oral cephalosporins

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    传统上,头孢菌素敏感性结果用于预测其他头孢菌素的敏感性;然而,2013-2014年,临床和实验室标准研究所(CLSI)重新审视了这一做法,并确定头孢唑林对于无并发症的尿路感染(uUTIs)是比头孢菌素更准确的替代药物.因此,建立了一个头孢唑啉代孕断点来预测7种口服头孢菌素对大肠杆菌的敏感性,肺炎克雷伯菌,和在uUTI的背景下的变形杆菌。临床微生物学实验室在实施头孢唑啉代孕断点时面临几个操作挑战,这可能会导致对最佳前进道路的困惑。这里,我们回顾代孕断点背后的历史背景和数据,审查口服头孢菌素的PK/PD概况,讨论部署断点的挑战,并强调了该空间中有限的临床结果数据。
    Traditionally, cephalothin susceptibility results were used to predict the susceptibility of additional cephalosporins; however, in 2013-2014, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) revisited this practice and determined that cefazolin is a more accurate proxy than cephalothin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). Therefore, a cefazolin surrogacy breakpoint was established to predict the susceptibility of seven oral cephalosporins for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis in the context of uUTIs. Clinical microbiology laboratories face several operational challenges when implementing the cefazolin surrogacy breakpoint, which may lead to confusion for the best path forward. Here, we review the historical context and data behind the surrogacy breakpoints, review PK/PD profiles for oral cephalosporins, discuss challenges in deploying the breakpoint, and highlight the limited clinical outcome data in this space.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肠杆菌是社区获得性单纯性尿路感染(UTI)的原因之一。目前,存在最少的口服治疗选择。现有的口服第三代头孢菌素与克拉维酸盐配对的新组合可以克服在这些新出现的尿路病原体中看到的耐药机制。含CTX-M型ESBLs或AmpC的耐头孢曲松大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌,除了窄谱OXA和SHV酶,从MERINO试验获得的血液培养分离物中选择。第三代头孢菌素(头孢泊肟,头孢替丁,头孢克肟,测定了含有和不含克拉维酸的头孢地尼)。一百一十一株分离物与ESBL一起使用,AmpC和窄谱OXA基因(如OXA-1、OXA-10)存在于84、15和35个分离株中,分别。单独口服第三代头孢菌素的敏感性非常差。添加2mg/L克拉维酸会降低MIC50值(头孢泊肟MIC502mg/L,头孢替丁MIC502mg/L,头孢克肟MIC502mg/L,头孢地尼MIC504mg/L)和恢复的敏感性(33%,49%,40%,21%易感,分别)在大量的分离物中。这一发现在共携带AmpC的分离株中不太明显。这些新组合的体外活性可能在共同携带多个抗微生物抗性基因的真实世界肠杆菌分离物中受到限制。药代动力学/药效学数据可用于进一步评估其活性。
    Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales as a cause of community-acquired uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is on the rise. Currently, there are minimal oral treatment options. New combinations of existing oral third-generation cephalosporins paired with clavulanate may overcome resistance mechanisms seen in these emerging uropathogens. Ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae containing CTX-M-type ESBLs or AmpC, in addition to narrow-spectrum OXA and SHV enzymes, were selected from blood culture isolates obtained from the MERINO trial. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of third-generation cephalosporins (cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, cefixime, cefdinir), both with and without clavulanate, were determined. One hundred and one isolates were used with ESBL, AmpC and narrow-spectrum OXA genes (e.g. OXA-1, OXA-10) present in 84, 15 and 35 isolates, respectively. Susceptibility to oral third-generation cephalosporins alone was very poor. Addition of 2 mg/L clavulanate reduced the MIC50 values (cefpodoxime MIC50 2 mg/L, ceftibuten MIC50 2 mg/L, cefixime MIC50 2 mg/L, cefdinir MIC50 4 mg/L) and restored susceptibility (33%, 49%, 40% and 21% susceptible, respectively) in a substantial number of isolates. This finding was less pronounced in isolates co-harbouring AmpC. In-vitro activity of these new combinations may be limited in real-world Enterobacterales isolates co-harbouring multiple antimicrobial resistance genes. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data would be useful for further evaluation of their activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头孢替丁是1995年由美国食品和药物管理局批准的口服头孢菌素,其在早期临床开发中与阿维巴坦的口服前药组合。我们评估了头孢替丁-阿维巴坦对产生临床相关β-内酰胺酶的分子特征肠杆菌的活性,并评估了与头孢替丁联合用于药敏试验的最佳阿维巴坦浓度。通过全基因组测序评估抗性机制。通过头孢替丁的肉汤微量稀释测定MIC值,阿维巴坦,和头孢替丁联合使用固定浓度(2、4和8mg/L)和比例(1:1和2:1)的阿维巴坦。生物体集合(n=71)包括产生ESBLs的肠杆菌,KPC,金属-β-内酰胺酶,AMPC,K-1、OXA-48和SME,以及有孔蛋白改变的分离株。头孢替布汀-阿维巴坦组合是与阿维巴坦的固定浓度为4mg/L的阿维巴坦组合,该组合可从抗性机制不受阿维巴坦影响的分离株中最佳分离出被阿维巴坦抑制的β-内酰胺酶。
    Ceftibuten is an oral cephalosporin approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1995 that is in early clinical development to be combined with an oral prodrug of avibactam. We evaluated the activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against molecularly characterized Enterobacterales that produced clinically relevant β-lactamases and assessed the best avibactam concentration to be combined with ceftibuten for susceptibility testing. Resistance mechanisms were evaluated by whole genome sequencing. MIC values were determined by broth microdilution of ceftibuten, avibactam, and ceftibuten combined with fixed concentrations (2, 4, and 8 mg/L) and ratios (1:1 and 2:1) of avibactam. The organism collection (n = 71) included Enterobacterales producing ESBLs, KPC, metallo-β-lactamases, AmpC, K-1, OXA-48, and SME, as well as isolates with porin alterations. The ceftibuten-avibactam combination that best separated isolates with β-lactamases inhibited by avibactam from isolates with resistance mechanisms that are not affected by avibactam was the combination with avibactam at a fixed concentration of 4 mg/L.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号