one-stage

一个阶段
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:合并胆囊和胆总管(CBD)结石,被称为胆囊胆总管结石症,在临床上很普遍。目前对顺序管理方法和同步管理方法没有共识,and,如果同时,采用哪种方法。这项荟萃分析评估了一期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)加术中内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)与二期ERCP联合LC治疗胆囊结石和CBD结石的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在五个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,VIP,还有万方,对于所有随机对照试验(RCT),截至2024年2月发表的队列和回顾性研究。数据提取由两名审阅者独立进行。主要结果是CBD结石清除率和术后并发症发生率。次要结果包括转换为其他程序和住院时间。使用R(v.4.3.2)进行统计分析,计算连续变量和二分变量的加权平均差和比值比(OR),分别,95%置信区间(CI)。
    结果:共纳入17项研究,涉及2120名患者,898例患者接受单阶段治疗,1222例患者接受两阶段治疗。在这些研究中,9项RCTs,8项为回顾性队列研究。一阶段组在CBD结石清除率方面表现出更好的结果(OR=2.07,p=0.0004),总发病率(OR=0.35,p<0.0001),术后胰腺炎(OR=0.49,p=0.006),转换为其他程序(OR=0.38,p=0.0006),和住院时间(MD=-2.6456,95%CI-3.5776;-1.7136,p<0.0001)。术后胆管炎无显著差异(OR=0.44,p=0.12),术后出血(OR=0.76,p=0.47),或胆漏(OR=1.28,p=0.54)。
    结论:对于合并胆囊结石和CBD结石的患者,结合ERCP和LC的一阶段方法似乎更安全、更有效,优点包括较高的结石清除率,减少术后并发症(尤其是胰腺炎),缩短住院时间,更少残留的石头,减少了对额外程序的需求。然而,我们还需要更多高质量的临床试验,以确定适合不同患者情况的最佳治疗方法.
    BACKGROUND: Concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD) stones, known as cholecystocholedocholithiasis, are clinically prevalent. There is currently no consensus on sequential versus simultaneous management approaches, and, if simultaneous, which approach to adopt. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus two-stage ERCP followed by LC for treating concomitant gallbladder and CBD stones.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in five databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, VIP, and Wanfang, for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort and retrospective studies published up to February 2024. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. The primary outcomes were CBD stone clearance rate and postoperative complications morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion to other procedures and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v.4.3.2) with weighted mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) calculated for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
    RESULTS: A total of 17 studies involving 2120 patients have been included, with 898 patients receiving single-stage and 1222 patients undergoing two-stage treatment. Of these studies, 9 were RCTs and 8 were retrospective cohort study. The one-stage group demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of CBD stone clearance (OR = 2.07, p = 0.0004), overall morbidity (OR = 0.35, p < 0.0001), post-operative pancreatitis (OR = 0.49, p = 0.006), conversion to other procedures (OR = 0.38, p = 0.0006), and length of hospital stay (MD = - 2.6456, 95% CI - 3.5776; - 1.7136, p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in post-operative cholangitis (OR = 0.44, p = 0.12), post-operative bleeding (OR = 0.76, p = 0.47), or bile leakage (OR = 1.28, p = 0.54).
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients with concomitant gallbladder and CBD stones, the one-stage approach combining ERCP and LC appears safer and more effective, with advantages including higher stone clearance rates, reduced postoperative complications (particularly pancreatitis), shorter hospital stays, fewer residual stones, and decreased need for additional procedures. However, additional high-quality clinical trials are needed to establish the optimal treatment approach for various patient scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项回顾性研究评估了通过经迷路入路(TLA)进行一期切除VII/VIII神经鞘瘤和半舌下面神经吻合的患者的预后。
    方法:该研究包括10名连续的单侧听力损失患者(6名女性,四个人,平均年龄:49.5±12.1岁)接受手术的人。该队列包括两名前庭神经鞘瘤(VSs)患者,四个面神经神经鞘瘤(FNS)(两个起源于面神经的膝状神经节,两个来自小脑桥脑角),一个是VS再生长,和三个具有剩余的VS。术前面神经功能,使用House-Brackmann(HB)量表进行评估,1例患者为V级,9例患者为VI级。术前平均面瘫持续时间为7.5±6.9个月。
    结果:所有患者均接受全切除。术后,一名患者出现脑脊液漏,通过腰椎引流和手术翻修成功进行了治疗。在后续行动中,所有患者的面神经功能均得到改善:HBV级至III级之一,HB六级至三级合一,HB六级至四级七,和VI至V级合二为一。随访期间未见肿瘤复发(平均病程:16.6±9.3个月),没有患者出现半舌萎缩。
    结论:用于VII/VIII神经鞘瘤的一期切除和面神经重建的TLA可有效治疗严重的术前面神经麻痹患者的桥小脑角或岩骨的再生和残留的VSs和FNSs。这种技术有助于同时切除肿瘤和进行神经吻合,从而减少了听力损失和面神经功能受损的患者对多种手术干预的需要。
    BACKGROUND: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing one-stage resection of VII/VIII schwannomas and hemihypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy via the translabyrinthine approach (TLA).
    METHODS: The study encompassed ten consecutive patients with unilateral hearing loss (six women, four men, mean age: 49.5 ± 12.1 years) who underwent surgery. The cohort included two patients with vestibular schwannomas (VSs), four with facial nerve schwannomas (FNSs) (two originating from the geniculate ganglion of the facial nerve and two from the cerebellopontine angle), one with VS regrowth, and three with residual VSs. Preoperative facial nerve function, assessed using the House-Brackmann (HB) scale, was Grade V in one and Grade VI in nine patients. The mean preoperative duration of facial paralysis was 7.5 ± 6.9 months.
    RESULTS: All patients underwent gross total resection. Postoperatively, one patient experienced cerebrospinal fluid leaks, which were successfully managed with lumbar drains and surgical revisions. At follow-up, facial nerve function improved in all patients: HB Grade V to III in one, HB Grade VI to III in one, HB Grade VI to IV in seven, and Grade VI to V in one. No tumor recurrence was observed during the follow-up period (mean duration: 16.6 ± 9.3 months), and no patient had hemilingual atrophy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The TLA for one-stage resection of VII/VIII schwannomas and facial nerve reconstruction is effective in treating both regrowth and residual VSs and FNSs in the cerebellopontine angle or petrosal bone in patients with severe preoperative facial palsy. This technique facilitates simultaneous tumor removal and nerve anastomosis, thereby reducing the need for multiple surgical interventions in patients with hearing loss and compromised facial nerve function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:一期内镜管理,同时进行乳头状干预和结石清除,据报道是由胆总管结石(CBDS)引起的急性胆管炎的有效治疗方法。然而,很少有报告将其与两阶段管理进行比较,也没有既定的战略来指示一个阶段的管理。本研究的目的是比较由CBDS引起的急性胆管炎的一阶段和两阶段管理之间的短期和长期结果。
    方法:我们回顾性研究了2010年5月至2020年12月期间577例急性胆管炎患者进行了一次或两次内镜治疗。根据内镜管理将患者分为一阶段组和两阶段组。比较两组的临床疗效。
    结果:两组的技术和临床成功率相似,尽管一期组的住院时间明显缩短。尽管两组早期不良事件(AE)没有差异,ERCP术后胰腺炎分别为3.4%和10.0%,在两阶段组中明显更高。累计晚期AE率为22.6%和14.1%,在一阶段组中明显更高。在多变量分析中,干预(一阶段),CBDS数≥2,胆道引流,ML的使用,胆囊结石被确定为与CBDS复发相关的重要因素。
    结论:虽然一阶段内镜管理在减少住院时间方面是有用且安全的,考虑到CBDS的复发,勤奋的术后随访至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: One-stage endoscopic management, where papillary interventions and stone removal are simultaneously performed, has been reported to be an effective treatment for acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, there have been few reports comparing it with two-stage management, and there is no established strategy for the indication of one-stage management. The aim of the present study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between one- and two-stage management for acute cholangitis caused by CBDS.
    METHODS: We retrospectively studied 577 patients who underwent one- or two-stage endoscopic management for acute cholangitis between May 2010 and December 2020. The patients were divided into one- and two-stage groups by endoscopic management. The clinical outcomes were compared between groups.
    RESULTS: The technical and clinical success were similar in both groups, although the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the one-stage group. Although there was no difference in the early adverse event (AE) between two groups, post-ERCP pancreatitis was recognized in 3.4% and 10.0%, which was significantly higher in the two-stage group. The cumulative late AE rate was 22.6% and 14.1%, which was significantly higher in the one-stage group. In the multivariate analyses, intervention (one-stage), number of CBDS ≥2, biliary drainage, the use of ML, and gallbladder stone were identified as significant factors associated with the recurrence of CBDS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although one-stage endoscopic management is useful and safe with reducing hospital stays, diligent postoperative follow-up with consideration to recurrence of CBDS is essential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    假肢关节感染(PJI)是最常见的失败模式,然而关于这个话题的文献很少,研究报告了关于最佳治疗策略的相互矛盾的数据。患有大型假体PJI的患者通常受到免疫抑制,外科医生必须平衡与旨在根除感染的手术相关的治疗效果和发病率之间的权衡。我们对大型假体PJI的审查集中在两个方面:(1)危险因素和预防策略;(2)控制这种情况的手术策略。风险因素分为不可修改或可修改。降低PJI风险的尝试应针对后者。预防PJI的策略包括使用镀银植入物,及时停止围手术期抗生素预防,和足够的软组织覆盖,以减少死区的数量。关于手术治疗,主要策略包括清创术,抗生素,植入物固位(DAIR),带有模块化组件交换功能的DAIR,茎保留(DAIRplus),一个阶段,和两阶段修订。两阶段修订是传统植入物中PJI的“黄金标准”;然而,其成功取决于足够的软组织覆盖和患者至少6周耐受间隔器的意愿.DAIRplus和一阶段修订可能适用于无法忍受两次手术发病率的精选患者组。此外,每当考虑DAIR时,应执行模块化组件的交换(DAIR+)。由于植入的巨型假体体积少,评估PJI的研究应该以多机构的方式进行。这将允许更有意义的群体比较,具有足够的统计能力。证据级别:IV。
    Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common mode of failure of megaprostheses, yet the literature on the topic is scarce, and studies report conflicting data regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Patients with megaprostheses PJI are often immunosuppressed, and surgeons must balance the trade-off between treatment efficacy and morbidity associated with the surgery aiming for infection eradication. Our review on megaprostheses PJI focuses on two axes: (1) risk factors and preventative strategies; and (2) surgical strategies to manage this condition. Risk factors were classified as either unmodifiable or modifiable. Attempts to decrease the risk of PJI should target the latter group. Strategies to prevent PJI include the use of silver-coated implants, timely discontinuation of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and adequate soft tissue coverage to diminish the amount of dead space. Regarding surgical treatment, main strategies include debridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR), DAIR with modular component exchange, stem retention (DAIR plus), one-stage, and two-stage revision. Two-stage revision is the \"gold standard\" for PJI in conventional implants; however, its success hinges on adequate soft tissue coverage and willingness of patients to tolerate a spacer for a minimum of 6 weeks. DAIR plus and one-stage revisions may be appropriate for a select group of patients who cannot endure the morbidity of two surgeries. Moreover, whenever DAIR is considered, exchange of the modular components should be performed (DAIR plus). Due to the low volume of megaprostheses implanted, studies assessing PJI should be conducted in a multi-institutional fashion. This would allow for more meaningful comparison of groups, with sufficient statistical power. Level of evidence: IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着全髋关节置换术(THA)发生率的增加,修订THA(RTHA)也有预期的同时增加,已知有较高的并发症和再修订率。在感染的背景下,根治性清创术是必不可少的,股骨骨丢失的选择是有限的。一个可行的解决方案是胶结的模块化茎,但是关于它们在脓毒症修订中的使用的证据有限。本研究旨在分析与骨水泥模块化茎在一期化脓性rTHA伴严重股骨骨丢失相关的生存和并发症。
    方法:回顾了接受rTHA治疗脓毒症一期翻修并结合模块化茎的患者的机构数据库。排除标准为年龄小于18岁且非感染性或2期修订的患者。测量的结果是并发症,再感染,重新操作,和植入物的存活率。共纳入150名患者。平均年龄为68岁(范围,30至91),平均随访时间为105个月(范围,1至150)。
    结果:81.3%的病例认为治疗成功。接受多次手术的患者治疗成功率较低(P<.001)。失败的主要原因是再次感染(28个中的11个)。在因无菌原因失败的病例中(28个中的17个),2例患者(1.3%)再次翻修的原因是骨水泥模块杆松动.
    结论:对于与严重股骨骨丢失相关的脓毒症一期rTHA,使用模块化骨水泥茎是一种可行的选择。然而,外科医生和患者应该意识到,这种治疗仍然具有高并发症率的特点,这可能会导致进一步的手术。
    方法:III.
    BACKGROUND: With the increasing incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is also an expected concurrent increase in revision THA (rTHA), which is known to have a high complication and re-revision rate. In the setting of infection, radical debridement is essential and options for femoral bone loss are limited. One viable solution is cemented modular stems, but limited evidence exists on their use in septic revision. This study aimed to analyze survival and complication related to the use of cemented modular stems in one-stage septic rTHA with severe femoral bone loss.
    METHODS: The institutional database of patients who underwent rTHA for septic one-stage revision with cemented modular stems was reviewed. Exclusion criteria were patients aged less than 18 years and nonseptic or 2 stage revisions. Outcomes measured were complication, re-infection, re-operation, and survivorship of the implant. A total of 150 patients were included. The mean age was 68 years (range, 30 to 91), and the mean follow-up was 105 months (range, 1 to 150).
    RESULTS: Treatment was considered successful in 81.3% of cases. Patients who underwent multiple prior surgeries demonstrated a lower rate of treatment success (P < .001). The main cause of failure was re-infection (11 of 28). Among cases failed for aseptic reasons (17 of 28), loosening of the cemented modular stem was the cause of re-revision in 2 patients (1.3%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of modular cemented stems is a viable option in case of septic one-stage rTHA associated with severe femoral bone loss. However, surgeons and patients should be aware that this treatment is still characterized by a high rate of complications, which may lead to further surgeries.
    METHODS: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用骨-髌腱-骨(BTB)移植物的解剖矩形隧道(RT)技术的一期翻修前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)可实现解剖学上精确的隧道放置和安全的移植物固定。这项研究评估了股骨隧道重叠方面的膝关节松弛和临床结果。假设无论股骨隧道重叠如何,膝关节松弛或临床结果都没有显着差异。
    方法:在2012年至2021年之间,一名外科医生使用BTB移植物用RT技术进行了196次单阶段翻修ACLRs。根据股骨隧道重叠的存在对患者进行划分。使用Lachman试验评估膝关节松弛度,枢轴移位测试,用KT-1000关节仪测量的左右差异。使用Lysholm评分评估临床结果,膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS),和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)膝关节检查表2000。在中位随访2.5年(范围2.0-8.0)后,比较两组之间的膝关节松弛和临床结果。
    结果:该研究包括重叠和非重叠组的30和73名患者,分别。在Lachman检验的结果中没有观察到显著差异,枢轴移位测试,或KT-1000关节仪以及Lysholm,KOOS,或IKDC评分在两组之间。根据IKDC的分数,所有患者均被分级为正常或接近正常.
    结论:使用BTB移植物的RT技术的一期翻修ACLR可改善膝关节松弛,并且无论股骨隧道重叠如何,均具有良好的临床疗效。为了在一阶段修订ACLR中获得最佳结果,在解剖附着区域内创建隧道并确保适当的移植物固定和张紧是至关重要的。
    方法:III.
    OBJECTIVE: One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the anatomic rectangular tunnel (RT) technique using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts results in anatomically precise tunnel placement and secure graft fixation. This study evaluated knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes in terms of femoral tunnel overlap. It was hypothesised that there would be no significant differences in knee joint laxity or clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap.
    METHODS: Between 2012 and 2021, a single surgeon conducted 196 one-stage revision ACLRs with the RT technique using BTB grafts. Patients were divided based on the presence of femoral tunnel overlap. Knee joint laxity was evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and side-to-side difference measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form 2000. Knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes were compared between groups after a median follow-up of 2.5 years (range 2.0-8.0).
    RESULTS: The study included 30 and 73 patients in the overlap and non-overlap groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the results of the Lachman test, pivot shift test, or KT-1000 arthrometer as well as in the Lysholm, KOOS, or IKDC scores between the two groups. Based on the IKDC scores, all patients were graded as normal or nearly normal.
    CONCLUSIONS: One-stage revision ACLR with the RT technique using BTB grafts improved knee joint laxity and had favourable clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap. To achieve optimal results in one-stage revision ACLR, it is crucial to create a tunnel within the anatomical attachment area and ensure proper graft fixation and tensioning.
    METHODS: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Mim8是用于治疗A型血友病(HA)的下一代双特异性抗体。与第一代分子相比,Mim8具有增加的效力。在含有Mim8的血浆中评估Mim8对非FVIII测量止血测定的影响。
    方法:在先天性重度HA血浆中添加浓度递增的Mim8(0-20μg/mL)。28个常规和专家止血试验用于测量活动。这些包括凝血酶原时间(PT)测试,纤维蛋白原,凝血酶,D-二聚体,反Xa,肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT),凝血因子II-XII,因子XIII,血管性血友病因子(VWF),血栓形成和DRVVT。
    结论:在除凝血酶时间(-10.5%)外的所有测定中,无Mim8的血浆与加标至15μg/mLMim8的血浆之间的差异小于10%,基于APTT的因子IX,XI和XII,沃芬VWF:RCo(10.6%)和西门子LA1(-26.4%)和LA2(-16.9%)。在Mim8的预期治疗稳态水平(5-8μg/mL),凝血酶时间和WerfenVWF:RCo的差异小于10%。基于APTT的FIX测定法,XI和XII在Mim8存在下显著升高并且不应进行。显色FIX测定可用于在Mim8存在下准确测量FIX活性。我们使用的DRVVT方法存在一些干扰,因此建议对其他DRVVT方法进行本地评估。预计所有其他测试的差异不会影响患者管理。
    OBJECTIVE: Mim8 is a next generation bispecific antibody developed for the treatment of haemophilia A (HA). Mim8 has an increased potency compared to first generation molecules. The impact on Mim8 on non-FVIII measuring haemostasis assays was assessed in plasma containing Mim8.
    METHODS: Congenital severe HA plasma was spiked with increasing concentrations of Mim8 (0-20 μg/mL). 28 routine and specialist haemostasis assays were used to measure activities. These included tests for prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, thrombin, D-dimer, anti-Xa, heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), clotting factors II-XII, factor XIII, von Willebrand factor (VWF), thrombophilia and DRVVT.
    CONCLUSIONS: Less than 10 % difference was calculated between plasma without Mim8 and plasma spiked to 15 μg/mL Mim8 in all assays except thrombin time (-10.5%), APTT-based factor IX, XI and XII, Werfen VWF:RCo (10.6%) and Siemens LA1 (-26.4%) and LA2 (-16.9%). At the expected therapeutic steady state levels of Mim8 (5-8 μg/mL), less than 10% difference was calculated for thrombin time and Werfen VWF:RCo. APTT-based assays of FIX, XI and XII are significantly elevated in the presence of Mim8 and should not be performed. A chromogenic FIX assay could be used to accurately measure FIX activity in the presence of Mim8. There was some interference in the DRVVT method we used so local assessment of other DRVVT methods is advised. Differences in all other tests would not be predicted to affect patient management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆管结石是一种广泛的疾病,由于并发症的发生,可能对生命构成重大风险。近年来,越来越倾向于使用一期微创手术来治疗这种疾病。然而,值得注意的是,在发展中国家,比如印度尼西亚,建立国家医疗保险系统的地方,由于医疗保健设施的限制,这些程序的实施仍然相对罕见。
    方法:本研究提供了一个病例系列,涉及13例患者,这些患者接受了一期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的初始尝试,随后进行了术中内镜逆行胰胆管造影(LC-ERCP),以提取胆管结石。这些患者是我们医院治疗胆管结石一年(2022年6月至2023年5月)的124例患者之一。这项研究的所有参与者都参加了国家健康保险。
    在诊断为胆管结石的124例患者中,13例(10.5%)接受了一期LC-ERCP手术的初步尝试,成功率为76.4%。然而,其中三人在胆管插管时遇到困难,导致这种方法的失败。纳入研究的患者平均年龄为46.5岁,总胆红素和直接胆红素的平均血清水平为2.1和1.4mg/dL,分别。手术成功和不成功的平均持续时间为121.5min和183.3min,分别。术后平均住院时间为3.5天,并且在研究期间没有记录到死亡或并发症的情况.
    结论:一期LC-ERCP手术为印度尼西亚的胆管结石提供了一种有希望的治疗选择,特别是在国家医疗保险系统下注册的患者。这种方法可以作为缺乏LC-CBDE技能的设施的可行替代方法。此外,仰卧位进行ERCP的能力对于获得高成功率至关重要.这项研究的结果表明,需要改进印度尼西亚的公共医疗机构,以满足对改进治疗方式的日益增长的需求。
    UNASSIGNED: Bile duct stones are a widespread condition that can pose a significant risk to life due to the occurrence of complications. In recent years, there has been a growing inclination toward the use of one-stage minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of this condition. However, it is important to note that in developing countries, such as Indonesia, where the National Healthcare Insurance System is established, the implementation of these procedures is still relatively uncommon due to limitations in healthcare facilities.
    METHODS: This study presents a case series involving 13 patients who underwent a consecutive initial attempt of one-stage Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with subsequent Intraoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (LC-ERCP) for the extraction of bile duct stones. These patients were among the 124 individuals treated for bile duct stones at our hospital for one year (June 2022 to May 2023). All the participants in this study were covered by the National Health Insurance.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 124 patients diagnosed with bile duct stones, thirteen (10.5 %) were subjected to an initial attempt of one-stage LC-ERCP procedure, which had a success rate of 76.4 %. However, three of them experienced difficulties during the cannulation of bile duct, leading to the failure of this approach. The patients included in the study had a mean age of 46.5 years, with average serum levels of total bilirubin and direct bilirubin measuring 2.1 and 1.4 mg/dL, respectively. The average duration of successful and unsuccessful procedures was 121.5 min and 183.3 min, respectively. The average length of postoperative hospital stay was 3.5 days, and no instances of mortality or complications were recorded during the study.
    CONCLUSIONS: One-stage LC-ERCP procedure offered a promising treatment option for bile duct stones in Indonesia, particularly for patients registered under the National Healthcare Insurance System. This approach could serve as a viable alternative for facilities that lack proficiency in LC-CBDE skills. Furthermore, the ability to perform ERCP in a supine position is crucial in achieving a high success rate. The results of this study showed the need for advancements in Indonesian public healthcare facilities to meet the growing demand for improved treatment modalities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们介绍了与Pelnac™人工真皮替代品同步释放后的一阶段重铺的结果。从2016年到2020年,在62名患者的145个网状物中使用人工真皮替代品修复了手指释放后的原始区域(平均年龄,33.1个月),包括65个简单的不完整的网络空间,29个简单完整的Web空间,20个复杂完整的网络空间,和31个复杂复杂的网络空间。14例患者为综合征。平均随访时间为33.4个月(范围,7-55个月)。根据温哥华瘢痕量表(0-14)评估的术后结局平均1.8(范围,0-11)和腹板蠕变评分(0-5)平均0.7(范围,0-4)。患者和家庭提供的视觉模拟量表得分平均为1.1(范围,0-10)用于外观。总之,Pelnac™人工真皮替代品是一种微创,简单,以及在同步发布中对缺陷进行一阶段重铺的有效选择。
    We present our results of one-stage resurfacing following syndactyly release with the Pelnac™ artificial dermal substitute. From 2016 to 2020, raw areas after digit release were restored with an artificial dermal substitute in 145 webs from 62 patients (average age, 33.1 months) including 65 simple incomplete web spaces, 29 simple complete web spaces, 20 complex complete web spaces, and 31 complex complicated web spaces. Fourteen patients were syndromic. The average follow-up period was 33.4 months (range, 7-55 months). Postoperative outcomes assessed as according to the Vancouver scar scale (0-14) averaged 1.8 (range, 0-11) and web creep score (0-5) averaged 0.7 (range, 0-4). Patient- and family-provided visual analog scale scores averaged 1.1 (range, 0-10) for appearance. In conclusion, the Pelnac™ artificial dermal substitute is a minimally invasive, simple, and effective option for one-stage resurfacing of defects in syndactyly release.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    临床试验已经使用多种凝血因子测定方法来评估用重组因子VIII(rFVIII)和重组因子IX(rFIX)延长半衰期(EHL)产品的治疗。然而,诊断实验室可以使用不同的试剂组合用于常规使用或用于EHL产品的现场试验。本综述的重点是选择一级凝血和显色因子VIII和因子IX方法以及测定原理和成分可能对结果的影响,包括不同活化部分凝血活酶时间试剂和因子缺乏血浆的影响。我们的目标是将每种方法和试剂组的结果制成表格,为实验室提供实用指导,说明当地实验室使用的试剂组合与其他试剂的比较情况。对于各种可用的EHL。
    Clinical trials have used a variety of coagulation factor assay methods to assess treatment with recombinant Factor VIII (rFVIII) and recombinant Factor IX (rFIX) extended half-life (EHL) products. However, diagnostic laboratories may use different reagent combinations for routine use or for field trials of EHL products. The focus of this review is on the choice of one-stage clotting and chromogenic Factor VIII and Factor IX methods and the influence that assay principle and components may have on results, including the effects of different activated partial thromboplastin time reagents and factor-deficient plasma. Our aim is to tabulate the findings for each method and reagent group to give laboratories practical guidance as to how the reagent combinations used in their local laboratory compare to others, for the various EHLs available.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号