We present a life-threatening case of postpartum acute necrotizing pancreatitis. The patient is a 37-year-old female with no past medical history who delivered a healthy baby boy via cesarean section. Twenty days later, she presented to the emergency department with acute onset of nausea, non-bloody vomiting, abdominal bloating, and epigastric pain radiating to the back. Less than 24 hours later, she progressed into septic shock despite aggressive resuscitation, requiring vasopressor support in the ICU. Initial CT imaging showed multiple patchy hypodensities throughout the pancreas consistent with severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Her hospitalization was further complicated by difficulty obtaining source control of her infection, Clostridium difficile, and nutritional deficiencies that resulted in gross anasarca. She was discharged from the hospital on day 59 after undergoing multiple percutaneous drain placements, IV antibiotics, and endoscopic gastrocystostomy with four pancreatic necrosectomies. Since discharge, the patient has required readmission twice for complications from her pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical pancreatic necrosectomy (SPN) is an option for the management of infected pancreatic necrosis. The literature indicates that an escalating, combined endoscopic, interventional radiology and minimally invasive surgery \"step-up\" approach, such as video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement, may reduce the number of required SPNs and ICU complications, such as multiple organ failure. We hypothesized that complications for surgically treated severe necrotizing pancreatitis patients decreased during the period of adoption of the \"step-up\" approach.
METHODS: The American college of surgeons national surgery quality improvement program database (ACS-NSQIP) was used to find SPN cases from 2007 to 2019 in ACS-NSQIP submitting hospitals. Mortality and Clavien-Dindo class 4 (CD4) ICU complications were collected. Predictors of outcomes were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: There were 2457 SPN cases. SPN cases decreased from 0.09% in 2007 to 0.01% in 2019 of NSQIP operative cases (p < 0.001). Overall mortality was 8.5% and did not decrease with time. CD4 complications decreased from 40 to 27% (p < 0.001). There was a 65% reduction in SPN cases requiring a return to the operating room. Multivariate predictors of complications were emergency general surgery (EGS, p < 0.001), serum albumin (p < 0.0001) and modified frailty index (mFI) (p < 0.0001). Multivariate predictors of mortality were EGS (p < 0.0001), serum albumin (p < 0.0001), and mFI (p < 0.04). The mFI decreased after 2010 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: SPNs decreased after 2010, with decreasing CD4 complications, decreasing reoperation rates and stable mortality rates, likely indicating broad adoption of a \"step-up\" approach. Larger, prospective studies to compare indications and outcomes for \"step up\" versus open SPN are warranted.

Debridement and drainage have always been mainstream treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN), and the application of minimally invasive necrosectomy is becoming increasingly widespread. However, few studies have compared video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) and small incision pancreatic necrosectomy (SIPN) individually. Our aim was to compare VARD and SIPN by evaluating outcomes.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with IPN who underwent either VARD or SIPN between 2010 and 2019 in China. Data relative to patient demographics, major complications, health care resource utilization and mortality were collected. Statistical analyses used were the two-tailed Student\'s t-test and the chi-squared test.
Of 59 patients, 31 patients underwent SIPN and 28 patients were treated with VARD. SIPN and VARD had similar treatment success and mortality rates. The rate of reintervention due to lack of clinical improvement was significantly lower in the SIPN group (32% versus 61%; P = 0.028). In addition, the length of total hospital stay was 60 days in the SIPN group and 72 days in the VARD group (P < 0.0001) and mean total costs was significantly less in the SIPN group than in the VARD group (P = 0.008).
Given the shorter hospitalization period, lower total cost and lower rate of reinterventions, SIPN may be superior to the step-up approach for patients with IPN than for those with VARD.

We describe a case of emphysematous pancreatitis, a rare and serious complication of acute pancreatitis, which has a high mortality rate.
UNASSIGNED: The development of emphysematous pancreatitis implies the existence of infected necrosis.It is characterized by the replacement of the pancreatic bed by gas presence.The development of endoscopic techniques represents a promising advance in the treatment of this condition.

Necrotizing pancreatitis has historically been treated with open necrosectomy, which carries a high morbidity and mortality rate. More recently, there has been a shift towards endoscopic and percutaneous approaches employed as part of a minimally invasive step-up approach. Herein, we describe the technical approaches to video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement and sinus tract endoscopic debridement of pancreatic necrosis. Additionally, we review important patient selection considerations and the strengths and weaknesses of each of the approaches.

There is little information regarding the clinical spectrum and outcome of emergency abdominal operations from specialized units in India. We examined these in our gastrointestinal surgery and liver transplantation unit from a prospective database maintained between July 1996 and April 2013. Out of 9966 operations performed, 2255 (26%) were emergency procedures (reoperations during the same admission, e.g., for necrotizing pancreatitis were excluded). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range 1-107) and included the following age groups: 0-18 years (n = 105, 4.7%); 19-64 years (n = 1766, 78.3%), and >65 years (n = 384, 17.0%). The majority were males (1609, 71%), and there were 646 females (29%). The most common indications were small bowel emergencies (598, 26.5%), followed by pancreatic (417, 18.5%) and colonic (281, 12.5%) emergencies. Pancreatic operations were the second commonest in the adult and middle aged group. Colorectal operations were the second commonest in the geriatric age group (>65 years). Emergency operations for other conditions were: postoperative complications following elective operations 171 (7.5%), gastroduodenal bleeding or perforation in 144 (6.3%), and liver surgery in 93 patients (4.1%) patients. In the small bowel emergencies, 223 patients (37.2%) had primary diagnosis of adhesive obstruction, gangrene in 135 patients (22.5%), perforation in 121 patients (20%), and fistula in 56 patients (9.3%). Mesenteric venous thrombosis was found to be the primary cause of small bowel emergencies, either as a primary cause in gangrene or as a secondary cause in perforations and adhesions. The postoperative mortality after emergencies was 12.6% compared to 2% in elective procedures. Mortality was significantly higher in males (14%) than females (9.6%), p < 0.005. Category wise mortality was as follows: pancreatic surgery (n = 86, 20.6%), surgery for postoperative complications (n = 33, 19.3%), duodenal surgery (n = 18, 12.5%), small intestinal surgery (n = 68, 11.4%), and colonic surgery (n = 35, 12.45%). Emergency operations comprise a significant proportion of a GI surgical unit\'s workload. The mortality is greatest after pancreatic operations followed by those done for postoperative complications. Despite advances in surgical and postoperative care, emergency operations for abdominal emergencies are associated with mortality which is six times higher compared to elective procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the minimally invasive surgery into the step-up approach procedures as a standard treatment for severe acute pancreatitis and comparing its results with those obtained by classical management.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparative with two groups treated over two consecutive, equal periods of time were defined: group A, classic management with open necrosectomy from January 2006 to June 2010; and group B, management with the step-up approach with minimally invasive surgery from July 2010 to December 2014.
RESULTS: In group A, 83 patients with severe acute pancreatitis were treated, of whom 19 underwent at least one laparotomy, and in 5 any minimally invasive surgery. In group B, 81 patients were treated: minimally invasive surgery was necessary in 17 cases and laparotomy in 3. Among operated patients, the time from admission to first interventional procedures was significantly longer in group B (9 days vs. 18.5 days; p = 0.042). There were no significant differences in Intensive Care Unit stay or overall stay: 9.5 and 27 days (group A) vs. 8.5 and 21 days (group B). Mortality in operated patients and mortality overall were 50% and 18.1% in group A vs 0% and 6.2% in group B (p < 0.001 and p = 0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the step-up approach and minimally invasive surgery algorithm is feasible and could be considered as the standard of treatment for severe acute pancreatitis. The mortality rate deliberately descends when it is used.

Pancreatic necrosectomy (PN) following percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is an effective method of treating patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, however, the predictive factors for PN after PCD have not yet been identified. A total of 74 patients with suspected infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) and peripancreatic fluid collection were enrolled in the current study between October 2010 and October 2015. These patients received ultrasound or computer topography guided PCD followed by PN. Patients were divided into two groups: i) A PCD-alone group (n=32) and ii) a PCD+necrosectomy group (n=42). Multivariate analysis revealed that reduction of fluid collection after PCD (P=0.021), maximum extent of peripancreatic necrosis (P=0.019) and multiple organ failure (P=0.017) were predictors of PN following PCD. A prediction model was produced to evaluate the aforementioned factors and indicated that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.827. The probability of successful PCD was determined using a prognostic nomogram. Thus, the results of the current study demonstrated that a reduction of fluid collection by <50% following PCD, a maximum extent of peripancreatic necrosis of >50% and multiple organ failure are effective predictors of necrosectomy in patients with INP following PCD failure.

Acute pancreatitis is a common disease that can progress to gland necrosis, which imposes significant risk of morbidity and mortality. In general, the treatment for pancreatitis is a supportive therapy. However, there are several reasons to escalate to surgery or another intervention. This review discusses the pathophysiology as well as medical and interventional management of necrotizing pancreatitis. Current evidence suggests that patients are best served by delaying interventions for at least 4 weeks, draining as a first resort, and debriding recalcitrant tissue using minimally invasive techniques to promote or enhance postoperative recovery while reducing wound-related complications.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety of epidural anesthesia (EA), its effect on pancreatic perfusion and the outcome of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).
METHODS: From 2005 to August 2010, patients with predicted severe AP [Ranson score ≥ 2, C-reactive protein > 100 or necrosis on computed tomography (CT)] were prospectively randomized to either a group receiving EA or a control group treated by patient controlled intravenous analgesia. Pain management was evaluated in the two groups every eight hours using the visual analog pain scale (VAS). Parameters for clinical severity such as length of hospital stay, use of antibiotics, admission to the intensive care unit, radiological/clinical complications and the need for surgical necrosectomy including biochemical data were recorded. A CT scan using a perfusion protocol was performed on admission and at 72 h to evaluate pancreatic blood flow. A significant variation in blood flow was defined as a 20% difference in pancreatic perfusion between admission and 72 h and was measured in the head, body and tail of the pancreas.
RESULTS: We enrolled 35 patients. Thirteen were randomized to the EA group and 22 to the control group. There were no differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. The Balthazar radiological severity score on admission was higher in the EA group than in the control group (mean score 4.15 ± 2.54 vs 3.38 ± 1.75, respectively, P = 0.347) and the median Ranson scores were 3.4 and 2.7 respectively (P = NS). The median duration of EA was 5.7 d, and no complications of the epidural procedure were reported. An improvement in perfusion of the pancreas was observed in 13/30 (43%) of measurements in the EA group vs 2/27 (7%) in the control group (P = 0.0025). Necrosectomy was performed in 1/13 patients in the EA group vs 4/22 patients in the control group (P = 0.63). The VAS improved during the first ten days in the EA group compared to the control group (0.2 vs 2.33, P = 0.034 at 10 d). Length of stay and mortality were not statistically different between the 2 groups (26 d vs 30 d, P = 0.65, and 0% for both respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that EA increases arterial perfusion of the pancreas and improves the clinical outcome of patients with AP.