BACKGROUND: The prognosis comparison between endoscopic therapy + partial splenic embolization (PSE) and Hassab\'s operation is unclear in the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to compare the outcome of endoscopic therapy + PSE (EP) with a combination of splenectomy + pericardial devascularization procedure, known as Hassab\'s operation (SH) for esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis with hypersplenism.
METHODS: We enrolled 328 patients, including 125 and 203 patients who underwent EP and SH, respectively. Each group consisted of 110 patients after propensity score matching (PSM). Subsequently, we recorded and analyzed bleeding episodes and mortality in 6 months and 1, 2, and 5 years after therapies.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time in the EP and SH groups was 53 and 64 months, respectively. Bleeding incidence 6 months after therapies in the EP group was lower than that in the SH group (1.8% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.010). Additionally, complications in the perioperative period were not significantly different (0% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.008). However, the bleeding rate between the two groups was not significantly different at 1, 2, and 5 years after therapies (7.3% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.157; 10.9% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.205; 30.6% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.801), as well as mortality rate (4.5% vs 7.3%, P = 0.571).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SH therapy, the bleeding rate 6 months after EP therapy was lower, but the long-term bleeding rate was similar.

UNASSIGNED: This study aims to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of percutaneous splenic embolization (PSE) and splenectomy as approaches to treating cases of traumatic splenic rupture (TSR).
UNASSIGNED: Eligible articles published throughout August 2023 were identified. Endpoints compared between PSE and splenectomy patient groups included operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, duration of hospitalization, postoperative complication rates, and measures of immune function.
UNASSIGNED: Thirteen studies, involving 474 and 520 patients in the PSE and splenectomy groups respectively, were incorporated into this meta-analysis. As compared to the splenectomy group, individuals treated via PSE exhibited a significant reduction in pooled operative time (p < 0.00001) and hospitalization duration (p < 0.00001), with corresponding reductions in rates of intraoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.00001), total complications (p < 0.0001), incisional infection (p < 0.0001), ileus (p = 0.0004), and abdominal infection (p = 0.02). The immune status of these PSE group patients was also improved, as evidenced by significantly higher pooled CD4+ (30 days), CD4+/CD8+ (30 days), and CD3+ (30 days) values (p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.0001, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: Compared to splenectomy, PSE-based TSR treatment can significantly reduce operative time, rate of postoperative complications, and incidence of intraoperative hemorrhage, while improving post-procedural immune functionality.

A 78-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C visited our department for treatment of a thoracic aortic aneurysm. Her Child-Pugh classification was class A, and her model for end-stage liver (MELD) disease score was 8. As she also had thrombocytopenia associated with splenomegaly and esophageal varices, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and partial splenic embolization were performed before total arch replacement surgery for treating esophageal varices to reduce the bleeding risk during transesophageal echocardiography and for thrombocytopenia, respectively. After endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and partial splenic embolization, the platelet count increased; hence, total arch replacement surgery was performed. By combining partial splenic embolization and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, we were able to safely perform transesophageal echocardiography and total arch replacement surgery in the perioperative period.

UNASSIGNED: Partial splenic embolization (PSE) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been reported in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhotic hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia. However, efficacy and safety of repeated PSE when required are unclear. This study aims to investigate post-procedural changes in peripheral blood cell and hepatic function, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of HCC patients with hypersplenism received TACE and repeated PSE compared to those received TACE alone.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included 102 HCC patients with hypersplenism who received TACE (n = 73) or TACE+PSE (n = 29) from January 2014 to December 2021. Changes in peripheral blood cell and hepatic function were investigated at 1 week, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. TACE procedure sessions and adverse events were recorded. PFS and prognostic factors were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: Despite response to initial PSE being limited, repeated PSE increased platelet (PLT) again, which peaked at 18 months. It also continued to improve red blood cell (RBC) and hemoglobin, which showed significant differences in changes from baseline between two groups until 24 months, as well as Child-Pugh scores at 12 and 18 months. Mean TACE procedure sessions were significantly higher in TACE+PSE group than that in TACE alone group (4.55 vs 3.26, P = 0.019). TACE+PSE group had longer median PFS (19.4 vs 9.5 months, P = 0.023) than TACE alone group, where PSE was an independent protective factor (HR, 0.508; P = 0.014). Initial and repeated PSE showed no significant differences in safety.
UNASSIGNED: Repeated PSE is effective in increasing PLT again and improving RBC, hemoglobin and liver function. It contributed to performing serial TACE procedures thereafter. TACE combined with repeated PSE has significantly longer PFS than TACE alone, where PSE was an independent protective factor. Moreover, the safety of repeated PSE was comparable to initial PSE.

We report a patient with hemophilia A who underwent partial splenic embolization (PSE) for severe thrombocytopenia secondary to portal hypertension-induced splenomegaly, resulting in a stable long-term quality of life. The patient was diagnosed with hemophilia A and unfortunately contracted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) from blood products. He subsequently developed progressive splenomegaly due to portal hypertension from chronic HCV, resulting in severe thrombocytopenia. PSE was performed because he had occasional subcutaneous bleeding and needed to start interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) treatment for curing his HCV infection at that time. His platelet counts increased, and no serious adverse events were observed. Currently, he continues to receive outpatient treatment, regular factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy for hemophilia A, and antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection. Vascular embolization has been reported to be an effective and minimally invasive treatment for bleeding in hemophilia patients. PSE also provided him with a stable quality of life without the side effects of serious infections and thrombocytopenia relapses. We conclude that PSE is a promising therapeutic option for patients with hemophilia A.

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of superior versus inferior splenic artery embolization in partial splenic embolization (PSE) and identify predictors of major complications. Material and methods: This retrospective case-control study included 73 patients who underwent PSE between May 2005 and April 2021. They were divided into two groups: the superior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group A, n = 37) and the inferior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group B, n = 36). Outcome differences and major complications between the groups were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of major complications, and the optimal cutoff value for splenic embolization rates was determined using the Youden index. Results: There were no significant differences in laboratory and radiological outcomes between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lower incidence of major complications than Group B (p = 0.049), a lower Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain (p = 0.036), and a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.022). Independent risk factors for major complications included inferior and middle splenic artery embolization (odds ratio [OR] = 3.672; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.028-13.120; p = 0.045) and a higher spleen embolization rate (OR = 1.108; 95% CI = 1.003-1.224; p = 0.044). The optimal cutoff for spleen embolization rate to predict major complications was 59.93% (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 63.6%). Conclusion: Using 500-700 µm microspheres for PSE, targeting the middle and superior splenic artery yields similar effects to targeting the middle and inferior artery, but results in lower rates of major complications and shorter hospital stays. To effectively minimize the risk of major complications, the embolization rate should be kept below 59.93%, regardless of the target vessel.

BACKGROUND: Partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been suggested as an alternative to splenectomy in the treatment of hypersplenism. However, some patients may experience recurrence of hypersplenism after PSE and require splenectomy. Currently, there is a lack of evidence-based medical support regarding whether preoperative PSE followed by splenectomy can reduce the incidence of complications.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of preoperative PSE followed by splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis and hypersplenism.
METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2021, 321 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and hypersplenism underwent splenectomy at our department. Based on whether PSE was performed prior to splenectomy, the patients were divided into two groups: PSE group (n = 40) and non-PSE group (n = 281). Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, and follow-up data were compared between groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted, and univariable and multivariable analyses were used to establish a nomogram predictive model for intraoperative bleeding (IB). The receiver operating characteristic curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the differentiation, calibration, and clinical performance of the model.
RESULTS: After PSM, the non-PSE group showed significant reductions in hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and operation time (all P = 0.00). Multivariate analysis revealed that spleen length, portal vein diameter, splenic vein diameter, and history of PSE were independent predictive factors for IB. A nomogram predictive model of IB was constructed, and DCA demonstrated the clinical utility of this model. Both groups exhibited similar results in terms of overall survival during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PSE followed by splenectomy may increase the incidence of IB and a nomogram-based prediction model can predict the occurrence of IB.

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endovascular managements, including splenic vein recanalization (SVR), partial splenic embolization (PSE), and percutaneous transsplenic gastric varices embolization combined with PSE (PSE+GVE), for management of SPH-related variceal hemorrhage (VH).
A total of 61 patients with SPH-related VH from three hospitals were enrolled and classified into three groups: the SVR group (Group 1, n=24), the PSE+GVE group (Group 2, n=17), and the PSE group (Group 3, n=20). Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared among the groups.
The technical success rates for transhepatic and transsplenic SVR were 27.8% and 34.6%, respectively. No major complications were observed during any of the procedures. The median follow-up period was 53.2 months. The 2-year GI rebleeding rates for Group 1, 2, and 3 were 0%, 5.9%, and 35%, respectively. Groups 1 and 2 have a lower GI rebleeding rate (p = 0.002, p = 0.048, respectively) and better results of the degree of GV (p = 0.003, p = 0.044, respectively) compared to Group 3. No significant differences were found in 2-year GI rebleeding rates and the degree of GV between Group 1 and 2 (p = 0.415, p = 0.352, respectively).
SVR, PSE+GVE, and PSE seem safe and effective for management of SPH-related VH. SVR appears to be the superior treatment option. Transsplenic access may further increase the SVR success rate. PSE+GVE seems to have comparable outcomes in GV control and GI rebleeding rates compared to SVR, while superior to PSE.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of partial splenic embolization (PSE) combined with endoscopic therapy and endoscopic therapy alone in cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and hypersplenism.
METHODS: Cirrhosis patients with AVB who visited three hospitals from June 2016 to June 2022 were prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated to either the endoscopic therapy combined with PSE group (EP group) or the endoscopic intervention group (E group) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint of the study was re-bleeding of varices during follow-up, and the secondary endpoints were the recurrence of varices, death, and adverse events.
RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients were prospectively included, of whom 110 completed the trial. The risk of variceal re-bleeding (19.3% vs. 40.4% (23/57), p = 0.013) and variceal recurrence (28.1% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001) five years after treatment was significantly lower in the EP group than in the E group, and the EP treatment was the only significant independent risk factor affecting variceal re-bleeding and variceal recurrence in patients. The mortality rate was comparable between the EP and E groups. Peripheral blood counts and liver function all improved significantly in the EP group compared to the E group during the follow-up (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The rates of variceal re-bleeding and recurrence were significantly lower in cirrhosis patients with AVB and hypersplenism after combined endoscopic and PSE treatment compared to those who were provided endoscopic treatment only. The peripheral blood counts and liver function were also improved significantly in EP group (NCT02778425).

BACKGROUND: Partial splenic embolization (PSE) is a non-surgical procedure which was initially used to treat hypersplenism. Furthermore, partial splenic embolization can be used for the treatment of different conditions, including gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage. Here, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of emergency and non-emergency PSE in patients with gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage and recurrent portal hypertensive gastropathy bleeding due to cirrhotic (CPH) and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH).
METHODS: From December 2014 to July 2022, twenty-five patients with persistent esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH) and gastric variceal hemorrhage (GVH), recurrent EVH and GVH, controlled EVH with a high risk of recurrent bleeding, controlled GVH with a high risk of rebleeding, and portal hypertensive gastropathy due to CPH and NCPH underwent emergency and non-emergency PSE. PSE for treatment of persistent EVH and GVH was defined as emergency PSE. In all patients pharmacological and endoscopic treatment alone had not been sufficient to control variceal bleeding, and the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was contraindicated, not reasonable due to portal hemodynamics, or TIPS failure with recurrent esophageal bleeding had occurred. The patients were followed-up for six months.
RESULTS: All twenty-five patients, 12 with CPH and 13 with NCPH were successfully treated with PSE. In 13 out of 25 (52%) patients, PSE was performed under emergency conditions due to persistent EVH and GVH, clearly stopping the bleeding. Follow-up gastroscopy showed a significant regression of esophageal and gastric varices, classified as grade II or lower according to Paquet\'s classification after PSE in comparison to grade III to IV before PSE. During the follow-up period, no variceal re-bleeding occurred, neither in patients who were treated under emergency conditions nor in patients with non-emergency PSE. Furthermore, platelet count increased starting from day one after PSE, and after one week, thrombocyte levels had improved significantly. After six months, there was a sustained increase in the thrombocyte count at significantly higher levels. Fever, abdominal pain, and an increase in leucocyte count were transient side effects of the procedure. Severe complications were not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study analyzing the efficacy of emergency and non-emergency PSE for the treatment of gastroesophageal hemorrhage and recurrent portal hypertensive gastropathy bleeding in patients with CPH and NCPH. We show that PSE is a successful rescue therapy for patients in whom pharmacological and endoscopic treatment options fail and the placement of a TIPS is contraindicated. In critically ill CPH and NCPH patients with fulminant gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, PSE showed good results and is therefore an effective tool for the rescue and emergency management of gastroesophageal hemorrhage.