BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is crucial for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, and its survival benefits may outweigh adverse events. Oncotype DX (ODX) assesses this balance; however, it is expensive. Using nomograms to identify cases requiring ODX may be economically beneficial. We aimed to identify clinicopathological variables that correlated with the recurrence score (RS) and develop a nomogram that predicted the RS.
METHODS: We included 457 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with metastases in fewer than four axillary lymph nodes who underwent surgery and ODX at our hospital between 2007 and 2023. We developed nomograms and internally validated them in 310 patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 and validated the model\'s performance in 147 patients who underwent surgery between 2022 and 2023.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed that progesterone receptor (PgR) level, histological grade (HG), and Ki67 index independently predicted the RS. A nomogram was developed using these variables to predict the RS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.870; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.92). The nomogram was applied to the model validation group (AUC, 0.877; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95). When the sensitivity of the nomogram was 90%, the model was able to identify 52.3% low-RS and 41.2% high-RS cases not requiring ODX.
CONCLUSIONS: This was the first nomogram model developed based on data from a cohort of Japanese women. It may help determine the indications for ODX and the use of nomogram to identify cases requiring ODX may be economically beneficial.

UNASSIGNED: Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test (ODx) is a gene profiling assay predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, to avoid unnecessary financial burden on the patient, many studies have attempted to establish alternatives to ODx using conventional clinicopathological factors, but these have not yet been successful. Thus, we retrospectively investigated clinicopathological factors to establish alternatives to ODx.
UNASSIGNED: Data from 114 Japanese women who underwent ODx were retrospectively examined to investigate the relationship between ODx recurrence score (RS) and clinicopathological features, including MUC1 staining patterns on immunohistochemical assessment. An RS of 0-25 was defined as low, and 26-100 as high.
UNASSIGNED: Ninety patients (79%) had low RS and 24 patients (21%) had high RS. Univariate analysis revealed that low tumor grade, high progesterone receptor (PgR) expression, and low Ki67 labeling index (LI) were significantly associated with low RS (p=0.025, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). Tumors with an apical pattern of MUC1 staining also frequently had a low RS (p=0.024). In multivariate analysis, PgR expression and Ki67 LI were independent factors associated with RS (p<0.001, for both). When the ODx results were categorized with a combination of these two factors, only 2% of the PgR-high and Ki67-low group (one in 51 cases) had a high RS.
UNASSIGNED: PgR expression and Ki67 LI were independent factors correlated with RS. MUC1 staining pattern also has the potential to be a useful marker. We believe that it is crucial to continue attempts to identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from ODx.

For early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer, tools to estimate treatment benefit include free and publicly available algorithms (e.g., PREDICT 2.1) and expensive molecular assays (e.g., Oncotype DX). There remains a need to identify patients who de-rive the most benefit from molecular assays and where this test may be of poor value. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we evaluated whether use of PREDICT 2.1 would impact physician decision making. For the first 6 months of the study, data on physician use of both PREDICT 2.1 and Oncotype DX ordering were collected on all newly diagnosed patients eligible for molecular testing. After 6 months, an educational intervention was undertaken to see if providing physicians with PREDICT 2.1 results affects the frequency of Oncotype DX requests. A total of 602 patients across six cancer centers in Ontario, Canada were recruited between March 2020 and November 2021. Providing PREDICT 2.1 results and an educational intervention did not alter the ordering of an Oncotype DX. For patients with low clinical risk, either by clinico-pathologic features or by PREDICT 2.1, the probability of obtaining a high Oncotype DX recurrence score was substantially lower compared to patients with high-clinical-risk disease. The introduction of an educational intervention had no impact on molecular assay requests. However, routine ordering of molecular assays for patients with low-clinical-risk disease is of poor value.

OBJECTIVE: It remains unclear whether patients with HER2-negative, low-estrogen receptor (ER-low)-positive early breast cancer (BC) benefit from Oncotype DX® (ODX) testing.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of cases referred for ODX testing over a seven-year period from a breast biomarker testing referral center (n = 854). For each case, we recorded the ODX Recurrence Score (RS) along with percentage of ER nuclear positivity and staining intensity on immunohistochemistry. Our criteria for ER-low was defined as ≤10% cells with nuclear positivity and/or weak intensity of staining. Slides from all ER-low cases were reviewed and the reported ODX ER gene scores were recorded. We randomly selected a comparator group of 56 patients with ER > 10% positivity and non-weak staining intensity (ER-high).
RESULTS: We identified 27 cases (3.2%) that met our criteria for ER-low. Of these, 92.6% had a high RS (>25), and 7.4% had a RS of 25. All cases with ≤10% ER nuclear positivity had a high RS. Most ER-low cases (85.2%) had ODX quantitative ER gene scores in the negative range, whereas all (100%) ER-high cases had positive ER gene scores.
CONCLUSIONS: ODX does not appear to add significant additional information to inform treatment decisions for most patients with ER-low BC. Incorporating weak ER staining intensity in addition to low percentage of nuclear positivity identifies about twice as many ER-low patients, although with reduced specificity for high RS. Our study supports the contention that most ER-low early BC should be regarded similarly to ER-negative BC.

Introduction Breast cancer remains the most significant cancer affecting women worldwide, with an increasing incidence, especially in developing regions. The introduction of genomic tests like Oncotype DX has revolutionized personalized treatment, allowing for more tailored approaches to therapy. This study focuses on the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, aiming to assess the predictive accuracy of the Oncotype DX test in categorizing patients based on recurrence risk. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 95 breast cancer patients diagnosed at Tawam Hospital between 2013 and 2017 who underwent Oncotype DX testing. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and Oncotype DX scores were collected. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the chi-square goodness of fit test assessing the model\'s adequacy. Results The cohort\'s age range was 27-71 years, with a mean age of 50, indicating a significant concentration of cases in the early post-menopausal period. The Oncotype DX analysis classified 55 patients (57.9%) as low risk, 29 (30.5%) as medium risk, and 11 (11.6%) as high risk of recurrence. The majority, 73 patients (76.8%), did not receive chemotherapy, highlighting the test\'s impact on treatment decisions. The survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates across the Oncotype DX risk categories (p = 0.268231). Conclusion The Oncotype DX test provides a valuable genomic approach to categorizing breast cancer patients by recurrence risk in the UAE. While the test influences treatment decisions, particularly the use of chemotherapy, this study did not find a significant correlation between Oncotype DX risk categories and actual recurrence events. These findings underscore the need for further research to optimize the use of genomic testing in the UAE\'s diverse patient population and enhance personalized treatment strategies in breast cancer management.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer, although the second most common malignancy in women in the United States, is rare in patients under the age of 40 y. However, this young patient population has high recurrence and mortality rates, with chemotherapy frequently used as adjuvant treatment. We aimed to determine whether age is an independent predictor of chemotherapy recommendation and subsequent treatment and the relationship to Oncotype Dx (ODX) recurrence score (RS).
METHODS: The National Cancer Database was retrospectively reviewed from 2010-2016 to identify women with early-stage (pT1-pT3, pN0-pN1mic, M0), hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer who underwent ODX RS testing.
RESULTS: Of 95,382 patients who met the inclusion criteria, risk groups using the traditional ODX RS cutoffs were 59% low, 33% intermediate, and 8% high. Using Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment RS cutoffs, risk groups were 23% low, 62% intermediate, and 15% high. Chemotherapy recommendation decreased as age at diagnosis increased (P < 0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreased odds of chemotherapy recommendation in univariate models both continuously (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.97-0.98; P < 0.001) and categorically by decade (P < 0.001). Age by decade remained an independent prognosticator of chemotherapy recommendation (P < 0.001), adjusted for risk groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy recommendation and treatment differs by age among patients with early-stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer who undergo ODX testing. While molecular profiling has been shown to accurately predict the benefit of chemotherapy, younger age at diagnosis is a risk factor for discordant use of ODX RS for treatment strategies in breast cancer; with patients aged 18-39 disproportionately affected.

OBJECTIVE: In Italy, Lombardy was the first region to reimburse multigene assays (MGAs) for patients otherwise candidates for chemotherapy. This is a real-world experience of MGAs usage in six referral cancer centers in Lombardy.
METHODS: Among MGAs, Oncotype DX (RS) was used in 97% of cases. Consecutive patients tested with Oncotype DX from July 2020 to July 2022 were selected. The distribution of clinicopathologic features by RS groups (low RS: 0-25, high RS: 26-100) was assessed using chi-square and compared with those of the TAILORx and RxPONDER trials.
RESULTS: Out of 1,098 patients identified, 73% had low RS. Grade and Ki67 were associated with RS (p < 0.001). In patients with both G3 and Ki67 > 30%, 39% had low RS, while in patients with both G1 and Ki67 < 20%, 7% had high RS. The proportion of low RS in node-positive patients was similar to that in RxPONDER (82% vs 83%), while node-negative patients with low RS were significantly less than in TAILORx (66% vs 86%, p < 0.001). The distribution of Grade was different from registration trials, with more G3 and fewer G1 (38% and 3%) than in TAILORx (18% and 27%) and RxPONDER (10% and 24%) (p < 0.001). Patients ≤ 50 years were overrepresented in this series (41%) than in TAILORx and RxPONDER (31% and 24%, respectively) (p < 0.001) and, among them, 42% were node positive.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world series, Oncotype DX was the test almost exclusively used. Despite reimbursement being linked to pre-test chemotherapy recommendation, almost 3/4 patients resulted in the low-RS group. The significant proportion of node-positive patients ≤ 50 years tested indicates that oncologists considered Oncotype DX informative also in this population.

In patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) negative breast cancer (BC), the TAILORx study showed the benefit of adding chemotherapy (CHT) to endocrine therapy (ET) in a subgroup of patients under 50 years with an intermediate Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS 11-25). The aim of the present study was to determine if the TAILORx findings, including the changes in the RS categories, impacted CHT use in the intermediate RS (11-25) group in daily practice, as well as to identify the main factors for CHT decisions. We conducted a retrospective study on 326 BC patients (59% node-negative), of which 165 had a BC diagnosis before TAILORx (Cohort A) and 161 after TAILORx publication (Cohort B). Changes in the RS categories led to shifts in patient population distribution, thereby leading to a 40% drop in the low RS (from 60% to 20%), which represented a doubling in the intermediate RS (from 30% to 60%) and an increase of 5% in the high RS (from 8-10% to 15%). The overall CHT recommendation and application did not differ significantly between cohort B when compared with A (19% vs. 22%, resp., p = 0.763). In the intermediate RS (11-25), CHT use decreased by 5%, while in the high-risk RS category (>25), there was an increase of 13%. The tumor board recommended CHT for 90% of the patients according to the new RS guidelines in cohort A and for 85% in cohort B. The decision for CHT recommendation was based on age (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.08-0.97, p = 0.001), nodal stage (OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.03-11.22, p < 0.001), and RS categories (RS 11-25 vs. RS 0-10: OR 0.06 (95% CI 0.02-0.17), p < 0.001; RS > 26 vs. RS 11-25: OR 618.18 95% CI 91.64-4169.91, p < 0.001), but did not depend on the cohort. In conclusion, while the tumor board recommendation for CHT decreased in the intermediate RS category, there was an increase being reported in the high RS category, thus leading to overall minor changes in CHT application. As expected, among the younger women with intermediate RS and unfavorable histopathological factors, CHT use increased.

Breast cancer stands as the most prevalent malignancy, necessitating a well-established approach to its management due to its sustained prevalence over decades. The implementation of intensive treatments, combining various modalities, has yielded excellent survival outcomes. Consequently, the optimization of quality of life and the mitigation of long-term side effects emerge as critical considerations for clinicians. As a result, discussions regarding treatment de-intensification strategies have been initiated for all treatment modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. RT plays a crucial role in adjuvant therapy. The efficacy of RT in disease control and overall survival across all stages of breast cancer has been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses utilizing extensive datasets. However, advancements in genetic tumor profiling and improved identification of disease subgroups have prompted a reevaluation of RT omission in low-risk groups as a strategy for treatment de-intensification. Conversely, technological improvements and shortened total treatment times with hypofractionation make RT a secure and feasible option for enhancing local control and survival with minimal impact on the quality of life.

With the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for treating advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC), it has become increasingly important to develop more accurate and reliable methods to identify HER2-low BC. In addition, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has limitations for quantification of HER2. We explored the relationship between HER2 IHC and mRNA levels and evaluated whether HER2 IHC scores and mRNA levels are associated with clinicopathologic features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative BCs. A total of 750 BCs sent for Oncotype DX (ODX) testing were included in this study, and 559 with HER2 mRNA levels were available. There were no statistically significant differences between HER2 0 and HER2-low BC in clinicopathologic variables or ODX RS using HER2 IHC. There was a significant difference in median HER2 mRNA values between HER2 0 and HER2-low (8.7 vs 9.3, P < .001); however, the HER2 mRNA distribution had substantial overlap between these 2 groups with a suboptimal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.68). A HER2 mRNA value of 9.2 was generated as the optimal cutoff for distinguishing HER2 0 and HER2-low BC. Comparing ER+ BCs with HER2 mRNA high (>9.2) and low (≤9.2) revealed a statistically significant difference in most clinicopathologic variables and ODX RS. From this large cohort of ER-positive, HER2-negative BC, our results demonstrated that HER2 mRNA levels correlated better with clinicopathologic features and recurrence risk as assessed by ODX RS than HER2 IHC scores. Our findings suggest that HER2 mRNA-detecting methods could potentially serve as a quantitative and reliable method for identifying a biologically meaningful group of HER2-low BC. Further study is needed to determine whether HER2 mRNA levels could be more reliable than IHC for identifying which patients will be most likely to benefit from trastuzumab deruxtecan.