painful neuropathy

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了雄性和雌性小鼠后爪和背根神经节(DRG)中紫杉醇(PTX)引起的持续性疼痛性神经病进展过程中基因表达变化的时间过程。在最后一个PTX后1、16和31天,使用BulkRNA-seq检查这些基因表达变化。在这些时间点,差异表达基因(DEGs)主要与上皮的减少或增加有关,皮肤,骨头,肌肉发育和血管生成,髓鞘形成,轴突发生,和神经发生。这些过程伴随着与细胞骨架相关的DEGs的调节,细胞外基质组织,和细胞能量生产。在持续性疼痛性神经病的进展过程中,这种基因可塑性可以解释为与组织再生/变性有关的生物学过程。相比之下,与免疫过程相关的基因可塑性在PTX后1-31天最小。还指出,尽管男性和女性在生物学过程和疼痛慢性方面有相似之处,具体的DEGs根据性别有很大差异。本研究的主要结论是,PTX神经病变进展过程中后爪和DRG的基因表达可塑性与组织再生和变性相似,对免疫系统过程的影响最小,并且在个体基因水平上严重依赖性别。
    This study investigated the time course of gene expression changes during the progression of persistent painful neuropathy caused by paclitaxel (PTX) in male and female mouse hindpaws and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Bulk RNA-seq was used to examine these gene expression changes at 1, 16, and 31 days post-last PTX. At these time points, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were predominantly related to the reduction or increase in epithelial, skin, bone, and muscle development and to angiogenesis, myelination, axonogenesis, and neurogenesis. These processes are accompanied by the regulation of DEGs related to the cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix organization, and cellular energy production. This gene plasticity during the progression of persistent painful neuropathy could be interpreted as a biological process linked to tissue regeneration/degeneration. In contrast, gene plasticity related to immune processes was minimal at 1-31 days after PTX. It was also noted that despite similarities in biological processes and pain chronicity between males and females, specific DEGs differed dramatically according to sex. The main conclusions of this study are that gene expression plasticity in hindpaw and DRG during PTX neuropathy progression similar to tissue regeneration and degeneration, minimally affects immune system processes and is heavily sex-dependent at the individual gene level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于人群的远端对称性多发性神经病(DPN)和糖尿病自主神经病变(DAN)的患病率估计令人担忧。在这里,我们提出了神经病变的估计,并描述了它们在1型和2型糖尿病患者中的重叠。
    方法:在大量的门诊参与者中,使用振动感知阈值评估DPN,腓肠神经功能,触摸,疼痛和热感觉。确定的DPN由多伦多共识标准定义。痛苦的DPN由DouleurNeuropathique4个问题定义。DAN测量为:心血管反射测试,电化学皮肤电导,和胃轻瘫基数症状指数。
    结果:我们包括822名1型个体(平均年龄(±SD)54±16岁,中位[IQR]糖尿病持续时间26[15-40]年)和899例2型糖尿病患者(平均年龄67±11岁,中位糖尿病病程16[11-22]年)。明确的DPN在54%和68%的人群中普遍存在,1型和2型参与者的5%和15%的痛苦DPN,分别。1型糖尿病的DAN患病率为6%至39%,2型糖尿病的DAN患病率为9-49%。没有其他神经病变的DPN在T1D中占45%,在T2D中占50%。
    结论:DPN和DAN的患病率较高。DPN和DAN仅在50%的病例中共存。
    BACKGROUND: Population-based prevalence estimates of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) and diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) are scares. Here we present neuropathy estimates and describe their overlap in a large cohort of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
    METHODS: In a large population of outpatient participants, DPN was assessed using vibration perception threshold, sural nerve function, touch, pain and thermal sensation. Definite DPN was defined by the Toronto Consensus Criteria. Painful DPN was defined by Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions. DAN measures were: cardiovascular reflex tests, electrochemical skin conductance, and gastroparesis cardinal symptom index.
    RESULTS: We included 822 individuals with type 1 (mean age (±SD) 54 ± 16 years, median [IQR] diabetes duration 26 [15-40] years) and 899 with type 2 diabetes (mean age 67 ± 11 years, median diabetes duration 16 [11-22] years). Definite DPN was prevalent in 54 % and 68 %, and painful DPN was in 5 % and 15 % of type 1 and type 2 participants, respectively. The prevalence of DAN varied between 6 and 39 % for type 1 and 9-49 % for type 2 diabetes. DPN without other neuropathy was present in 45 % with T1D and 50 % with T2D.
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of DPN and DAN was high. DPN and DAN co-existed in only 50 % of cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    自发性上肢肌肉血肿是罕见的临床现象,经常被低估或误诊。他们可以在抗凝治疗的背景下提出管理挑战,尤其是在其他医疗条件下。我们介绍了一名52岁男性的病例,最初错过了自发性肌肉血肿的表现,该病例进展并重新出现在急诊科(ED),有混合性上肢神经病变的迹象,需要手术撤离和紧急筋膜切开术。该病例强调了及时诊断和干预的重要性。虽然血肿压迫引起的臂丛神经损伤并不常见,在我们的案例中,我们讨论了在临床上关注骨筋膜室综合征或进行性神经病时,手术干预以缓解压力和优化患者预后的必要性.
    Spontaneous upper limb muscle haematomas are rare clinical phenomenons, which often go under- or misdiagnosed. They can present management challenges in the context of anticoagulant therapy, especially in the presence of other medical conditions. We present the case of a 52-year-old male with an initially missed presentation of a spontaneous muscle haematoma that progressed and re-presented to the emergency department (ED) with signs of mixed upper limb neuropathy requiring surgical evacuation and an emergency fasciotomy. This case highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and intervention. While brachial plexus injuries from haematoma compression are uncommon, in our case, we discuss the need for surgical intervention to relieve pressure and optimise patient outcomes when clinically concerned about compartment syndrome or progressive neuropathy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:糖尿病神经病是糖尿病的一种使人衰弱的并发症,影响全世界数百万人。其特征在于由于长时间暴露于高血糖水平而导致的神经损伤。糖尿病性神经病可能会引起一系列症状,包括疼痛,麻木,肌肉无力,自主神经功能障碍,和足部溃疡,可能对那些受影响的人的生活质量造成重大损害。本文旨在对糖尿病神经病变的病理生理学进行全面概述。将讨论糖尿病神经病变的病因,包括风险因素,易感条件,以及高血糖之间复杂的相互作用的概述,代谢失调,和神经损伤。此外,我们将探索糖尿病神经病变的分子机制和途径,包括高血糖对神经功能的影响,葡萄糖代谢异常,晚期糖基化终产物(AGEs)的作用,以及炎症和免疫介导的过程。我们将概述受糖尿病神经病变影响的各种神经纤维,并探讨疼痛医学领域与糖尿病神经病变相关的常见症状和并发症。
    结果:这篇综述强调了在理解糖尿病神经病变的病理生理学方面的进展,并回顾了潜在的新治疗策略和未来研究的有希望的领域。总之,本文旨在阐明糖尿病神经病变的病理生理学,其深远的后果,以及不断发展的预防和管理策略。在了解糖尿病神经病变的机制和该领域正在进行的研究中,医疗保健专业人员可以更好地为糖尿病患者服务,最终改善福祉并减少并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: Diabetic neuropathy is a debilitating complication of diabetes mellitus that affects millions of individuals worldwide. It is characterized by nerve damage resulting from prolonged exposure to high blood glucose levels. Diabetic neuropathy may cause a range of symptoms, including pain, numbness, muscle weakness, autonomic dysfunction, and foot ulcers, potentially causing significant impairment to the quality of life for those affected. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy. The etiology of diabetic neuropathy will be discussed, including risk factors, predisposing conditions, and an overview of the complex interplay between hyperglycemia, metabolic dysregulation, and nerve damage. Additionally, we will explore the molecular mechanisms and pathways of diabetic neuropathy, including the impact of hyperglycemia on nerve function, abnormalities in glucose metabolism, the role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and inflammatory and immune-mediated processes. We will provide an overview of the various nerve fibers affected by diabetic neuropathy and explore the common symptoms and complications associated with diabetic neuropathy in the pain medicine field.
    RESULTS: This review highlights advances in understanding the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy as well as reviews potential novel therapeutic strategies and promising areas for future research. In conclusion, this review article aims to shed light on the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy, its far-reaching consequences, and the evolving strategies for prevention and management. In understanding the mechanisms of diabetic neuropathy and the ongoing research in this area, healthcare professionals can better serve patients with diabetes, ultimately improving well-being and reducing complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    加巴喷丁含有环己基并且是γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的一种形式。尽管它的名字,加巴喷丁不影响抑制性神经递质GABA或其受体。相反,它充当配体,与α2δ(Ca)通道亚基强烈结合,并干扰其调节功能和兴奋性神经递质的释放。加巴喷丁被FDA批准用于治疗癫痫和神经性疼痛,除了三叉神经痛.然而,它经常被用来治疗其他疼痛和心理障碍,比如焦虑。不像其他药物,加巴喷丁在肝脏中不代谢,仅由肾脏排泄。因此,调整肾功能不全患者的剂量以避免严重的不良反应至关重要。在这个案例报告中,我们介绍了1例慢性肾功能损害患者,他在加巴喷丁剂量增加后不久出现了毁灭性的肌阵挛性急干运动.
    Gabapentin contains a cyclohexyl group and is a form of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Despite its name, gabapentin does not affect the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA or its receptors. Instead, it acts as a ligand, binding strongly to the α2δ (Ca) channel subunit and interfering with its regulatory function and the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Gabapentin is approved by the FDA for treating seizure disorders and neuropathic pain, except for trigeminal neuralgia. However, it is frequently used off-label to treat other pain conditions and psychological disorders, such as anxiety. Unlike other drugs, gabapentin is not metabolized in the liver and is solely excreted by the kidneys. Therefore, it is crucial to adjust the dosage in patients with renal insufficiency to avoid severe adverse effects. In this case report, we present a patient with chronic renal impairment who experienced devastating myoclonic jerky movements shortly after increasing his gabapentin dose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:下背部和神经根疼痛是导致残疾和生活质量下降的主要原因,特别是由于其在普通人群中的高患病率。冷却射频治疗(CRT)已成为一种新型的非侵入性技术,用于治疗椎间盘源性疼痛,具有安全有效的结果。这项研究的目的是评估CRT治疗慢性神经性疼痛患者在接受保守治疗但未达到适当疼痛管理后继发于腰疝的神经根性疼痛的有效性。
    方法:对接受CRT治疗的盘源性下腰痛患者进行了前瞻性研究。参加第一次评估并通过磁共振成像(MRI)证实腰疝时,在CRT治疗前进行了1个月的物理治疗.为了评估患者的演变,在干预前后采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry下腰痛残疾量表(OLBPDS)评分进行测量.
    结果:共74例患者(平均年龄:48.42±14.32岁,66.11%的女性)被包括在内,他们总共接受了134个腰椎间盘突出症。当比较下腰痛的初始感觉和在一个月的物理治疗后发现非显著的部分改善后,观察到接受CRT治疗的患者在98.64%的病例中,椎间盘源性疼痛的平均改善为79.92%(p=<0.0001,95%CI:-7.010~-6.379).这伴随着他们日常生活活动功能的增加,由OLBPDS衡量。没有患者出现明显的不良事件,在唯一没有获得所需疼痛管理的情况下,病人的不适并没有恶化。
    结论:CRT椎间盘内扩张术是治疗腰椎神经根病的重要方法。术后结果显示其治疗神经根性疼痛的有效性和安全性,且无明显不良反应。
    BACKGROUND: Lower back and radicular pain are leading causes of disability and loss of quality of life, especially due to its high prevalence in the general population. Cooled radiofrequency treatment (CRT) has emerged as a novel non-invasive technique for the management of discogenic pain with safe and effective results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CRT in the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a lumbar hernia in patients with chronic neuropathic pain after receiving conservative treatment that did not achieve adequate pain management.
    METHODS: A prospective study of patients undergoing CRT for the management of discogenic low back pain was carried out. When attending the first evaluation and corroborating the lumbar hernias by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), treatment was offered one month of physiotherapy before CRT. To assess the evolution of the patients, measurements were taken before and after the intervention with the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry low back pain disability scale (OLBPDS) scores.
    RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (mean age: 48.42 ± 14.32 years, 66.11% female) were included, who were undergoing a total of 134 herniated intervertebral lumbar discs. When comparing the initial perception of low back pain and after finding a non-significant partial improvement with one month of physiotherapy treatment, it was observed that the patients who were offered CRT showed an average improvement in discogenic pain of 79.92% (p = <0.0001, 95% CI: -7.010 to -6.379) in 98.64% of cases. This was accompanied by an increase in their functionality of daily living activities, as measured by OLBPDS. No patients presented significant adverse events, and in the only case where the desired pain management was not obtained, the patient\'s discomfort did not worsen.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intradiscal biacuplasty by CRT is a considerable treatment for lumbar radiculopathy. Postoperative results demonstrated its effectiveness and safety in the management of radicular pain without the presence of significant adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:虽然糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的危险因素现在已被公认,疼痛性DPN的危险因素尚不清楚.我们对EURODIAB前瞻性并发症研究数据进行分析,以阐明疼痛性DPN的发生率和危险因素。
    方法:EURODIAB前瞻性并发症研究招募了3250名1型糖尿病患者,随访时间为7.3±0.6(平均值±SD)年。要评估DPN,使用了标准化的协议,包括临床评估,定量感官测试和自主功能测试。在基线和随访时评估疼痛性DPN(定义为确诊DPN的参与者腿部疼痛性神经性症状)。
    结果:在基线时,927例DPN患者中有234例(25.2%)患有疼痛性DPN。在后续行动中,1172名参与者中有276名(23.5%)出现了DPN事件。其中,41例(14.9%)有痛性DPN事件。大多数发生疼痛性DPN的参与者是女性(73%vs48%无痛DPNp=0.003),在调整糖尿病持续时间和HbA1c后,这仍然显着(OR2.69[95%CI1.41,6.23],p=0.004)。与无痛性DPN相比,疼痛性DPN患者中大量或微量白蛋白尿的参与者比例较低(15%vs34%,p=0.02),在调整HbA1c后,这种关联仍然存在,糖尿病病程和性别(p=0.03)。
    结论:在这项调查疼痛性DPN危险因素的第一项前瞻性研究中,我们明确证明,女性是痛性DPN的危险因素.此外,糖尿病肾病在疼痛事件中的证据较少,与无痛相比,DPN。因此,疼痛性DPN不是由传统上与微血管疾病相关的心脏代谢因素驱动的。因此,性别差异可能在糖尿病神经性疼痛的病理生理学中起重要作用。未来的研究需要关注社会心理,遗传和其他因素在疼痛性DPN的发展中。
    OBJECTIVE: While the risk factors for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) are now well recognised, the risk factors for painful DPN remain unknown. We performed analysis of the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study data to elucidate the incidence and risk factors of painful DPN.
    METHODS: The EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study recruited 3250 participants with type 1 diabetes who were followed up for 7.3±0.6 (mean ± SD) years. To evaluate DPN, a standardised protocol was used, including clinical assessment, quantitative sensory testing and autonomic function tests. Painful DPN (defined as painful neuropathic symptoms in the legs in participants with confirmed DPN) was assessed at baseline and follow-up.
    RESULTS: At baseline, 234 (25.2%) out of 927 participants with DPN had painful DPN. At follow-up, incident DPN developed in 276 (23.5%) of 1172 participants. Of these, 41 (14.9%) had incident painful DPN. Most of the participants who developed incident painful DPN were female (73% vs 48% painless DPN p=0.003) and this remained significant after adjustment for duration of diabetes and HbA1c (OR 2.69 [95% CI 1.41, 6.23], p=0.004). The proportion of participants with macro- or microalbuminuria was lower in those with painful DPN compared with painless DPN (15% vs 34%, p=0.02), and this association remained after adjusting for HbA1c, diabetes duration and sex (p=0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this first prospective study to investigate the risk factors for painful DPN, we definitively demonstrate that female sex is a risk factor for painful DPN. Additionally, there is less evidence of diabetic nephropathy in incident painful, compared with painless, DPN. Thus, painful DPN is not driven by cardiometabolic factors traditionally associated with microvascular disease. Sex differences may therefore play an important role in the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain in diabetes. Future studies need to look at psychosocial, genetic and other factors in the development of painful DPN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    没有专门针对疼痛性小纤维神经病(SFN)的药物治疗。传送,第二阶段丰富的注册研究,评估了维索三嗪的疗效和安全性,电压和使用依赖性钠通道阻滞剂,在患有特发性或糖尿病相关疼痛SFN的参与者中。
    运输是第二阶段,多中心,安慰剂对照,双盲(DB),丰富的入学率,随机戒断研究。该研究于2018年5月17日至2021年4月12日在13个国家(欧洲和加拿大)的68个地点进行。在为期4周的开放标签期中,265名患有疼痛性SFN(大纤维神经病和小纤维神经病的混合物并非排他性)的成年人每天两次(BID)接受口服维索三嗪350mg,123名参与者(在开放标签期间平均每日疼痛[ADP]评分比基线降低≥30%)被随机分为1:1:1,接受200mgBID,350mgBID或安慰剂,为期12周的双盲(DB)期。主要终点是DB第12周时ADP相对于基线的变化。次要终点包括ADP从基线降低≥30%的参与者比例和DB第12周时患者整体疼痛印象(PGIC)应答者的比例。监测因治疗引起的不良事件(AE)。统计显著性设定为0.10(双侧)。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03339336)和ClinicalTrialsregister上注册。欧盟(2017-000991-27)。
    使用维索三嗪200mgBID(-0.85;SE,0.43;95%CI,-1.71至0.00;p=0.050),但不是350毫克BID(-0.17;SE,0.43;95%CI,-1.01至0.68;p=0.70)。数字上,但没有统计学意义,与安慰剂相比,更多接受维索三嗪的参与者ADP从基线降低≥30%(68.3-72.5%vs52.5%),在DB第12周,仅350mgBID组的PGIC应答者显著高于安慰剂组(48.8%vs30.0%;比值比=2.60;95%CI,0.97-6.99;p=0.058).维索三嗪组的AE大多为轻度至中度。DB200mgBID和350mgBID维索三嗪组中最常见的不良事件(≥5%的维索三嗪治疗的参与者)是跌倒,鼻咽炎,肌肉痉挛,和尿路感染.
    在我们的研究中,维索三嗪200毫克,但不是350毫克的BID,达到主要终点;在DB第12周时,更多接受维索三嗪治疗的参与者ADP比基线降低≥30%。在SFN患者中,维索三嗪(两种剂量)的耐受性良好。
    Biogen,Inc.
    UNASSIGNED: No pharmacological treatments are specifically indicated for painful small fibre neuropathy (SFN). CONVEY, a phase 2 enriched-enrolment study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of vixotrigine, a voltage- and use-dependent sodium channel blocker, in participants with idiopathic or diabetes-associated painful SFN.
    UNASSIGNED: CONVEY was a phase 2, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind (DB), enriched-enrolment, randomised withdrawal study. The study was conducted at 68 sites in 13 countries (Europe and Canada) between May 17, 2018, and April 12, 2021. Following a 4-week open-label period in which 265 adults with painful SFN (a mixture of large and small fibre neuropathy was not exclusionary) received oral vixotrigine 350 mg twice daily (BID), 123 participants (with a ≥30% reduction from baseline in average daily pain [ADP] score during the open-label period) were randomised 1:1:1 to receive 200 mg BID, 350 mg BID or placebo for a 12-week double-blind (DB) period. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in ADP at DB Week 12. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of participants with a ≥30% reduction from baseline in ADP and the proportion of Patient Global Impression of Pain (PGIC) responders at DB Week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were monitored. Statistical significance was set at 0.10 (2-sided). The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03339336) and on ClinicalTrialsregister.eu (2017-000991-27).
    UNASSIGNED: A statistically significant difference from placebo in least squares mean reduction in ADP score from baseline to DB Week 12 was observed with vixotrigine 200 mg BID (-0.85; SE, 0.43; 95% CI, -1.71 to 0.00; p = 0.050) but not 350 mg BID (-0.17; SE, 0.43; 95% CI, -1.01 to 0.68; p = 0.70). Numerically, but not statistically significantly, more participants who received vixotrigine vs placebo experienced a ≥30% ADP reduction from baseline (68.3-72.5% vs 52.5%), and only the 350 mg BID group had significantly more PGIC responders vs placebo (48.8% vs 30.0%; odds ratio = 2.60; 95% CI, 0.97-6.99; p = 0.058) at DB Week 12. AEs were mostly mild to moderate in the vixotrigine groups. The most common AEs (≥5% of vixotrigine-treated participants) in the DB 200 mg BID and 350 mg BID vixotrigine groups were falls, nasopharyngitis, muscle spasm, and urinary tract infection.
    UNASSIGNED: In our study, vixotrigine 200 mg BID, but not 350 mg BID, met the primary endpoint; more vixotrigine-treated participants experienced a ≥30% reduction from baseline in ADP at DB Week 12. Vixotrigine (at both dosages) was well tolerated in participants with SFN.
    UNASSIGNED: Biogen, Inc.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痛苦的周围神经病变是一种可能与糖尿病以及其他神经病变有关的疾病。常见的疼痛治疗包括局部应用辣椒素以及使用口服药物,通常是加巴喷丁。结果是可变的,很少提供实质性的持久救济。
    本报告描述了如何使用一种简单易行的针灸技术-骨间膜刺激-治疗3例患者的疼痛性神经病:1例糖尿病性神经病;1例特发性疼痛性神经病;1例在越南服用时暴露于橙剂引起的疼痛性神经病。
    这3名患者在几周的时间内缓解了与神经病相关的疼痛。通过定期治疗,在没有添加新药的情况下,获得了持续的缓解。
    骨间膜刺激是安全的,简单,并有效治疗疼痛性神经病。对于患有疼痛性神经病的患者,应考虑这种治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Painful peripheral neuropathy is a condition that may be associated with diabetes as well as other causes of neuropathy. Common treatments for the pain include topical application of capsaicin as well as using oral medications, typically gabapentin. The results are variable and rarely provide substantial lasting relief.
    UNASSIGNED: This report describes how a simple and easy to perform acupuncture technique-interosseous membrane stimulation-was used to treat painful neuropathy in 3 patients: 1 with painful diabetic neuropathy; 1 with idiopathic painful neuropathy; and 1 with painful neuropathy caused by exposure to Agent Orange while serving in Vietnam.
    UNASSIGNED: The 3 patients had much relief from the pain associated with their neuropathy for several weeks at a time. With regular treatments, sustained relief was obtained any without the addition of new medication.
    UNASSIGNED: Interosseous membrane stimulation is safe, simple, and effective for treatment of painful neuropathy. This treatment should be considered for patients who are suffering with painful neuropathy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的:神经淋巴瘤病定义为恶性淋巴瘤细胞对周围神经系统(PNS)的浸润。这是一种罕见的实体,诊断很复杂,特别是当PNS受累是最初和主要症状时。为了提高对该疾病的认识并缩短诊断时间,我们报告了9例没有血液系统恶性肿瘤病史的患者,在评估和检查周围神经病变后被诊断为神经淋巴瘤病。
    方法:患者来自PitiéSalpätrière和Nancy医院的临床神经生理学系,为期15年。每位患者的组织病理学检查均证实了神经淋巴瘤病的诊断。我们描述了他们的临床特征,电生理学,生物,成像,和组织病理学特征。
    结果:神经病变的特征是疼痛(78%),近端受累(44%)或所有四肢受累(67%),不对称或多焦点分布(78%),丰富的纤颤(78%),迅速恶化的趋势,和显著相关的体重减轻(67%)。神经淋巴瘤病主要在神经活检(89%)上诊断为淋巴样细胞浸润,非典型细胞(78%),单克隆种群(78%),并由氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描支持,脊柱或神经丛MRI,脑脊液分析,和血液淋巴细胞免疫分型。六名患者患有全身性疾病,三名患者仅限于PNS。在后一种情况下,进展可能是不可预测的,可能是弥漫性和爆炸性的,有时发生在看似乏味的课程之后几年。
    结论:这项研究提供了对神经淋巴瘤病的更好的认识和理解,而神经病是最初的表现。
    Neurolymphomatosis is defined as an infiltration of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) by malignant lymphoma cells. It is a rare entity and diagnosis is complicated especially when PNS involvement is the initial and leading symptom. To improve knowledge of the disorder and shorten the time to diagnosis, we report a series of nine patients without a history of hematologic malignancy, who were diagnosed with neurolymphomatosis after evaluation and workup of peripheral neuropathy.
    The patients were included from the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology at Pitié Salpêtrière and Nancy Hospitals over a period of 15 years. Diagnosis of neurolymphomatosis was confirmed by histopathologic examination for each patient. We characterized their clinical, electrophysiological, biological, imaging, and histopathologic features.
    The neuropathy was characterized by pain (78%), proximal involvement (44%) or of all four limbs (67%), asymmetrical or with multifocal distribution (78%), abundant fibrillation (78%), a tendency to worsen rapidly, and significant associated weight loss (67%). Neurolymphomatosis was diagnosed principally on nerve biopsy (89%) identifying infiltration of lymphoid cells, atypical cells (78%), a monoclonal population (78%), and supported by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, spine or plexus MRI, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and blood lymphocyte immunophenotyping. Six patients had systemic disease and three impairment limited to the PNS. In the latter case, progression could be unpredictable and may be diffuse and explosive, sometimes occurring years after a seemingly indolent course.
    This study provides better knowledge and understanding of neurolymphomatosis when neuropathy is the initial presentation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号