pharyngoesophageal

咽食管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们通常在全喉切除术重建中使用ALT或腓骨皮瓣,取决于外科医生的偏好。ALT皮瓣和腓骨皮瓣的结果没有直接比较。
    从2014年到2022年,我们回顾了全喉切除术并用ALT皮瓣和腓骨皮瓣重建的患者。收集并比较患者特征和手术结果。
    腓骨组新咽漏的风险明显更高(40%vs.13.2%,p=.020)和晚期咽部皮肤瘘形成(30%vs.5.3%,p=.009)比ALT组。在多因素Logistic回归分析中,发现腓骨皮瓣是新咽漏(p=0.025,比值比[OR]=5.5)和晚期咽部皮肤瘘形成(p=.02,OR=7.7)的唯一独立危险因素。
    在全喉切除术的重建中,ALT皮瓣优于腓骨皮瓣。
    UNASSIGNED: We usually use an ALT or peroneal flap in total laryngectomy reconstruction, depending on the surgeons\' preference. No direct comparison of the outcomes of the ALT flap and peroneal flap exists.
    UNASSIGNED: From 2014 to 2022, we reviewed patients who had total laryngectomy and were reconstructed with an ALT flap and peroneal flap. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected and compared.
    UNASSIGNED: The peroneal group had a significantly higher risk of neopharynx leakage (40% vs. 13.2%, p = .020) and late pharyngocutaneous fistula formation (30% vs. 5.3%, p = .009) than the ALT group. Peroneal flap was found to be the only independent risk factor for neopharynx leakage (p = .025, odds ratio [OR] = 5.5) and late pharyngocutaneous fistula formation (p = .02, OR = 7.7) in multivariate logistic regression.
    UNASSIGNED: In the reconstruction of total laryngectomy, the ALT flap is preferable over the peroneal flap.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:腐蚀性咽食管狭窄是危及生命的损伤,具有重要的管理困难,缺乏明确的治疗指南。这项研究的目的是评估我们机构严重的腐蚀性咽食管狭窄的手术程序和结果。
    UNASSIGNED:回顾性分析了2006年6月至2018年12月在国家心胸中心因严重苛性咽食管损伤而接受手术的29例患者。年龄分布,性别,管理程序,手术后的并发症,并对结果进行了分析。
    未经评估:有17名男性。平均年龄为11.7岁(范围为2-56岁)。所有病人都不小心吞下了苛性钠,除了摄入不明物质的年龄最大的病人.治疗程序包括15例(51.7%)患者的咽成形术,结肠瓣增强咽食管成形术(CFAP)在10(34.5%),和气管造口术的咽喉成形术4例(13.8%)。有1例胸骨后粘连带移植物阻塞,1例术后返流伴夜间返流。无颈部吻合口漏发生。大多数患者需要口服喂养的康复训练不到一个月。随访期为1至12年。在此期间有四名患者死亡;两名是术后立即死亡,两名发生晚。一名患者失去了随访。
    未经批准:腐蚀性咽食管狭窄的手术效果令人满意。结肠瓣扩张咽食管成形术减少了手术前气管造口术的需要,我们的病人开始吃得早,没有吸入。
    UNASSIGNED: caustic pharyngoesophageal strictures are life-threatening injuries with important management difficulties, lacking clear therapeutic guidelines. The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical procedures and outcomes of severe caustic pharyngoesophageal strictures in our institution.
    UNASSIGNED: a total of 29 patients who underwent surgery for severe caustic pharyngoesophageal injury at the National Cardiothoracic Center from June 2006 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The age distribution, sex, management procedures, complications after surgery, and the outcome were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: there were 17 males. The mean age was 11.7 years (range 2- 56 years). All patients accidentally swallowed caustic soda, except the oldest patient who ingested an unidentified substance. The treatment procedures included colopharyngoplasty in 15 (51.7%) patients, colon-flap augmentation pharyngoesophagoplasty (CFAP) in 10 (34.5%), and colopharyngoplasty with tracheostomy in 4 (13.8%). There was one case of graft obstruction from a retrosternal adhesive band and one case of postoperative reflux with nocturnal regurgitation. No cervical anastomotic leak occurred. Rehabilitative training for oral feeding was required for less than a month in most patients. Follow-up period ranged from one to twelve years. Four patients died within this period; two were immediate post-operative deaths and two occurred late. One patient was lost to follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: outcome of surgery for caustic pharyngoesophageal stricture is satisfactory. Colon-flap augmentation pharyngoesophagoplasty reduces the need for tracheostomy before surgery, and our patients start eating early without aspiration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    作者强调了由细胞病理学家对咽食管憩室进行快速现场评估的重要贡献,该肿块最初被临床解释为甲状腺起源。他们讨论了避免解释性诊断错误和甲状腺Bethesda报告不当的陷阱。
    The authors highlight the important contribution of rapid on-site evaluation by the cytopathologist of a pharyngoesophageal diverticulum in a mass initially interpreted clinically as thyroidal in origin. They discuss pitfalls in avoiding interpretive diagnostic error and inappropriate thyroid Bethesda reporting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the success rate and safety profile of the available endoscopic surgical options for radiation-induced dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients following organ preservation treatment, including upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dilation, cricopharyngeus (CP) myotomy (CPM), and CP intramuscular botulinum toxin (Botox) injection.
    METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was done to identify articles published between January 1980 and December 2017. Pediatric series, foreign language articles, series with Zenker\'s diverticulum or following primary surgical treatment including laryngectomy, open UES/CP surgery, or samples with fewer than 5 patients were excluded.
    RESULTS: An initial search identified 539 articles. All titles and abstracts were reviewed. One hundred and sixteen potentially relevant articles were inspected in more detail, and 14 retrospective studies met eligibility criteria. Dilation group included 10 studies on anterograde and/or retrograde dilation, with an overall 208 patients. Success rate ranged from 42% to 100%. The endoscopic CPM group included 3 studies with a total of 36 patients, and the success rate ranged from 27% to 90%. In the Botox group, 1 one study with 20 patients met our inclusion criteria, with an overall 65% success rate (13/20). Major complications were only reported in the dilation group, which included esophageal perforation and death.
    CONCLUSIONS: The lack of consistency across trials indicates insufficient evidence for guiding clinical practice. This systematic review suggests the need for greater standardization of outcomes and instruments. Future prospective evaluation should use validated patient-rated and clinician-rated assessment tools to optimally measure postoperative swallowing outcomes of head and neck cancer dysphagic patients following organ preservation therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号