Facial trauma often involves injuries to the eyelid and periorbital region. Management of these injuries can be challenging due to the involvement of multiple complex anatomic structures that are in close proximity. Restoration of normal anatomic relationships of the eyelids and periocular structures is essential for optimum functional and aesthetic outcome after trauma. This review provides an overview of the current literature involving soft tissue trauma of the eyelid and periorbital tissue, and highlights key steps in patient evaluation and management with various types of injuries.

Facial trauma often involves injuries to the eyelid and periorbital region. Management of these injuries can be challenging due to the involvement of multiple complex anatomic structures that are in close proximity. Restoration of normal anatomic relationships of the eyelids and periocular structures is essential for optimum functional and aesthetic outcome after trauma. This review provides an overview of the current literature involving soft tissue trauma of the eyelid and periorbital tissue, and highlights key steps in patient evaluation and management with various types of injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic periocular injuries occasionally result in significant soft tissue loss, for which there are limited management options that provide satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes. The authors describe the use of a bioengineered dermal substitute (Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template [DRT], Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, NJ) as an alternative to immediate flap reconstruction or skin grafting.
METHODS: Retrospective interventional case series of patients who underwent DRT placement for periocular tissue loss at the time of trauma. In each case, primary closure or immediate flap reconstruction was deemed impractical or undesirable due to the size and location of the primary and associated secondary defects. One to four weeks later, the outer silicone layer was removed and healing assessed. Additional reconstructive techniques were performed as needed.
RESULTS: Three patients were treated at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute and one at Byers Eye Institute at Stanford. The defects healed completely in two patients, and by 79.2% in a third, with no need for additional reconstructive surgery. In the remaining patient, the defect was significantly downsized by 56.1%, allowing for a simpler flap reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Bioengineered dermal substitutes should be considered as a viable alternative to traditional reconstructive techniques for large periocular defects resulting from trauma. The outer silicone layer prevents desiccation and serves as a protective barrier, while the inner collagen matrix organizes the growth of neo-dermis and minimizes wound contraction. The dimensions of cutaneous defects can therefore be reduced dramatically, potentially eliminating the need for skin grafting and/or reducing the ultimate complexity of flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Eyelids are important structures and play a role in protecting the globe from trauma, brightness, in maintaining the integrity of tear films and moving the tears towards the lacrimal drainage system and contribute to aesthetic appearance of the face. Ophthalmic trauma is an important cause of morbidity among individuals and has also been responsible for additional cost of healthcare. Periocular trauma involving eyelids and adjacent structures has been found to have increased recently probably due to increased pace of life and increased dependence on machinery. A comprehensive classification of periocular trauma would help in stratifying these injuries as well as study outcomes.
METHODS: This study was carried out at our institute from June 2015 to Dec 2015. We searched multiple English language databases for existing classification systems for periocular trauma. We designed a system of classification of periocular soft tissue injuries based on clinico-anatomical presentations. This classification was applied prospectively to patients presenting with periocular soft tissue injuries to our department.
RESULTS: A comprehensive classification scheme was designed consisting of five types of periocular injuries. A total of 38 eyelid injuries in 34 patients were evaluated in this study. According to the System for Peri-Ocular Trauma (SPOT) classification, Type V injuries were most common. SPOT Type II injuries were more common isolated injuries among all zones.
CONCLUSIONS: Classification systems are necessary in order to provide a framework in which to scientifically study the etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of diseases in an orderly fashion. The SPOT classification has taken into account the periocular soft tissue injuries i.e., upper eyelid, lower eyelid, medial and lateral canthus injuries., based on observed clinico-anatomical patterns of eyelid injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: The SPOT classification seems to be a reliable system to address eyelid injuries. This classification scheme would guide the ophthalmic and facial reconstructive surgeons to provide optimal outcomes in eyelid injuries. Based on the classification scheme and review of existing literature, an algorithm is presented to facilitate repair and reconstruction.