After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), approximately 20% of patients experience persistent postoperative pain (PPP). Although preoperative and postoperative pain intensity is a relevant factor, more detailed description of pain is needed to determine specific intervention strategies for clinical conditions. This study aimed to clarify the associations between preoperative and postoperative descriptions of pain and PPP. Fifty-two TKA patients were evaluated for pain intensity and description of pain preoperatively and 2 weeks postoperatively, and the intensities were compared. In addition, the relationship between pain intensity and PPP at 3 and 6 months after surgery was analyzed using a Bayesian approach. Descriptions of arthritis (\"Throbbing\" and \"aching\") improved from preoperative to 2 weeks postoperative. Several preoperative (\"Shooting\", \"Aching\", \"Caused by touch\", \"Numbness\") and postoperative (\"Cramping pain\") descriptors were associated with pain intensity at 3 months postoperatively, but only \"cramping pain\" at 2 weeks postoperatively was associated with the presence of PPP at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. In conclusion, it is important to carefully listen to the patient\'s complaints and determine the appropriate intervention strategy for the clinical condition during perioperative pain management.

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in surgical and anesthesia techniques, acute and persistent postoperative pain are still a common challenge. Postoperative pain has direct effects on individual patient care and outcome, as well as putting strain on limited health care resources. Several prediction methods for postoperative pain have been described. One such method is the assessment of pain during peripheral venous cannulation (VCP). It is not known if different approaches to anesthesia and analgesia, depending on the evaluation of risk for postoperative pain, can improve outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate if individualized anesthesia and analgesia can affect postoperative pain and recovery after surgery, in patients stratified by VCP.
METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery undergo pain-sensitivity stratification using VCP on the day of surgery. Patients scoring VCP ≥2.0 on the visual analogue scale (pain-sensitive) are randomized to multimodal anaesthesia and analgesia with opioids or standard of care. Patients scoring VCP ≤1.9 (pain-tolerant) are randomized to opioid-free anaesthesia or standard of care. The primary outcome is acute postoperative pain measured with numeric rating scale in the postoperative care unit. Secondary outcomes include analysis of pain after 24 h, persistent postoperative pain and quality of recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Individualized perioperative pain management has the potential to improve patient care. This study will examine the impact of different anesthesia and analgesia regimes, in patients with differing pain sensitivity, on postoperative pain.
BACKGROUND: Prospectively posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04751812.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the Neuropathic Pain for Post-Surgical Patients (NeuPPS) scale against clinically verified neuropathic pain (NP) by quantitative sensory testing (QST) as well as evaluation of other psychometric properties. The NeuPPS is a validated 5-item scale designed to evaluate NP in surgical populations.
METHODS: Data from 537 women aged >18 years scheduled for primary breast cancer surgery enrolled in a previous study for assessing risk factors for persistent pain after breast cancer treatment were used. Exclusion criteria were any other breast surgery or relevant comorbidity. A total of 448 eligible questionnaires were available at 6 months and 455 at 12 months. At 12 months, 290 patients completed a clinical examination and QST. NeuPPS and PainDETECT were analyzed against patients with and without clinically verified NP. NP was assessed using a standardized QST protocol including a clinical assessment. Furthermore, the NeuPPS and PainDETECT scores were psychometrically tested with an item response theory method, the Rasch analysis, to assess construct validity. Primary outcomes were the diagnostic accuracy measures for the NeuPPS, and secondary measures were psychometric analyses of the NeuPPS after 6 and 12 months. PainDETECT was also compared to clinically verified NP as well as NeuPPS comparing the stability of the estimates.
RESULTS: Comparing the NeuPPS scores with verified NP using a receiver operating characteristic curve, the NeuPPS had an area under the curve of 0.80. Using a cutoff of 1, the NeuPPS had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 59%, and using a cutoff of 3, the values were 35 and 96%, respectively. Analysis of the PainDETECT indicated that the used cutoffs may be inappropriate in a surgical population.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the validity of the NeuPPS as a screening tool for NP in a surgical population.

Chronic neuropathic dental pain has a poor prognosis with a low chance of significant spontaneous improvement. Local or oral therapies may be efficient, however short in terms of duration with potential side effects. Cryoneurolysis has been described to prevent acute postoperative pain or to treat some chronic pain conditions; however, application to dental orofacial pain has not been reported so far.
Following a positive diagnostic block on the corresponding alveolar nerve, neuroablation was performed using a cryoprobe on three patients suffering from persistent pain after a dental extraction and 1 after multiple tooth surgeries. The effect of treatment was assessed using a Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and determined by changes in medication dosage and quality of life at day 7 and 3 months. Two patients experienced more than 50% of pain relief at 3 months, 2 by 50%. One patient was able to wean off pregabalin medication, one decreased amitriptyline by 50%, and one decreased tapentadol by 50%. No direct complications were reported. All of them mentioned improvement in sleep and quality of life.
Cryoneurolysis on alveolar nerves is a safe and easy-to-use technique allowing prolonged neuropathic pain relief after dental surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after abdominal visceral surgery is an underestimated long-term complication with relevant impact on health-related quality of life and socioeconomic costs. Early identification of affected patients is important. We aim to identify the incidence and risk factors for CPSP in this patient population.
METHODS: Retrospective case-control matched analysis including all patients diagnosed with CPSP after visceral surgery in our institution between 2016 and 2019. One-to-two case-control matching was based on operation category (HPB, upper-GI, colorectal, transplantation, bariatric, hernia and others) and date of surgery. Potential risk factors for CPSP were identified using conditional multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among a cohort of 3730 patients, 176 (4.7%) were diagnosed with CPSP during the study period and matched to a sample of 352 control patients. Independent risk factors for CPSP were age under 55 years (OR 2.64, CI 1.51-4.61), preexisting chronic pain of any origin (OR 3.42, CI 1.75-6.67), previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.99, CI 1.11-3.57), acute postoperative pain (OR 1.29, CI 1.16-1.44), postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR 3.73, OR 1.61-8.65), opioid use on discharge (OR 3.78, CI 2.10-6.80) and length of stay over 3 days (OR 2.60, CI 1.22-5.53). Preoperative Pregabalin intake was protective (OR 0.02, CI 0.002-0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CPSP is high and associated with specific risk factors, some of them modifiable. Special attention should be given to sufficient treatment of preexisting chronic pain and acute postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: Surviving breast cancer does not necessarily mean complete recovery to a premorbid state of health. Among the multiple psychological and somatic symptoms that reduce the quality of life of breast cancer survivors, persistent pain after breast cancer treatment (PPBCT) with a prevalence of 15-65% is probably the most invalidating. Once chronic, PPBCT is difficult to treat and requires an individualized multidisciplinary approach. In the past decades, several somatic and psychological risk factors for PPBCT have been identified. Studies aiming to prevent PPBCT by reducing perioperative pain intensity have not yet shown a significant reduction of PPBCT prevalence. Only few studies have been performed to modify psychological distress around breast cancer surgery. The AMAZONE study aims to investigate the effect of online cognitive behavioral therapy (e-CBT) on the prevalence of PPBCT.
METHODS: The AMAZONE study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial, with an additional control arm. Patients (n=138) scheduled for unilateral breast cancer surgery scoring high for surgical or cancer-related fears, general anxiety or pain catastrophizing are randomized to receive either five sessions of e-CBT or online education consisting of information about surgery and a healthy lifestyle (EDU). The first session is scheduled before surgery. In addition to the online sessions, patients have three online appointments with a psychotherapist. Patients with low anxiety or catastrophizing scores (n=322) receive treatment as usual (TAU, additional control arm). Primary endpoint is PPBCT prevalence 6 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints are PPBCT intensity, the intensity of acute postoperative pain during the first week after surgery, cessation of postoperative opioid use, PPBCT prevalence at 12 months, pain interference, the sensitivity of the nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory system as measured by quantitative sensory testing (QST), the efficiency of endogenous pain modulation assessed by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and quality of life, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and fear of recurrence until 12 months post-surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: With perioperative e-CBT targeting preoperative anxiety and pain catastrophizing, we expect to reduce the prevalence and intensity of PPBCT. By means of QST and CPM, we aim to unravel underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The online application facilitates accessibility and feasibility in a for breast cancer patients emotionally and physically burdened time period.
BACKGROUND: NTR NL9132 , registered December 16 2020.

Persistent postoperative pain causes influence the life quality of many patients. The Epac/PKC pathway has been indicated to regulate mechanical hyperalgesia. The present study used skin/muscle incision and retraction (SMIR) to induce postoperative pain in rats and evaluated the Epac/PKC pathway in postoperative pain. Mechanical allodynia was assessed by paw withdrawal threshold before and after incision. The levels of Epac, PKC, proinflammatory cytokines, and blood-nerve barrier-related proteins were assessed using Western blotting. We found that SMIR induced the activation of the Epac/PKC pathway, mechanical allodynia, and upregulation of Glut1, VEGF, and PGP9.5 proteins in dorsal root ganglia. Under the influence of agonists of Epac/PKC, normal rats showed mechanical allodynia and increased Glut1, VEGF, and PGP9.5 proteins. After inhibition of Epac1 in rats with SMIR, mechanical allodynia was alleviated, and proinflammatory cytokines and Glut1, VEGF, and PGP9.5 proteins were decreased. Moreover, dorsal root ganglia neurons showed abnormal proliferation under the activation of the Epac/PKC pathway. Using Captopril to protect vascular endothelial cells after SMIR had a positive effect on postoperative pain. In conclusion, SMIR regulates the persistent postoperative pain in rats by the Epac/PKC pathway.

Between 9% and 20% of patients experience moderate to severe persistent postoperative pain after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Severe immediate postoperative pain limits rehabilitation and is associated with the development of persistent postoperative pain. Therefore, perioperative analgesic and physiotherapeutic interventions are of interest to reduce persistent pain. In two systematic reviews with identical methodology, we aim to investigate the effects of (a) perioperative analgesic interventions and (b) physiotherapeutic interventions in reducing persistent pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty.
We will include randomised and cluster-randomised controlled trials on perioperative analgesic and physiotherapeutic interventions for patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. After contact with the authors, trials without pain data 3-24 months postoperatively will be excluded. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and reference lists will be searched for eligible trials. Two authors will independently screen, extract data and assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome is pain scores 3-24 months postoperatively. Meta-analyses will be performed for interventions with two or more trials. We will conduct trial sequential analyses and assign Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) ratings.
No previous review on reduction of persistent postoperative pain has included non-pharmacological or invasive analgesic techniques. These two reviews with identical methodology will summarise the evidence of analgesic and physiotherapeutic perioperative interventions to prevent persistent pain.
CRD42021284175.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the association between cardiac surgical approach (thoracotomy vs. sternotomy) and incidence of persistent postoperative pain at 3 months. Secondary objectives were the incidence and intensity of persistent pain at 6 and 12 months, acute postoperative pain, analgesic requirement and its side effects.
METHODS: Single-center, prospective, observational study. Recruitment between December 2017 and August 2018.
METHODS: Perioperative care at university-affiliated tertiary care centre.
METHODS: 202 adults scheduled for cardiac surgery. Patients with chronic pain or behavioural disorder were excluded.
METHODS: Thoracotomy (n = 106) and sternotomy (n = 96).
METHODS: Pain scores and pain medication requirements from extubation until hospital discharge. Persistent postoperative pain was assessed using a telephone questionnaire.
RESULTS: Incidence and intensity of pain was not significantly different between thoracotomy or sternotomy either in the short- or in the long-term follow-up. Incidence of persistent postoperative pain showed no differences between groups (30.2 vs 22.9% at 3 months (p = 0.297), 10.4 vs 7.3% at 6 months (p = 0.364) and 7.5 vs 7.3% at 12 months (p = 0.518) in thoracotomy and sternotomy group). A significant decrease of pain incidence was observed between 3 and 6 months (p < 0.001) but not between 6 and 12 months (p = 0.259) in both groups. ANOVA of repeated measures adjusted for confounding variable showed a decrease of acute pain intensity over time (p = 0.001) with no difference between groups (p = 0.145). Acute pain medication requirements were not different between the groups (p = 0.237 for piritramide and p = 0.743 for oxycodone) with no difference in their side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no difference in short- or long-term pain in patients undergoing anterolateral thoracotomy or median sternotomy. Both groups showed a decrease in persistent postoperative pain incidence between 3 and 6 months without any significant changes at 12 months.