peripheral vascular intervention

外周血管介入
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内碎石术(IVL)通过提供搏动的声压能量来改变浅表和深层血管钙,从而使钙在原位断裂,从而增强透壁血管顺应性,限制纤维弹性反冲,和支架植入的优化。迄今为止,IVL作为促进支架植入的辅助手段受到靶血管大尺寸和钙分布偏心率的限制.
    ShockwaveL6IVL球囊输送系统包括6个声波能量发射器,该声波能量发射器安装在30.0毫米长的球囊的轴上,直径范围为8.0至12.0毫米。气球公称压力为4个大气压。我们描述了人类首次使用这种新型IVL输送系统来促进在涉及远端腹主动脉和双侧动脉的严重钙化狭窄中进行覆膜支架植入。
    在低压(3atm)下实现了全IVL球囊扩张,尽管钙化严重,随后安全有效的覆膜支架植入。
    ShockwaveL6球囊似乎扩大了IVL在严重钙化大血管治疗中的应用,如腹主动脉和髂动脉。
    UNASSIGNED: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) modifies superficial and deep vascular calcium by delivering pulsatile sonic pressure energy that fractures calcium in situ with the consequent enhancement of transmural vessel compliance, limitation of fibroelastic recoil, and optimization of stent implantation. To date, the use of IVL as an adjunct to facilitate stent implantation has been limited by large target vessel size and eccentricity of calcium distribution.
    UNASSIGNED: The Shockwave L6 IVL balloon delivery system includes 6 sonic energy emitters mounted on the shaft of a 30.0-mm long balloon with diameters ranging from 8.0 to 12.0 mm. The balloon nominal pressure is 4 atm. We describe first human use of this novel IVL delivery system to facilitate covered stent implantation in severely calcified stenoses involving the distal abdominal aorta and bilateral iliac arteries.
    UNASSIGNED: Full IVL balloon expansion was achieved at low pressures (3 atm), despite the severity of calcification, with subsequent safe and effective covered stent implantation.
    UNASSIGNED: The Shockwave L6 balloon seems to expand the application of IVL to the treatment of severely calcified large vessels, such as the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于较低的进入部位并发症发生率和提高的患者满意度,桡动脉(RA)进入已越来越多地用于冠状动脉手术。然而,可用于周围血管介入(PVI)的RA入路的数据有限.我们对2020年2月至2022年9月在单一机构通过RA接受PVI的143例患者进行了回顾性审查。从前瞻性维护的机构数据库中确定了基线特征和后续数据。在491个PVI中,156例(31.8%)通过RA进行。介入的解剖位置为股骨(44.8%),髂关节(31.1%),pop(9.6%)腓骨(2.7%),胫骨(9.9%),锁骨下动脉(1.9%)。通过正确的RA获得了程序访问(92.9%),左RA(4.5%),或右尺动脉(2.6%)使用6法国R2P目的地细长鞘在85厘米,105厘米,和119厘米的长度。动脉粥样硬化切除术的使用率为34.7%。平均造影剂体积为105.5mL,平均透视时间为18.5分钟。由于动脉痉挛和不可交叉病变,3例(1.9%)发生了股动脉通路的转换。2例(1.3%)同时使用踏板。围手术期并发症发生率为3.84%,其中入路血肿最常见(3.2%);没有人需要输血,手术干预,或额外住院。住院脑卒中1例(0.64%)。30天的死亡率,6个月,1年期为1.4%,2.8%,和4.2%,分别。总之,RA接入对于不同的PVI是可行的,未来的研究需要评估与股动脉入路相比的安全性和益处.
    Radial artery (RA) access has been increasingly utilized for coronary procedures because of lower rates of access-site complications and improved patient satisfaction. However, limited data are available for RA access for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We performed a retrospective review of 143 patients who underwent PVI through RA access from February 2020 to September 2022 at a single institution. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were ascertained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Of 491 PVI, 156 (31.8%) were performed through the RA. Anatomical locations for intervention were the femoral (44.8%), iliac (31.1%), popliteal (9.6%) peroneal (2.7%), tibial (9.9%), and subclavian (1.9%) arteries. Procedural access was obtained through the right RA (92.9%), left RA (4.5%), or right ulnar artery (2.6%) using the 6 French R2P Destination Slender sheath in 85, 105, and 119 cm lengths. Atherectomy was used in 34.7%. Mean contrast volume was 105.5 ml and the average fluoroscopy time was 18.5 minutes. Conversion to femoral access occurred in 3 cases (1.9%) because of arterial spasm and noncrossable lesions. Concomitant pedal access occurred in 2 cases (1.3%). Periprocedural complication rate was 3.84%, of which access-site hematoma was most common (3.2%); none required blood transfusion, surgical intervention, or additional hospital stay. There was 1 case (0.64%) of in-hospital stroke. The mortality rate at 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year was 1.4%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. In conclusion, RA access is feasible for diverse PVI, and future studies are needed to assess safety and benefit compared with femoral artery access.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内超声(IVUS)在接受外周血管介入(PVI)的患者中的作用的证据有限。我们利用HCUP-AHRQ国家再入院数据库(NRD)进行了回顾性队列研究,以描述IVUS指导的PVI与非IVUS指导的PVI的结局。本研究在2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间使用了NRD。我们使用相关的ICD-10-PCS确定了接受血管内介入治疗外周动脉疾病的患者。根据手术过程中IVUS的使用情况对队列进行划分。主要结果是住院后6个月的大截肢。使用倾向评分逆概率治疗称重法匹配测量的混杂因素。我们进一步根据疾病严重程度进行了亚组分析,干预地点,装置,和程序。本分析共包括434901例住院治疗。有IVUS的PVI与无IVUS的PVI在6个月时具有相似的截肢风险(8939中的195[2.17%]与384003中的10404[2.71%]);危险比,0.98;CI,0.77-1.25。Further,次要结局的发生率无差异.关于子群分析,有休息疼痛的患者截肢率显着降低,在髂关节干预中,或使用IVUS进行药物洗脱支架植入的患者与未使用IVUS进行比较。这项全国性的观察性研究表明,在接受PVI的患者中,使用IVUS的主要截肢率没有差异。然而,在静息疼痛患者亚组中,髂动脉介入或药物洗脱支架植入术使用IVUS与大截肢率显著降低相关.
    There is limited evidence for the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients who underwent peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We conducted retrospective cohort study utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Readmission database to delineate outcomes in IVUS-guided PVI versus non-IVUS-guided PVI. The present study utilized National Readmission database between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. We identified patients who underwent endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease using relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedural Coding System. The cohort was divided based on the use of IVUS during the procedure. The primary outcome was major amputation at 6 months after index hospitalization. Measured confounders were matched using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighing method. We further performed a subgroup analysis based on disease severity, location of intervention, device, and procedure. A total of 434,901 hospitalizations were included in the present analysis. PVI with IVUS compared with no IVUS had similar risk of amputation at 6 months (195 of 8,939 [2.17%] vs 10,404 of 384,003 [2.71%]), hazard ratio 0.98, CI 0.77 to 1.25. Further, there was no difference in the rates of secondary outcomes. On subgroup analysis, amputation rates were significantly lower in patients with rest pain, in iliac intervention, or patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation with the use of IVUS compared with no IVUS. This nationwide observational study showed that there was no difference in major amputation rates with the use of IVUS in patients who underwent PVI. However, in subgroup of patients with rest pain, iliac intervention or drug-eluting stent implantation IVUS use was associated with significantly lower major amputation rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间歇性跛行(IC)的外周血管介入(PVI)的使用不断扩大,但是基线人口统计是否存在不确定性,程序技术和结果因性别而异,种族,和种族。
    目的:按性别检查FPPVI后4年内的IC截肢率和血运重建率,种族,和种族。
    方法:分析了PINCAITM医疗保健数据库中2016-2020年期间接受FPPVI治疗IC的患者。主要结果是任何指数截肢(ILA),通过Kaplan-Meier估计进行评估。次要结果包括指数肢体大截肢,重复血运重建,和索引肢体重复血运重建。使用Cox比例风险回归模型估计未调整和调整的风险比(HR)。
    结果:这项研究包括19,324例IC患者,这些患者接受了FPPVI,女性占41.2%,15.6%的黑人患者,和4.7%的西班牙裔患者。与男性相比,女性接受粥样斑块切除术的可能性较低(45.1%vs.47.8%,p=0.0003),黑人患者比白人患者更有可能接受粥样斑块切除术(50.7%与44.9%,p<0.001),与非西班牙裔患者相比,西班牙裔患者接受动脉粥样硬化斑块切除术的可能性较低(41%vs.47%,p=0.0004)。未经调整的截肢率在男性和女性之间相似(每组6.4%,logrankp=0.842),黑人患者高于。白人患者(7.8%vs.6.1%,logrankp=0.007),西班牙裔患者高于非西班牙裔患者(8.8%vs.6.3%,logrankp=0.031)。调整基线特性后,黑人种族与较高的重复血运重建率(调整后的HR=1.13;95%CI:1.04,1.22)和任何股pop血运重建率(调整后的HR=1.10;95%CI:1.01,1.20)相关。比较组之间的截肢率无统计学差异。
    结论:间歇性跛行的女性和男性在FPPVI后有相似的粗截肢和调整截肢和血运重建结果。黑人患者的重复血运重建和任何FP血运重建率高于白人患者。黑人和西班牙裔患者的粗截肢率较高,但通过调整基线特征,这些差异得以减弱.黑人患者更有可能接受斑块切除术,并且任何重复血运重建和特别是FP血运重建的发生率更高。需要进一步研究以确定这些模式是否与疾病特定问题或不同人群之间的实践模式差异有关。
    Use of peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for intermittent claudication (IC) continues to expand, but there is uncertainty whether baseline demographics, procedural techniques and outcomes differ by sex, race, and ethnicity. This study aimed to examine amputation and revascularization rates up to 4 years after femoropopliteal (FP) PVI for IC by sex, race, and ethnicity. Patients who underwent FP PVI for IC between 2016 and 2020 from the PINC AI Healthcare Database were analyzed. The primary outcome was any index limb amputation, assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Secondary outcomes included index limb major amputation, repeat revascularization, and index limb repeat revascularization. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. This study included 19,324 patients with IC who underwent FP PVI, with 41.2% women, 15.6% Black patients, and 4.7% Hispanic patients. Women were less likely than men to be treated with atherectomy (45.1% vs 47.8%, p = 0.0003); Black patients were more likely than White patients to receive atherectomy (50.7% vs 44.9%, p <0.001), and Hispanic patients were less likely than non-Hispanic patients to receive atherectomy (41% vs 47%, p = 0.0004). Unadjusted rates of any amputation were similar in men and women (6.4% for each group, log-rank p = 0.842), higher in Black patients than in White patients (7.8% vs 6.1%, log-rank p = 0.007), and higher in Hispanic patients than in non-Hispanic patients (8.8% vs 6.3%, log-rank p = 0.031). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, Black race was associated with higher rates of repeat revascularization (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.22) and any FP revascularization (adjusted HR 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.20). No statistical difference in amputation rate was observed among comparison groups. Women and men with IC had similar crude and adjusted amputation and revascularization outcomes after FP PVI. Black patients had higher repeat revascularization and any FP revascularization rates than did White patients. Black and Hispanic patients had higher crude amputation rates, but these differences were attenuated by adjustment for baseline characteristics. Black patients were more likely to receive atherectomy and had higher rates of any repeat revascularization and specifically FP revascularization. Further study is necessary to determine whether these patterns are related to disease-specific issues or practice-pattern differences among different populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)患者面临较高的长期死亡风险。确定新的死亡率预测因子和风险状况将使个人医疗保健计划设计和提高生存率成为可能。我们旨在利用随机生存森林机器学习算法来识别接受外周血管干预的CLTI患者的长期全因死亡率预测因素。
    结果:2017年至2018年接受外周血管干预的CLTI患者来自与Medicare相关的VQI(血管质量倡议)注册表。我们构建了一个随机生存森林,根据程序前变量的相对重要性和3年全因死亡率的平均最小深度对66个变量进行排名。使用训练样本(队列的80%)建立了2000棵树的随机生存森林。使用连续排名的概率评分在测试样本(20%)中评估准确性,HarrellC-index,和包外错误率。共纳入10114例患者(平均年龄±SD,72.0±11.0岁;59%男性)。3年死亡率为39.1%,中位生存期为1.4年(四分位距,0.7-2.0年)。最具预测性的变量是慢性肾病,年龄,充血性心力衰竭,痴呆症,心律失常,需要辅助护理,住在家里,和体重指数。共有41个跨越生物心理社会模型所有领域的变量被列为死亡率预测因子。模型的准确性非常好(连续排名概率得分,0.172;哈雷尔C指数,0.70;袋外错误率,29.7%)。
    结论:我们的随机生存森林准确地预测了长期的CLTI死亡率,这是由人口驱动的,功能,行为,和医疗合并症。扩大风险框架和完善医疗保健计划以包括多维风险因素可以改善CLTI的个性化护理。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) face a high long-term mortality risk. Identifying novel mortality predictors and risk profiles would enable individual health care plan design and improved survival. We aimed to leverage a random survival forest machine-learning algorithm to identify long-term all-cause mortality predictors in patients with CLTI undergoing peripheral vascular intervention.
    RESULTS: Patients with CLTI undergoing peripheral vascular intervention from 2017 to 2018 were derived from the Medicare-linked VQI (Vascular Quality Initiative) registry. We constructed a random survival forest to rank 66 preprocedural variables according to their relative importance and mean minimal depth for 3-year all-cause mortality. A random survival forest of 2000 trees was built using a training sample (80% of the cohort). Accuracy was assessed in a testing sample (20%) using continuous ranked probability score, Harrell C-index, and out-of-bag error rate. A total of 10 114 patients were included (mean±SD age, 72.0±11.0 years; 59% men). The 3-year mortality rate was 39.1%, with a median survival of 1.4 years (interquartile range, 0.7-2.0 years). The most predictive variables were chronic kidney disease, age, congestive heart failure, dementia, arrhythmias, requiring assisted care, living at home, and body mass index. A total of 41 variables spanning all domains of the biopsychosocial model were ranked as mortality predictors. The accuracy of the model was excellent (continuous ranked probability score, 0.172; Harrell C-index, 0.70; out-of-bag error rate, 29.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our random survival forest accurately predicts long-term CLTI mortality, which is driven by demographic, functional, behavioral, and medical comorbidities. Broadening frameworks of risk and refining health care plans to include multidimensional risk factors could improve individualized care for CLTI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名44岁的健康男性,有右膝外伤和外科手术史,因右膝反复积血被送往急诊科。病人接受了血液检查,X光片,和膝盖的磁共振成像。计算机断层扫描血管造影显示膝盖滑膜发红。患者成功栓塞了膝状动脉分支。关节积血没有复发。使用膝状动脉栓塞术,在我们的案例中,不仅成功地解决了复发性关节积血,而且强调了其在全面患者管理中的新兴作用。这种微创方法,精确地瞄准受影响滑膜的血管供应,在常规疗法可能不足的情况下提供了有效的替代方案。除了症状缓解,它有望预防关节积血复发,对具有挑战性的膝关节出血病例的临床医生干预措施的一个有价值的补充。在更大的队列和比较研究中的进一步调查可能揭示其更广泛的适用性和长期疗效。复发性关节积血的塑形治疗选择。
    A 44-year-old otherwise healthy male with a history of trauma and surgical interventions in his right knee presented to the emergency department with repeated hemarthrosis of the right knee. The patient underwent blood tests, X-rays, and magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A computed tomography angiography revealed blushing of the synovium of the knee. The patient underwent successful embolization of the genicular artery branches. Hemarthrosis did not recur. The use of genicular artery embolization, in our case, not only successfully addressed recurrent hemarthrosis but also underscores its emerging role in comprehensive patient management. This minimally invasive approach, precisely targeting the vascular supply to the affected synovium, offers an effective alternative where conventional therapies may fall short. Beyond symptom relief, it holds promise for preventing hemarthrosis recurrence, a valuable addition to clinicians\' interventions for challenging knee joint bleeding cases. Further investigation in larger cohorts and comparative studies may reveal its broader applicability and long-term efficacy, shaping treatment options for recurrent hemarthrosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:由于血管手术的紧急性和紧急性,因此重点戒烟不如标准选择性手术,例如疝修补术。整容手术,和减肥程序。这项研究的目的是确定主动吸烟对接受外周血管干预(PVI)的患者的影响。我们的目标是确定在非紧急情况下,是否应通过诊所就诊而不是急诊室安排戒烟,是否应更加重视教育。
    方法:本研究使用多机构去识别血管质量倡议-医疗保险链接数据库(VISION)进行。我们的研究包括2004-2019年间因外周动脉闭塞性疾病而接受PVI的索赔人。我们的最终样本包括18,726名患者:3,617(19.3%)不吸烟者(NS),9,975(53.3%)以前的吸烟者(FS)和5,134(27.4%)目前的吸烟者(CS)。我们对29个变量[年龄,性别,种族,种族,治疗设置(门诊或住院),肥胖,保险,高血压,糖尿病,CAD,CHF,COPD,CKD,上一个CABG,CEA,严重截肢,流入处理,先前的旁路或PVI,术前用药,治疗水平,伴随动脉内膜切除术,和治疗类型(粥样斑块切除术,血管成形术,支架)]在NS与FS之间以及FS与CS之间。结果是长期(五年)总生存期(OS),肢体抢救(LS),无再干预(FR)和无截肢生存(AFS)。
    结果:PSM导致3,160对NS和FS匹配良好,3,750对FS和CS匹配良好。FS和NS在OS方面没有差异[HR=0.94,95%CI0.82-1.09,p=0.43],FR[HR=0.96,95%CI0.89-1.04,p=0.35],或AFS[HR=0.90,95%CI0.79-1.03,p=0.12]。然而,与CS相比,我们发现FS具有较高的OS[HR=1.18,95%CI1.04-1.33,p=0.01],较低的FR[HR=0.89,95%CI0.83-0.96,p=0.003]和较大的AFS[HR=1.16,95%CI1.03-1.31,p=0.01]。
    结论:这项多机构医疗保险相关研究对出现跛行的PAD患者的选择性PVI病例进行了研究,发现前吸烟者与非吸烟者相比在OS方面具有相似的5年结局。FTR和AFS。此外,与以前吸烟者相比,目前吸烟者的总生存率和无截肢生存率较低.总的来说,这表明,应高度鼓励吸烟的人参加有组织的戒烟计划,甚至要求他们在选择性PVI之前停止吸烟,因为他们认为5年获益.
    OBJECTIVE: Emphasis on tobacco cessation, given the urgent and emergent nature of vascular surgery, is less prevalent than standard elective cases such as hernia repairs, cosmetic surgery, and bariatric procedures. The goal of this study is to determine the effect of active smoking on claudicating individuals undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). Our goal is to determine if a greater emphasis on education should be placed on smoking cessation in nonurgent cases scheduled through clinic visits and not the Emergency Department.
    METHODS: This study was performed using the multi-institution de-identified Vascular Quality Initiative/Medicare-linked database (Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network [VISION]). Claudicants who underwent PVI for peripheral arterial occlusive disease between 2004 and 2019 were included in our study. Our final sample consisted of a total of 18,726 patients: 3617 nonsmokers (19.3%) (NSs), 9975 former smokers (53.3%) (FSs), and 5134 current smokers (27.4%) (CSs). We performed propensity score matching on 29 variables (age, gender, race, ethnicity, treatment setting [outpatient or inpatient], obesity, insurance, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, previous coronary artery bypass graft, carotid endarterectomy, major amputation, inflow treatment, prior bypass or PVI, preoperative medications, level of treatment, concomitant endarterectomy, and treatment type [atherectomy, angioplasty, stent]) between NS vs FS and FS vs CS. Outcomes were long-term (5-year) overall survival (OS), limb salvage (LS), freedom from reintervention (FR), and amputation-free survival (AFS).
    RESULTS: Propensity score matching resulted in 3160 well-matched pairs of NS and FS and 3750 well-matched pairs of FS and CS. There was no difference between FS and NS in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.09; P = .43), FR (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04; P = .35), or AFS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.03; P = .12). However, when compared with CS, we found FS to have a higher OS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33; P = .01), less FR (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96; P = .003), and greater AFS (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31; P = .01).
    CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional Medicare-linked study looking at elective PVI cases in patients with peripheral artery disease presenting with claudication found that FSs have similar 5-year outcomes in comparison to NSs in terms of OS, FR, and AFS. Additionally, CSs have lower OS and AFS when compared with FSs. Overall, this suggests that smoking claudicants should be highly encouraged and referred to structured smoking cessation programs or even required to stop smoking prior to elective PVI due to the perceived 5-year benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)患者血运重建后死亡率高。短期结果的风险分层具有挑战性。我们旨在开发机器学习模型,对外周血管介入(PVI)后30天和90天全因死亡率的预测变量进行排名。
    纳入Medicare相关血管质量计划中接受CLTI的PVI患者。包括66个术前变量。在训练样本中构建30天和90天全因死亡率的随机生存森林(RSF)模型,并在测试样本中进行评价。预测变量通过重要性加权的相对重要性图根据它们引起最接近根节点的分支分裂的频率进行排序。模型性能通过Brier评分进行评估,连续排名概率得分,包外错误率,和哈雷尔的C指数。
    共纳入10,114例患者。粗死亡率在30天为4.4%,在90天为10.6%。RSF模型通常识别为5期慢性肾脏病(CKD),痴呆症,充血性心力衰竭(CHF),年龄,紧急程序,并且需要辅助护理作为最具预测性的变量。对于这两种型号,前10个变量中有8个是医学合并症或功能状态变量.模型显示出良好的辨别(C统计量0.72和0.73)和校准(Brier评分0.03和0.10)。
    30天和90天全因死亡率的RSF模型通常被确定为CKD,痴呆症,CHF,在家需要辅助护理,紧急程序,年龄是CLTI中最具预测性的变量,也是CLTI的关键因素。结果可能有助于指导有关PVI的个性化风险收益治疗对话。
    Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have high mortality rates after revascularization. Risk stratification for short-term outcomes is challenging. We aimed to develop machine-learning models to rank predictive variables for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI).
    Patients undergoing PVI for CLTI in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Sixty-six preprocedural variables were included. Random survival forest (RSF) models were constructed for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality in the training sample and evaluated in the testing sample. Predictive variables were ranked based on the frequency that they caused branch splitting nearest the root node by importance-weighted relative importance plots. Model performance was assessed by the Brier score, continuous ranked probability score, out-of-bag error rate, and Harrell\'s C-index.
    A total of 10,114 patients were included. The crude mortality rate was 4.4% at 30 days and 10.6% at 90 days. RSF models commonly identified stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), age, urgent procedures, and need for assisted care as the most predictive variables. For both models, eight of the top 10 variables were either medical comorbidities or functional status variables. Models showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.72 and 0.73) and calibration (Brier score 0.03 and 0.10).
    RSF models for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality commonly identified CKD, dementia, CHF, need for assisted care at home, urgent procedures, and age as the most predictive variables as critical factors in CLTI. Results may help guide individualized risk-benefit treatment conversations regarding PVI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估经臂入路作为外周动脉疾病(PAD)复杂干预的单一或联合手术的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在2011年3月至2021年4月之间,169例PAD患者通过经肱动脉途径进行了单或双手术的血管内治疗。进行单变量和多变量分析以评估肱动脉穿刺处不良事件的预测因子。所有人口统计,临床,围手术期数据来自电子病历并进行回顾性分析.
    结果:在87和82例患者中单独使用和联合使用肱动脉通路,分别。联合入路组患者术中支架植入术较多,血管闭合装置(VCD)较多。多因素logistic回归分析显示高血压是肱动脉穿刺部位不良事件发生率较高的独立因素(比值比,4.76;95%置信区间,1.33-16.97;p=0.016)。26例患者发生肱动脉通路部位并发症,包括6例(23.1%)主要并发症和20例(76.9%)次要入站并发症。21例(16.8%)和5例(11.4%)患者被分配到手动按压和VCD组,分别。主要或次要并发症的发生率无明显组间差异。有趣的是,被分配到VCD组的患者没有出现重大的入室并发症.
    结论:经臂入路,作为单一或组合的程序,是PAD患者复杂干预措施的安全替代方案。随着血压控制的改善,肱动脉通路的并发症逐渐减少。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the transbrachial approach as a single or combined procedure for complex interventions in peripheral artery disease (PAD).
    METHODS: Between March 2011 and April 2021, 169 patients with PAD underwent endovascular therapy via the transbrachial approach as a single or dual procedure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictors of adverse events at the brachial puncture site. All demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were acquired from electronic medical records and retrospectively analyzed.
    RESULTS: Brachial artery access was used alone and in combination in 87 and 82 patients, respectively. Patients in the combined-approach group underwent more intraoperative stent implantations and had more vascular closure devices (VCD). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that hypertension was an independent factor for higher rates of brachial puncture site adverse events (odds ratio, 4.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-16.97; P = 0.016). Brachial artery access-site complications occurred in 26 patients, including 6 (23.1%) major and 20 (76.9%) minor entry-site complications. Entry-site complications were observed in 21 (16.8%) and 5 (11.4%) patients assigned to manual compression and VCD groups, respectively. There were no significant intergroup differences in the incidence of major or minor complications. Interestingly, patients assigned to the VCD group did not experience major entry-site complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: The transbrachial approach, as a single or combined procedure, is a safe alternative to complex interventions in patients with PAD. Complications of brachial access progressively decrease with improved blood pressure control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于腹股沟下外周动脉疾病(PAD)引起的间歇性跛行(IC)的血运重建取决于持久性和预期的益处。我们旨在评估八十岁和九岁以上(年龄≥80岁)和年龄小于80岁(年龄<80岁)的IC干预结果。
    方法:对血管质量倡议(2010-2020)进行了外周血管介入(PVI)和腹股沟下旁路(IIB)治疗IC的查询。基线特征,程序细节,并对结果进行分析(比较年龄≥80岁和年龄<80岁)。
    结果:IC有84,210PVI(12.1%年龄≥80和87.9%年龄<80)和10,980IIB(7.4%年龄≥80和92.6%年龄<80)。对于PVI,年龄≥80岁的患者更经常接受股动脉(70.7%与58.1%)和膝下(19%与9.3%),和较少的髂关节干预(32.1%vs.48%)(全部P<.001)。年龄≥80岁的患者围手术期血肿较多(3.5%vs.2.4%)和30天死亡率(0.9%vs.0.4%)(P<.001)。干预后1年,年龄≥80岁的队列中独立行走的患者较少(80%与91.5%,P<.001)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,年龄≥80岁的患者的再干预/无截肢生存率较低(81.4%vs.86.8%),无截肢生存率(87.1%vs.94.1%),和生存率(92.3%vs.PVI后1年为96.8%)(P<.001)。风险调整分析显示,年龄≥80岁与更高的再干预/截肢/死亡相关(HR1.22,95%CI1.1-1.35)。截肢/死亡(HR1.85,95%CI1.61-2.13),PVI的死亡率(HR1.92,95%1.66-2.23)(全部P<.001)。对于IIB,年龄≥80岁的患者更容易出现膝下靶(28.4%与19.4%),30天死亡率较高(1.3%vs.0.5%),肾功能衰竭(4.1%vs.2.2%),和心脏并发症(5.4%vs.3.1%)(P<.001)。在1年,年龄≥80岁组的独立卧床患者较少(81.7%vs.88.8%,P=.02)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,年龄≥80岁队列的再干预/无截肢生存率较低(75.7%vs.81.5%),无截肢生存率(86.9%vs.93.9%),和生存率(90.4%vs.96.5%)(全部P<.001)。风险调整分析显示,年龄≥80岁与较高的截肢/死亡(HR1.68,95%CI1.1-2.54,P=0.015)和死亡率(HR1.85,95%1.16-2.93,P=0.009)相关,但不是IIB后的再干预/截肢/死亡(HR1.1,95%CI.85-1.44,P=.47)。
    结论:八十岁和九岁有更高的围手术期发病率和长期动态功能损害,肢体丧失,PVI和跛行旁路手术后的死亡率。对老年跛行患者的干预风险应仔细权衡血运重建的感知益处。在这一人群中,医疗和运动治疗工作应最大化。
    Revascularization for intermittent claudication (IC) due to infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is dependent on durability and expected benefit. We aimed to assess outcomes for IC interventions in octogenarians and nonagenarians (age ≥80 years) and those younger than 80 years (age <80 years).
    The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried (2010-2020) for peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypasses (IIBs) performed to treat IC. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were analyzed (comparing age ≥80 years and age <80 years).
    There were 84,210 PVIs (12.1% age ≥80 years and 87.9% age <80 years) and 10,980 IIBs (7.4% age ≥80 years and 92.6% age <80 years) for IC. For PVI, patients aged ≥80 years more often underwent femoropopliteal (70.7% vs 58.1%) and infrapopliteal (19% vs 9.3%) interventions, and less often iliac interventions (32.1% vs 48%) (P < .001 for all). Patients aged ≥80 years had more perioperative hematomas (3.5% vs 2.4%) and 30-day mortality (0.9% vs 0.4%) (P < .001). At 1-year post-intervention, the age ≥80 years cohort had fewer independently ambulatory patients (80% vs 91.5%; P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients aged ≥80 years had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (81.4% vs 86.8%), amputation-free survival (87.1% vs 94.1%), and survival (92.3% vs 96.8%) (P < .001) at 1-year after PVI. Risk adjusted analysis showed that age ≥80 years was associated with higher reintervention/amputation/death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.35), amputation/death (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.61-2.13), and mortality (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.66-2.23) (P < .001 for all) for PVI. For IIB, patients aged ≥80 years more often had an infrapopliteal target (28.4% vs 19.4%) and had higher 30-day mortality (1.3% vs 0.5%), renal failure (4.1% vs 2.2%), and cardiac complications (5.4% vs 3.1%) (P < .001). At 1 year, the age ≥80 years group had fewer independently ambulatory patients (81.7% vs 88.8%; P = .02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the age ≥80 years cohort had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (75.7% vs 81.5%), amputation-free survival (86.9% vs 93.9%), and survival (90.4% vs 96.5%) (P < .001 for all). Risk-adjusted analysis showed age ≥80 years was associated with higher amputation/death (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.1-2.54; P = .015) and mortality (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16-2.93; P = .009), but not reintervention/amputation/death (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.85-1.44; P = .47) after IIB.
    Octogenarians and nonagenarians have greater perioperative morbidity and long-term ambulatory impairment, limb loss, and mortality after PVI and IIB for claudication. Risks of intervention on elderly patients with claudication should be carefully weighed against the perceived benefits of revascularization. Medical and exercise therapy efforts should be maximized in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号