暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: 0.05% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG; Irrisept [IrriMax]) is a commercial wound irrigation solution approved by the Food and Drug Administration that has seen recent adoption in the field of prosthetic urology; however, no study has evaluated whether 0.05% CHG is compatible with the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface (InhibiZone) of the AMS 700 penile prosthesis (Boston Scientific).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether 0.05% CHG alters the antibiotic efficacy of the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated penile prosthesis surface.
METHODS: Discs (8 mm) were taken by a punch biopsy (Sklar) from sterile penile prosthesis reservoirs whose surfaces had been impregnated with rifampin and minocycline. Discs (n = 10) were suspended in 0.05% CHG, vancomycin and gentamicin, or normal saline for 2 minutes to simulate intraoperative irrigation. Discs were then rinsed in normal saline to remove any unbound solution and incubated with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus for 48 hours. Adherent surface bacteria were suspended by shaking in a 0.3% Tween 20 solution, serially diluted, plated onto 3M PetriFilms, and counted. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion assays were conducted to generalize findings across various organisms.
RESULTS: Outcomes included (1) bacterial adherence to the implant surface measured as bacterial counts (in colony-forming units per milliliter) and (2) bacterial growth reduction measured as zones of inhibitions (in millimeters).
RESULTS: Incubation of implant surfaces in 0.05% CHG did not alter recovered bacterial counts as compared with normal saline and vancomycin/gentamycin. Similarly, within a single bacterial species, 0.05% CHG and vancomycin/gentamycin did not alter zone-of-inhibition measurements in Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates in vitro that 0.05% CHG may be used directly on the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface without altering the antibiotic efficacy of the coating.
UNASSIGNED: Strengths include that this is the first study to evaluate if 0.05% CHG affected the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface. Limitations include the use of in vitro studies, which serve as a proxy for in vivo practices and may not be entirely accurate or translatable in a clinical setting.
CONCLUSIONS: 0.05% CHG does not alter the antimicrobial activity of the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface as compared with vancomycin/gentamycin and normal saline in vitro; however, its efficacy in clinical practice remains to be evaluated.

UNASSIGNED: Implantation of a penile prosthesis is a reliable option for men with erectile dysfunction (ED) refractory to less invasive therapies. While the frequency of penile prosthesis infections have decreased, they remain a devastating complication. Herein we discuss why immediate salvage surgery is an essential technique for the management of implant infections. We will also describe the relevant advancements to this technique.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a narrative review via computer based search of PubMed for all relevant articles on penile prosthesis infection management, including guidelines, case series, reviews, and expert opinions. Search terms used included: \"inflatable penile prosthesis\", \"IPP\", \"penile prosthesis\", \"salvage\", \"treatment\", \"delayed\", \"immediate\". Only English peer-reviewed publications were included.
UNASSIGNED: Historically, patients who presented with penile prosthesis infections were exclusively managed with complete removal of the prosthesis without replacement. Although this strategy is safe, it hastens immediate ED and corporal fibrosis, resulting in loss of penile length and increased difficulty with subsequent prosthesis replacement. Previous case series have reported successful treatment of localized penile prosthesis infections with nonsurgical treatment, but the role of conservative treatment remains limited. The current standard of immediate salvage entails removal of the infected prosthesis and washout followed by immediate replacement with a new penile prosthesis. This technique has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, thus allowing patients to resume intercourse and maintain penile length.
UNASSIGNED: Immediate salvage surgery is safe and effective, and has emerged as the preferred strategy for the management of most patients with a penile prosthesis infection.

UNASSIGNED: Priapism is a rare condition characterized by persistent erection of the penis that lasts more than 4 hours in the absence of sexual stimulation and is associated with significant morbidity and complications, including erectile dysfunction and penile fibrosis. Surgical management of priapism can be extremely challenging. We herein provide a comprehensive review that aims to evaluate the role of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation in the management of priapism.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of PP implantation in treating priapism and the long-term complications, outcomes, and patients\' satisfaction rate.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 717 English-language studies published between 2002 and 2022, 17 were chosen for this review. Majority of patients had a malleable PP (MPP) implant, either early or delayed after the priapism episode. Early placement (EP) of PP is widely defined between studies ranging from less than 72 hours, within 1 week, and within 3 weeks. Most common causes of priapism were sickle cell anemia (SCA), medication-induced, and idiopathic. Studies show a higher satisfaction rate ranging between 80% and 100%, with sexual intercourse achievement ranging between 64.2% and 100%. Based on the GRADE system, included studies rated as very low quality of evidence. Commonly reported complications that arise after PP procedures, include device infection, erosion, curvature, and mechanical malfunction, such as auto-inflation.
UNASSIGNED: PP can be an effective treatment option for priapism, particularly in cases of ischemic priapism lasting more than 36 hours or recurrent priapism that is medically refractory. However, due to the very low quality of evidence, larger, well-designed studies are warranted where long-term outcomes, patients\' satisfaction, and complications following priapism-related PP implantation are measured as endpoints.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment options for patients with erectile dysfunction whose medical management has failed include the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Many patients with an IPP require subsequent urologic surgery, during which the reservoir of the IPP can be injured.
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to present a summary of current literature related to iatrogenic injuries to the IPP sustained during urologic surgery.
METHODS: Two reviewers independently performed a systematic search on PubMed using standardized search terms to identify pertinent articles. After preliminary review, relevant studies were analyzed to identify the presence of perioperative complications resulting in IPP reservoir injury. Results were categorized by surgical procedures.
RESULTS: Among 13 articles included, all were based on urologic surgery. Four studies identified IPP reservoir injury as a result of surgical injury. Of these, injuries occurred during radical prostatectomy (n = 3) and prostatic urethral lift surgery (UroLift, n = 1). Most radical prostatectomy studies without IPP reservoir injuries also described intentional surgical techniques that were employed to prevent reservoir damage, including modulation of reservoir inflation-deflation (n = 3), temporary reservoir repositioning (n = 1), or reservoir capsule dissection to improve visualization (n = 1). Findings from an additional novel case report on IPP injury during a UroLift procedure are presented in this review.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of studies identified intraoperative IPP reservoir injury as a significant complication of urologic surgery, particularly during radical prostatectomy. Novel case report findings also contribute the only other case of IPP reservoir damage sustained from delivery of UroLift implants. Findings are used to create a standardized surgical checklist that guides perioperative planning measures prior to pursuing surgery in adjacent spaces.

BACKGROUND: The salvage procedure for infected penile implants (IPs) has been a subject of interest since its inception in the late 1980s, yet its widespread adoption remains limited. The aim of this study was to realize a systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive analysis of salvage techniques for IPs and assess their efficacy, specifically focusing on functional success.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, employing Mesh terms related to penile prosthesis, penile implant, infection, and salvage procedures. Articles in French or English were considered for the final analysis, with exclusion of literature reviews.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles detailing various salvage techniques for IPs were identified. Mulcahy\'s initial technique was described in 1996, and consisted of complete removal of infected components, extensive lavage, and subsequent replacement with a similar implant. Success rates ranged from 80% to 100%, with emerging trends favoring the use of malleable implants during salvage. Unfortunately, functional data remained limited. When salvage penile prosthesis placement involved a malleable prosthesis, between 20% and 33% of patients underwent conversion to hydraulic prosthesis.
CONCLUSIONS: The salvage procedure for infected penile implants is a reliable method, with success rates surpassing 80%. The need for comparative studies assessing the type of implant used during salvage is required to tailor conservative management strategies for optimal patient outcomes. Finally, few data have been published regarding subsequent conversions from malleable penile implants to hydraulic penile implants after salvage.

暂无摘要。

The space of Retzius is an important anatomic location for pathology. Pathology in the space of Retzius is more common than previously believed, especially as more cases are discovered with increased use of cross-sectional imaging. Knowledge of the anatomy of the Space of Retzius is crucial for identifying and distinguishing between benign and pathological findings. This paper uses several case examples to discuss benign etiologies, including normal tissue or a foreign body. The paper also demonstrates a case series with pathologic findings in the Space of Retzius under the broad categories of infection, neoplasm, hemorrhage, or urine extravasation. Understanding of the anatomy and these example cases can improve the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists.

This article provides a comprehensive discussion of 3-piece inflatable penile implant surgery when performed through an infrapubic approach in patients presenting with challenging anatomy or corporal fibrosis. The infrapubic approach is one of the primary approaches for inflatable device placement with excellent long-term functional outcomes. While the literature is rich in descriptions of infrapubic placement in the primary, uncomplicated setting, its role in the management of complex patients presenting to centers of excellence is less elucidated. In uncomplicated cases, the infrapubic approach offers several theoretical advantages including shorter operative time and quicker return to sexual function. In addition to describing specific details of our infrapubic technique and perioperative management, I discuss scenarios in which an infrapubic approach may allow for better exposure for correction of dorsal deformity, facilitate secondary surgical maneuvers such as suprapubic lipectomy, or protect existing incontinence prosthetics already in place. Specific technique and surgical pearls from our prosthetic center of excellence are reviewed for each of these challenging scenarios. Ultimately, prosthetic surgeons should be adept at placing, revising, and removing devices through both approaches so that various forms of anatomical deformity and device failures can be addressed proficiently. In addition to my own clinical reflections, a critical review was performed using the Medline database to support our statements.

UNASSIGNED: Treatment for medication-refractory erectile dysfunction (ED) is based on a shared decision-making model. The gold standard treatment for medication refractory ED is penile prosthesis (PP) placement. Patient satisfaction rates with PP are high with adequate counseling and expectation-setting. However, as with any elective surgery, patient selection is key to minimizing complications and ultimately patient dissatisfaction. Psychological well-being is an important consideration in the preoperative evaluation and postoperative management of patients undergoing PP placement.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a PubMed literature review to identify pertinent studies for this narrative review. Specifically, we sought describe preoperative evaluation including appropriate counseling and patient selection as well relevant intraoperative and postoperative factors for patients undergoing PP placement with a specific focus on optimizing preoperative psychiatric factors and treatment-related patient satisfaction to identify pertinent articles describing ways to optimize patient satisfaction with PP.
UNASSIGNED: A patient\'s psychological state can influence the degree of understanding of their condition, affect perception of their treatment team, and limit their ability to cope with complications. All patients should undergo a thorough medical history and physical examination to screen for psychiatric health disorders, substance abuse, and chronic pain conditions. Establishing patient expectations with regards to treatment-related outcomes during the preoperative consultation will ensure congruency between the patient and performing surgeon. Patients with a more significant psychiatric distress related to their underlying sexual dysfunction may require additional evaluation and counseling preoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: PP placement is associated with high levels of overall satisfaction in appropriately screened patients. Specific considerations during preoperative counseling and careful patient selection, intraoperative decision making to avoid or anticipate possible complications, and postoperative cares are necessary to ensure the best result for an individual patient.