BACKGROUND: Limited comparative data exist on different interventional strategies for endovascular revascularization of complex femoropopliteal interventions.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors aimed to compare a stent-avoiding (SA) vs a stent-preferred (SP) strategy, promoting optimal lesion preparation and the use of drug-eluting technologies in both arms.
METHODS: Within a prospective, multicenter, pilot study, 120 patients with symptomatic complex femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4, mean lesion length 187.7 ± 78.3 mm, 79.2% total occlusions) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to endovascular treatment with either paclitaxel-coated balloons or polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stents. Lesion preparation including the use of devices for plaque modification and/or removal was at the operators\' discretion in both treatment arms.
RESULTS: In the SA group, lesion preparation was more frequently performed (71.7% SA [43/60] vs 51.7% [31/60] SP; P = 0.038) with a high provisional stenting rate (48.3% [29/60]). At the 12-month follow-up, primary patency was 78.2% (43/55) in the SA group and 78.6% (44/56) in the SP group (P = 1.0; relative risk: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.818-1.210). Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 93.1% (54/58) in the SA group and in 94.9% (56/59) in the SP group (P = 0.717; relative risk: 0.981; 95% CI: 0.895-1.075), with all adverse events attributable to clinically driven target lesion revascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: Both endovascular strategies promoting lesion preparation before the use of drug-eluting devices suggest promising efficacy and safety results in complex femoropopliteal procedures with a high proportion of total occlusions through 12 months. Ongoing follow-up will show whether different results emerge over time. (Best Endovascular Strategy for Complex Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery [BEST-SFA]; NCT03776799).

BACKGROUND: According to a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, paclitaxel-coated devices (PCDs) for lower limb endovascular revascularization may be associated with increased risk of late mortality.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether PCDs are associated with all-cause mortality in a real-world setting.
METHODS: DETECT is a nationwide, exhaustive retrospective cohort study using medico-administrative data from the French National Healthcare System representing >99% of the population. The main selection criterion was the first procedure of interest: endovascular revascularization for lower limb peripheral artery disease involving ≥1 balloon and/or stent performed between October 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Patients with or without PCDs were compared for all-cause mortality until December 31, 2021.
RESULTS: A total of 259,137 patients were analyzed, with 20,083 (7.7%) treated with ≥1 PCD. After a median follow-up of 4.1 years (Q1-Q3: 2.3-6.4 years), a total of 5,385 deaths/73,923 person-years (PY) (7.3/100 PY) and 109,844 deaths/1,060,513 PY (10.4/100 PY) were observed in the PCD and control groups, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors, PCD treatment was associated with a lower risk of mortality in multivariable Cox analyses (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.84-0.89; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed using propensity score matching approaches based on either nearest-neighbor or exact matching.
CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide analysis based on large-scale real-world data, exposure to PCDs was not associated with a higher risk of mortality in patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for lower limb peripheral artery disease. (The DETECT Project; NCT05254106).

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel-eluting devices (PED) reduce restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) in femoropopliteal intervention. Recent data suggest a two-fold increased long-term mortality in patients treated with PED. The aim of our study is to evaluate if endovascular therapy (EVT) with PED increases mortality risk in patients with symptomatic lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) compared to non-eluting devices (NED).
METHODS: The study is a retrospective, single-center registry on patients undergoing EVT for PAD from January 2009 to June 2018. Propensity score analysis on logistic regression model for independent predictors of long-term mortality was used to match PED and NED patients. Mortality was assessed at 2, 5 and 7 years in the entired matched population and in a sub-group of patients ≤75 years.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1294 patients, 718 NED and 576 PED, met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and entered in the study. Propensity score matching analysis identified 854 matched patients, 414 PED and 440 NED. The population was mainly characterized by diabetic patients with CLI (80%) and high prevalence of CAD (30%), heart failure (15%) and renal insufficiency (20%). Mean follow-up length was 58 ± 34 months, (median 52.5). Mortality was 18% in NED vs 12% in PED patients at two years (p = 0.01), 36% vs 30% at 5 years (p = 0.03) and 41% vs 39% at seven years (p = 0.2) respectively. In patients ≤75 years, mortality at 7-year was 28% in PED vs 36% in NED, p = 0.07.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a reduced mortality at 2 and 5 years with PED as compare to NED treatment in a real-world CLI scenario. At 7-year follow-up, the advantage was numerically evident only in patients ≤75 years.