phase 1 trial

第一阶段试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:贝伐单抗和FOLFIRINOX联合用于RAS突变型转移性结直肠癌(RASm-mCRC)患者。Regorafenib,口服多酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,具有抗血管生成特性,细胞抑制作用和真正的细胞毒性作用,与贝伐单抗不同。这项研究的目的是确定RASm-mCRC患者瑞戈非尼-FOLFIRINOX组合的最大耐受剂量(MTD)和推荐的2期剂量(RP2D)。
    方法:FOLFIRINOX-R试验是1/2期研究,其中剂量递增部分(3+3设计,三个剂量水平,DL)在其提前终止之前完成。FOLFIRINOX(14天周期)包括奥沙利铂(标准剂量),亚叶酸,氟尿嘧啶和伊立替康(150或180毫克/平方米)。从每个周期的第4天至第10天给予瑞戈非尼(每天120或160mg)。在前三个周期中研究了剂量限制性毒性(DLT)。资格标准包括ECOG表现状态≤1且先前未处理过的RASm-mCRC。
    结果:纳入13例患者(中位年龄:65岁;min-max:40-76)。由于观察不良,无法在一名患者(DL3)中评估DLT。中位治疗时间和中位随访时间分别为6.2(min-max:2.3-10)和13.4(min-max:3.8-18.0)个月,分别。12/13(92%)患者的剂量进行了修改。在DL2时发生了1例3级低钾血症。在DL3没有达到MTD。在所有DL中平均分布的7/13患者中记录了3级腹泻(13例事件)。
    结论:根据我们的独立数据监测委员会的建议,由于与治疗相关的3级腹泻的患病率很高,因此无法确定该瑞戈非尼-FFX组合的RP2D。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03828799。
    OBJECTIVE: The combination of bevacizumab and FOLFIRINOX is used in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (RASm-mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has antiangiogenic properties, cytostatic effects and also true cytotoxic effects, unlike bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the regorafenib-FOLFIRINOX combination in patients with RASm-mCRC.
    METHODS: The FOLFIRINOX-R trial was a phase 1/2 study where the dose-escalation part (3 + 3 design with three dose levels, DLs) was completed before its early termination. FOLFIRINOX (14-day cycle) included oxaliplatin (standard dose), folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (150 or 180 mg/m²). Regorafenib (120 or 160 mg daily) was given from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was studied in the first three cycles. Eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status ≤ 1 and not previously treated RASm-mCRC.
    RESULTS: Thirteen patients (median age: 65 years; min-max: 40-76) were enrolled. DLT could not be evaluated in one patient (DL3) due to poor observance. The median treatment duration and median follow-up were 6.2 (min-max: 2.3-10) and 13.4 (min-max: 3.8-18.0) months, respectively. Dose was modified in 12/13 (92%) patients. One grade 3 hypokalemia occurred at DL2. MTD was not reached at DL3. Grade 3 diarrhea was recorded in 7/13 patients (13 events) equally distributed in all DLs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D for this regorafenib-FFX combination could not be determined due to a high prevalence of grade 3 diarrhea related to treatment as advised by our Independent Data Monitoring Committee.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03828799.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    AWZ1066S已被开发为被忽视的热带病淋巴丝虫病和盘尾丝虫病的潜在治疗方法。AWZ1066S靶向致病性线虫寄生虫中存在的Wolbachia细菌内共生体。这项第一阶段的首次人体研究旨在评估AWZ1066S在健康人类参与者中的安全性和药代动力学。在随机双盲中,安慰剂对照,单次递增剂量研究,健康成人接受单剂口服AWZ1066S(或安慰剂),随访10天.AWZ1066S的计划单剂量范围为100至1600mg,每个剂量给一组8名参与者(6名AWZ1066S和2名安慰剂)。共有30人参加,18(60%)女性,中位年龄30.0岁(最小20岁,最大61岁)。给予100、200、300和400mgAWZ1066S的队列进展不显著。单次700毫克剂量后,所有4名参与者均出现急性胃炎症状和肝酶短暂增加。这些不良事件的严重程度从轻度到重度,1名参与者需要住院。药代动力学分析表明AWZ1066S快速吸收,具有可预测的药代动力学。总之,由于安全性方面的考虑,本研究无法达到AWZ1066S对淋巴丝虫病和盘尾丝虫病临床有效所需的人体暴露量.
    AWZ1066S has been developed as a potential treatment for the neglected tropical diseases lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. AWZ1066S targets the Wolbachia bacterial endosymbiont present in the causative nematode parasites. This phase 1, first-in-human study aimed to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of AWZ1066S in healthy human participants. In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study, healthy adults received a single oral dose of AWZ1066S (or placebo) and were followed up for 10 days. The planned single doses of AWZ1066S ranged from 100 to 1600 mg, and each dose was administered to a cohort of 8 participants (6 AWZ1066S and 2 placebo). In total 30 people participated, 18 (60%) female, median age 30.0 years (minimum 20, maximum 61). The cohorts administered 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg of AWZ1066S progressed unremarkably. After single 700-mg doses all 4 participants developed symptoms of acute gastritis and transient increases in liver enzymes. The severity of these adverse events ranged from mild to severe, with 1 participant needing hospital admission. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that AWZ1066S is rapidly absorbed with predictable pharmacokinetics. In conclusion, safety concerns prevented this study from reaching the human exposures needed for AWZ1066S to be clinically effective against lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:甲胎蛋白升高型胃癌(AFPGC)因其侵袭性和不良预后而受到越来越多的关注。这里,进行了1期剂量递增研究,以评估Zimbererelimab(GLS-010,抗PD-1)联合乐伐替尼和化疗(XELOX)作为AFPGC一线治疗的安全性和有效性.
    方法:组织学证实HER2阴性,筛选血清AFP水平升高(≥20ng/ml)的晚期GC患者.使用3+3剂量递增设计,患者接受不同剂量的乐伐替尼(12,16,20mg)和GLS-010和XELOX.主要终点是安全性和确定推荐的II期剂量(RP2D)。次要终点包括总体反应率(ORR),无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病控制率。
    结果:纳入9例患者,未观察到剂量限制性毒性。最常见的治疗相关AE是疲劳(55.6%),手足综合征(55.6%)和皮疹(55.6%),未报告≥4级AE。所有患者均表现出疾病控制,ORR达到33.3%。中位PFS和OS达到7.67个月(95%CI4.07-11.27)和13.17个月(95%CI2.78-23.56),分别。发现血清AFP水平与治疗反应相关。进一步的16srRNA测序分析表明,肠道微生物群发生了变化,其中Lachnospispileaceae细菌GAM79和RoseburiahominisA2-183的丰度升高。
    结论:GLS-010加lenvatinib和XELOX显示出可控制的安全性,对AFPGC具有良好的疗效。Lenvatinib的RP2D确定为16mg,进一步的扩展队列现在正在进行中。转化研究表明,血清AFP可以指示治疗反应,某些微生物群物种表明对免疫疗法的有利反应在组合治疗后升高。
    BACKGROUND: Alpha-fetoprotein elevated gastric cancer (AFPGC) got growing interests for its aggressive nature and unfavorable prognosis. Here, a phase 1 dose escalation study was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of zimberelimab (GLS-010, anti-PD-1) plus lenvatinib and chemotherapy (XELOX) as the first-line treatment for AFPGC.
    METHODS: Histologically confirmed HER2-negative, advanced GC patients with elevated serum AFP level (≥ 20 ng/ml) were screened. Using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, patients were administered varying doses of lenvatinib (12, 16, 20 mg) with GLS-010 and XELOX. The primary endpoints were safety and determination of recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate.
    RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were fatigue (55.6%), hand-foot syndrome (55.6%) and rash (55.6%), and no grade ≥ 4 AEs were reported. All patients exhibited disease control with ORR reaching 33.3%. The median PFS and OS reached 7.67 months (95% CI 4.07-11.27) and 13.17 months (95% CI 2.78-23.56), respectively. Serum AFP level was found correlated with therapeutic responses. Further 16s rRNA sequencing analysis demonstrated altered gut microbiota with elevated abundance of Lachnospiraceae bacterium-GAM79 and Roseburia hominis A2-183.
    CONCLUSIONS: GLS-010 plus lenvatinib and XELOX demonstrated a manageable safety profile with promising efficacy for AFPGC. With RP2D of lenvatinib determined as 16 mg, further expansion cohort is now ongoing. Translational investigation suggested that serum AFP can be indictive for therapeutic responses and certain microbiota species indicating favorable responses to immunotherapy was elevated after the combinational treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    安全有效的疼痛管理是关键的医疗保健和社会需求。扑热息痛(ApAP)过量可能导致急性肝损伤;慢性非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)使用的肾毒性和胃肠道损伤;阿片类药物成瘾是尚未解决的挑战。我们开发了SRP-001,一种非阿片类和非肝毒性的小分子,与ApAP不同,不产生肝毒性代谢物N-乙酰基-对苯醌-亚胺(NAPQI),并在高剂量下保持肝紧密连接的完整性。暴露于SRP-001的CD-1小鼠没有死亡,与在72小时内增加等摩尔剂量的ApAP观察到的70%死亡率不同。SRP-001和ApAP具有可比的抗伤害作用,包括完整的弗氏佐剂诱导的炎性vonFrey模型。两者都通过中脑导水管周围灰色(PAG)伤害感受区域的N-花生四酰基酚胺(AM404)形成诱导镇痛,SRP-001产生的AM404数量高于ApAP。PAG的单细胞转录组学发现SRP-001和ApAP也共享调节疼痛相关基因表达和细胞信号传导途径/网络,包括内源性大麻素信号,与机械伤害感受有关的基因,和脂肪酸酰胺水解酶(FAAH)。两者都调节编码FAAH的关键基因的表达,2-花生四酰基甘油(2-AG),大麻素受体1(CNR1),CNR2,瞬时受体电位香草素4型(TRPV4),和电压门控Ca2+通道。第一阶段试验(NCT05484414)(2022年2月8日)证明了SRP-001的安全性,耐受性,和有利的药代动力学,包括从4.9到9.8h的半衰期。鉴于其非肝毒性和临床验证的镇痛机制,SRP-001为ApAP提供了一个有前途的替代方案,NSAIDs,和阿片类药物用于更安全的疼痛治疗。
    Safe and effective pain management is a critical healthcare and societal need. The potential for acute liver injury from paracetamol (ApAP) overdose; nephrotoxicity and gastrointestinal damage from chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use; and opioids\' addiction are unresolved challenges. We developed SRP-001, a non-opioid and non-hepatotoxic small molecule that, unlike ApAP, does not produce the hepatotoxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone-imine (NAPQI) and preserves hepatic tight junction integrity at high doses. CD-1 mice exposed to SRP-001 showed no mortality, unlike a 70% mortality observed with increasing equimolar doses of ApAP within 72 h. SRP-001 and ApAP have comparable antinociceptive effects, including the complete Freund\'s adjuvant-induced inflammatory von Frey model. Both induce analgesia via N-arachidonoylphenolamine (AM404) formation in the midbrain periaqueductal grey (PAG) nociception region, with SRP-001 generating higher amounts of AM404 than ApAP. Single-cell transcriptomics of PAG uncovered that SRP-001 and ApAP also share modulation of pain-related gene expression and cell signaling pathways/networks, including endocannabinoid signaling, genes pertaining to mechanical nociception, and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Both regulate the expression of key genes encoding FAAH, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1), CNR2, transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4 (TRPV4), and voltage-gated Ca2+ channel. Phase 1 trial (NCT05484414) (02/08/2022) demonstrates SRP-001\'s safety, tolerability, and favorable pharmacokinetics, including a half-life from 4.9 to 9.8 h. Given its non-hepatotoxicity and clinically validated analgesic mechanisms, SRP-001 offers a promising alternative to ApAP, NSAIDs, and opioids for safer pain treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    ADG106,一种针对CD137(4-1BB)的配体阻断激动性抗体,在临床前研究中表现出有希望的结果,在各种动物模型中证明肿瘤抑制,并在安全性和有效性之间表现出平衡的特征。这项1期研究招募了62名晚期恶性肿瘤患者,揭示了良好的耐受性高达5.0mg/kg剂量水平。在10.0mg/kg时,只有一名患者(6.3%)出现剂量限制性毒性,导致4级中性粒细胞减少。最常见的治疗相关不良事件包括白细胞减少(22.6%),中性粒细胞减少症(22.6%),丙氨酸转氨酶升高(22.6%),皮疹(21.0%),瘙痒(17.7%),天冬氨酸转氨酶升高(17.7%)。晚期实体瘤的总体疾病控制率为47.1%,非霍奇金淋巴瘤的总体疾病控制率为54.5%。循环生物标志物表明ADG106的靶向参与和循环T的免疫调节,B,以及自然杀伤细胞和细胞因子干扰素γ和白细胞介素-6,这可能会影响临床疗效的概率。ADG106在晚期癌症患者中具有可控的安全性和初步的抗肿瘤功效(该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03802955注册)。
    ADG106, a ligand-blocking agonistic antibody targeting CD137 (4-1BB), exhibits promising results in preclinical studies, demonstrating tumor suppression in various animal models and showing a balanced profile between safety and efficacy. This phase 1 study enrolls 62 patients with advanced malignancies, revealing favorable tolerability up to the 5.0 mg/kg dose level. Dose-limiting toxicity occurs in only one patient (6.3%) at 10.0 mg/kg, resulting in grade 4 neutropenia. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events include leukopenia (22.6%), neutropenia (22.6%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (22.6%), rash (21.0%), itching (17.7%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (17.7%). The overall disease control rates are 47.1% for advanced solid tumors and 54.5% for non-Hodgkin\'s lymphoma. Circulating biomarkers suggest target engagement by ADG106 and immune modulation of circulating T, B, and natural killer cells and cytokines interferon γ and interleukin-6, which may affect the probability of clinical efficacy. ADG106 has a manageable safety profile and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy in patients with advanced cancers (this study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03802955).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    背景:高级别神经胶质瘤(HGG)尽管接受了多模式治疗,但预后不佳。甲苯咪唑是一种抗蠕虫苯并咪唑,已在许多体外癌症模型中证明了疗效,并且能够穿过血脑屏障。我们进行了一项1期试验(NCT01837862),以评估甲苯咪唑联合贝伐单抗和伊立替康在HGG儿童和年轻人中的安全性。
    目的:确定甲苯达唑联合贝伐单抗和伊立替康在HGG患儿中的最大耐受剂量;描述该组的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
    方法:将1至21岁的HGG患者纳入3+3设计,以递增剂量的甲苯咪唑联合贝伐单抗(10mg/kg/剂)和伊立替康(150mg/m2/剂)。受试者在完成放射后或在进展时预先符合条件。甲苯咪唑每天连续口服两次,贝伐单抗和伊立替康在28天周期的第1天和第15天静脉注射.
    结果:在2015年至2020年之间,招募了10名受试者,剂量为50mg/kg/天(n=3),100mg/kg/天(n=4),和200mg/kg/天(n=3)。分配给100mg/kg/天的一名受试者不可评估。七名受试者诊断为弥漫性中线神经胶质瘤,一个受试者有间变性星形细胞瘤,一名受试者患有脊髓HGG。所有受试者都接受了辐射。没有剂量限制性毒性。最常见的G3/4不良事件是中性粒细胞减少症(n=3)和淋巴细胞减少症(n=4)。总有效率为33%,两名受试者实现部分反应,一名受试者实现持续10个月的完全反应。从研究开始治疗的平均PFS和OS分别为4.7和11.4个月,分别。
    结论:甲苯达唑以200mg/kg/天的剂量与贝伐单抗和伊立替康一起给药时是安全且耐受性良好的。需要进一步的研究来确定这种治疗的疗效。
    BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGG) have a dismal prognosis despite multimodal therapy. Mebendazole is an anti-helminthic benzimidazole that has demonstrated efficacy in numerous in vitro cancer models, and is able to cross the blood-brain barrier. We conducted a phase 1 trial (NCT01837862) to evaluate the safety of mebendazole in combination with bevacizumab and irinotecan in children and young adults with HGG.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximally tolerated dose of mebendazole when given in combination with bevacizumab and irinotecan in children with HGG; to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for this group.
    METHODS: Patients between 1 and 21 years of age with HGG were enrolled in a 3 + 3 design to escalating doses of mebendazole in combination with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg/dose) and irinotecan (150 mg/m2 /dose). Subjects were eligible upfront after completion of radiation or at the time of progression. Mebendazole was taken orally twice per day continuously, and bevacizumab and irinotecan were given intravenously on Days 1 and 15 of 28-day cycles.
    RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, 10 subjects were enrolled at mebendazole doses of 50 mg/kg/day (n = 3), 100 mg/kg/day (n = 4), and 200 mg/kg/day (n = 3). One subject assigned to 100 mg/kg/day was not evaluable. Seven subjects had a diagnosis of diffuse midline glioma, one subject had anaplastic astrocytoma, and one subject had a spinal HGG. All subjects received radiation. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most frequent G3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (n = 3) and lymphopenia (n = 4). The overall response rate was 33%, with two subjects achieving a partial response and one subject achieving a complete response sustained for 10 months. The mean PFS and OS from the start of study treatment were 4.7 and 11.4 months, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mebendazole was safe and well tolerated when administered with bevacizumab and irinotecan at doses up to 200 mg/kg/day. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    倍他司汀于1970年代在欧洲注册,并在80多个国家/地区被批准作为梅尼埃病的一线治疗方法。它已被用于超过1.5亿患者。然而,根据Cochrane对倍他司汀的系统评价和最近的荟萃分析,没有足够的证据表明倍他司汀在目前批准的剂量高达48mg/d时是否有任何作用。与单胺氧化酶B(MAO-B)抑制剂的组合,司来吉兰,可将倍他司汀的生物利用度提高到与L-DOPA与卡比多巴或苄丝肼联合治疗帕金森病相似的水平。我们研究了司来吉兰对倍他司汀药代动力学的影响以及该组合在人体中的安全性。
    在研究者发起的前瞻性中,非随机化,单序列,两周期滴定,开放标签单中心第一阶段研究,15名健康志愿者接受三次单次口服倍他司汀(24、48和96毫克,至少2天的洗脱期),不使用和使用司来吉兰(5毫克/天,7天的负荷期)。在8个时间点的240分钟内测量倍他司汀血清浓度(曲线下面积,AUC0-240分钟)。该试验已在EudraCT(2019-002610-39)和ClinicalTrials.gov注册。
    在所有三种单一倍他司汀剂量中,司来吉兰可使倍他司汀的生物利用度增加约80至100倍。例如,单独使用倍他司汀48mg的曲线下面积平均值(±SD)为0.64(+/-0.47)h*ng/mL,而倍他司汀加司来吉兰的曲线下面积平均值(±SD)为53.28(+/-37.49)h*ng/mL.大约30分钟的半衰期基本上不受影响,除了24毫克倍他司汀的剂量。总的来说,记录了14次轻度不良事件。
    这项1期试验表明,MAO-B抑制剂司来吉兰使倍他司汀的生物利用度提高了约80至100倍。未检测到安全问题。增加的生物利用度是否对梅尼埃病的预防性治疗有影响,急性前庭综合征,或BPPV后残留的头晕必须在安慰剂对照试验中进行评估。
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05938517?intr=倍他司汀%20和%20selegiline&rank=1,标识符:NCT05938517。
    UNASSIGNED: Betahistine was registered in Europe in the 1970s and approved in more than 80 countries as a first-line treatment for Menière\'s disease. It has been administered to more than 150 million patients. However, according to a Cochrane systematic review of betahistine and recent meta-analyses, there is insufficient evidence to say whether betahistine has any effect in the currently approved dosages of up to 48 mg/d. A combination with the monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor, selegiline, may increase the bioavailability of betahistine to levels similar to the well-established combination of L-DOPA with carbidopa or benserazide in the treatment of Parkinson\'s disease. We investigated the effect of selegiline on betahistine pharmacokinetics and the safety of the combination in humans.
    UNASSIGNED: In an investigator-initiated prospective, non-randomized, single-sequence, two-period titration, open label single-center phase 1 study, 15 healthy volunteers received three single oral dosages of betahistine (24, 48, and 96 mg in this sequence with at least 2 days\' washout period) without and with selegiline (5 mg/d with a loading period of 7 days). Betahistine serum concentrations were measured over a period of 240 min at eight time points (area under the curve, AUC0-240 min). This trial is registered with EudraCT (2019-002610-39) and ClinicalTrials.gov.
    UNASSIGNED: In all three single betahistine dosages, selegiline increased the betahistine bioavailability about 80- to 100-fold. For instance, the mean (±SD) of the area under curve for betahistine 48 mg alone was 0.64 (+/-0.47) h*ng/mL and for betahistine plus selegiline 53.28 (+/-37.49) h*ng/mL. The half-life time of around 30 min was largely unaffected, except for the 24 mg betahistine dosage. In total, 14 mild adverse events were documented.
    UNASSIGNED: This phase 1 trial shows that the MAO-B inhibitor selegiline increases betahistine bioavailability by a factor of about 80 to 100. No safety concerns were detected. Whether the increased bioavailability has an impact on the preventive treatment of Menière\'s disease, acute vestibular syndrome, or post-BPPV residual dizziness has to be evaluated in placebo-controlled trials.
    UNASSIGNED: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05938517?intr=betahistine%20and%20selegiline&rank=1, identifier: NCT05938517.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    安全有效地管理疼痛是关键的医疗保健和社会需求。与阿片类药物相关的滥用和成瘾的可能性,肾毒性,慢性非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的胃肠道损伤,以及扑热息痛(APAP)过量引起的急性肝损伤,是未解决的挑战。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种非阿片类和非肝毒性的小分子,SRP-001。与ApAP相比,SRP-001没有肝毒性,因为它不产生N-乙酰基-对苯醌-亚胺(NAPQI),并在高剂量下保持肝紧密连接的完整性。SRP-001在疼痛模型中具有可比的镇痛作用,包括完全弗氏佐剂(CFA)炎性vonFrey。两者都通过中脑导水管周围灰色(PAG)伤害感受区的N-花生四酰基酚胺(AM404)形成引起镇痛,SRP-001产生的AM404数量高于ApAP。PAG的单细胞转录组学发现SRP-001和ApAP也共享调节疼痛相关基因表达和细胞信号传导途径,包括内源性大麻素,机械伤害感受,和脂肪酸酰胺水解酶(FAAH)途径。两者都调节编码FAAH的关键基因的表达,2-AG,CNR1、CNR2、TRPV4和电压门控Ca2+通道。第一阶段试验结果证明了SRP-001的安全性,耐受性,和有利的药代动力学(NCT05484414)。鉴于其非肝毒性和临床验证的镇痛机制,SRP-001为ApAP提供了一个有前途的替代方案,NSAIDs,和阿片类药物用于更安全的疼痛治疗。
    The safe and effective management of pain is a critical healthcare and societal need. The potential for misuse and addiction associated with opioids, nephrotoxicity, and gastrointestinal damage from chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, as well as acute liver injury from paracetamol (ApAP) overdose, are unresolved challenges. To address them, we developed a non-opioid and non-hepatotoxic small molecule, SRP-001. Compared to ApAP, SRP-001 is not hepatotoxic as it does not produce N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone-imine (NAPQI) and maintains hepatic tight junction integrity at high doses. SRP-001 has comparable analgesia in pain models, including the complete Freund\'s adjuvant (CFA) inflammatory von Frey. Both induce analgesia via N-arachidonoylphenolamine (AM404) formation in the midbrain periaqueductal grey (PAG) nociception area, with SRP-001 generating higher amounts of AM404 than ApAP. Single-cell transcriptomics of PAG uncovered that SRP-001 and ApAP also share modulation of pain-related gene expression and cell signaling pathways, including the endocannabinoid, mechanical nociception, and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) pathways. Both regulate the expression of key genes encoding FAAH, 2-AG, CNR1, CNR2, TRPV4, and voltage-gated Ca2+ channel. Interim Phase 1 trial results demonstrate SRP-001\'s safety, tolerability, and favorable pharmacokinetics (NCT05484414). Given its non-hepatotoxicity and clinically validated analgesic mechanisms, SRP-001 offers a promising alternative to ApAP, NSAIDs, and opioids for safer pain treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂治疗是抑制性激素依赖性疾病女性促性腺激素活性的有效策略。在这里,我们提供安全,药代动力学(PK),和健康绝经前妇女口服非肽GnRH拮抗剂SHR7280的药效学(PD)谱。方法:在这个随机的,双盲,安慰剂对照,剂量递增,第一阶段试验,健康绝经前女性随机接受SHR7280或安慰剂口服治疗.计划四种剂量的SHR7280(200、300、400和500mgBID)。安全,PK,和PD参数进行了评估。结果:SHR7280具有可耐受的毒性,大多数不良事件的严重程度为轻度。SHR7280显示快速起效(每个剂量的中位Tmax范围为1.0至1.2h),血浆暴露呈剂量依赖性。PD结果显示,SHR7280300mgBID及以上抑制了子宫内膜异位症的雌二醇(E2)治疗窗口内的雌激素浓度(20-50pg/ml),抑制促黄体生成素(LH)和促卵泡激素(FSH)浓度峰值的出现,并将孕酮(P)的浓度维持在无排卵状态(2nmol/L)。结论:SHR7280显示良好的安全性,PK,在健康的绝经前妇女中,剂量范围为200-500mgBID的PD谱。这项研究支持SHR7280作为女性性激素依赖性疾病的GnRH拮抗剂的持续临床开发。临床试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04554043,标识符NCT04554043。
    Background: Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists is a powerful strategy to suppress gonadotropin activity in women with sex hormone-dependent disorders. Herein, we provide the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles of SHR7280, an oral non-peptide GnRH antagonist in healthy premenopausal women. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ascending, phase 1 trial, healthy premenopausal women were randomized to receive SHR7280 or placebo orally. Four doses of SHR7280 (200, 300, 400, and 500 mg BID) were planned. Safety, PK, and PD parameters were evaluated. Results: SHR7280 presented tolerable toxicity and most adverse events were mild in severity. SHR7280 showed rapid onset of action (median Tmax ranged from 1.0 to 1.2 h for each dose), and plasma exposure was dose-dependent. PD results showed that SHR7280 300 mg BID and above suppressed estrogen concentration within the estradiol (E2) treatment window for endometriosis (20-50 pg/ml), inhibited the emergence of the peak of luteinizing hormone (LH) and the concentration of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and maintained the concentration of progesterone (P) in an anovulatory state (2 nmol/L). Conclusion: SHR7280 showed favorable safety, PK, and PD profiles in the dose range of 200-500 mg BID in healthy premenopausal women. This study supports the continued clinical development of SHR7280 as a GnRH antagonist for sex hormone-dependent disorders in women. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04554043, Identifier NCT04554043.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的标准治疗免疫疗法与膀胱内芽孢杆菌卡介苗(BCG)与不良事件(AE)相关,疾病复发/进展,和供应短缺。临床前数据表明,膀胱内滴注Ty21a/Vivotif,口服伤寒疫苗,可能是BCG的有效和更安全的替代品。我们评估了膀胱内Ty21a在NMIBC中的安全性。出于道德原因,纳入了不需要BCG免疫治疗的低危或中危NMIBC患者.为了确定最大耐受剂量,在1a期对3例患者每周一次膀胱内滴注逐渐增加剂量的Ty21a/Vivotif,共4周.在阶段1b,10例患者每周接受一次选定的剂量(1×108CFU),持续6周,至于标准卡介苗治疗。在这个剂量下,所有患者都完成了治疗。大多数患者出现轻微的全身性AE,而一半报告轻度局部膀胱AE。40%的患者仅在一次或两次滴注后发生AE。滴注后1周仅在72个尿液样本中的三个中回收了Ty21a细菌。膀胱内注射Ty21a可能具有良好的耐受性,没有累积的副作用,无发烧>39°C,与卡介苗相比,细菌持续存在的风险较低。因此,Ty21a治疗值得进行临床试验,以探索其在高风险NMIBC中的安全性和抗肿瘤功效。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册为NCT03421236。
    UNASSIGNED:我们研究了一种新的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的膀胱内免疫疗法作为标准BCG治疗的替代方法的安全性。我们的数据显示Ty21a疫苗可能具有良好的耐受性。需要进一步的研究来确定这种治疗的安全性和抗肿瘤功效。
    Standard-of-care immunotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with intravesical Bacillus Calmettte-Guérin (BCG) is associated with adverse events (AEs), disease recurrence/progression, and supply shortages. Preclinical data have shown that intravesical instillation of Ty21a/Vivotif, the oral vaccine against typhoid fever, may be an effective and safer alternative to BCG. We assessed the safety of intravesical Ty21a in NMIBC. For ethical reasons, patients with low- or intermediate-risk NMIBC not requiring BCG immunotherapy were enrolled. To determine the maximum tolerated dose, escalating doses of Ty21a/Vivotif were intravesically instilled in three patients once a week for 4 wk in phase 1a. In phase 1b, ten patients received the selected dose (1 × 108 CFU) once a week for 6 wk, as for standard BCG therapy. At this dose, all patients completed their treatment. Most patients experienced minor systemic AEs, while half reported mild local bladder AEs. AEs only occurred after one or two instillations for 40% of the patients. Ty21a bacteria were only recovered in three out of 72 urinary samples at 1 wk after instillation. Intravesical Ty21a might be well tolerated with no cumulative side effects, no fever >39 °C, and lower risk of bacterial persistence than with BCG. Ty21a treatment thus warrants clinical trials to explore its safety and antitumor efficacy in high-risk NMIBC. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03421236.
    UNASSIGNED: We examined the safety of a new intra-bladder immunotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer as an alternative to the standard BCG treatment. Our data show that the Ty21a vaccine might be well tolerated. Further studies are needed to determine the safety and antitumor efficacy of this treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号