patient response

患者反应
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估中风运动和相关的行为变化对于评估干预效果和指导未来策略至关重要。我们旨在评估患者和旁观者对卒中体征和症状的预知以及他们在卒中发作时的反应。如果中风患者患有致残性中风,我们使用经过验证的问卷或他们的旁观者采访了中风患者。问卷是对165名参与者进行的,142例(86.1%)卒中患者和23例(13.9%)旁观者。平均年龄为52.6(SD=11.7),男女比例为7:1。在参与者中,33人(20.1%)对中风体征有预见性认识,其中,27人(16.5%)知道卡塔尔的中风运动。中风发作时的行为反应包括;激活急诊医疗服务(EMS)(n=55,33.3%),打电话给朋友/亲戚(n=69,41.8%),开车去医院(n=33,20%),等待病情改善(n=21,12.7%)。没有种族联系,婚姻状况,或活动意识与EMS激活。尽管社区对中风迹象和运动的认识有限,通过EMS激活寻求帮助的行为普遍较高,强调需要有针对性的教育工作和公共卫生干预措施。
    Evaluating stroke campaigns and associated behavioural changes is crucial to assess intervention effectiveness and inform future strategies. We aimed to evaluate patient\'s and bystanders\' foreknowledge of stroke signs and symptoms and their response at stroke onset. We interviewed stroke patients using a validated questionnaire or their bystanders if the stroke patient had disabling stroke. The questionnaire was administered to 165 participants, 142 (86.1%) stroke patients and 23 (13.9%) bystanders. The mean age was 52.6 (SD = 11.7), and male-female ratio was 7:1. Among the participants, 33 (20.1%) had foreknowledge of stroke signs, and of these, 27 (16.5%) were aware of the stroke campaign in Qatar. The behavioural responses at stroke onset included; activating Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (n = 55, 33.3%), calling friends/relatives (n = 69, 41.8%), driving to hospital (n = 33, 20%), waiting for improvement in condition (n = 21, 12.7%). There was no association of ethnicity, marital status, or campaign awareness with EMS activation. Despite limited community awareness of stroke signs and campaign, help-seeking behaviour through EMS activation was generally high, underscoring the need for focused educational efforts and public health interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:治疗前嗜铬粒蛋白A,碱性磷酸酶(ALP),或DeRitis比率(天冬氨酸转氨酶/丙氨酸转氨酶)是接受肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)的转移性神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者的预后因素。然而,它们对治疗内监测的价值尚不清楚.我们评估了PRRT期间血浆标志物的变化是否可以帮助识别预后不良的患者。
    方法:对141例接受[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOCPRRT的NET患者进行单中心回顾性分析。通过将每个PRRT周期之前立即确定的值除以治疗前值来计算实验室参数的变化。低vs.患者将高PFS与Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较。
    结果:进展,复发,在103/141例患者中观察到PRRT后死亡。PFS低的患者在PRRT的第三个(p=0.014)和第四个(p=0.039)周期之前显示出相对ALP的显着增加。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,治疗期间ALP值降低(Δ>10%)的患者的中位PFS为24.3个月(95%CI,20.7-27.8个月)。ALP值升高(Δ>10%)的患者12.5个月(95%CI,9.2-15.8个月),17.7个月(95%CI,13.6-21.8个月),ALP值稳定(Δ±10%)。
    结论:基于这些探索性数据,血浆ALP升高可能提示疾病进展,治疗期间应谨慎解读.
    BACKGROUND: Pretherapeutic chromogranin A, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) are prognostic factors in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). However, their value for intratherapeutic monitoring remains unclear. We evaluated if changes in plasma markers during PRRT can help identify patients with unfavorable outcomes.
    METHODS: A monocentric retrospective analysis of 141 patients with NET undergoing PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC was conducted. Changes in laboratory parameters were calculated by dividing the values determined immediately before each cycle of PRRT by the pretherapeutic value. Patients with low vs. high PFS were compared with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
    RESULTS: Progression, relapse, or death after PRRT was observed in 103/141 patients. Patients with low PFS showed a significant relative ALP increase before the third (p = 0.014) and fourth (p = 0.039) cycles of PRRT. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median PFS of 24.3 months (95% CI, 20.7-27.8 months) in patients with decreasing ALP values (Δ > 10%) during treatment, 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.2-15.8 months) in patients with increasing ALP values (Δ > 10%), and 17.7 months (95% CI, 13.6-21.8 months) with stable ALP values (Δ ± 10%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on these exploratory data, a rise in plasma ALP might indicate disease progression and should be interpreted cautiously during therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫检查点抑制(ICI)疗法重塑了肺癌管理的治疗前景,首次改善患者反应,预后,和总体生存率。尽管他们的临床效果,治疗反应性的变异性,以及抗药性,导致了对预测性生物标志物的迫切需求,以促进最有效的治疗方法的个性化选择。在识别此类生物标志物方面取得了重大进展,肿瘤突变负荷(TΜΒ)似乎是ICIs在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)等肿瘤中的疗效的主要和最有希望的预测生物标志物。抗PD-1/PD-L1和抗CTLA-4抗体已被广泛研究和临床利用。然而,这些药物的整体疗效仍不能令人满意,敦促研究新型抑制剂,例如针对LAG-3,TIM-3,TIGIT和VISTA的那些,可以作为单一疗法或与PD-1/PD-L1或CTLA-4阻断剂协同使用。这里,我们研究了TMB和癌症新抗原作为预测生物标志物在肺癌患者对不同ICI疗法的反应中的作用,特别关注最新的免疫检查点抑制剂,针对LAG-3、TIM-3、TIGIT和VISTA。我们进一步讨论免疫疗法的新趋势,包括CAR-T细胞疗法和个性化肿瘤疫苗。我们还回顾了可用于肺癌免疫疗法反应的其他潜在生物标志物。如PD-L1+IHC,MSI/DMMR,肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL),以及微生物组和循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)的作用。最后,我们讨论了每一个的局限性和挑战。
    Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapies have reshaped the therapeutic landscape in lung cancer management, providing first-time improvements in patient response, prognosis, and overall survival. Despite their clinical effectiveness, variability in treatment responsiveness, as well as drug resistance, have led to a compelling need for predictive biomarkers facilitating the individualized selection of the most efficient therapeutic approach. Significant progress has been made in the identification of such biomarkers, with tumor mutation burden (ΤΜΒ) appearing as the leading and most promising predictive biomarker for the efficacy of ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among other tumors. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have been extensively studied and clinically utilized. However, the overall efficiency of these drugs remains unsatisfactory, urging for the investigation of novel inhibitors, such as those targeting LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT and VISTA, which could be used either as a monotherapy or synergistically with the PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 blockers. Here, we investigate the role of TMB and cancer neoantigens as predictive biomarkers in the response of lung cancer patients to different ICI therapies, specifically focusing on the most recent immune checkpoint inhibitors, against LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT and VISTA. We further discuss the new trends in immunotherapies, including CAR T-cell therapy and personalized tumor vaccines. We also review further potential biomarkers that could be used in lung cancer response to immunotherapy, such as PD-L1+ IHC, MSI/dMMR, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), as well as the role of the microbiome and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Finally, we discuss the limitations and challenges of each.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非图像引导注射治疗(“神经阻滞”)通常在安大略省的社区疼痛诊所中针对慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)提供,但仍存在争议。
    目的:我们探讨了患者对CNCP神经阻滞的看法。
    方法:我们对安大略省四个社区疼痛诊所的CNCP疼痛患者进行了一项33项横断面调查,加拿大。该调查捕获了人口统计信息,并询问了患者神经阻滞的经历。
    结果:在接受治疗的616名患者中,562(91%)提供了完整的调查。受访者的平均年龄为53岁(标准差为12岁),71%是女性,大多数(57%)报告说与CNCP一起生活了十多年。58%的人已经接受神经阻滞治疗超过3年,51%的每周频率。自从接受神经阻滞后,在11分数字评定量表上,患者自我报告疼痛强度的中位数改善为2.5分(95%CI-2.5至-3.0),66%报告停止或减少处方药,包括阿片类药物。大多数未退休的人(62%)正在领取残疾福利,无法以任何身份工作。当被问及停止神经阻滞会有什么影响时,大多数就业患者(52%)报告说他们将无法工作,大多数表明它们在多个域中发挥作用的能力会下降。
    结论:接受CNCP神经阻滞的受访者认为这种干预有重要的疼痛缓解和功能改善。迫切需要随机试验和临床实践指南来优化CNCP神经阻滞的循证应用。
    BACKGROUND: Non-image guided injection treatments (\"nerve blocks\") are commonly provided in community pain clinics in Ontario for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) but remain controversial.
    OBJECTIVE: We explored patients\' perspectives of nerve blocks for CNCP.
    METHODS: We administered a 33-item cross-sectional survey to patients living with CNCP pain attending four community-based pain clinics in Ontario, Canada. The survey captured demographic information and asked about patient experiences with nerve blocks.
    RESULTS: Among 616 patients that were approached, 562 (91%) provided a completed survey. The mean age of respondents was 53 (SD 12), 71% were female, and the majority (57%) reported living with CNCP for more than a decade. Fifty-eight percent had been receiving nerve blocks for their pain for >3 years, 51% on a weekly frequency. Since receiving nerve blocks, patients self-reported a median improvement in pain intensity of 2.5 points (95% CI -2.5 to -3.0) on an 11-point numeric rating scale and 66% reported stopping or reducing prescription medications, including opioids. The majority who were not retired (62%) were receiving disability benefits and were unable to work in any capacity. When asked what impact cessation of nerve blocks would have, most employed patients (52%) reported they would be unable to work, and the majority indicated their ability to function across multiple domains would decrease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our respondents who received nerve blocks for CNCP attribute important pain relief and functional improvement to this intervention. Randomized trials and clinical practice guidelines are urgently needed to optimize the evidence-based use of nerve blocks for CNCP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:PD-1/PD-L1免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)广泛用于治疗转移性恶性肿瘤。合理地平衡疾病控制(DC)与免疫相关不良事件(irAE)的发展仍然是治疗的关键方面。持续疾病控制(SDC)后停止治疗的效果尚不清楚。该分析的目的是评估ICI应答者在至少12个月(SDC)后停止治疗的结果。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2014年至2021年新墨西哥大学综合癌症中心(UNMCCC)的数据库,并确定了接受ICI的患者。转移性实体瘤患者在获得SDC后停止ICI治疗[疾病稳定,部分响应,完全反应(SD,PR,选择CR)],并从他们的电子健康记录中审查结果。
    结果:我们确定了204例接受ICI治疗的各种实体癌患者。44名患者(21.6%)符合标准,其中35例随访数据被纳入最终分析;包括11例黑色素瘤,5非小细胞肺,4头和脖子,8肾,4尿路上皮,1肛门,1默克尔细胞癌,和1个脂肪肉瘤.患者分为两组:因irAE而停止ICI的患者[irAE组,n=14,中位治疗时间(MTT),16.6mo]和因其他原因停止治疗的人(例如完成2年的治疗,n=20,非癌症相关手术,n=1)(非IRAE组,n=21,MTT,23.7个月)。在irAE组中,最常见的irAE包括肺炎,皮疹,转胺炎,和疲劳。截至数据截止日期,14名患者中有9名(64%)继续显示SDC。该组中只有14名患者中的5名(36%)经历了疾病进展(PD),2例患者中有1例达到DC(最后一次治疗后中位随访19.2个月,范围3-50.2个月)。在非IRAE组中,21个中的13个(62%)继续拥有SDC。21人中有8人(38%)在停止治疗后出现PD,其中7人接受了ICI的重新挑战,7人中有2人达到DC(中位随访时间为22.2个月,范围3.6-54.8个月)。在停止ICI治疗的中位随访21.3个月(范围,3-54.8个月),来自irAE组的10名患者(71%)和来自非irAE组的13名患者(61.9%)在DC中并且没有经历PD。
    结论:我们证明22(66%)患者经历了SDC,无论癌症类型或irAE的发展。在包括因PD再次接受ICI治疗的患者后,25(71%)保留在DC中。未来的前瞻性恶性肿瘤特异性试验有必要评估最佳治疗持续时间。
    BACKGROUND: PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the treatment of metastatic malignancies. Judiciously balancing disease control (DC) against development of immune-related adverse events (irAE) remains a crucial aspect of treatment. The effect of treatment discontinuation after sustained disease control (SDC) is unknown. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate outcomes of responders to ICI who discontinue treatment after a minimum of 12 months (SDC).
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the database of the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center (UNMCCC) between 2014 and 2021 and identified patients who had received ICI. Patients with metastatic solid tumors who had stopped ICI therapy after achieving SDC [stable disease, partial response, complete response (SD, PR, CR)] were selected and outcomes reviewed from their electronic health records.
    RESULTS: We identified 204 patients who were treated with ICI for various solid cancers. Forty-four patients (21.6%) met the criteria, of whom 35 with follow-up data were included in the final analysis; including 11 melanoma, 5 non-small cell lung, 4 head & neck, 8 renal, 4 urothelial, 1 anal, 1 Merkel cell carcinoma, and 1 liposarcoma. Patients were divided into two groups: those who stopped ICI due to an irAE [irAE group, n = 14, median treatment time (MTT), 16.6 mo] and those who stopped due to other reasons (eg completion of 2 years of therapy, n = 20, non-cancer related surgery, n = 1) (non-irAE group, n = 21, MTT, 23.7 mo). Among the irAE group, the most common irAE included pneumonitis, rash, transaminitis, and fatigue. As of data cutoff date, 9 of 14 (64%) patients continued to show SDC. Only 5 of 14 (36%) patients in this group experienced progression of disease (PD), with 1 of 2 patients achieving DC (median follow-up of 19.2 mo after last dose of treatment, range 3-50.2 mo). Among the non-irAE group, 13 of 21 (62%) continued to have SDC. Eight of 21 (38%) experienced PD after stopping treatment, 7 of whom received ICI rechallenge, with 2 of 7 achieving DC (median follow-up of 22.2 mo, range 3.6-54.8 mo). At a median follow-up of 21.3 mo from stopping ICI therapy (range, 3-54.8 mo), 10 patients (71%) from the irAE group and 13 (61.9%) from the non-irAE group are in DC and have not experienced PD.
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that 22 (66%) patients experienced SDC, regardless of cancer type or development of irAE. After including patients who were re-challenged with ICI due to PD, 25 (71%) remain in DC. Future prospective malignancy-specific trials are warranted to evaluate optimal treatment duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    皮肤黑色素瘤细胞与它们的肿瘤微环境(TME)紧密相连,这影响了他们的开始,programming,和对治疗干预的敏感性/抗性。免疫活性TME有利于患者对免疫检查点抑制(ICI)的反应,但并非所有患者都对治疗有反应。这里,我们从TCGA-SKCM数据集评估了原发性和转移性肿瘤中的差异基因表达,与GTEx项目的正常皮肤样本进行比较,并验证了4个独立GEO数据集的关键发现,以及在独立患者队列中使用免疫组织化学。我们把注意力集中在检查各种免疫受体的表达上,免疫细胞部分,具有不同肿瘤突变负担(TMB)的皮肤黑色素瘤的免疫相关特征和突变特征。全球范围内,大多数免疫受体的表达与患者生存相关,但在TMBhigh和TMBlow肿瘤之间没有差异。黑色素瘤富含“幼稚T细胞”,“效应记忆T细胞”,“耗尽的T细胞”,“静息TregT细胞”和“Th1样”签名,不管他们的BRAF,NF1或RAS突变状态。IDO1和HLA-DRA中的体细胞突变很常见,可能与阻碍患者对ICI疗法的反应有关。我们最终分析了ICI治疗患者的转录组概况,并将他们的反应与高水平的IFNγ相关联,Merck18,CD274,CD8和低水平的骨髓衍生抑制细胞(MDSCs),癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAFs)和M2巨噬细胞,无论其TMB地位如何。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了预先存在的T细胞免疫在皮肤黑色素瘤ICI治疗结局中的重要性,并提示TMBlow患者也可从此类治疗中获益.
    Skin melanoma cells are tightly interconnected with their tumor microenvironment (TME), which influences their initiation, progression, and sensitivity/resistance to therapeutic interventions. An immune-active TME favors patient response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), but not all patients respond to therapy. Here, we assessed differential gene expression in primary and metastatic tumors from the TCGA-SKCM dataset, compared to normal skin samples from the GTEx project and validated key findings across 4 independent GEO datasets, as well as using immunohistochemistry in independent patient cohorts. We focused our attention on examining the expression of various immune receptors, immune-cell fractions, immune-related signatures and mutational signatures across cutaneous melanomas with diverse tumor mutation burdens (TMB). Globally, the expression of most immunoreceptors correlated with patient survival, but did not differ between TMBhigh and TMBlow tumors. Melanomas were enriched in \"naive T-cell\", \"effector memory T-cell\", \"exhausted T-cell\", \"resting Treg T-cell\" and \"Th1-like\" signatures, irrespective of their BRAF, NF1 or RAS mutational status. Somatic mutations in IDO1 and HLA-DRA were frequent and could be involved in hindering patient response to ICI therapies. We finally analyzed transcriptome profiles of ICI-treated patients and associated their response with high levels of IFNγ, Merck18, CD274, CD8, and low levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and M2 macrophages, irrespective of their TMB status. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of pre-existing T-cell immunity in ICI therapeutic outcomes in skin melanoma and suggest that TMBlow patients could also benefit from such therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肿瘤生长的个体曲线可以表示为数学模型。在本文中,我们利用药代动力学-药效学(PKPD)模型来使用临床研究数据准确预测肺生长曲线。我们的分析包括19例非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者接受了特定的大分割方案,定义为立体定向身体放射治疗(SBRT)。结果显示PKPD模型用于针对临床数据测试肺肿瘤的生长假设的实用性。该模型拟合了观察到的肺肿瘤的进展行为,通过测量患者在CT筛查治疗前后的肿瘤体积来表达。动力学的变化最好通过确定为患者对治疗的反应的参数来捕获。SBRT后肿瘤体积的中位随访时间为126天。这些结果已证明在临床前抗癌研究中使用数学建模作为潜在的预后工具。
    Individual curves for tumor growth can be expressed as mathematical models. Herein we exploited a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model to accurately predict the lung growth curves when using data from a clinical study. Our analysis included 19 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with specific hypofractionated regimens, defined as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The results exhibited the utility of the PKPD model for testing growth hypotheses of the lung tumor against clinical data. The model fitted the observed progression behavior of the lung tumors expressed by measuring the tumor volume of the patients before and after treatment from CT screening. The changes in dynamics were best captured by the parameter identified as the patients\' response to treatment. Median follow-up times for the tumor volume after SBRT were 126 days. These results have proven the use of mathematical modeling in preclinical anticancer investigations as a potential prognostic tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Immune checkpoint inhibitors target the inhibitory receptors on T cells to reinstate their antitumor ability and have shown significant efficacy in treating various cancers. However, because of tumor heterogeneity and many other uncover reasons, the objective response rate for programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade is only 20 to 30%; its response rate in solid tumors is relatively low, and different degrees of side effects have occurred. There are still many unknown factors affecting the therapeutic effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Additionally, screening the responding tumor patients accurately and improving the response rate and efficacy are huge challenges for tumor precise treatment. Here, we attempt to summarize the recent progress in response prediction and combined application of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and briefly discuss the methods and evaluations combined with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade to improve the implementation of precision immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This paper conceptualizes the act of diagnosis in primary care as a \'diagnostic moment,\' comprising a diagnostic utterance in a \'diagnostic slot,\' together with a patient response. Using a dataset of 201 treated conditions drawn from 255 video recorded medical visits with 71 physicians across 33 clinical practices in the Western United States, we investigate the incidence of diagnostic moments, aspects of their verbal design, and patient responsiveness. We find that only 53% of treated conditions in the dataset are associated with a diagnostic moment. Physicians present 66% of these diagnoses as hedged or otherwise doubtful, and deliver 30% of them without gazing at the patient. In the context of these diagnostic moments, patients are non- or minimally responsive 59% of the time. These findings underscore the different significance that may be accorded diagnosis in primary care in contrast to care in other medical contexts. The paper concludes that the analysis of sequences of action which empirically realize diagnosis are underrepresented in the sociology of diagnosis, and that better understanding of the diagnostic moment would enhance our understanding of diagnostic processes in primary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号