patient-centered interventions

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本综述研究了以医疗保健团队为重点的干预措施,以管理长期居住或住院医疗机构中老年人的持续性或复发性痛苦行为。
    我们使用OvidMEDLINE搜索了针对医护人员(HCW)与遇险行为管理相关的知识和技能的干预措施,ElsevierEmbase,和OvidPsycINFO从2002年12月到2022年12月。
    我们筛选了6,582篇文章;29项随机试验符合纳入标准。关于患者面临的HCW相互作用的三项研究(例如,药物管理,诊断困扰)在躁动方面的结果好坏参半;一项研究发现对生活质量没有影响。六项以HCW为重点的研究表明,痛苦行为的短期减少。没有证据表明生活质量改善或减少抗精神病药的使用。在结合HCW重点活动和面向患者活动的17项干预措施中,0显示显著的窘迫减少,8例显示抗精神病药物显著减少(OR=0.79,95CI[0.69,0.91]),9例显示生活质量改善(SMD=0.71,95CI[0.39,1.04])。一项评估HCW的研究,患者-,以环境为重点的干预活动在躁动方面表现出短期改善。
    结合HCW培训和患者管理的新型医疗保健模式提高了患者的生活质量,减少抗精神病药的使用,并可能减少苦恼行为。需要评估干预措施对员工倦怠和利用率的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: This review examines health care team-focused interventions on managing persistent or recurrent distress behaviors among older adults in long-term residential or inpatient health care settings.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched interventions addressing health care worker (HCW) knowledge and skills related to distress behavior management using Ovid MEDLINE, Elsevier Embase, and Ovid PsycINFO from December 2002 through December 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: We screened 6,582 articles; 29 randomized trials met inclusion criteria. Three studies on patient-facing HCW interactions (e.g. medication management, diagnosing distress) showed mixed results on agitation; one study found no effect on quality of life. Six HCW-focused studies suggested short-term reduction in distress behaviors. Quality-of-life improvement or decreased antipsychotic use was not evidenced. Among 17 interventions combining HCW-focused and patient-facing activities, 0 showed significant distress reduction, 8 showed significant antipsychotic reduction (OR = 0.79, 95%CI [0.69, 0.91]) and 9 showed quality of life improvements (SMD = 0.71, 95%CI [0.39, 1.04]). One study evaluating HCW, patient-, and environmental-focused intervention activities showed short-term improvement in agitation.
    UNASSIGNED: Novel health care models combining HCW training and patient management improve patient quality of life, reduce antipsychotic use, and may reduce distress behaviors. Evaluation of intervention\'s effects on staff burnout and utilization is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述文章评估了减少衰弱和痴呆住院老年人跌倒的策略的有效性和局限性。它探讨了现有的跌倒预防策略对急性容易跌倒和跌倒相关后果的队列的有效性。在MEDLINE进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,CINAHL,和PsycINFO,采用医学主题词(MeSH)确定2013年至2023年发表的关于患有痴呆和虚弱的住院老年人跌倒预防策略的研究.最初的643条记录被提炼成八篇文章,结构化跨学科床边回合(SIBR)作为一种值得注意的干预措施。SIBR通过促进改进的跨学科交流和护理计划,证明了跌倒的减少。然而,连续会议期间家庭参与的下降表明需要采取策略来维持家庭参与.研究结果提倡以患者为中心的干预措施,以解决该老年人群面临的认知和功能挑战。这篇综述提倡在医院环境中进行全面和包容性的研究,以改善虚弱的老年痴呆症患者的跌倒预防策略。
    This review article assesses the effectiveness and limitations of strategies to reduce falls among hospitalized older adults with frailty and dementia. It explores the efficacy of existing fall prevention strategies for a cohort that is acutely susceptible to falls and fall-related consequences. A systematic literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, employing Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to identify studies on fall prevention strategies in hospitalized older adults with both dementia and frailty published from 2013 to 2023. The initial 643 records were distilled to eight articles, with Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds (SIBR) emerging as a notable intervention. SIBR demonstrated a reduction in falls by fostering improved interdisciplinary communication and care planning. However, a decline in family engagement during consecutive sessions suggests a need for strategies to sustain familial involvement. The findings advocate for patient-centered interventions that address the cognitive and functional challenges faced by this cohort of older adults. This review advocates for comprehensive and inclusive research in hospital environments to improve fall prevention strategies for frail older adults with dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有效的沟通是以患者为中心的护理的重要组成部分,健康素养低的个人在管理健康方面面临重大挑战。导致住院时间更长,结果更差。视觉辅助工具,如医学插图和象形图,可以增强患者的理解力和记忆力;然而,在医学领域,缺乏评估和提高医生为患者绘制临床插图的能力的工具。本文探讨了波士顿大学医学院与波士顿大学美术系合作创建的美学量表。该量表对可以在临床环境中合理改进的基本设计元素进行评分。一项试点研究表明,训练有素的艺术家对不同概念和视觉质量的图像进行评分,Cronbach的alpha为0.95之间的评分可靠性。该量表在医学视觉教育和临床评估中具有潜在的用途。
    Effective communication is a crucial component of patient-centered care and individuals with low health literacy face significant challenges in managing their health, leading to longer hospital stays and worse outcomes. Visual aids, such as medical illustrations and pictograms, can enhance patient understanding and memory retention; however, there is a lack in the medical field of tools for evaluating and improving a physician\'s ability to draw clinical illustrations for their patient. This article explores an aesthetic scale created in collaboration between Boston University Medical School and the Boston University Fine-Arts department. The scale scores basic design elements that could reasonably be improved in a clinical setting. A pilot study demonstrated interrater reliability between trained artists scoring images of varying concepts and visual quality with a Cronbach\'s alpha of 0.95. This scale has potential use in medical visual education and clinical evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号