were conducted using data-driven exploratory network modeling. The results showed (a) a predominant role of phonological skills at the beginning of learning, which tends to decrease with advancing schooling; (b) an increasing contribution of morphological skills from Grade 1 to Grade 5 with a drop in Grade 4, which is the only contribution that continues to increase in Grade 5; and (c) a contribution of the sensitivity to graphotactic regularities that tends to be stable until Grade 4 before decreasing in Grade 5. Our findings show the importance of all three skills in a dynamic process in learning to spell. The implications of these results are discussed in light of the integration of multiple patterns model of learning to spell.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一个词通常表达许多不同的形态功能。单词的哪一部分有助于整体含义的哪一部分并不总是清楚的,这就提出了如何学习这些功能的问题。虽然语言学研究默契地假设线索和结果的共同出现足以学习这些功能(Baer-Henney,Kügler,&vandeVijver,2015;Baer-Henney&vandeVijver,2012),错误驱动的学习表明,偶然性而不是连续性是至关重要的(尼克松,2020;拉姆斯卡,Yarlett,染料,Denny,&Thorpe,2010).在错误驱动的学习中,线索获得关联强度,如果他们预测一定的结果,如果没有结果,他们就会失去力量。这种关联强度的降低称为非学习。到目前为止,目前尚不清楚这种不学习是否对线索-结果关联的影响超出了减少的影响。为了测试遗忘的后果,我们在一个人工语言学习实验中教授参与者的形态语义学模式。在一个街区,两个形态结果的线索-复数和小写-共同出现在相同的单词形式中。在另一个街区,这两个结果中只有一个的单一线索以不同的单词形式呈现。我们想知道,如果参与者不了解这个提示与结果的关联,而这个结果不是由提示单独预测的,并且如果这允许缺席提示与缺席结果相关联。我们的结果表明,如果不学习是可能的,参与者了解到,缺席提示比没有可能取消学习的情况更好地预测缺席结果。如果未学习的提示更明显,则此效果更强。这表明,即使没有提供缺席结果的替代线索,也会发生学习,这突出表明,正如领域一般错误驱动学习所预测的那样,学习者同时考虑了积极和消极的证据。
    A word often expresses many different morphological functions. Which part of a word contributes to which part of the overall meaning is not always clear, which raises the question as to how such functions are learned. While linguistic studies tacitly assume the co-occurrence of cues and outcomes to suffice in learning these functions (Baer-Henney, Kügler, & van de Vijver, 2015; Baer-Henney & van de Vijver, 2012), error-driven learning suggests that contingency rather than contiguity is crucial (Nixon, 2020; Ramscar, Yarlett, Dye, Denny, & Thorpe, 2010). In error-driven learning, cues gain association strength if they predict a certain outcome, and they lose strength if the outcome is absent. This reduction of association strength is called unlearning. So far, it is unclear if such unlearning has consequences for cue-outcome associations beyond the ones that get reduced. To test for such consequences of unlearning, we taught participants morphophonological patterns in an artificial language learning experiment. In one block, the cues to two morphological outcomes-plural and diminutive-co-occurred within the same word forms. In another block, a single cue to only one of these two outcomes was presented in a different set of word forms. We wanted to find out, if participants unlearn this cue\'s association with the outcome that is not predicted by the cue alone, and if this allows the absent cue to be associated with the absent outcome. Our results show that if unlearning was possible, participants learned that the absent cue predicts the absent outcome better than if no unlearning was possible. This effect was stronger if the unlearned cue was more salient. This shows that unlearning takes place even if no alternative cues to an absent outcome are provided, which highlights that learners take both positive and negative evidence into account-as predicted by domain general error-driven learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然已经使用神经解码方法广泛探索了语音分类的最早阶段的神经基础,在诸如单词形式如何表示以及这种单词级表示以何种方式影响大脑下游处理等基本问题上,仍然缺乏共识。隔离和定位词形的神经表示形式是具有挑战性的,因为口语会激活各种表示形式(例如,分段,语义,除了基于形式的表示之外)。我们通过使用基于感兴趣区域(ROI)的新型集成神经解码和有效连接设计来解决这些挑战,在词汇决策任务期间收集的源重建脑磁图/脑电图(MEG/EEG)数据。要识别单词形式表示,我们对来自不同语音邻域的单词和非单词进行了分类器训练,然后测试了分类器区分与训练项目在语音上重叠的未训练目标单词的能力。在紧随目标呈现之后的时间段内,使用单词邻居进行的训练比使用非单词邻居进行的训练支持的解码要好得多。解码区域主要包括颞叶后部的右半球区域,涉及语音和词汇表示。此外,与目标单词开头对齐的邻居(对于单词识别至关重要)支持解码,但是与单词codas的等效语音重叠没有,建议词汇调解。有效的连通性分析显示了ROI之间丰富的交互模式,支持基于词汇邻居训练的解码,特别是由右颞中后回驱动。总的来说,这些结果证明了与音素或语义表示分离的颞叶中单词形式的功能表示。
    While the neural bases of the earliest stages of speech categorization have been widely explored using neural decoding methods, there is still a lack of consensus on questions as basic as how wordforms are represented and in what way this word-level representation influences downstream processing in the brain. Isolating and localizing the neural representations of wordform is challenging because spoken words activate a variety of representations (e.g., segmental, semantic, articulatory) in addition to form-based representations. We addressed these challenges through a novel integrated neural decoding and effective connectivity design using region of interest (ROI)-based, source-reconstructed magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography (MEG/EEG) data collected during a lexical decision task. To identify wordform representations, we trained classifiers on words and nonwords from different phonological neighborhoods and then tested the classifiers\' ability to discriminate between untrained target words that overlapped phonologically with the trained items. Training with word neighbors supported significantly better decoding than training with nonword neighbors in the period immediately following target presentation. Decoding regions included mostly right hemisphere regions in the posterior temporal lobe implicated in phonetic and lexical representation. Additionally, neighbors that aligned with target word beginnings (critical for word recognition) supported decoding, but equivalent phonological overlap with word codas did not, suggesting lexical mediation. Effective connectivity analyses showed a rich pattern of interaction between ROIs that support decoding based on training with lexical neighbors, especially driven by right posterior middle temporal gyrus. Collectively, these results evidence functional representation of wordforms in temporal lobes isolated from phonemic or semantic representations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号