An optoelectronic sensor was developed to measure the in-plane displacement between two parallel surfaces. This sensor used a photodetector, which was placed on one of the parallel surfaces, to measure the intensity of the red (R), green (G), blue (B), and white/clear (C) light spectra of a broad-spectrum light that was reflected off a color grid on the opposing surface. The in-plane displacement between these two surfaces caused a change in the reflected RGB and C light intensity, allowing the prediction of the displacement direction and magnitude by using a polynomial regression prediction algorithm to convert the RGB and C light intensity to in-plane displacement. Results from benchtop experiments showed that the sensor can achieve accurate displacement predictions with a coefficient of determination R2 > 0.97, a root mean squared error (RMSE) < 0.3 mm, and a mean absolute error (MAE) < 0.36 mm. By measuring the in-plane displacement between two surfaces, this sensor can be applied to measure the shear of a flexible layer, such as a shoe\'s insole or the lining of a limb prosthesis. This sensor would allow slippage detection in wearable devices such as orthotics, prostheses, and footwear to quantify the overfitting or underfitting of these devices.

BACKGROUND: Orthosis (orthotic) fabrication is an essential part of the treatment plan for many upper extremity conditions.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to comprehensively identify the current body of evidence about the purpose, structure, scope, and application of available orthotic classification systems. Our secondary aim was to know if the current classification systems can be used as a decision guide for clinicians.
METHODS: A scoping review.
METHODS: A scoping review of research studies identified through data-based and gray literature was conducted to determine studies that addressed classification systems of the orthosis (orthotic) in the hand and upper limb. Two investigators screened study titles and abstracts and did the data extraction. To do a comprehensive review, all the hand therapy associations were contacted and asked to share their specific orthosis classification system. To answer our second aim, we discussed our findings with the experts in a panel.
RESULTS: Twelve different classification systems were identified, which were developed with different aims. Five classification systems classified orthosis based on their function (n = 5, 50%); one based on therapeutic goals and proposed a decision algorithm. Two of the proposed systems were aimed at helping in decision-making or offering an algorithm for therapists to help them choose the proper orthosis. The expert panel process identified that the current classification systems could not help clinicians select proper orthosis for their patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There are different classification systems which were developed with various aims. However, none of those can help clinicians make informed decisions about appropriate orthosis choices for their patients.

UNASSIGNED: \'Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs)\' denote an umbrella term that includes arthritic, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular conditions involving the temporomandibular joint, the masticatory muscles, and the associated tissues. Occlusal devices are one of the common treatment modalities utilized in the conservative management of TMDs. The indications for the available \'oral splints\' or \'oral orthotic occlusal devices\' remain ambiguous.
UNASSIGNED: A joint international consortium was formulated involving the subject experts at TMJ Foundation, to resolve the current ambiguity regarding the use of oral orthotic occlusal appliance therapy for the temporomandibular joint disorders based on the current scientific and clinical evidence.
UNASSIGNED: The recommendations and the conclusion of the clinical experts of the joint international consort has been summarized for understanding the indications of the various available oral orthotic occlusal appliances and to aid in the future research on oral occlusal orthotics.
UNASSIGNED: The use of the oral orthotic occlusal appliances should be based on the current available scientific evidence, rather than the archaic protocols.

Canine prostheses have been commercially available for many years but are still in early stages of research, development, and clinical application.
To prospectively investigate mid-term clinical outcomes of partial limb amputation with a socket prosthesis (PLASP) in canine patients via a descriptive prospective clinical case series and to describe a clinical protocol for PLASP.
Client-owned dogs (n = 12) with distal limb pathology for which total limb amputation was recommended were enrolled. Partial limb amputation was performed and a socket prosthesis was moulded and fitted to the limb. Complications, clinical follow-up, and objective gait analysis (OGA) were recorded for at least 6 months. An online survey was completed by owners after study completion.
Ten dogs with thoracic limb pathology and two with pelvic limb pathology were included. The most common site of amputation was mid-radius (n = 5). Eleven of 12 dogs demonstrated quadrupedal gait on OGA with mean per cent body weight distribution (%BWD) of 26% on thoracic limb prostheses and a %BWD of 16% for the one pelvic limb prosthesis that OGA data were available for. Complications included prosthesis suspension difficulties (n = 5), pressure sores (4), bursitis (4), postoperative infection (3), prosthesis aversion (2), dermatitis (1), and owner noncompliance (1). Two owners elected to discontinue prosthesis use.
PLASP allowed restoration of quadrupedal gait patterns in most patients. Owners reported overall positive satisfaction, though a high complication rate was observed. PLASP should be considered in select cases as an alternative to total limb amputation for dogs with distal limb pathology.

UNASSIGNED: The study\'s starting point is to find a low-cost and best-fit solution for comfortable movement for a recreational runner with knee pain using an orthopedic device. It is a case study. The research aims to apply digitization, CAD/CAM tools, and 3D printing to create an individual 3D running insole. The objective is to incorporate flexible shape optimization would provide comfort reductions in foot plantar pressures in one subject with knee pain while running. The test hypothesis was if it is possible to make it from one material. For this purpose, we created a new digital workflow based on the Decision Tree method and analyzed pain and comfort scores during user testing of prototypes.
UNASSIGNED: The input data were obtained during a professional examination by a specialist doctor in the orthopedic outpatient clinic in the motion laboratory (DIERS 4D Motion Lab, Germany) with the output of data on the proband\'s complex movement stereotype. Surface and volumetric data were obtained in the biomedical laboratory with the 3D scanner. We modified the digital 3D foot models in 3D mesh software, developed the design in SW Gensole (Gyrobot, UK), and finally incorporated the internal structure and the surface layer of the insole data of the knowledge from the medical examination, comfort analyses, and scientific studies findings.
UNASSIGNED: Four complete 3D-printed prototypes (n=4) with differences in density and correction elements were designed. All of them were fabricated on a 3D printer (Prusa i3 MK3S, Czech Republic) with flexible TPU material suitable for skin contact. The Participant tested each of them five times in the field during a workout and final insoles three months on the routine training.
UNASSIGNED: A novel workflow was created for designing, producing, and testing full 3D-printed insoles. The product is fit for immediate use.

UNASSIGNED: To determine the effects of ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) on step-based physical activities in individuals with neurological, orthopaedic, or cardiovascular disorders.
UNASSIGNED: Electronic searches of databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO were conducted. Two evaluators independently searched with keywords focusing on step-based physical activities, and either articulated or non-articulated AFO. Study quality was assessed using a modified Downs and Black quality scale.
UNASSIGNED: Eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected, including four being classified as good, four as fair, and three as poor in quality. The majority of these trials found no significant effects of AFO on step activities. Only a few studies reported improvements in step counts and active times in step activity with a limited to moderate level of evidence. Subjective evaluations such as user satisfaction, and physical functionality during step activity, on the other hand, showed substantial changes with the use of AFO interventions, although there was no evidence of improvement in the quality of life.
UNASSIGNED: Although the AFO did not seem to have a substantial effect on step activity, it appeared to play a vital role in improving the patient satisfaction level of step activity.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONAnkle-foot orthoses (AFO) may not significantly affect the step activity of individuals with impaired ankle-foot complex.AFO may enhance patient-reported satisfaction, physical functioning, participation, and fatigue level during step activity.The patient\'s perception that the AFO is beneficial is in contrast to objective data showing no significant increase in real-world activity.

Forward head posture (FHP) is a common postural displacement that is significantly associated with neck pain, with higher risks of having neck pain in female and older populations. This study investigated the effect of two different forward head posture (FHP) interventions in elderly participants with poor posture and non-specific neck pain. Sixty-six elderly participants with a craniovertebral angle (CVA) < 50° were randomized into either a Chiropractic Biophyics® (CBP®) or a standardized exercise based FHP correction group (Standard Group). Both groups were treated for 18 sessions over a 6-week period. A 3-month post-treatment follow-up was also assessed with no further interventions. The CBP group received a mirror image® exercise and a Denneroll™ cervical traction orthotic (DCTO); the standard group performed a protocol of commonly used stretching and strengthening exercises for the neck. Both groups received 30 min of their respective interventions per session. The primary outcome was the CVA, with secondary outcomes including pain intensity, Berg balance score (BBS), head repositioning accuracy (HRA), and cervical range of motion (CROM). After 18 sessions (6 weeks later), the CBP group had statistically significant improvement in the CVA (p < 0.001), whereas the standard group did not. In contrast, both groups showed improved functional measurements on the BBS and HRA as well as improved pain intensity. However, at the 3-month follow-up (with no further treatment), there were statistically significant differences favoring the CBP group for all outcomes (p < 0.001). The differences in the between group outcomes at the 3-month follow-up indicated that the improved outcomes were maintained in the CBP group, while the standard group experienced regression of the initially improved outcomes at 6 weeks. It is suggested that the improvement in the postural CVA (in the CBP group but not in the standard group) is the driver of superior and maintained pain and functional outcomes.

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and effect of a multimodal program for the management of chronic nonspecific neck pain CNSNP with the addition of a 3D adjustable posture corrective orthotic (PCO), with a focus on patient recruitment and retention. This report describes a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study with twenty-four participants with CNSNP and definite 3D postural deviations who were randomly assigned to control and study groups. Both groups received the same multimodal program; additionally, the study group received a 3D PCO to perform mirror image® therapy for 20−30 min while the patient was walking on a treadmill 2−3 times per week for 10 weeks. Primary outcomes included feasibility, recruitment, adherence, safety, and sample size calculation. Secondary outcomes included neck pain intensity by numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), neck disability index (NDI), active cervical ROM, and 3D posture parameters of the head in relation to the thoracic region. Measures were assessed at baseline and after 10 weeks of intervention. Overall, 54 participants were screened for eligibility, and 24 (100%) were enrolled for study participation. Three participants (12.5%) were lost to reassessment before finishing 10 weeks of treatment. The between-group mean differences in change scores indicated greater improvements in the study group receiving the new PCO intervention. Using an effect size of 0.797, α > 0.05, β = 80% between-group improvements for NDI identified that 42 participants were required for a full-scale RCT. This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of recruitment, compliance, and safety for the treatment of CNSNP using a 3D PCO to a multimodal program to positively affect CNSNP management.

People with lower limb impairment can participate in activities such as running with the use of a passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (PD-AFO). Specifically, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) is a PD-AFO design that includes a carbon-fiber strut, which attaches posteriorly to a custom-fabricated tibial cuff and foot plate and acts in parallel with the impaired biological ankle joint to control sagittal and mediolateral motion, while allowing elastic energy storage and return during the stance phase of running. The strut stiffness affects the extent to which the orthosis keeps the impaired biological ankle in a neutral position by controling sagittal and mediolateral motion. The struts are currently manufactured to a thickness that corresponds with one of five stiffness categories (1 = least stiff, 5 = most stiff) and are prescribed to patients based on their body mass and activity level. However, the stiffness values of IDEO carbon-fiber struts have not been systematically determined, and these values can inform dynamic function and biomimetic PD-AFO prescription and design. The PD-AFO strut primarily deflects in the anterior direction (ankle dorsiflexion), and resists deflection in the posterior direction (ankle plantarflexion) during the stance phase of running. Thus, we constructed a custom apparatus and measured strut stiffness for 0.18 radians (10°) of anterior deflection and 0.09 radians (5°) of posterior deflection. We measured the applied moment and strut deflection to compute angular stiffness, the quotient of moment and angle. The strut moment-angle curves for anterior and posterior deflection were well characterized by a linear relationship. The strut stiffness values for categories 1-5 at 0.18 radians (10°) of anterior deflection were 0.73-1.74 kN·m/rad and at 0.09 radians (5°) of posterior deflection were 0.86-2.73 kN·m/rad. Since a PD-AFO strut acts in parallel with the impaired biological ankle, the strut and impaired biological ankle angular stiffness sum to equal total stiffness. Thus, strut stiffness directly affects total ankle joint stiffness, which in turn affects ankle motion and energy storage and return during running. Future research is planned to better understand how use of a running-specific PD-AFO with different strut stiffness affects the biomechanics and metabolic costs of running in people with lower limb impairment.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of gait training using ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on the gait of stroke patients when not wearing AFOs with two different types of AFO, an AFO with an oil damper (AFO-OD) that resists plantarflexion and an AFO with a plantarflexion stop (AFO-PS), and to display the possible differences between the AFO types.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-two patients (38 males, 4 males, mean age: 59.7±10.9; range, 38 to 81 years) with subacute stroke were randomized to either an AFO-PS or an AFO-OD group. Participants were given gait training in a two-week period by physiotherapists wearing their allocated AFO. Nineteen patients were assigned to the AFO-PS group and 20 to the AFO-OD group. Patients\' gait without an AFO before gait training and then after two weeks of training wearing allocated AFOs was recorded through a three-dimensional movement capture system.
UNASSIGNED: A therapeutic effect through two weeks of continuous use of AFOs and gait training was found in both AFO groups (main effect of time) in the spatiotemporal factors, ankle joint moments, ankle power generation, shank-to-vertical angle, and center of gravity velocity throughout the stance phase, pre-swing knee angular velocity, and hip flexion moment in pre-swing. The results did not show a large interaction between two AFOs group.
UNASSIGNED: These findings reveal that both AFOs had significant therapeutic effects on stroke gait. There was no significant difference between the two AFO groups. Further studies with a control group representing the effects of gait training without wearing an AFO are needed.