panoramic radiograph

全景射线照片
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:这项初步研究的目的是评估AI驱动平台的诊断性能,诊断(诊断有限公司,旧金山,CA,美国),使用全景X光片(PAN)评估牙髓治疗结果。材料和方法:该研究包括55例患者的55张PAN图像(男15例,女40例,12-70岁)在私人牙科中心接受成像。所有图像均使用HyperionX9PRO数字头像仪采集,并使用Diagnocat进行评估。基于云的AI平台。AI系统评估了以下牙髓治疗特征:填充概率,闭塞充足,密度,过量填充,填充中的空隙,短填充。两名人类观察者独立评估了这些图像,他们的共识作为参考标准。计算诊断准确性指标。结果:AI系统在检测牙髓填充的可能性方面表现出很高的准确性(90.72%)和很强的F1评分(95.12%)。然而,该系统在其他类别中显示出可变的性能,较低的准确性指标和不可接受的F1分数,用于短填充和填充评估中的空白(8.33%和14.29%,分别)。检测足够的闭塞和密度的准确性分别为55.81%和62.79%,分别。结论:基于AI的系统在识别牙髓治疗的牙齿方面表现出非常高的准确性,但对于牙髓治疗的其他定性特征却表现出可变的诊断准确性。
    Background/Objectives: The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an AI-driven platform, Diagnocat (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA), for assessing endodontic treatment outcomes using panoramic radiographs (PANs). Materials and Methods: The study included 55 PAN images of 55 patients (15 males and 40 females, aged 12-70) who underwent imaging at a private dental center. All images were acquired using a Hyperion X9 PRO digital cephalometer and were evaluated using Diagnocat, a cloud-based AI platform. The AI system assessed the following endodontic treatment features: filling probability, obturation adequacy, density, overfilling, voids in filling, and short filling. Two human observers independently evaluated the images, and their consensus served as the reference standard. The diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated. Results: The AI system demonstrated high accuracy (90.72%) and a strong F1 score (95.12%) in detecting the probability of endodontic filling. However, the system showed variable performance in other categories, with lower accuracy metrics and unacceptable F1 scores for short filling and voids in filling assessments (8.33% and 14.29%, respectively). The accuracy for detecting adequate obturation and density was 55.81% and 62.79%, respectively. Conclusions: The AI-based system showed very high accuracy in identifying endodontically treated teeth but exhibited variable diagnostic accuracy for other qualitative features of endodontic treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中风是世界范围内死亡的主要原因之一,与颈动脉粥样硬化密切相关。全景X光片(PR)通常用于牙科实践,并可用于可视化颈动脉钙化(CAC)。这项研究的目的是自动和健壮地分类和分割CAC具有大的大小变化,形状,和位置,以及基于PR的深度学习分析与解剖结构重叠的那些。我们开发了一个级联的深度学习网络(CACSNet),由PR上CAC的分类和分段网络组成。该网络是在参考CT图像使用具有优化权重的Tversky损失函数通过在精度和召回率之间进行平衡而准确确定的地面实况数据上进行训练的。具有EfficientNet-B4的CACSNet在正常或异常PR分类中的AUC为0.996,准确性为0.985,灵敏度为0.980,特异性为0.988。Jaccard指数对CAC病变的分割表现为0.595,骰子相似系数为0.722,0.749的精度,和0.756召回。我们的网络展示了优于以前基于PR的方法的分类性能,并且具有与基于其他成像方式的研究相当的分割性能。因此,CACSNet可用于CAC病变的稳健分类和分割,这些病变在形态上是可变的,并且与PR上下颌角的整个后下部区域的周围结构重叠。
    Stroke is one of the major causes of death worldwide, and is closely associated with atherosclerosis of the carotid artery. Panoramic radiographs (PRs) are routinely used in dental practice, and can be used to visualize carotid artery calcification (CAC). The purpose of this study was to automatically and robustly classify and segment CACs with large variations in size, shape, and location, and those overlapping with anatomical structures based on deep learning analysis of PRs. We developed a cascaded deep learning network (CACSNet) consisting of classification and segmentation networks for CACs on PRs. This network was trained on ground truth data accurately determined with reference to CT images using the Tversky loss function with optimized weights by balancing between precision and recall. CACSNet with EfficientNet-B4 achieved an AUC of 0.996, accuracy of 0.985, sensitivity of 0.980, and specificity of 0.988 in classification for normal or abnormal PRs. Segmentation performances for CAC lesions were 0.595 for the Jaccard index, 0.722 for the Dice similarity coefficient, 0.749 for precision, and 0.756 for recall. Our network demonstrated superior classification performance to previous methods based on PRs, and had comparable segmentation performance to studies based on other imaging modalities. Therefore, CACSNet can be used for robust classification and segmentation of CAC lesions that are morphologically variable and overlap with surrounding structures over the entire posterior inferior region of the mandibular angle on PRs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查拉脱维亚青少年牙科患者牙齿发育不全和相关牙齿畸形的患病率,并与其他欧洲国家进行比较。
    方法:在RigaStradins大学口腔医学研究所就诊的2692名11至14岁患者(男性占39.9%,女性占60.1%)的横断面研究,并在2020年8月至2021年9月之间拍摄了全景X射线照片。排除任何遗传综合征的患者。记录牙齿发育不全(不包括第三磨牙)和其他牙齿异常的数据。
    结果:拉脱维亚青少年牙科患者牙齿发育不全的患病率为9.3%,性别差异无统计学意义(χ2检验,p=0.472)。最常见的牙齿缺失是下颌第二前磨牙,其次是上外侧切牙和上第二前磨牙。在牙齿发育不全患者中,与其他牙齿异常的存在具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。
    结论:这项研究发现,拉脱维亚青少年牙科患者中非综合征性牙齿发育不全的患病率为9.3%,性别之间无统计学差异。患有牙齿发育不全的患者具有存在其他牙齿异常的统计学显着可能性(p<0.001)。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of tooth agenesis and associated dental anomalies in Latvian adolescent dental patients and compare it to other European countries.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 2692 11-to-14-year-old patients (39.9% males and 60.1% females) attending Riga Stradins University Institute of Stomatology with panoramic radiographs taken between August 2020 and September 2021. Patients with any genetic syndromes were excluded. Data on tooth agenesis (excluding third molars) and other dental anomalies were recorded.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of tooth agenesis in Latvian adolescent dental patients was 9.3% with no statistically significant difference between genders (χ2 test, p = 0.472). The most commonly missing teeth were mandibular second premolars, followed by upper lateral incisors and upper second premolars. There was a statistically significant association with the presence of other dental anomalies in tooth agenesis patients (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the prevalence of non-syndromic tooth agenesis in Latvian adolescent dental patients was 9.3% with no statistically significant differences between the genders. Patients with tooth agenesis have a statistically significant possibility of the presence of other dental anomalies (p < 0.001).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:准确的支架定位仍然具有挑战性。为避免角度误差,有些人建议在粘合期间检查全景射线照片。然而,它会导致扭曲。锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)提供了更精确的全景重建,但辐射剂量更高。这项研究的主要目的是比较没有射线照相术的直接结合之间的轴向定位精度,用传统的全景射线照片,并从CBCT进行全景重建。次要目标是评估每颗牙齿的定位精度并评估从业者经验水平的影响。
    方法:30名从业者,根据他们的经验分为两组,三次在模型上进行直接结合:没有射线照相术,然后用传统的全景射线照片,然后用CBCT进行全景重建。模型被扫描,使用OrthoAnalyzer测量角度误差。使用Friedman检验和Bonferroni校正进行多重比较(P值=0.05)。
    结果:对于低经验组,角度误差显著大于没有射线照相参考的公认极限,与CBCT重建显著降低。对于高水平的经验组,成角误差明显低于三种粘接方法的公认极限。对于每一颗牙齿,使用CBCT的全景重建作为参考,是最准确的方法,无论经验水平如何。更有经验的从业者对这三种方法的错误较少。
    结论:CBCT的全景重建是限制直接结合过程中角度误差的最准确方法。如果谨慎使用,传统的全景射线照相术仍然是可靠的工具。特别是对于经验不足的从业者,应避免没有任何射线照相参考的粘合。
    BACKGROUND: Accurate bracket positioning remains challenging. To avoid angulation errors, some recommend examining the panoramic radiograph during bonding. However, it can cause distortions. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides a more precise panoramic reconstruction but with higher radiation doses. The main objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of axial positioning between direct bonding without radiography, with conventional panoramic radiograph, and with panoramic reconstruction from CBCT. The secondary objectives are to evaluate positioning accuracy of each tooth and to assess the influence of practitioner level of experience.
    METHODS: Thirty practitioners, divided into two groups based on their experience performed direct bonding on a model thrice: without radiography, then with the conventional panoramic radiograph, then with the panoramic reconstruction from CBCT. Models were scanned, and angulation errors were measured using OrthoAnalyzer. Values were compared using the Friedman\'s test followed by the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (P-value = 0.05).
    RESULTS: For the low level of experience group, angulation errors were significantly greater than the accepted limit without radiographic reference, and significantly lower with CBCT reconstruction. For the high level of experience group, angulation errors were significantly lower than the accepted limit for the three bonding methods. For every tooth, using the panoramic reconstruction from CBCT as a reference, was the most accurate method, regardless of the level of experience. More experienced practitioners made fewer errors for the three methods.
    CONCLUSIONS: Panoramic reconstruction from CBCT is the most accurate method to limit angulation errors during direct bonding. Conventional panoramic radiography remains a reliable tool if used with caution. Bonding without any radiographic reference should be avoided especially for less experienced practitioners.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:根尖周病变(PLs)在牙科放射学中经常被发现。这些病变的准确诊断对于正确的治疗计划至关重要。使用成像技术(例如,正像图(OPG)和锥形束CT(CBCT)成像)来识别PL。这项研究的目的是评估人工智能(AI)软件Diagnocat在OPG和CBCT图像中进行PL检测的诊断准确性。方法:本研究包括49例患者,总共1223颗牙齿。OPG和CBCT图像均通过AI软件和三名经验丰富的临床医生进行分析。所有图像都是在一个患者队列中获得的,并将研究结果与使用CBCT的人类读者的共识进行了比较。将AI的诊断准确性与参考方法进行了比较,计算灵敏度,特异性,准确度,阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值(NPV),F1得分。结果:AI对OPG图像的敏感度为33.33%,F1评分为32.73%。对于CBCT图像,AI的敏感性为77.78%,F1评分为84.00%。OPG和CBCT图像的AI特异性均超过98%。结论:AI在CBCT图像中检测PLs具有较高的敏感性和特异性,但在OPG图像中具有较低的敏感性。
    Background/Objectives: Periapical lesions (PLs) are frequently detected in dental radiology. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is essential for proper treatment planning. Imaging techniques such as orthopantomogram (OPG) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging are used to identify PLs. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software Diagnocat for PL detection in OPG and CBCT images. Methods: The study included 49 patients, totaling 1223 teeth. Both OPG and CBCT images were analyzed by AI software and by three experienced clinicians. All the images were obtained in one patient cohort, and findings were compared to the consensus of human readers using CBCT. The AI\'s diagnostic accuracy was compared to a reference method, calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Results: The AI\'s sensitivity for OPG images was 33.33% with an F1 score of 32.73%. For CBCT images, the AI\'s sensitivity was 77.78% with an F1 score of 84.00%. The AI\'s specificity was over 98% for both OPG and CBCT images. Conclusions: The AI demonstrated high sensitivity and high specificity in detecting PLs in CBCT images but lower sensitivity in OPG images.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:弥漫性特发性骨骼骨肥厚症(DISH)是一种潜在的严重骨病,与前椎骨合并骨化相关,并可能伴有一系列症状学和全身性合并症。在全景射线照片和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描中描述这一发现的牙科文献有限。
    方法:提供两例DISH病例报告。一名患者沿颈椎表现出广泛的骨化,并随后出现吞咽困难和声音嘶哑。另一名受影响的患者的宫颈骨化是在形成的早期阶段发现的,没有症状。全景摄影,颈椎X线照相术,已提供CBCT检查。
    结论:牙科保健医生在拍摄全景X线片和CBCT扫描时,应仔细评估所有感兴趣的区域和周围的视野,以了解DISH的表现和其他潜在的颈椎疾病。可疑的DISH放射学发现应及时转诊以进行全面的医学评估,以减轻神经功能缺损和其他合并症。
    BACKGROUND: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a potentially serious osteopathic disorder associated with coalescing ossifications of the anterior vertebrae and may be concomitant with a constellation of symptomatology and systemic comorbidities. There is limited dental literature describing this finding on panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
    METHODS: Two case reports of DISH are provided. One patient manifested extensive ossifications along the cervical vertebrae and consequent episodes of dysphagia and hoarseness. The other affected patient\'s cervical ossification was found at an earlier stage of formation and without symptomatology. Panoramic radiography, cervical spine radiography, and CBCT examinations have been provided.
    CONCLUSIONS: Attending dental healthcare practitioners should carefully evaluate all areas of interest and surrounding fields of view when taking panoramic radiographs and CBCT scans for manifestations of DISH and other potential disorders of the cervical vertebrae. A suspected radiologic finding of DISH should prompt timely referral for comprehensive medical assessment to mitigate neurologic deficits and other comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:茎突(SP)在细长的SP(ESP)和/或钙化增加的意义上表现出增大(>30mm),从而导致鹰综合征(ES),从而具有临床相关性。全景图(PR)或计算机断层扫描(CT)是ES常规诊断的一部分。目前,CT被认为是金标准。这项研究的目的是在PR和CT之间的比较研究中调查SP/ESP的诊断/测量的准确性。此外,除了测量既定的参数,本研究旨在确定SP底部和尖端的当前未检查宽度。
    方法:本研究检查了在同一天接受PR和CT的100例患者的双侧SP的放射学发现。在基底和尖端处进行SP的长度和宽度的测量。此外,钙化模式,分析Langlais分类和ESP的患病率。
    结果:对于每个参数,PR和CT测量SP之间存在高度显著的相关性。在18-75岁的年龄组中,男性的SP明显长于女性。SP的长度测量结果(男性:右侧SP=32.98mm;左侧SP=35.21mm;女性:右侧SP=30.31mm;左侧SP=30.92mm)显着超过了可比研究的值。
    结论:因此,可以得出结论,与CT相比,PR提供了准确的测量结果,用于测量和诊断SP/ESP/Eagle综合征。这项研究是第一个检查底部和尖端的SP宽度的研究之一,因此,这些测量值可以作为进一步研究的基线.由于本研究中SP的平均长度超过30.0毫米,这些发现提出了一个问题,即30.0mm的截距是否足以诊断ESP.
    OBJECTIVE: The styloid process (SP) becomes clinically relevant when it shows enlargement (>30 mm) in the sense of an elongated SP (ESP) and/or increasing calcification leading to Eagle Syndrome (ES). Panoramic radiograph (PR) or computed tomography (CT) are part of the routine diagnostics in ES. Currently, CT is considered the gold standard. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy in the diagnostics/measurements of SP/ESP throughout a comparative study between PR and CT. Furthermore, in addition to measuring established parameters, this study aimed to determine the currently unexamined width in the base and tip of the SP.
    METHODS: The present study examined the radiological findings of bilateral SP in 100 patients who received both PR and CT on the same day. Measurements of the length of the SP and width at the basis and tip were performed. Furthermore, calcification patterns, Langlais classification and the prevalence of ESP were analyzed.
    RESULTS: There was a highly significant correlation between PR and CT measuring SP for every parameter. Males showed significantly longer SP than females among the age group between 18-75 years. The results of the length measurements of the SP (male: right SP=32.98 mm; left SP=35.21 mm; female: right SP=30.31 mm; left SP=30.92 mm) significantly exceeded the values of comparable studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Consequently, it can be concluded that PR provides accurate measurements when compared to CT for measuring and diagnosing SP/ESP/Eagle syndrome. This study was one of the first to examine the width of the SP in the base and tip, thus these measurements can serve as a baseline for further studies. Since the mean lengths of SP exceeded 30.0 mm in the present study, these findings raise the question of whether the cut-off of 30.0 mm is adequate for the diagnosis of ESP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the incidence and clinical characteristics of concomitant hypodontia and hyperdontia (CHH) by performing panoramic radiographs.
    METHODS: A total of 41 648 panoramic radiographs of pediatric patients who were admitted to the hospitals from January 2019 to May 2021 were reviewed, and 145 CHH patients were included in the study. The presence of CHH was recorded. SPSS 24.0 software was used for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of CHH was 0.35% (145/41 648). Males (102 cases) were obviously more than females (43 cases), and the difference between genders was statistically significant (P<0.001). The features of congenital permanent tooth loss in this group were predominantly 1 and 2 teeth missing and preferably mandibular lateral incisors and mandibular second premolars missing. The incidence of congenital permanent teeth loss was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla (P<0.001), but no difference was found in the distribution between left and right (P=0.84). The features of supernumerary teeth in this group were 1 and 2 teeth, mostly in the maxillary anterior area, mostly conical, mostly vertical inversion and orthotopic growth.
    CONCLUSIONS: CHH is a rare mixed numeric dental anomaly characterized by congenital missing teeth and supernumerary teeth occurring in the same individual. CHH cases are higher in men than in women. The characteristics of their hypodontia and hyperdontia are similar to those of patients with congenital permanent tooth absence or supernumerary teeth. Early diagnosis of the condition and a multidisciplinary approach for management of such case is recommended.
    目的: 应用曲面体层技术探讨少牙多牙症(CHH)的发生率和临床特征。方法: 收集2019年1月—2021年5月就诊的41 648例儿童口腔科患者的曲面体层片,纳入CHH患者145例,观察记录CHH的发生情况。应用SPSS 24.0软件统计分析所得的数据。结果: CHH的发生率为0.35%(145/41 648),男性(102例)多于女性(43例),性别间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。恒牙先天缺失特征:缺失1~2颗为主;最好发下颌侧切牙和下颌第二前磨牙;下颌恒牙先天缺失多于上颌恒牙先天缺失,二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);左侧先天缺失与右侧先天缺失差异无统计学意义(P=0.84)。多生牙特征:数目1~2颗;多见于上颌前牙区;多为圆锥形;垂直倒置生长和垂直正位生长为主。结论: CHH是一种少见的混合牙齿数目异常,男性多于女性,恒牙先天缺失和多生牙的特征与单独发生的恒牙先天缺失/多生牙的特征相似,建议早期诊断和多学科治疗。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    报告在巴勒斯坦种植牙治疗期间的影像学偏好。
    在第六届国际种植学会议(巴勒斯坦)期间,以电子和硬拷贝形式问卷提供了十四个多项选择题。这些问题调查了基于各种临床场景和治疗阶段主要使用的射线照相技术。
    捕获了一百三十七个响应。大多数参与者是有植入经验的普通牙医(79.6%)。不到三分之一的参与者(27.2%)是巴勒斯坦牙科种植学协会的成员。其中大多数(85.9%)在城市地区进行练习。在计划阶段,全景射线照相(PAN)与锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)相结合是最优选的射线照相技术。
    PAN和CBCT是规划阶段的首选。术后首选PAN,如果没有相关并发症。在有症状的患者的情况下,CBCT是首选的X线片。
    UNASSIGNED: To report the radiographic preferences during dental implant therapy in Palestine.
    UNASSIGNED: Fourteen multiple-choice questions were delivered in electronic and hardcopy formats questionnaires during the Sixth International Implantology Conference (Palestine). The questions investigated the radiographic techniques that are mostly used based on various clinical scenarios and treatment phases.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and thirty-seven responses were captured. The majority of the participants were general dentists with implant experience (79.6%). Less than a third of the participants (27.2%) were members of the Palestinian Association of Dental Implantology. The majority (85.9%) of them have their practice in a city zone. Panoramic radiograph (PAN) combined with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was the most preferred radiographic technique during the planning stage.
    UNASSIGNED: PAN and CBCT was the preferred choice during the planning stages. A PAN was preferred postoperatively and if no complications were associated. In the case of symptomatic patients, CBCT was the radiograph of choice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是将使用卷积神经网络(CNN)的技术与Demirjian的方法进行比较,以根据全景射线照片中的牙齿年龄对活着的个体进行实际年龄估计。这项研究使用了从2015年至2020年在安塔利亚口腔和牙科健康医院寻求治疗的4-17岁儿科患者中收集的5898张全景X射线图像进行诊断。Demirjian方法的评分是由具有适当培训和经验的研究人员执行的。在CNN方法中,各种CNN架构,包括Alexnet,VGG16,ResNet152,DenseNet201,InceptionV3,Xception,NASNetLarge,已对InceptionResNetV2和MobieNetV2进行了评估。Densenet201表现出0.73年的最低MAE值,强调其在年龄估计方面优于其他架构。在大多数年龄类别中,预测年龄与实际年龄非常吻合。在12岁和13岁时观察到最不一致的结果。结果突出了CNN预测的年龄与Demirjian方法之间的对应关系。总之,结果表明,CNN方法足以替代Demirjian的年龄估计方法。我们建议卷积神经网络可以有效地优化年龄估计的准确性,并且可以比传统方法更快,消除了向专家学习的需要。
    The aim of this study is to compare a technique using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with the Demirjian\'s method for chronological age estimation of living individuals based on tooth age from panoramic radiographs. This research used 5898 panoramic X-ray images collected for diagnostic from pediatric patients aged 4-17 who sought treatment at Antalya Oral and Dental Health Hospital between 2015 and 2020. The Demirjian\'s method\'s grading was executed by researchers who possessed appropriate training and experience. In the CNN method, various CNN architectures including Alexnet, VGG16, ResNet152, DenseNet201, InceptionV3, Xception, NASNetLarge, InceptionResNetV2, and MobieNetV2 have been evaluated. Densenet201 exhibited the lowest MAE value of 0.73 years, emphasizing its superior accuracy in age estimation compared to other architectures. In most age categories, the predicted age closely matches the actual age. The most inconsistent results are observed at ages 12 and 13. The results highlight correspondence between the age predicted by CNN and the Demirjian\'s approach. In conclusion, the results show that the CNN method is adequate to be an alternative to the Demirjian\'s age estimation method. We suggest that convolutional neural network can effectively optimize the accuracy of age estimation and can be faster than traditional methods, eliminating the need for additional learning from experts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号