BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic created challenges in accessing food, water, medications, and healthcare services some of which are linked with lower self-rated health (SRH). These challenges have already been documented in the US, but it remains unknown how the pandemic affected access to food, water, medications and healthcare services, and how these challenges relate to SRH in this group, a population experiencing profound health disparities and limited resources prior to the pandemic.
OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between challenges accessing food, water, healthcare, and medications during the COVID-19 pandemic and SRH among adults in Puerto Rico.
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of Puerto Rico-CEAL. Adults (>18 years; n=582) completed an online survey (December 30, 2021-February 8, 2022). Presence of each challenge during the past 30 days was measured and analyzed individually and combined (0, 1, >2). SRH (rated from poor-excellent) was measured before and at pandemic. Change in SRH was calculated. Adjusted Poisson models with robust variance errors estimated prevalence ratios (PR).
RESULTS: Experiencing food, water, medication, and healthcare challenges (vs. not) were associated with pandemic fair-poor SRH (PR=1.44, 95%CI=1.06-1.97; PR=1.59, 95%CI=1.15-2.18; PR=1.38, 95%CI=1.05-1.81; and PR=1.56,9 5%CI=1.15-2.12, respectively). Experiencing 2+ challenges (vs. none) was associated with pandemic fair-poor SRH (PR=1.77, 95%CI=1.22-2.55). Additionally, experiencing food, medication, and healthcare challenges (vs. not) was associated with decreased SRH (PR=1.35, 95%CI=1.08-1.69; PR=1.24, 95%CI=1.01-1.51; and PR=1.25, 95%CI=1.01-1.54, respectively), as well as experiencing 2+ challenges (vs. none; PR =1.49, 95%CI=1.15-1.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Challenges accessing food, water, medications, and healthcare services during the pandemic were associated with fair-poor SRH and decreased SRH in Puerto Rico. Public health policy should ensure access to basic needs.

Background Healthcare workers (HCWs) were compelled to use personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic to prevent cross-transmission. One of the most significant challenges in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic is the consistent and effective use of PPE to avoid staff exposure and infection. This study aimed to detect and evaluate the adverse effects of PPE and determine the associated risk factors. Methodology This cross-sectional study included 186 randomly selected HCWs at Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, from May 2022 to July 2022. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection, and data analysis was done using descriptive statistics. Results PPE-related adverse effects were noted among 147 HCWs, with a prevalence of 79.03%. Data analysis showed that factors significantly associated with PPE adverse effects in HCWs were age group 20-40 years (chi-squared (χ2) = 4.119, p = 0.04) and female gender (χ2 = 7.153, p = 0.007). Overall, 30.8% of participants had tested positive while on duty during the pandemic. Similarly, adverse effects were associated with PPE use of more than four hours per day and more than three days per week (χ2 = 5.477, p = 0.02 and χ2 = 6.488, p = 0.01, respectively). The majority of HCWs expressed indentation and pain on the back of the ear (52.7%) and pressure-related injury (39.8%) as adverse effects after wearing masks; skin soaking in sweat (54.83%) due to gloves; profuse sweating due to gown (64.28%); fogging (65.26%) due to googles and face-shield; and discomfort (61.29%). Conclusions The prevalence of adverse effects related to wearing PPE was alarmingly high among HCWs. The major risk factors were age, female sex, and duration of use. Although the majority of healthcare personnel have received vaccinations, the use of PPE has not altered, and severe skin reactions continue to be a global issue with no known solution. To further understand the problem, national data for the impacted healthcare professionals could be helpful. Furthermore, workplace prevention programs are necessary.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic triggered a global crisis affecting the work and partially the existence of businesses, governments, administrations and nonprofit organizations (NPOs). The latter not only faced severe challenges themselves, but also play(ed) a major role in fighting the pandemic, especially those offering services in social and health care. Maintaining service delivery under pandemic conditions to serve the often vital needs of clients requires (organizational) resilience. This concept generally relates to the ability to withstand adversity, to adapt in a turbulent environment and respond to (disruptive) change. Based on a qualitative content analysis of 33 interviews with nonprofit executives, this paper explores the impact of the pandemic on Austrian NPOs active in health and social care in terms of contextual challenges faced. Our study contributes to (nonprofit) resilience research and extreme context research literature as it illustrates how NPOs coped with this disruptive extreme context. Our findings show which resilience mechanisms (i.e. all kinds of resilient behavior, resources and capabilities) were helpful in overcoming pandemic challenges and getting through these hard times.