pancreatic adenocarcinoma treatment

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胰腺导管腺癌在儿童中极为罕见。这里,我们报道了一例诊断为胰腺导管腺癌的9岁男孩.根据针对患有胰腺癌的成人的国家综合癌症网络®(NCCN®)指南对患者进行治疗。尽管患者有多次进展,患者在初次诊断后18个月仍存活.
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is exceedingly rare in children. Here, we report the case of a nine-year-old boy diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The patient was treated per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) guidelines for adults with pancreatic cancer. Though the patient had multiple episodes of progression, the patient has remained alive with the disease 18 months after the initial diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估IV期胰腺腺癌及其转移的质子束治疗(PBT),并确定合格标准。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估了组织病理学诊断为胰腺腺癌的患者,已经进展到第四阶段,并在2017年至2022年期间接受了原发性和一些转移性病变的PBT。使用被动散射技术进行PBT。
    结果:16例患者(中位年龄,72年;范围,55-85岁)注册。所有患者在PBT开始时都患有IV期胰腺癌。从IV期诊断到开始PBT的中位持续时间为5.8(范围,0.4-13.5)个月。在转诊到我们医院之前,有三名患者在其他机构被诊断为复发性IV期癌症,因为他们在切除原发肿瘤后有局部复发和远处转移。化疗如下:PBT前,4、7、4和1例患者的0、1、2和3行,分别;与PBT同时,11例和5例患者中的0和1行,分别;PBT后,5和5例患者中的0和1行,分别;和未知,6名患者。有或没有未照射的活动性转移性肿瘤的自IV期诊断之日起的中位生存时间(MST)分别为11.4和20.1个月,分别。单因素分析显示,绩效状态(PS)水平(p<0.01),糖类抗原(CA)19-9肿瘤标志物水平(p<0.01),未接受放射治疗的活动性肿瘤(p=0.02),和有或没有PBT后化疗(p<0.01)是有统计学意义的因素。多因素分析显示,CA19-9肿瘤标志物水平(p=0.04),转移灶的数量(p=0.049),有无未照射的活动性转移性肿瘤(p=0.02)是重要因素。
    结论:当转移灶的数量限制在≤4个病灶,并且所有肿瘤都可以在患者的耐受时间内进行最小数量的照射范围内进行照射时,这是一个主观的持续时间,取决于病人的反应在每个疗程。它可能是寡转移胰腺癌患者的可行治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate proton beam therapy (PBT) for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its metastases and define the criteria for eligibility. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who had a histopathological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, had progressed to stage IV, and underwent PBT for both the primary and some metastatic lesions between 2017 and 2022. PBT was performed using the passive scattering technique.
    RESULTS: Sixteen patients (median age, 72 years; range, 55-85 years) were enrolled. All patients had stage IV pancreatic cancer at the initiation of PBT. The median duration from the date of stage IV diagnosis to the initiation of PBT was 5.8 (range, 0.4-13.5) months. Three patients had been diagnosed as having recurrent stage IV cancer at other institutions before their referral to our hospital because they had local recurrence and distant metastases after the resection of the primary tumor. Chemotherapy was as follows: pre-PBT, 0, 1, 2, and 3 lines in 4, 7, 4, and 1 patients, respectively; concurrent with PBT, 0 and 1 line in 11 and 5 patients, respectively; post-PBT, 0 and 1 line in 5 and 5 patients, respectively; and unknown, 6 patients. The median survival times (MSTs) from the date of stage IV diagnosis for the with or without non-irradiated active metastatic tumor were 11.4 and 20.1 months, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the performance status (PS) levels (p < 0.01), the carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 tumor marker levels (p < 0.01), active tumors not treated with irradiation (p = 0.02), and with or without post-PBT chemotherapy (p < 0.01) were statistically significant factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the CA 19-9 tumor marker levels (p= 0.04), the number of metastatic lesions (p = 0.049), and with or without non-irradiated active metastatic tumors (p = 0.02) were significant factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: PBT is indicated when the number of metastases is limited to ≤ 4 lesions and all tumors can be irradiated within the smallest possible number of irradiation fields that can be performed within the patient\'s tolerable time, which is a subjective duration that depends on the patient\'s reaction during each session. It may be a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的初始分期采用计算机断层扫描(CT)进行。分期进行腹膜细胞学检查的腹腔镜检查可以发现CT未发现的隐匿性疾病。此病例系列评估了PDAC患者在进行细胞学分期腹腔镜检查后的临床过程。
    方法:这项单中心研究检查了2017年至2020年诊断为非转移性PDAC的患者。患者在治疗前接受了CT和随后的腹腔镜检查以及细胞学检查。人口统计,临床病理状态,疗程,和生存率进行了比较。
    结果:确定了8例患者。所有腹腔镜检查均为阴性。五个细胞学检查是阴性的,两个是非典型的,一个是积极的。2例细胞学阴性的患者接受了新辅助化疗并接受了切除,诊断后平均随访时间为32.9个月。在剩下的三个细胞学阴性的患者中,没有人接受切除。一个人接受了延迟化疗,而其他人由于医学禁忌症而不能。平均生存期为3.5个月(n=2)。在两名非典型细胞学患者中,都没有做过切除手术.一个人因为医学禁忌症不能接受化疗,而另一个在诊断后不久就失去了随访。平均生存期为1.3个月(n=1)。细胞学阳性的患者接受确定性化疗,未切除,存活21.6个月。
    结论:细胞学检查阳性的患者可以幸免于非治疗性手术。其余未切除的患者生存不佳,尽管缺乏立即化疗可能有助于这一发现。需要进一步的研究来确定侵入性分期的最佳候选者和非典型细胞学的含义。
    BACKGROUND: Initial staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is performed with computed tomography (CT). Laparoscopy with peritoneal cytology at staging can uncover occult disease undetected by CT. This case series assessed clinical course following staging laparoscopy with cytology in patients with PDAC.
    METHODS: This single-center study examined patients with non-metastatic PDAC diagnosed from 2017 to 2020. Patients underwent CT and subsequent laparoscopy with cytology prior to treatment. Demographics, clinicopathologic status, treatment course, and survival were compared.
    RESULTS: Eight patients were identified. All had negative laparoscopies. Five cytologies were negative, two were atypical, and one was positive. Two patients with negative cytology received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent resection, with an average follow-up time of 32.9 months since diagnosis. Of the three remaining patients with negative cytology, none underwent resection. One received delayed chemotherapy, while the others could not due to medical contraindications. The average survival was 3.5 months (n=2). Of two patients with atypical cytology, neither underwent resection. One could not receive chemotherapy due to medical contraindication, while the other was lost to follow-up shortly after diagnosis. The average survival was 1.3 months (n=1). The patient with positive cytology received definitive chemotherapy without resection and survived for 21.6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: The patient with positive cytology may have been spared non-therapeutic surgery. Remaining unresected patients showed poor survival, though the lack of immediate chemotherapy may contribute to this finding. Further research is needed to determine optimal candidates for invasive staging and implications of atypical cytology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号