Due to the similarity and diversity among kinases, small molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs) often display multi-target effects or selectivity, which have a strong correlation with the efficacy and safety of these inhibitors. However, due to the limited number of well-known popular databases and their restricted data mining capabilities, along with the significant scarcity of databases focusing on the pharmacological similarity and diversity of SMIKIs, researchers find it challenging to quickly access relevant information. The KLIFS database is representative of specialized application databases in the field, focusing on kinase structure and co-crystallised kinase-ligand interactions, whereas the KLSD database in this paper emphasizes the analysis of SMKIs among all reported kinase targets. To solve the current problem of the lack of professional application databases in kinase research and to provide centralized, standardized, reliable and efficient data resources for kinase researchers, this paper proposes a research program based on the ChEMBL database. It focuses on kinase ligands activities comparisons. This scheme extracts kinase data and standardizes and normalizes them, then performs kinase target difference analysis to achieve kinase activity threshold judgement. It then constructs a specialized and personalized kinase database platform, adopts the front-end and back-end separation technology of SpringBoot architecture, constructs an extensible WEB application, handles the storage, retrieval and analysis of the data, ultimately realizing data visualization and interaction. This study aims to develop a kinase database platform to collect, organize, and provide standardized data related to kinases. By offering essential resources and tools, it supports kinase research and drug development, thereby advancing scientific research and innovation in kinase-related fields. It is freely accessible at: http://ai.njucm.edu.cn:8080.

Epigenetic therapies are being investigated for the treatment of cancer, cognitive disorders, metabolic alterations and autoinmune diseases. Among the different epigenetic target families, protein lysine methyltransferases (PKMTs), are especially interesting because it is believed that their inhibition may be highly specific at the functional level. Despite its relevance, there are currently known inhibitors against only 10 out of the 50 SET-domain containing members of the PKMT family. Accordingly, the identification of chemical probes for the validation of the therapeutic impact of epigenetic modulation is key. Moreover, little is known about the mechanisms that dictate their substrate specificity and ligand selectivity. Consequently, it is desirable to explore novel methods to characterize the pharmacological similarity of PKMTs, going beyond classical phylogenetic relationships. Such characterization would enable the prediction of ligand off-target effects caused by lack of ligand selectivity and the repurposing of known compounds against alternative targets. This is particularly relevant in the case of orphan targets with unreported inhibitors. Here, we first perform a systematic study of binding modes of cofactor and substrate bound ligands with all available SET domain-containing PKMTs. Protein ligand interaction fingerprints were applied to identify conserved hot spots and contact-specific residues across subfamilies at each binding site; a relevant analysis for guiding the design of novel, selective compounds. Then, a recently described methodology (GPCR-CoINPocket) that incorporates ligand contact information into classical alignment-based comparisons was applied to the entire family of 50 SET-containing proteins to devise pharmacological similarities between them. The main advantage of this approach is that it is not restricted to proteins for which crystallographic data with bound ligands is available. The resulting family organization from the separate analysis of both sites (cofactor and substrate) was retrospectively and prospectively validated. Of note, three hits (inhibition > 50% at 10 µM) were identified for the orphan NSD1.

Whilst most new drugs are designed to act on a single target or a small number of targets, many do show broad pharmacological activity. In some cases this can be beneficial and necessary for efficacy and in others it can be detrimental, leading to increased safety liability. To probe off-target pharmacology most drug discovery programs include screening against a broad panel of targets that represent known troublesome pharmacology. Hits against any one of these targets can then be subjected to a risk assessment for potential safety problems in preclinical or clinical studies. In addition, the secondary pharmacology profile can also be thought of as an alternative description of the compound and as such can be used as a method for assessing \'similarity\'. Consequently, inspection of the in vivo findings of pharmacological neighbors can give important insights into potential safety liabilities that are neither identified by pure chemical similarity searches nor by risk assessment on individual targets. Here we show that the pharmacological profile contains additional information as compared to chemical similarity, and also demonstrate how this can be used in the hazard assessment done during drug discovery and development.