The case is a woman in her 60s. She had been aware of lower abdominal distention and pain for six months but was under observation. Gradually, the patient experienced worsening pain during distention and became aware of distention, especially before urination. She visited our clinic. Ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) revealed an abdominal incisional hernia. The hernia was in the bladder. We decided on surgical treatment and made a skin incision of about 3 cm just above the hernia portal. Since the size of the hernia portal was approximately 1.3 cm, the patient underwent direct suture closure to repair the hernia portal, and the surgery was completed. The postoperative course was good. The patient was discharged on the second postoperative day. Four months have passed since the surgery, and the patient is under observation without recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Elective open incisional hernia operations are a frequently performed and complex procedure. Prophylactic drainage is widely practised to prevent local complications, but nevertheless the benefit of surgical drain placement remains a controversially discussed subject. Objective of this analysis was to evaluate the current status of patient care in clinical routine and outcome in this regard.
METHODS: The study based on prospectively collected data of the Herniamed Register. Included were all patients with elective open incisional hernia between 1/2005 and 12/2020 and completed 1-year follow-up. Multiple linear and logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relation of individual factors to the outcome variables.
RESULTS: Analysed were data from 39,523 patients (28,182 with drain, 11,341 without). Patients with drain placement were significantly older, had a higher BMI, more preoperative risk factors, and a larger defect size. Drained patients furthermore showed a significant disadvantage in the outcome parameters intraoperative complications, general complications, postoperative complications, complication-related reoperations, and pain at the 1-year follow-up. No significant difference was observed with respect to the recurrent rate.
CONCLUSIONS: With 71.3%, the use of surgical drainages has a high level of acceptance in elective open incisional hernia operations. The worse outcome of patients is associated with the use of drains, independent of other influencing factors in the model such as patient or surgical characteristics. The use of drains may be a surrogate parameter for other unobserved confounders.

Aim Giant incisional herniae are larger than 15 cm and are typically treated with an open approach. Our aim was to highlight the outcomes of treating giant incisional hernia using open intraperitoneal dual mesh. Methods Between January 2015 and December 2021, 25 patients with giant incisional hernias, where fascial defects were 15-30 cm, were evaluated retrospectively. Intraperitoneal dual mesh was used in all patients. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal surgeries, defect diameter, anesthesia method, length of hospital stay, drain application, complications, and recurrence. Results Eleven of the patients were male and 14 were female. The mean age was 62±13.5 years (29-82 years). The average BMI was 32 kg/m2 (20-52 kg/m2). The mean size of the fascial defect was 22±5.5 cm (15-30). The mean operation time was 90 minutes (70-130 minutes). Six patients had type I and II complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, specifically superficial skin infections, skin erosion, subcutaneous bleeding, and temporary ileus due to intestinal adhesion. During the average follow-up period of 36 months (6-70 months), no major complications were observed related to the recurrence and use of dual mesh. Conclusion In the treatment of giant incisional hernia, open intraperitoneal dual mesh application should be kept in mind as an effective treatment option with low complication and recurrence rates.

UNASSIGNED: Incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are frequent complications after laparotomy (9-20%) and often need incisional hernia repair (IHR). In order to ensure wound healing and to therefore prevent postoperative short and long term morbidity carrying an abdominal binder (AB) and physical rest is frequently advised. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning clinical effects regarding these recommendations. Hence, we conducted a survey to analyze the patient reported outcome following IHR.
UNASSIGNED: From December 2017 to May 2018, we conducted a survey among 270 patients who underwent open and laparoscopic IHR at two maximum care hospitals. They were interviewed about their type of operation, postoperative treatment, recommendations, and outcome.
UNASSIGNED: 163 patients replied to the questionnaire. The average age was 63.2 ± 12 years. 74 patients were female and 89 were male. 32.6% of the patients reported an AB-induced immobility and 71.2% reported that the AB reduced pain after IHR. A prolonged period of physical rest and the use of an AB had no statistical significance on postoperative morbidity.
UNASSIGNED: Due to our findings we assume that the AB may induce immobility and reduce postoperative pain. A prolonged period of physical rest and wearing an AB does not seem to have an impact on the postoperative outcome following IHR. Therefore, a shortened duration of physical rest and wearing an AB following IHR should be taken under consideration. To reveal more evidence on this topic further clinical trials are essential.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are frequent complication after laparotomy (9-20%). Open incisional hernia repair with sublay mesh placement (SMP) on the posterior rectus sheath is described as being a sufficient method for repairing incisional hernia. In order to ensure wound healing and to therefore prevent recurrence, carrying an abdominal binder (AB) or a pressure dressing (PD) and physical rest for a certain time is the common postoperative recommendation, though the evidence for post-operative treatment is low. Hence, we conducted a survey to reveal the different recommendations given by surgical departments (SD).
METHODS: We conducted a survey among 65 German SDs of the XXX Hospital Group. The SDs were interviewed about the number of open incisional hernia repair with SMP in the time frame of 2013-2014, the known recurrence rate (RR), their recommended prescription of the AB/PD and the time of physical rest.
RESULTS: The head physicians of 48 surgical departments answered the questionnaire. The survey revealed 42 different recommendations of postoperative-treatment. The majority of the SDs advices 4 weeks (20,5%) of physical rest and no prescription of the AB (29,5%). No correlation between the known RR and the duration of physical rest was detected. No head physician\'s prescribes a PD.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to our findings we assume that a short period of physical rest is a considerable postoperative treatment following an open incisional hernia repair with SMP. By reducing the individual incapacity for work and immobility this would have a social-economic impact. The use of a PD may prevent seroma formation. Further investigations with randomized clinical trials are mandatory to support our hypothesis.