OBJECTIVE: There is significant variability in the immediate post-operative and long-term management of patients undergoing per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), largely stemming from the lack of high-quality evidence. We aimed to establish a consensus on several important questions on the after care of post-POEM patients through a modified Delphi process.
METHODS: A steering committee developed an initial questionnaire consisting of 5 domains (33 statements): post-POEM admission/discharge, indication for immediate post-POEM esophagram, peri-procedural medications and diet resumption, clinic follow-up recommendations, and post-POEM reflux surveillance and management. A total of 34 experts participated in the 2 rounds of the Delphi process, with quantitative and qualitative data analyzed for each round to achieve consensus.
RESULTS: A total of 23 statements achieved high degree of consensus. Overall, the expert panel agreed on the following: (1) same-day discharge after POEM can be considered in select patients, (2) a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics may be as effective as a short course, (3) a modified diet can be advanced as tolerated, (4) all patients should be followed in clinic and undergo objective testing for surveillance and management of reflux. Consensus could not be achieved on the indication of post-POEM esophagram to evaluate for leak.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this Delphi process established expert agreement on several important issues and provides a practical guidance on key aspects in the care of patients following POEM.

Third space endoscopy (TSE) encompasses a breadth of procedures for the treatment of a variety of GI disorders. The widespread use of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and its diversification to include extended indications and at locations other than the oesophagus has provided an insight into the potential complications encountered. The most common adverse events associated with POEM, the epitome of TSE procedures, include insufflation related injuries, bleeding, failure of mucosal barrier, infections, pain, blown out myotomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The purpose of this review is to highlight the pitfalls and to identify the risk factors that may lead to adverse events, and to recommend appropriate salvage interventions in the scope of the current evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Achalasia cardia, a primary motility disorder of the esophagus, poses significant malnutrition risks. This study aims at comprehensively assessing the nutritional status in untreated achalasia patients, contrasting it with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) cases and impact of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on nutrition at one-year.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study, including consecutive achalasia cases, from December 2021 to April 2022 at a tertiary care centre. Biochemical parameters, anthropometry, subjective global assessment (SGA) and malnutrition universal screening tool were used for nutritional assessment. Cases diagnosed with FGIDs served as controls.
RESULTS: As many as 118 cases (41.2 ± 13.9 years, 61% males) with achalasia and 200 controls (43.4 ± 11.9 years, 69% males) were included in the study. Sub-types of achalasia included type I (16.9%), II (76.3%) and III (6.8%). Overall, 38.1% and 6.8% cases were moderately and severely malnourished, respectively. As compared to controls, cases with achalasia had lower pre-albumin (19.4 vs. 25.2; p = 0.001), serum calcium (p = 0.012), vitamin D (p = 0.001), serum iron (p = 0.001), triceps fold thickness (p = 0.002) and hand-grip strength (p = 0.001). On univariate analysis, type-I achalasia, body mass index, % weight loss, lower esophageal sphincter pressures and Eckardt scores were predictors of malnourishment (SGA). On multivariate analysis, type of achalasia, mid arm circumference and low body mass index were significant predictors of malnourishment in cases with achalasia. There was significant improvement in the nutritional status after POEM at one-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Achalasia patients demonstrate a notably higher risk of malnutrition compared to individuals with FGIDs. Nutritional status significantly improves after POEM. (NCT05161923).

Achalasia can significantly impair the quality of life. The clinical presentation typically includes dysphagia to both solids and liquids, chest pain, and regurgitation. Diagnosis can be delayed in patients with atypical presentations, and they might receive a wrong diagnosis, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), owing to overlapping symptoms of both disorders. Although the cause of achalasia is poorly understood, its impact on the motility of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is well established. Several treatment modalities have been utilized, with the most common being surgical Heller myotomy with concomitant fundoplication and pneumatic balloon dilatation. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has gained popularity as an effective treatment for achalasia, despite a relatively high incidence of GERD occurring after treatment compared to other modalities. The magnitude of post-POEM GERD depends on its definition and is influenced by patient and procedure-related factors. The long-term sequelae of post-POEM GERD are yet to be determined, but it appears to have a benign course and is usually manageable with clinically available modalities. Identifying risk factors for post-POEM GERD and modifying the POEM procedure in selected patients may improve the overall success of this technique.

OBJECTIVE: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become the first line treatment for achalasia, but controversies remain about the prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-POEM GERD by a retrospective analysis of a single center cohort.
METHODS: Achalasia patients aged 18 or above, who underwent POEM between 2012 and 2021, were included, provided they had an endoscopic control of reflux at least one year after POEM. GERD symptoms based on GerdQ questionnaire, and proton pomp inhibitors (PPI) consumption were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Among a consecutive cohort of 422 patients treated by POEM, 254 patients were included. Endoscopic results were available after a mean follow-up of 1.9 ± 1.5 years. 71/254 patients (28 %) had erosive esophagitis (86 % Los Angeles Grade A or B). At the last follow-up (mean 4.5 ± 2.2 years), clinical success of POEM (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was achieved in 79.5 % of patients. 44.5 % of patients were on PPI. Mean GerdQ score was 2.2 ± 2.7, with only 13 patients (6.5 %) with a score ≥ 8.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of achalasia patients with an endoscopic follow-up at least 1 year after POEM, GERD did not appear a major threat concern: clinical symptoms were mild in most cases, as was the degree of erosive esophagitis. Furthermore, at the time of last follow up, less than half of patients required treatment with PPI.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder with three subtypes based on manometry that can treated with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). With the advent of impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP®), we hypothesized the three achalasia subtypes would have different pre-POEM EndoFLIP® diameter and distensibility index (DI) measurements but would be similar after POEM.
METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective review of consecutive POEM cases by a single surgeon-endoscopist team from 04/07/2017 to 08/28/2023. Patients with a diagnosis of achalasia were stratified into type 1, 2, or 3 based on pre-POEM manometry. Patient characteristics, Eckardt scores, and pre-and-post-POEM diameter and DI were compared by subtype with descriptive, univariate, and multivariable linear regression statistics.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 9(14.1%) had Type 1, 36(56.3%) had Type 2, and 19(29.7%) had Type 3. There were no differences between Types with respect to median pre-POEM Eckardt scores (9[IQR:7-9) vs. 8[IQR:6-9] vs. 7[IQR:5-8], p = 0.148), median post-POEM Eckardt scores (0[IQR:0-1] vs. 0[IQR:0-0] vs. 0[IQR0-0.5], p = 0.112). EndoFLIP® data revealed variation in median pre-POEM diameter and DI between Subtypes (6.9[IQR:6-8.5] vs. 5.5[IQR:5-6.8] vs. 5[IQR:5-6.1], p = 0.025 and 1.8[IQR:1.3-3.2] vs. 0.9[IQR:0.6-1.6] vs. 0.6[IQR:0.5-0.8], p = 0.003, respectively), but not in the change in diameter or DI post-POEM (5.1[IQR:4.3-5.9] vs. 5.1[IQR:4.1-7.1] vs. 5.9[IQR:5-6.4], p = 0.217 and 3.9[IQR:2.5-4.7] vs. 3.4[IQR:2.4-4.7] vs. 2.7[IQR:2.3-3.7], p = 0.461, respectively). However, after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, pre- or post-POEM diameter and DI did not demonstrate statistically significant differences among subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Achalasia subtypes did not demonstrate different pre-POEM diameters or DI as measured by EndoFLIP® nor are there differences after POEM completion. While achalasia subtypes may have slightly different pathophysiology based on manometry findings, similar pre- and post-POEM impedance planimetry findings, along with similar Eckardt scores, support the use of POEM in the treatment of any achalasia subtype.

In this editorial, we respond to a review article by Nabi et al, in which the authors discussed gastroesophageal reflux (GER) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM is presently the primary therapeutic option for achalasia, which is both safe and effective. A few adverse effects were documented after POEM, including GER. The diagnostic criteria were not clear enough because approximately 60% of patients have a long acid exposure time, while only 10% experience reflux symptoms. Multiple predictors of high disease incidence have been identified, including old age, female sex, obesity, and a baseline lower esophageal sphincter pressure of less than 45 mmHg. Some technical steps during the procedure, such as a lengthy or full-thickness myotomy, may further enhance the risk. Proton pump inhibitors are currently the first line of treatment. Emerging voices are increasingly advocating for the routine combining of POEM with an endoscopic fundoplication method, such as peroral endoscopic fundoplication or transoral incisionless fundoplication. However, more research is necessary to determine the safety and effectiveness of these procedures in the long term for patients who have undergone them.

Achalasia cardia, the most prevalent primary esophageal motility disorder, is predominantly characterized by symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation. The principal therapeutic approaches for achalasia encompass pneumatic dilatation (PD), Heller\'s myotomy, and the more recent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM has been substantiated as a safe and efficacious modality for the management of achalasia. Although POEM demonstrates superior efficacy compared to PD and an efficacy parallel to Heller\'s myotomy, the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following POEM is notably higher than with the aforementioned techniques. While symptomatic reflux post-POEM is relatively infrequent, the significant occurrence of erosive esophagitis and heightened esophageal acid exposure necessitates vigilant monitoring to preclude long-term GERD-related complications. Contemporary advancements in the field have enhanced our comprehension of the risk factors, diagnostic methodologies, preventative strategies, and therapeutic management of GERD subsequent to POEM. This review focuses on the limitations inherent in the 24-h pH study for evaluating post-POEM reflux, potential modifications in the POEM technique to mitigate GERD risk, and the strategies for managing reflux following POEM.

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and its utilization in non-achalasia disorders of the esophagus. POEM, a relatively novel endoscopic technique, involves submucosal tunneling to access esophageal muscle layers, enabling selective myotomy and mitigating the consequences of motor disorders of the esophagus. POEM is an effective treatment modality for diffuse esophageal spasm providing resolution of chest pain and dysphagia in a majority of patients who have refractory symptoms despite medical therapy. The results of POEM are more equivocal compared to esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO). POEM in EGJOO has been shown to have a 93% clinical success rate in 6 months. POEM appears to be more effective in motor disorders that affect the lower esophageal sphincter, such as EGJOO and opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction. While the current data for POEM in other entities such as DES and HE are positive, more supportive data are required to make POEM a consistent recommendation for patients.

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive procedure that is very effective in the treatment of achalasia, a rare esophageal motility disorder. POEM has become the first-line treatment for achalasia, with high success rates reported in the literature. However, a known complication of POEM is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The exact cause and risk factors of post-POEM GERD are not fully understood; however, a number of factors have played a role in its development. The management of post-POEM GERD is mainly by conservative measures, such as lifestyle changes and medications, like proton pump inhibitors (PPI), which are often the first-line method of treatment. However, surgical procedures, such as fundoplication, may be necessary in some patients. This literature review will discuss the effectiveness of the use of PPIs as a management strategy for post-POEM GERD, the factors that lead to PPI-resistant GERD, and other management strategies utilized in these cases.