online/digital journalism

  • 文章类型: News
    研究人员和从业者越来越认为,新闻业必须改善与受众的关系,以增加人们消费和支持新闻的可能性。在本文中,我们认为,这一假设忽略了结构和个人层面因素在塑造新闻受众行为中的重要性。借鉴吉登斯的结构化理论,我们建议,当涉及到人们花在新闻上的时间时,消费者的选择更多地取决于生活环境,而不是新闻偏好。为了说明这一点,我们利用了这么多人的生活环境发生变化时收集的采访和受众分析数据的组合:COVID-19大流行的开始。我们发现,在大流行的前几个月,人们消耗的新闻比平时多,因为(1)由于就地避难订单等原因,他们有更多的时间在手上,裁员,转向在家工作,(2)他们对了解冠状病毒的传播和风险以及正在采取的预防措施更感兴趣。我们得出的结论是,记者应该接受“新闻谦逊”,“从而承认并接受他们对接收工作的控制比他们希望相信的要少得多。
    Researchers and practitioners increasingly believe that journalism must improve its relationship with audiences to increase the likelihood that people will consume and support news. In this paper, we argue that this assumption overlooks the importance of structural- and individual-level factors in shaping news audience behavior. Drawing on Giddens\' theory of structuration, we suggest that, when it comes to the amount of time that people devote to news, consumers\' choices are guided more by life circumstances than by news preferences. To illustrate this point, we draw on a combination of interview and audience analytics data collected when so many people\'s life circumstances changed: the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that people consumed more news during the early months of the pandemic than normal because (1) they had more time on their hands due to things like shelter-in-place orders, layoffs, and shifts to working from home and (2) they were more interested in understanding the coronavirus\' spread and risks as well as the preventative measures being pursued. We conclude that journalists should embrace \"journalistic humility,\" thereby acknowledging and accepting that they have much less control over the reception of their work than they would like to believe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: News
    这项研究依靠22位专家访谈和对美国40位财经记者的调查,重新评估财经记者在当今高频信息和新闻时代对金融市场的作用。研究结果表明,记者为自己描绘的理想的积极监督者角色与他们的实际角色之间存在差异。此外,在金融体系内,构建和传播财经新闻的过程是自我参照的,为另类的声音留下很小的空间。在这个意义上,定期财务报告对推动股市价格的影响被发现是有限的,但取决于各种因素,如意外消息,反复负面报道,或者关于合并的新闻.最终,面对网络新闻的泛滥,记者对新闻价值观的丧失提出了普遍的担忧,但是他们也看到了自动报道和在线新闻的潜力。
    This study relies on 22 expert interviews and a survey among 40 financial journalists in the United States to reassess the role of financial journalists for financial markets in today\'s high-frequency information and news era. Findings point to a discrepancy between the ideal active watchdog role journalists picture for themselves and their actual role enactment. Furthermore, the process of constructing and distributing financial news has been found to be self-referential within the financial system, leaving little room for alternative voices. In this sense, the influence of regular financial reporting in driving stock market prices has been found to be limited but contingent on various factors such as unexpected news, repeatedly negative reporting, or news about a merger. Eventually, facing the proliferation of online news, journalists have raised a general concern regarding the loss of journalistic values, but they also see potentials for their discipline in light of automated reporting and online news.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号