OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the experience of prescribing phenosanic acid in the practice of a neurologist/epileptologist when prescribing the second, third anticonvulsant drug (AED) as part of combination therapy for patients with manifestations of fatigue due to epilepsy.
METHODS: 501 patients with focal epilepsy accompanied by asthenic disorders were included in the observational program. The observation program protocol included 5 visits, including visit 1, at which screening and inclusion in the OP took place. The observation period was 10 months. At baseline and at the end of the 10-month follow-up, the patients\' condition was assessed according to the following indicators: frequency and transformation of attacks with focal onset, severity of fatigue (self-assessment scale MFI-20); quality of life (questionnaire QoLiE-10-P); frequency of attacks with focal onset. The safety of phenosanic acid (Dibufelon) was also assessed.
RESULTS: In 10 months after the inclusion of Dibufelon as the 2nd, 3rd AED in the treatment regimen, a statistically significant (p<0.01) decrease in the frequency of seizures was observed: in general - in 88% of patients; by 50% or more - in 76% of patients; transition from the group with a large number of seizures to the group with a smaller number of seizures - 74% of patients. Also when taking phenosanic acid, a positive dynamics of seizure type was noted: a reliable decrease in the proportion of patients with seizures with secondary generalization from 70% to 56%; a decrease in the number of focal seizures with impaired consciousness from 65% to 53%. In addition, there was a 38% decrease in the severity of fatigue on the MFI-20 scale (the greatest decrease on the «Mental fatigue» scale), improvement in the quality of life - a 2.7-fold increase in the mean values of the QOLIE-10 questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of phenosanic acid to antiepileptic therapy as a second or third AED allows for better control of seizures, leading to a decrease the frequency and severity of attacks and the severity of fatigue both, and an increase of the quality of life of patients with epilepsy.
UNASSIGNED: Оценка эффективности фенозановой кислоты в практике врача-невролога при назначении 2-м, 3-м противоэпилептическим препаратом (ПЭП) в составе комбинированной терапии пациентов с проявлениями астении.
UNASSIGNED: В наблюдательную программу (НП) был включен 501 пациент с фокальной эпилепсией с наличием астении. Протокол наблюдательной программы предусматривал 5 визитов, включая визит скрининга, на котором происходило включение в НП. Длительность наблюдения составила 10 мес. Исходно и по окончании 10-месячного наблюдения оценивались частота и трансформация приступов с фокальным дебютом; выраженность астении (шкала MFI-20); качество жизни (опросник QoLiE-10-P). Также оценивалась безопасность применения фенозановой кислоты.
UNASSIGNED: В результате анализа динамики частоты приступов через 10 мес после включения в схему лечения Дибуфелона было отмечено статистически значимое снижение частоты приступов: в целом — у 88% пациентов (p<0,01); на 50% и более — у 76%; переход из группы с большим количеством приступов в группу с меньшим количеством — у 74%. На фоне приема Дибуфелона отмечалась положительная трансформация типа приступов: достоверное снижение доли пациентов с приступами с вторичной генерализацией с 70 до 56%; снижение количества фокальных приступов с нарушением осознанности с 65 до 53%. Зарегистрированы снижение выраженности астении на 38% (наибольшее снижение по шкале «психическая астения»), повышение качества жизни — увеличение средних значений показателей опросника QOLIE-10 в 2,7 раза.
UNASSIGNED: Добавление Дибуфелона к противоэпилептической терапии в качестве 2-го, 3-го ПЭП позволяет добиться более полного контроля над приступами, приводя к снижению частоты и тяжести приступов, уменьшению выраженности астении, повышению качества жизни пациентов.

BACKGROUND: The rate of pharmacoresistance among in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia is around 30%. Clozapineis the drug of choice for these patients; however, an adequate response to treatment doesn\'t always occur. One of the possible augmentation approaches, specifically for non-adherent patients, is the administration of long-acting parenteral antipsychotics. Our goal was to evaluate previous experiences of administering a combination of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and long-acting injectable antipsychotics to pharmacoresistant patients at the Department of Psychiatry the Czech Republic and to assess the safety and effectiveness of such administration.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patient case studies was conducted for those who were hospitalized in the Ward for the therapy of Psychotic disorders between 2016 and 2020 and had a medication history of combining clozapine and depot antipsychotics.
RESULTS: Over half of the patients had no illness relapses during the observed period. The clinical manifestation of adverse effects from combination therapy appears low in our patient sample, primarily involving mild and pharmacologically manageable side effects (tachycardia). Only one of the cases recorded neutropenia, which led to discontinuation of clozapine; the patient was maintained on long-acting injectable antipsychotics medication.
CONCLUSIONS: From our findings, it can be inferred that augmenting clozapine with depot antipsychotics is a potential therapeutic intervention that pharmacoresistant patients could benefit from. However, it is essential to emphasize that this therapeutic approach should only be administered after carefully considering the patient\'s existing treatment. It should be strictly individualized based on the treating physician\'s or clinical pharmacist\'s sufficient professional experience.

Although numerous studies have acknowledged disparities in epilepsy-related disease processes between young and aged animals, little is known about how epilepsy changes from young adulthood to middle age. This study investigates the impact of aging on 6-Hz corneal kindling in young-adult mice and middle-aged mice. We found that the kindling acquisition of the 6-Hz corneal kindling model was delayed in middle-aged mice when compared to young-adult mice. While the seizure stage and incidence of generalized seizures (GS) were similar between the two age groups, the duration of GS in the kindled middle-aged mice was shorter than that in the kindled young-adult mice. Besides, all kindled mice, regardless of age, were resistant to phenytoin sodium (PHT), valproate sodium (VPA), and lamotrigine (LGT), whereas middle-aged mice exhibited higher levetiracetam (LEV) resistance compared to young-adult mice. Both age groups of kindled mice displayed hyperactivity and impaired memory, which are common behavioral characteristics associated with epilepsy. Furthermore, middle-aged mice displayed more pronounced astrogliosis in the hippocampus. Additionally, the expression of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) was lower in middle-aged mice than in young-adult mice prior to kindling. These data demonstrate that both the acquisition and expression of 6-Hz corneal kindling are attenuated in middle-aged mice, while hippocampal astrogliosis and pharmacological resistance are more pronounced in this age group. These results underscore the importance of considering age-related factors when utilizing the 6-Hz corneal kindling model in mice of varying age groups.

Translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) PET imaging is used to monitor glial activation. Recent studies have proposed TSPO PET as a marker of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE). This study aims to assess the contributions of TSPO imaging using [18F]DPA-714 PET and [18F]FDG PET for localizing the EZ during presurgical assessment of DRFE, when phase 1 presurgical assessment does not provide enough information.
We compared [18F]FDG and [18F]DPA-714 PET images of 23 patients who had undergone a phase 1 presurgical assessment, using qualitative visual analysis and quantitative analysis, at both the voxel and the regional levels. PET abnormalities (increase in binding for [18F]DPA-714 vs decrease in binding for [18F]FDG) were compared with clinical hypotheses concerning the localization of the EZ based on phase 1 presurgical assessment. The additional value of [18F]DPA-714 PET imaging to [18F]FDG for refining the localization of the EZ was assessed. To strengthen the visual analysis, [18F]DPA-714 PET imaging was also reviewed by 2 experienced clinicians blind to the EZ location.
The study included 23 patients. Visual analysis of [18F]DPA-714 PET was significantly more accurate than [18F]FDG PET to both, show anomalies (95.7% vs 56.5%, p = 0.022), and provide additional information to refine the EZ localization (65.2% vs 17.4%, p = 0.019). All 10 patients with normal [18F]FDG PET had anomalies when using [18F]DPA-714 PET. The additional value of [18F]DPA-714 PET seemed to be greater in patients with normal brain MRI or with neocortical EZ (especially if insula is involved). Regional analysis of [18F]DPA-714 and [18F]FDG PET provided similar results. However, using voxel-wise analysis, [18F]DPA-714 was more effective than [18F]FDG for unveiling clusters whose localization was more often consistent with the EZ hypothesis (87.0% vs 39.1%, p = 0.019). Nonrelevant bindings were seen in 14 of 23 patients in visual analysis and 9 patients of 23 patients in voxel-wise analysis.
[18F]DPA-714 PET imaging provides valuable information for presurgical assessments of patients with DRFE. TSPO PET could become an additional tool to help to the localization of the EZ, especially in patients with negative [18F]FDG PET.
Eudract 2017-003381-27. Inclusion of the first patient: September 24, 2018.
This study provides Class IV evidence on the utility of [18F]DPA-714 PET compared with [18F]FDG PET in identifying the epileptic zone in patients undergoing phase 1 presurgical evaluation for intractable epilepsy.

Despite progress in the development of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), one third of people with epilepsy have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The working definition of DRE, proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) in 2010, helped identify individuals who might benefit from presurgical evaluation early on. As the incidence of DRE remains high, the TASK1 workgroup on DRE of the ILAE/American Epilepsy Society (AES) Joint Translational Task Force discussed the heterogeneity and complexity of its presentation and mechanisms, the confounders in drawing mechanistic insights when testing treatment responses, and barriers in modeling DRE across the lifespan and translating across species. We propose that it is necessary to revisit the current definition of DRE, in order to transform the preclinical and clinical research of mechanisms and biomarkers, to identify novel, effective, precise, pharmacologic treatments, allowing for earlier recognition of drug resistance and individualized therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if growing evidence for epilepsy surgery as an early treatment option is reflected in the decrease of latencies between epilepsy onset and referral for presurgical evaluation METHODS: Retrospective analysis of latencies in 1646 patients (children and adults) from the time of epilepsy diagnosis to first presurgical workup in the period from 1999 to 2019 based on electronic patient charts at a tertiary epilepsy center. Time spans 1999-2009 and 2010-2019, prior to and following the ILAE definition of pharmacoresistance, and the role of etiological factors were assessed.
RESULTS: Over the whole period, the mean latency between diagnosis and a presurgical workup was 15.3 y. There was a significant reduction in the latencies between the periods 1999-2009 (16.9 y) and 2010-2019 (13.4 y), (p < 0.0001). In a linear regression analysis, the latency decreased by 2.6 months/year from 17.4 in 1999 to 13.1 y in 2019 (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed significant decreases in latency to presurgical evaluation in patients with hippocampal sclerosis from 24.4 to 19.5 y, in malformations of cortical development from 16.4 to 13.2 y, and in nonlesional patients from 18.1 to 12.8 y, in contrast to patients with MR evidence for brain tumors with similar latencies across time (10.5 vs. 9.5 y, n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of the time span to a first presurgical evaluation was highly significant over time, yet moderate in its degree. Overall, the aim of early diagnostic evaluation for epilepsy surgery options after established pharmacoresistance was only achieved for a minority of patients.

暂无摘要。

Drug resistance continues to be a major clinical problem in the therapeutic management of canine epilepsies with substantial implications for quality of life and survival times. Experimental and clinical data from human medicine provided evidence for relevant contributions of intrinsic severity of the disease as well as alterations in pharmacokinetics and -dynamics to failure to respond to antiseizure medications. In addition, several modulatory factors have been identified that can be associated with the level of therapeutic responses. Among others, the list of potential modulatory factors comprises genetic and epigenetic factors, inflammatory mediators, and metabolites. Regarding data from dogs, there are obvious gaps in knowledge when it comes to our understanding of the clinical patterns and the mechanisms of drug-resistant canine epilepsy. So far, seizure density and the occurrence of cluster seizures have been linked with a poor response to antiseizure medications. Moreover, evidence exists that the genetic background and alterations in epigenetic mechanisms might influence the efficacy of antiseizure medications in dogs with epilepsy. Further molecular, cellular, and network alterations that may affect intrinsic severity, pharmacokinetics, and -dynamics have been reported. However, the association with drug responsiveness has not yet been studied in detail. In summary, there is an urgent need to strengthen clinical and experimental research efforts exploring the mechanisms of resistance as well as their association with different etiologies, epilepsy types, and clinical courses.

Drug-resistant epilepsy occurs in about 30% of epilepsy patients. It has been suggested that etiology or seizure type would increase the risk of pharmacoresistance. This study aims to compare the characteristics of patients with drug-sensitive epilepsy with patients with drug-resistant epilepsy to identify risk factors.
A multicentric cohort study was conducted between 2019 and 2022. We included patients >18 years-old with epilepsy but excluded psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and less than 2 years of follow-up.
We included 128 patients, of whom 46 had drug-resistance epilepsy, and 82 responding to medication. Both groups showed similar characteristics. Febrile seizures (OR: 7.25), focal epilepsy (OR: 2.4), focal seizures with loss of consciousness (OR: 2.36), structural etiology (OR: 2.2) and abnormal MRI (OR: 4.6) were significant risk factors for drug-resistance epilepsy.
Following other studies, we observed that factors such as epilepsy type, seizure type, structural etiology, abnormal MRI, and febrile seizure increased the risk for drug-resistance epilepsy, in our population.

Despite new antiseizure medications, the development of cholinergic-induced refractory status epilepticus (RSE) continues to be a therapeutic challenge as pharmacoresistance to benzodiazepines and other antiseizure medications quickly develops. Studies conducted by Epilepsia. 2005;46:142 demonstrated that the initiation and maintenance of cholinergic-induced RSE are associated with trafficking and inactivation of gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors (GABAA R) thought to contribute to the development of benzodiazepine pharmacoresistance. In addition, Dr. Wasterlain\'s laboratory reported that increased N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPAR) contribute to enhanced glutamatergic excitation (Neurobiol Dis. 2013;54:225; Epilepsia. 2013;54:78). Thus, Dr. Wasterlain postulated that targeting both maladaptive responses of reduced inhibition and increased excitation that is associated with cholinergic-induced RSE should improve therapeutic outcome. We currently review studies in several animal models of cholinergic-induced RSE that demonstrate that benzodiazepine monotherapy has reduced efficacy when treatment is delayed and that polytherapy with drugs that include a benzodiazepine (eg midazolam and diazepam) to counter loss of inhibition, concurrent with an NMDA antagonist (eg ketamine) to reduce excitation provide improved efficacy. Improved efficacy with polytherapy against cholinergic-induced seizure is demonstrated by reduction in (1) seizure severity, (2) epileptogenesis, and (3) neurodegeneration compared with monotherapy. Animal models reviewed include pilocarpine-induced seizure in rats, organophosphorus nerve agent (OPNA)-induced seizure in rats, and OPNA-induced seizure in two mouse models: (1) carboxylesterase knockout (Es1-/- ) mice which, similarly to humans, lack plasma carboxylesterase and (2) human acetylcholinesterase knock-in carboxylesterase knockout (KIKO) mice. We also review studies showing that supplementing midazolam and ketamine with a third antiseizure medication (valproate or phenobarbital) that targets a nonbenzodiazepine site rapidly terminates RSE and provides further protection against cholinergic-induced SE. Finally, we review studies on the benefits of simultaneous compared with sequential drug treatments and the clinical implications that lead us to predict improved efficacy of early combination drug therapies. The data generated from seminal rodent studies of efficacious treatment of cholinergic-induced RSE conducted under Dr. Wasterlain\'s guidance suggest that future clinical trials should treat the inadequate inhibition and temper the excess excitation that characterize RSE and that early combination therapies may provide improved outcome over benzodiazepine monotherapy.