peritoneal irritation

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    自发性胆管穿孔引起的胆汁性腹水是一种罕见的病例,通常在6-36个月的儿科年龄组中看到。我们正在介绍一个14个月大的婴儿腹胀伴腹痛的病例,呕吐,发烧,和没有大便的历史。经检查,腹部紧张而柔软。关于放射学调查,腹腔中存在大量游离液,并伴有肠梗阻和脾胃部分倒置。经直肠刺激后肠梗阻缓解,之后口服喂养耐受性良好。诊断性穿刺发现胆汁液,确认诊断。患者进一步接受广谱抗生素和游离液体引流治疗。治疗范围从保守治疗到Roux-en-Y吻合术。非手术诊断是罕见的,如果早期发现,有助于改善患者的预后。此病例报告强调了危重患者早期诊断和非手术治疗方式的重要性。
    Biliary ascites due to spontaneous biliary duct perforation is a rare case presentation usually seen in the paediatric age group of 6-36 months. We are presenting the case of a 14-month-old baby with abdominal distention associated with abdominal pain, vomiting, fever, and a history of no passage of stools. Upon examination, the abdomen was tense and tender. On radiological investigations, gross free fluid was present in the abdominal cavity along with bowel obstruction and partial situs inversus of the spleen and stomach. The bowel obstruction was relieved by rectal stimulation, after which oral feeds were well tolerated. Bilious fluid was found on diagnostic paracentesis, confirming the diagnosis. The patient was managed further by broad-spectrum antibiotics and drainage of the free fluid. The management ranges from conservative treatment to Roux-en-Y anastomosis. A non-surgical diagnosis is uncommonly seen and helps improve the patient\'s prognosis if detected early. This case report highlights the importance of early diagnosis and non-surgical treatment modality in critical patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Plénies体征是捷克医学文献中报道的腹膜刺激的主要症状之一,并在临床实践中使用。然而,不知道Plénies到底是谁。作者借助档案材料揭示了自己的身份,登记册和当代出版社,介绍了描述这种症状的关键文章和讲座,并提供了这位被遗忘的医生的基本传记和参考书目。
    Plénies sign is one of the main symptoms of peritoneal irritation reported in the Czech medical literature and used in clinical practice. However, it is not known who Plénies really was. The author reveals his identity with the help of archival materials, registers and contemporary press, presents a key article and lecture in which this symptom is described, and provides a basic biography and bibliography of this forgotten physician.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小儿急性阑尾炎(PAA)今天仍然是一个诊断挑战。经典指数的诊断性能只有中等,尤其是在儿科人群中。本研究旨在定义一种临床,诊断PAA的放射学和分析指标。
    方法:这项前瞻性研究包括151例患者,分为两组:(1)53例非手术性腹痛(NSAP)患者和(2)98例确诊PAA患者。使用Mann-WhitneyU检验和Fisher精确检验比较各组之间的社会人口统计学和临床特征。为了确定PAA的预测因子,我们使用正向逐步分析进行了多变量逻辑回归,并为所选变量分配了整数值的倍数.通过计算受试者工作特征曲线下的面积来评估指标的诊断性能。使用Hosmer-Lemeshow测试评估队列内校准。
    结果:我们开发了BIDIAP指数(儿科阑尾炎诊断的BIomarker),其中包括三个独立预测PAA几率较高的变量:阑尾口径(≥6.9mm),全身免疫炎症指数(≥890)和腹膜刺激,得了4分,3分和2分,分别。参与者的平均(SD)评分在第1组中为2.38(2.06),在第2组中为7.89(1.50)。ROC下面积为0.97(95%CI0.95-0.99)。截止点确定在4点,灵敏度为98.98%,特异性为77.78%。
    结论:BIDIAP指数在PAA中具有出色的诊断性能。这些结果的重要性在于它的新颖性和索引的简单性。尽管需要进行外部验证,初步结果看起来很有希望。
    BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) continues to be a diagnostic challenge today. The diagnostic performance of classical indices is only moderate, especially in pediatric population. This study aimed to define a clinical, radiological and analytical index for the diagnosis of PAA.
    METHODS: This prospective study included 151 patients divided into two groups: (1) 53 patients with non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP) and (2) 98 patients with a confirmed PAA. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Fisher exact test. To identify the predictors of PAA, we performed a multivariable logistic regression using a forward stepwise analysis and we assigned multiples of integer values to the selected variables. The diagnostic performance of the index was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Intra-cohort calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
    RESULTS: We developed the BIDIAP index (BIomarkers for the DIagnosis of Appendicitis in Pediatrics), which included three variables that independently predicted higher odds of PAA: appendiceal caliber (≥ 6.9 mm), systemic immune-inflammation index (≥ 890) and peritoneal irritation, which scored 4, 3 and 2 points, respectively. Mean (SD) score of the participants was 2.38 (2.06) in group 1 and 7.89 (1.50) in group 2. The area under the ROC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99). The cut-off point was established at 4 points, resulting in a sensitivity of 98.98% and a specificity of 77.78%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The BIDIAP index has an exceptional diagnostic performance in PAA. The importance of these results lies in its novelty and in the simplicity of the index. Although external validation will be necessary, initial results look promising.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号