pain mechanisms

疼痛机制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不适应可塑性与疼痛等疾病的慢性化有关,但是从急性疼痛到慢性疼痛的转变在机制上还没有得到很好的理解。杏仁核中央核(CeA)的神经可塑性已成为损伤引起的疼痛的感觉和情感方面的机制,尽管证据来自几乎仅在急性疼痛条件下进行的研究,并且对细胞类型特异性不了解。这里,我们报道了神经性疼痛中基因不同和投射特异性CeA神经元的时间依赖性变化.急性期CRF投射神经元的过度兴奋和臂旁(PB)输入的突触可塑性转变为慢性期非CRF神经元无突触可塑性的过度兴奋。因此,PB→CeA途径的化学遗传抑制减轻了急性疼痛相关行为,但不是慢性的,神经性疼痛。神经可塑性的细胞类型特异性时间变化为临床观察提供了神经生物学证据,即慢性疼痛不仅仅是急性疼痛的长期持续存在。
    Maladaptive plasticity is linked to the chronification of diseases such as pain, but the transition from acute to chronic pain is not well understood mechanistically. Neuroplasticity in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) has emerged as a mechanism for sensory and emotional-affective aspects of injury-induced pain, although evidence comes from studies conducted almost exclusively in acute pain conditions and agnostic to cell type specificity. Here, we report time-dependent changes in genetically distinct and projection-specific CeA neurons in neuropathic pain. Hyperexcitability of CRF projection neurons and synaptic plasticity of parabrachial (PB) input at the acute stage shifted to hyperexcitability without synaptic plasticity in non-CRF neurons at the chronic phase. Accordingly, chemogenetic inhibition of the PB→CeA pathway mitigated pain-related behaviors in acute, but not chronic, neuropathic pain. Cell-type-specific temporal changes in neuroplasticity provide neurobiological evidence for the clinical observation that chronic pain is not simply the prolonged persistence of acute pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探索可改变的社会心理因素,睡眠相关变量,中枢疼痛处理指标和患者特征作为疼痛的潜在预后因素,肩关节功能,肩袖修复后1年的生活质量(QoL)。设计:这项观察性纵向研究包括142例接受肩袖修复的患者。所有措施都在肩袖修复前(T0)进行,肩袖修复后12周(T1)和12个月(T2)。方法:西安大略肩袖指数之间的混合效应线性回归模型关系(WORC,模型A),主观肩值(SSV,模型B),和EuroQol的QoLEQ-5D-5L(型号C),和潜在的预后因素随着时间的推移。因素包括心理社会变量,睡眠相关指数,和中枢疼痛处理的代理。患者年龄,性别,和体重指数补充了分析。结果:在随访(T2),来自124名参与者的数据可用于分析.确定了1年预后的五个预后因素。对症状减轻(P<0.0001,-1.4mm)和DouleurNeuropathique4评分增加(P=.0481,-0.9mm)的更好预期影响了WORC随时间的演变(模型A)。损伤感知分量表结果的增加(P=.0035,0.04%)影响了SSV轨迹(模型B)。此外,当睡眠质量(P=0.0011,-0.13%)和睡眠效率(P=0.0002,0.005%)改善时,EQ-5D-5L斜率受到影响(模型C)。结论:解决认知,肩袖修补术前的疼痛机制和睡眠行为可以识别手术后有不良预后风险的患者.J正交运动物理学号2024;54(8):530-540。Epub2024年7月4日。doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12398。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore modifiable psychosocial factors, sleep-related variables, indices of central pain processing and patients\' characteristics as potential prognostic factors for pain, shoulder function, and quality of life (QoL) 1 year after rotator cuff repair. DESIGN: This observational longitudinal study included 142 patients who were undergoing rotator cuff repair. All measures took place pre-rotator cuff repair (T0), and 12 weeks (T1) and 12 months (T2) after rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Mixed-effects linear regression modeled relationships between the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC, model A), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV, model B), and EuroQol\'s EQ-5D-5L for QoL (model C), and potential prognostic factors over time. Factors included psychosocial variables, sleep-related indices, and proxies of central pain processing. Patients\' age, sex, and body mass index complemented the analyses. RESULTS: At follow-up (T2), data from 124 participants were available for analysis. Five prognostic factors were identified for the 1-year outcome. Better expectations for symptom reduction (P<.0001, -1.4 mm) and an increase in Douleur Neuropathique 4 score (P = .0481, -0.9 mm) affected the evolution of WORC over time (model A). An increase in injury perception subscale consequence (P = .0035, 0.04%) influenced the SSV trajectory (model B). In addition, when sleep quality (P = .0011, -0.13%) and sleep efficiency (P = .0002, 0.005%) improved, the EQ-5D-5L slope was affected (model C). CONCLUSION: Addressing cognitions, pain mechanisms and sleep behavior prior to rotator cuff repair can identify people who are at risk of a poor outcome after surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(8):530-540. Epub 4 July 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12398.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中医(TCM),作为中国独特的医学模式,已被证明是有效的治疗许多疾病。实践证明,中医可以提高痛阈,增加体内内啡肽和脑啡肽的水平,并减少身体对不良刺激的反应。近年来,中医学者在疼痛治疗领域做出了宝贵的探索,采用中医内外敷、针灸等方法开展疼痛治疗研究,取得了较为满意的效果。中医治疗疼痛的方法多种多样,并发现了多种潜在的治疗疼痛的生物活性物质。随着其他中医治疗疼痛方法研究的新进展,中医药在疼痛临床应用中将具有更大的潜力。
    Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), as a unique medical model in China, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of many diseases. It has been proven that TCM can increase the pain threshold, increase the level of endorphins and enkephalins in the body, and reduce the body\'s response to adverse stimuli. In recent years, TCM scholars have made valuable explorations in the field of pain treatment, using methods such as internal and external application of TCM and acupuncture to carry out research on pain treatment and have achieved more satisfactory results. TCM treats pain in a variety of ways, and with the discovery of a variety of potential bioactive substances for pain treatment. With the new progress in the research of other TCM treatment methods for pain, TCM will have greater potential in the clinical application of pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估疼痛诱发手动压力(PIMP)是否会导致条件性疼痛调节(CPM)介导的压力痛阈值(PPT)的影响,以及这些影响是否受到强度和重复的影响刺激。此外,探讨了心理因素和体力活动对PIMP反应的影响。方法:将72名无痛学生随机分配到3项交叉试验中。试验1比较了PIMP与冷加压任务和疼痛诱导电刺激的效果。试验2比较了引起中度疼痛的手动压力的效果,轻度疼痛,也没有疼痛.试验3比较了单个PIMP刺激与在相同部位或不同部位施加的四个刺激。结果:PIMP产生的PPT增加低于冷加压任务,与电刺激无差异。与轻度疼痛和无痛应用相比,引起中度疼痛的手动压力导致PPT增加更大。重复PIMP刺激,无论是在相同或不同的网站,与单次刺激相比,PPT没有显着增加。未发现与心理因素或身体活动有关。结论:PIMP产生PPT的增加,表明CPM相关机制的参与。
    Objective: The aim of this study is to assess whether pain-inducing manual pressure (PIMP) leads to effects on pressure pain threshold (PPT) mediated by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and whether these effects are influenced by the intensity and repetition of the stimulus. Additionally, the influence of psychological factors and physical activity on the response to PIMP was explored. Methods: A total of 72 pain-free students were randomly assigned to three crossover trials. Trial 1 compared the effects of PIMP with the cold pressor task and pain-inducing electrostimulation. Trial 2 compared the effects of manual pressure that elicited moderate pain, mild pain, and no pain. Trial 3 compared a single PIMP stimulation with four stimuli applied at the same site or at different sites. Results: PIMP produced a lower increase in PPT than cold pressor task and no difference with electrostimulation. Manual pressure that caused moderate pain led to a greater increase in PPT compared to mild pain and pain-free application. Repetition of PIMP stimulus, whether at the same or different sites, did not significantly increase PPT compared to a single stimulation. No association with psychological factors or physical activity was found. Conclusions: PIMP produces an increase in PPT, suggesting the involvement of CPM-related mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性疼痛,复杂而衰弱的状况,对世界各地的患者和医疗保健提供者都构成了重大挑战。传统的药物干预通常证明不足以提供令人满意的缓解,同时携带成瘾和不良反应的风险。近年来,电神经调节在慢性疼痛治疗中成为一种有希望的替代方法.该方法需要对中枢神经系统内的特定神经或区域进行精确的电刺激以调节疼痛信号。通过包括改变神经活动和释放内源性疼痛缓解物质的机制,电神经调节能有效缓解疼痛,提高患者生活质量。电神经调节的几种方式,具有不同等级的侵入性,提供量身定制的策略来解决各种形式和起源的慢性疼痛。通过对慢性疼痛的解剖和生理途径的探索,包括神经递质的参与,这篇叙述性综述提供了对电疗法作用机制的见解,临床效用,以及慢性疼痛管理的未来前景。
    Chronic pain, a complex and debilitating condition, poses a significant challenge to both patients and healthcare providers worldwide. Conventional pharmacological interventions often prove inadequate in delivering satisfactory relief while carrying the risks of addiction and adverse reactions. In recent years, electric neuromodulation emerged as a promising alternative in chronic pain management. This method entails the precise administration of electrical stimulation to specific nerves or regions within the central nervous system to regulate pain signals. Through mechanisms that include the alteration of neural activity and the release of endogenous pain-relieving substances, electric neuromodulation can effectively alleviate pain and improve patients\' quality of life. Several modalities of electric neuromodulation, with a different grade of invasiveness, provide tailored strategies to tackle various forms and origins of chronic pain. Through an exploration of the anatomical and physiological pathways of chronic pain, encompassing neurotransmitter involvement, this narrative review offers insights into electrical therapies\' mechanisms of action, clinical utility, and future perspectives in chronic pain management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    风湿性疾病的疼痛超越了传统的伤害性范式,结合伤害性之间复杂的相互作用,神经病,和有害机制,以及重要的社会心理因素。了解慢性疼痛的进展突出了外周和中枢敏化的作用,以及伤害性疼痛的出现——中枢神经系统处理改变的结果。这种现代观点承认情绪障碍的影响,环境压力源,和认知模式,比如灾难化,揭示了生物之间复杂的相互作用,心理,和痛苦的社会决定因素。研究强调大脑在疼痛感知中的关键作用,强调整合医学的综合方法的重要性,心理,和社会干预措施,以有效解决风湿性疾病慢性疼痛的多面性。
    Pain in rheumatic diseases transcends the traditional nociceptive paradigm, incorporating complex interactions between nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic mechanisms, as well as significant psychosocial factors. Advances in understanding chronic pain highlight the role of peripheral and central sensitization, and the emergence of nociplastic pain-a result of altered central nervous system processing. This modern perspective acknowledges the influence of mood disorders, environmental stressors, and cognitive patterns like catastrophizing, revealing the intricate interplay between biological, psychological, and social determinants of pain. Research emphasizes the brain\'s pivotal role in pain perception, underscoring the importance of comprehensive approaches that integrate medical, psychological, and social interventions to address the multifaceted nature of chronic pain in rheumatic diseases effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性疼痛在全球范围内构成了重大的疾病负担,并占医疗保健支出的很大一部分。COVID-19大流行导致这种负担增加,因为患者在感染COVID-19后出现肌肉骨骼或神经性疼痛,或者慢性疼痛症状因病毒而加剧。这篇广泛的文献综述分析了大流行前疼痛的流行病学,与COVID-19大流行相关的成本,病毒对身体的影响,疼痛的机制,大流行后慢性疼痛的管理,以及患有或目前感染COVID-19的慢性疼痛患者可选择的潜在治疗方案。
    Chronic pain constitutes a significant disease burden globally and accounts for a substantial portion of healthcare spending. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to an increase in this burden as patients presented with musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain after contracting COVID-19 or had their chronic pain symptoms exacerbated by the virus. This extensive literature review analyzes the epidemiology of pain pre-pandemic, the costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of the virus on the body, mechanisms of pain, management of chronic pain post-pandemic, and potential treatment options available for people living with chronic pain who have had or are currently infected with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    在颈部疼痛的患者中,疼痛抑制和促进内源性疼痛机制是否发生改变尚不清楚.这项系统评价和荟萃分析旨在通过评估与鞭打(WAD)或非特异性(NSNP)性质的颈部疼痛患者的条件性疼痛调节(CPM)和疼痛时间总和(TSP)来提高他们的理解。无痛对照。非常低的确定性证据表明:远程评估慢性WAD患者的CPM受损(n=7;230名患者和204名对照;SMD=-0.47[-0.89至-0.04];P=0.04),但不是局部的(n=6;155名患者和150名对照;SMD=-0.34[-0.68至0.01];P=0.05),局部评估时,慢性NSNP患者的CPM受损(n=5;223例患者和162例对照;SMD=-0.55[-1.04至-0.06];P=0.04),但非远程评估(n=3;72例患者和66例对照;SMD=-0.33[-0.92至0.25];P=0.13),慢性WAD(局部TSP:n=4;90名患者和87名对照;SMD=0.68[-0.62至1.99])(远程TSP:n=8;254名患者和214名对照;SMD=0.18[-0.12至0.48])或慢性NSNP(局部TSP:n=2;139名患者和92名对照;SMD=0.21[-1.00至1.41])(远程TSP:n=3;91名患者和352名对照;SMD=0.60[-1.33至2.52])。证据非常不确定在WAD和NSNP患者中CPM是否受损和TSP是否促进。观点:本综述和荟萃分析提供了WAD和NSNP患者CPM和TSP的最新证据。需要测量方法的标准化才能得出明确的结论。随后,未来的研究应研究这些指标作为预后变量或治疗成功预测因子的临床相关性.
    In patients with neck pain, it is unclear whether pain inhibition and facilitation endogenous pain mechanisms are altered. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to improve their understanding by assessing conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) in patients with neck pain associated with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) or of a nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) nature compared to pain-free controls. Very low certainty evidence suggests: impaired CPM when assessed remotely in chronic WAD patients (n = 7, 230 patients and 204 controls, standardized mean differences (SMD) = -.47 [-.89 to -.04]; P = .04) but not locally (n = 6, 155 patients and 150 controls; SMD = -.34 [-.68 to .01]; P = .05), impaired CPM in chronic NSNP patients when assessed locally (n = 5, 223 patients and 162 controls; SMD = -.55 [-1.04 to -.06]; P = .04) but not remotely (n = 3, 72 patients and 66 controls; SMD = -.33 [-.92 to .25]; P = .13), TSP not facilitated in either chronic WAD (local TSP: n = 4, 90 patients and 87 controls; SMD = .68 [-.62 to 1.99]) (remote TSP: n = 8, 254 patients and 214 controls; SMD = .18 [-.12 to .48]) or chronic NSNP (local TSP: n = 2, 139 patients and 92 controls; SMD = .21 [-1.00 to 1.41]), (remote TSP: n = 3; 91 patients and 352 controls; SMD = .60 [-1.33 to 2.52]). The evidence is very uncertain whether CPM is impaired and TSP facilitated in patients with WAD and NSNP. PERSPECTIVE: This review and meta-analysis present the current evidence on CPM and TSP in patients with WAD and NSNP. Standardization of measurement methodology is needed to draw clear conclusions. Subsequently, future studies should investigate the clinical relevance of these measurements as prognostic variables or predictors of treatment success.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有神经病样症状的人比有伤害性的人有更多不利的疼痛特征。此外,条件性疼痛调节不足在有神经病样症状的人中很常见。PainDETECT问卷已用于评估中枢致敏体征和症状。然而,painDETECT问卷是否可以识别条件性疼痛调节的损害仍是未知的。因此,本研究旨在评估疼痛检测问卷对肌肉骨骼疼痛患者条件性疼痛调节受损的诊断准确性.
    方法:我们进行了一项诊断准确性比较,用于评估条件性疼痛调节的心理物理测试(参考标准)。我们通过计算灵敏度来确定诊断准确性,特异性,预测值,和可能的引擎盖比率。
    结果:我们回顾性地纳入了308名门诊肌肉骨骼疼痛患者。大多数参与者是女性(n20=220,71.4%),平均年龄为52.2(±15.0)岁。一百七十三名(56.1%)参与者被归类为伤害性疼痛,69(22.4%)不清楚,66(21.4%)为神经病样症状。根据冷压缩机测试,60名(19.4%)参与者表现出条件性疼痛调节受损。与冷压测试相比,痛苦检测问卷的12个截止点显示诊断准确性低于70%,阴性预测值除外[76.995%置信区间(CI)71.7至81.5]。截止点19显示高特异性(78.6%,95%CI73.0至83.5),高阴性预测值(80.5%,95%CI78.1至82.7),与冷压缩机测试相比,准确率为67.5%。
    结论:painDETECT问卷对于排除肌肉骨骼疼痛和条件性疼痛调节受损的患者似乎很有价值。
    BACKGROUND: People with neuropathic-like symptoms had more unfavourable pain features than people with nociceptive. Moreover, deficient conditioned pain modulation is common in people with neuropathic-like symptoms. PainDETECT questionnaire have been used to assess the central sensitisation sign and symptoms. However, whether the painDETECT questionnaire can identify the conditioned pain modulation\'s impairment is still unknown. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the painDETECT questionnaire in detecting the impairment of conditioned pain modulation in people with musculoskeletal pain.
    METHODS: We conducted a diagnostic accuracy comparing the painDETECT questionnaire (index method) with the cold pressor test, the psychophysical test used to assess the conditioned pain modulation (reference standard). We determined diagnostic accuracy by calculating sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likely hood ratios.
    RESULTS: We retrospectively enrolled 308 people with musculoskeletal pain in outpatient departments. Most participants were female (n 20 = 220, 71.4%) and had a mean age of 52.2 (± 15.0) years. One hundred seventy-three (56.1%) participants were classified as nociceptive pain, 69 (22.4%) as unclear, and 66 (21.4%) as neuropathic-like symptoms. According to the cold pressor test, 60 (19.4%) participants presented impairment of conditioned pain modulation. The cutoff point of 12 of the painDETECT questionnaire showed values of diagnostic accuracy below 70% compared to the cold pressor test, except for a negative predictive value [76.9 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 71.7 to 81.5]. The cutoff point 19 showed high specificity (78.6%, 95% CI 73.0 to 83.5), high negative predictive value (80.5%, 95% CI 78.1 to 82.7), and accuracy of 67.5% compared to the cold pressor test.
    CONCLUSIONS: The painDETECT questionnaire seems valuable for ruling out people with musculoskeletal pain and impairment of conditioned pain modulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究表明,一系列的疼痛机制,比如睡眠质量差,感知压力,疼痛灾难化或疼痛敏感性,可能会加剧临床疼痛。动物研究表明,这些疼痛机制可以通过增加体力活动来调节,但是需要人类数据来支持这一假设。这项探索性研究旨在调查8周简单的自我指导步行程序后疼痛机制的变化。此外,这项探索性研究调查了睡眠质量差评估随时间变化之间的相互作用,感知压力,疼痛灾难化或疼痛敏感性以及这些变化如何相互作用。
    方法:这项前瞻性队列研究包括30名健康受试者,他们在基线和开始步行计划后4周和8周(每天30分钟步行,持续8周)进行评估。自我报告结果包括:疼痛突变量表(PCS),感知压力量表(PSS)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数。压力疼痛阈值,使用袖带测痛法评估疼痛的时间总和和条件性疼痛调节(CPM).
    结果:24名受试者完成了所有访问(年龄:42.2,SD:14.9,16名女性)。与基线相比,在8周就诊时PCS和PSS显著下降(p<0.05)。比较8周访视与基线访视时,睡眠质量(p=0.071)和疼痛敏感性(p>0.075)的改善没有显着差异。比较基线和8周数据,计算疼痛机制的变化,回归分析发现,PCS的改善与CPM的改善相关(R2=0.197,p=0.017),对步行程序的更高依从性与PCS的更大改善相关(R2=0.216,p=0.013)。
    结论:当前的探索性研究表明,一个简单的8周自我指导步行程序可以改善疼痛灾难化的想法,感知压力。对步行程序的更高依从性与疼痛灾难化的改善有关,而疼痛灾难化的改善与条件性疼痛调节的增加有关。
    Studies suggest that a range of pain mechanisms, such as poor quality of sleep, perceived stress, pain catastrophizing or pain sensitivity, are likely to enhance clinical pain. Animal studies suggest that these pain mechanisms can be modulated by increasing physical activity, but human data are needed to support this hypothesis. This exploratory study aimed to investigate the changes in pain mechanisms after a simple self-directed walking program of 8-weeks. Additionally, this exploratory study investigated the interaction between changes over time in assessments of poor quality of sleep, perceived stress, pain catastrophizing or pain sensitivity and how these changes interacted with each other.
    This prospective cohort study included 30 healthy subjects who were assessed at baseline and 4- and 8-weeks after initiating the walking program (30 min walking/day for 8 weeks). Self-report outcomes included: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were assessed using cuff algometry.
    Twenty-four subjects completed all the visits (age: 42.2, SD: 14.9, 16 females). PCS and PSS significantly decreased at the 8-week\'s visit compared to baseline (p<0.05). No significant differences were seen for an improvement in quality of sleep (p=0.071) and pain sensitivity (p>0.075) when comparing the 8-week\'s visit to the baseline visit. Changes in pain mechanisms comparing baseline and 8-weeks data were calculated and regression analyses found that an improvement in PCS was associated with an improvement in CPM (R2=0.197, p=0.017) and that a higher adherence to the walking program was associated with a larger improvement in PCS (R2=0.216, p=0.013).
    The current exploratory study indicates that a simple self-directed walking program of 8-weeks can improve pain catastrophizing thoughts, perceived stress. Higher adherence to the walking program were associated with an improvement in pain catastrophizing and an improvement in pain catastrophizing was associated with an increase in conditioned pain modulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号