oncologic outcome

肿瘤学结果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小肠神经内分泌肿瘤(siNETs)的患者经常由于肠缺血或肠梗阻而出现紧急症状。急诊手术对siNET预后的影响仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是调查表现类型(紧急/选择性)与肿瘤结果之间的关联。
    在柏林Charité大学接受肠切除术并因siNET治疗的患者的临床病理数据,对德国进行了回顾性分析。
    共有165例患者接受了siNET肠切除术。其中,22.4%(n=37)为急诊,77.6%(n=128)为选择性手术。在急诊手术患者中,术前已知诊断较少(48.6%vs85.2%;p<0.001),所有肿瘤表现的完全切除较少(32.4%vs50.8%;p=0.049),而必须进行更多的完井作业(24.3%vs11.1%;p=0.049)。紧急手术患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)降低(5年OS:85.2%vs89.5%(p=0.023);5年PFS:26.7%vs52.5%(p=0.018))。此外,经多元回归分析,急诊手术与OS呈负相关.
    siNET患者的急诊手术与包括较短OS和PFS在内的不良肿瘤学结局相关。在晚期疾病中应强调紧急情况的预防。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNETs) frequently present emergently due to bowel ischemia or bowel obstruction. The influence of emergency surgery on the prognosis of siNET remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between type of presentation (emergency/elective) and oncological outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent bowel resection and were treated due to siNET at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany were analyzed retrospectively.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 165 patients underwent bowel resection for siNET. Of these, 22.4% (n = 37) were emergency and 77.6% (n = 128) were elective procedures. A preoperative known diagnosis was less common in patients with emergency surgery (48.6% vs 85.2%; p < 0.001) and complete resections of all tumor manifestations were performed less often (32.4% vs 50.8%; p = 0.049), while more completion operations had to be performed (24.3% vs 11.1%; p = 0.049). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of emergently operated patients were reduced (5-year OS: 85.2% vs 89.5% (p = 0.023); 5-year PFS: 26.7% versus 52.5% (p = 0.018)). In addition, emergency surgery was negatively associated with OS after multivariable regression analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Emergency surgery in siNET patients is associated with adverse oncological outcomes including shorter OS and PFS. Prevention of emergency conditions should be emphasized in advanced disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:严格评估T3/T4a声门和声门上鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者经口激光显微手术(TLM)后的肿瘤和功能结局。
    方法:对五个主要数据库的全面搜索-PubMed,Embase,Scopus,ScienceDirect,和WebofScience-使用相关关键词和MeSH术语的组合进行。
    方法:比值比(OR)的系统评价和荟萃分析,危险比(HR),和比例,重点关注TLM在晚期T3/T4a声门和声门上肿瘤中的肿瘤和功能结局。采用随机效应荟萃分析模型。
    结果:该综述纳入了29项队列研究,代表总共1,897例接受TLM治疗T3/T4a声门和声门上SCC的患者。T3声门和声门上肿瘤的累积5年无病生存率(DFS)为44.4%(95%CI:47-66%)和62.8%(95%CI:63-81%),而T4声门和声门上肿瘤的5年DFS为41.1%(95%CI:33.4-49.2%)和32.9%(95%CI:19.3-50.1%),分别。与T3声门上肿瘤相比,T3声门肿瘤在TLM后局部复发的几率显着提高了2.5倍(95%CI:1.6-3.9,p<0.0001)。T3声门和声门上肿瘤的喉保留率分别为68.9%(95%CI:48.7-83.8%)和88.4%(95%CI:79.4-93.8%),分别。两组气管造口术(p=0.48)和胃造口术(p=0.17)的发生率相当。
    结论:这项荟萃分析表明,TLM是选择T3/T4a声门和声门上肿瘤患者的可行的喉保留方法。然而,与晚期声门上型肿瘤相比,TLM后声门型肿瘤的预后较差.
    方法:N/A喉镜,2024喉镜,2024.
    OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate oncological and functional outcomes following transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in patients with T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
    METHODS: A comprehensive search of five major databases-PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science-was conducted using a combination of relevant keywords and MeSH terms.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of odds ratio (OR), hazards ratio (HR), and proportion, focusing on oncological and functional outcomes of TLM in advanced T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic tumors. A random-effects meta-analysis model was employed.
    RESULTS: The review incorporated 29 cohort studies, representing a total of 1,897 patients undergoing TLM for T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic SCC. The cumulative 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for T3 glottic and supraglottic tumors was 44.4% (95% CI: 47-66%) and 62.8% (95% CI: 63-81%), while the 5-year DFS for T4 glottic and supraglottic tumors was 41.1% (95% CI: 33.4-49.2%) and 32.9% (95% CI: 19.3-50.1%), respectively. T3 glottic tumors exhibited a 2.5-fold significantly higher odds of local recurrence post-TLM compared to their T3 supraglottic tumors (95% CI: 1.6-3.9, p < 0.0001). Laryngeal preservation rates for T3glottic and supraglottic tumors were 68.9% (95% CI: 48.7-83.8%) and 88.4% (95% CI: 79.4-93.8%), respectively. Both groups showed comparable rates of tracheostomy (p = 0.48) and gastrostomy performed (p = 0.17).
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that TLM is a viable larynx preservation approach in select patients with T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic tumors. However, glottic tumors may have less favorable outcomes after TLM compared to those with advanced supraglottic tumors.
    METHODS: N/A Laryngoscope, 2024 Laryngoscope, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:上纵隔是食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)最常见的转移部位,由于肿瘤原因,该区域的完整解剖非常重要。这项研究旨在比较接受Ivor-Lewis(IL)或McKeown(MK)手术的ESCC患者的上纵隔夹层的肿瘤学结果和完整性。
    方法:2013年至2018年,680例患者(IL,433;MK,247)接受了前段食管切除术,并进行了两野淋巴结(LN)清扫,以治疗中下部ESCCs。进行倾向评分匹配(1:1比例)以最大程度地减少混杂因素的影响。
    结果:平均年龄为64.5±8.8岁,其中635例(93.4%)患者为男性。中位随访期为71.66个月(四分位距[IQR],59.60-91.04个月)。IL组的平均年龄较高,较低的体重指数,高级T和N的比例更高,和更高的辅助治疗率,但在倾向评分匹配后,这些差异平衡良好.匹配后,两组纵隔和右喉返神经(RLN)的平均解剖LN数相似,而IL组在左侧RLN处显示出更多数量的解剖LN。在匹配的患者中,IL组和MK组的5年总生存率相似(OS:75.1%vs78.0%;p=0.368).多变量模型显示操作系统没有差异,无病生存,或局部区域的无复发生存率,上纵隔,或颈部介于两组之间。
    结论:这项研究表明,IL和MK手术对于中下部ESCC患者在肿瘤学上都是可行的。
    BACKGROUND: The upper mediastinum is the most common metastatic site of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and complete dissection of this region is important for oncologic reasons. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes and completeness of upper mediastinal dissection for ESCC patients undergoing the Ivor-Lewis (IL) or McKeown (MK) operations.
    METHODS: Between 2013 and 2018, 680 patients (IL, 433; MK, 247) underwent upfront esophagectomy with two-field lymph node (LN) dissection for mid-to-lower ESCCs. Propensity score-matching (1:1 ratio) was performed to minimize the effects of confounding factors.
    RESULTS: The mean age was 64.5 ± 8.8 years, and 635 (93.4%) of the patients were male. The median follow-up period was 71.66 months (interquartile range [IQR], 59.60-91.04 months). The IL group had a higher mean age, lower body mass index, higher proportion of advanced T and N, and higher adjuvant therapy rates, but these differences were well-balanced after propensity score-matching. The mean number of dissected LNs at the mediastinum and at the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) were similar between the two groups after matching, whereas the IL group exhibited a slightly greater number of dissected LNs at the left RLN. Among the matched patients, the IL and MK groups exhibited similar 5-year overall survival (OS: 75.1% vs 78.0%; p = 0.368). The multivariate model showed no differences in OS, disease-free survival, or recurrence-free survival for locoregional, upper mediastinum, or neck between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that both the IL and MK operations are oncologically feasible for patients with mid-to-lower ESCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨肉瘤或直接侵犯骶骨的盆腔癌代表了部分或全骶骨切除术的适应症。目的是描述肿瘤外科治疗和并发症的情况,并分析我们在骶骨切除术后的结果。
    方法:在回顾性分析中,包括27例患者(n=8/10/9肉瘤/脊索瘤/局部复发性直肠癌(LRRC))。9例进行了全骶骨切除术(包括。L5组合式脊椎切除术2),部分切除10例,半球切除8例。在12名患者中,切除是导航辅助.为了重建,网膜成形术,在20、10和13例患者中进行了VRAM皮瓣或脊柱骨盆固定术,分别。
    结果:中位随访时间(FU)为15个月,FU率为93%。R0切除81.5%(使用导航没有显著差异),81.5%的患者患有一种或多种轻度至中度并发症(尤其是伤口愈合障碍/感染)。中位总生存期为70个月。局部复发发生率为20%,而44%的患者发生转移,5例患者死于疾病。
    结论:骶骨肿瘤的切除具有挑战性,并且与高并发症有关。与内脏/血管和整形外科的跨学科合作至关重要。在脊索瘤患者中,与LRRC和肉瘤相比,全身肿瘤控制是有利的。导航提供了术中定向的增益,即使目前似乎没有肿瘤益处。完整的手术切除为接受各种复杂疾病的骶骨切除术的患者提供了长期生存。
    BACKGROUND: Bone sarcoma or direct pelvic carcinoma invasion of the sacrum represent indications for partial or total sacrectomy. The aim was to describe the oncosurgical management and complication profile and to analyze our own outcome results following sacrectomy.
    METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, 27 patients (n = 8/10/9 sarcoma/chordoma/locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) were included. There was total sacrectomy in 9 (incl. combined L5 en bloc spondylectomy in 2), partial in 10 and hemisacrectomy in 8 patients. In 12 patients, resection was navigation-assisted. For reconstruction, an omentoplasty, VRAM-flap or spinopelvic fixation was performed in 20, 10 and 13 patients, respectively.
    RESULTS: With a median follow-up (FU) of 15 months, the FU rate was 93%. R0-resection was seen in 81.5% (no significant difference using navigation), and 81.5% of patients suffered from one or more minor-to-moderate complications (especially wound-healing disorders/infection). The median overall survival was 70 months. Local recurrence occurred in 20%, while 44% developed metastases and five patients died of disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Resection of sacral tumors is challenging and associated with a high complication profile. Interdisciplinary cooperation with visceral/vascular and plastic surgery is essential. In chordoma patients, systemic tumor control is favorable compared to LRRC and sarcomas. Navigation offers gain in intraoperative orientation, even if there currently seems to be no oncological benefit. Complete surgical resection offers long-term survival to patients undergoing sacrectomy for a variety of complex diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:与最初的计划不同,部分食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者在新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后不能或不接受手术治疗.本研究旨在报告nCRT术后未接受手术患者的流行病学情况,并评估拒绝手术的潜在风险。
    方法:我们分析了在2005年1月至2020年3月期间接受nCRT作为初始治疗意向的T3-T4aN0M0或T1-T4aN1-N3M0ESCC临床分期患者。未接受手术的患者使用预定义的标准进行分类。为了评估拒绝手术的风险,我们与接受手术的患者进行了倾向匹配的比较.组间比较无复发(RFS)和总生存期(OS),根据对nCRT的临床反应。
    结果:在研究人群中(n=715),105例患者(14.7%)最终未能达到手术。不接受手术有三种主要模式:手术前疾病进展(n=25),重新评估时功能恶化(n=47),和病人拒绝无禁忌症(n=33)。在倾向得分匹配后,手术组和拒绝组的RFS曲线差异有统计学意义(p<0.001),而OS曲线无显著差异(p=0.069)。在重新评估后达到临床完全缓解的患者中,手术组和拒绝组的RFS曲线(p=0.382)和OS曲线(p=0.290)均无显著差异.然而,在重新评估时显示部分反应或疾病稳定的患者中,与手术组相比,拒绝组的RFS和OS曲线总体上明显较差(均p<0.001).拒绝组的5年RFS率为10.3%,手术组为48.2%,拒绝组的5年OS率为8.2%,手术组为46.1%。
    结论:患者的拒绝仍然是完成ESCC三联疗法的主要障碍之一。拒绝手术时提供可能会危及肿瘤的结果,特别是那些在nCRT后重新评估残留疾病的患者。这些结果为咨询nCRT后不愿进行食管切除术的患者提供了重要意义。
    OBJECTIVE: Unlike the initial plan, some patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cannot or do not receive surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to report the epidemiology of patients not receiving surgery after nCRT and to evaluate the potential risk of refusing surgery.
    METHODS: We analysed patients with clinical stage T3-T4aN0M0 or T1-T4aN1-N3M0 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent nCRT as an initial treatment intent between January 2005 and March 2020. Patients not receiving surgery were categorized using predefined criteria. To evaluate the risk of refusing surgery, a propensity-matched comparison with those who received surgery was performed. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was compared between groups, according to clinical response to nCRT.
    RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 715), 105 patients (14.7%) eventually failed to reach surgery. There were three major patterns of not receiving surgery: disease progression before surgery (n = 25), functional deterioration at reassessment (n = 47), and patient\'s refusal without contraindications (n = 33). After propensity-score matching, the RFS curves of the surgery group and the refusal group were significantly different (P < 0.001), while OS curves were not significantly different (P = 0.069). In patients who achieved clinical complete response on re-evaluation, no significant difference in the RFS curves (P = 0.382) and in the OS curves (P = 0.290) was observed between the surgery group and the refusal group. However, among patients who showed partial response or stable disease on re-evaluation, the RFS and OS curves of the refusal group were overall significantly inferior compared to those of the surgery group (both P < 0.001). The 5-year RFS rates were 10.3% for the refusal group and 48.2% for the surgery group, and the 5-year OS rates were 8.2% for the refusal group and 46.1% for the surgery group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patient\'s refusal remains one of the major obstacles in completing the trimodality therapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Refusing surgery when offered may jeopardize oncological outcome, particularly in those with residual disease on re-evaluation after nCRT. These results provide significant implications for consulting patients who are reluctant to oesophagectomy after nCRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们研究了术前血浆钾水平(PPLs)对膀胱尿路上皮癌(UCB)行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)患者预后的影响,假设钾失衡可能会影响结果。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,分析了2009年至2017年在三级中心接受RC的501例UCB患者。手术前一周收集的血样根据机构标准定义正常和异常PPL。我们评估了总生存期(OS),癌症特异性生存率(CSS),无复发生存率(RFS),术后并发症,30天死亡率,和非器官限制的疾病。Kaplan-Meier估计,Cox比例危险,逻辑回归,并采用决策曲线分析(DCA)。
    结果:63例(13%)患者术前PPL异常,50(10%)升高,13(2.5%)降低。在59个月的中位随访中,152(31%)有疾病复发,197(39%)死于任何原因,和119(24%)来自UCB。校正围手术期参数的多变量cox回归分析显示PPL异常与OS恶化相关(HR=1.9,P=0.009),CSS(HR=2.8,P<0.001)和RFS(HR=2.1;P=0.007)。术前PPL升高也显示与OS不良结局显著相关,CSS,和RFS(均P<0.05)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,异常和升高的PPL与30天死亡率无关,术后30天主要并发症,淋巴结疾病阳性,pT3/4级,和非器官狭窄疾病(均P>0.05)。
    结论:术前PPL异常和升高与接受RC治疗的UCB患者的不良肿瘤学结局相关。等待外部验证,术前PPL可能具有成本效益,易于获得的补充生物标志物,可丰富这种高度可变的疟疾的结果预测准确性。
    OBJECTIVE: We examined the impact of preoperative plasma potassium levels (PPLs) on outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), hypothesizing that potassium imbalances might influence outcomes.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, 501 UCB patients undergoing RC from 2009 to 2017 at a tertiary center were analyzed. Blood samples collected a week prior to surgery defined normal and abnormal PPL based on institutional standards. We assessed overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and non-organ confined disease. Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards, logistic regression, and decision curve analyses (DCA) were employed.
    RESULTS: 63 (13%) patients had abnormal preoperative PPLs, with 50 (10%) elevated and 13 (2.5%) decreased. In a 59 months median follow-up, 152 (31%) had disease recurrence, 197 (39%) died from any cause, and 119 (24%) from UCB. Multivariable cox regression analyses adjusting for perioperative parameters demonstrated abnormal PPL was associated with worse OS (HR=1.9, P=0.009), CSS (HR=2.8, P<0.001) and RFS (HR=2.1; P=0.007). Elevated preoperative PPLs also demonstrated significant associations with adverse outcomes in OS, CSS, and RFS (all P<0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, abnormal and elevated PPLs were not associated with 30-day mortality, major 30-day postoperative complications, positive nodal disease, pT3/4 stage, and non-organ confined disease (all P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal and elevated preoperative PPLs correlate with adverse oncologic outcomes in UCB patients treated with RC. Pending external validation, preoperative PPLs might be a cost-effective, easily obtainable supplemental biomarker for enriching accuracy of outcome prediction in this highly variable maladie.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管大多数癌症的发病率随着年龄的增长而增加,相当多的患者在生育期间接受癌症诊断。希望在癌症治疗后怀孕的年轻女性应提供有关保留生育能力和可能选择的咨询。在宫颈癌患者中,子宫切除术通常是不可避免的,因为子宫离子宫颈太近。对于希望怀孕且病变局限于子宫颈的年轻子宫颈癌患者,保留子宫,部分,子宫颈应该尽可能优先,同时确保良好的肿瘤学结果。在这次审查中,我们探讨了在早期宫颈癌女性行根治性子宫切除术后,如何选择适当的保留生育功能的手术方式,以在良好的肿瘤学结局与妊娠期间的生育和管理之间取得平衡.对于需要子宫切除术或放疗的患者,应讨论评估卵巢状况和腹腔镜卵巢移位,然后使用人工生殖技术和代孕妊娠,作为成功妊娠的选择。
    Although the incidence of most cancers increases with age, a considerable number of patients receive a diagnosis of cancer during their reproductive years. Young women wishing to get pregnant after cancer treatment should be provided consultation for fertility preservation and possible options. In patients with cervical cancer, hysterectomy is often inevitable because the uterus is located too close to the cervix. For young patients with cervical cancer who desire to get pregnant and whose lesion is confined to the cervix, sparing the uterus and, partially, the cervix should be prioritized as much as possible, while simultaneously ensuring favorable oncologic outcomes. In this review, we explore how to choose an adequate fertility-preserving procedure to achieve a balance between favorable oncologic outcomes and fertility and management during pregnancy after a radical trachelectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. For patients who require hysterectomy or radiation, evaluation of the ovarian condition and laparoscopic ovarian transposition followed by the use of artificial reproduction techniques and pregnancy by surrogacy should be discussed as options to achieve a successful pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:保留Retzius的前列腺切除术随着早期尿失禁的结果而得到推广。长期的肿瘤结果仍然未知。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较这两种方法在接受随机对照试验治疗的患者队列中的中期肿瘤学结局.
    方法:在2015年1月至2016年4月期间,共有120例患者被随机分组,分别接受保留retzius(RS-RARP)和标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(S-RARP)。基线,外科,并评估了病理特征以及肿瘤结局.根据接受的治疗进行分析。
    结果:63例患者接受了S-RARP,57例患者接受了RS-RARP。基线和手术特征均无统计学差异。中位随访时间为71.24(IQR59.75-75.75)。RS-RARP中病理T3疾病较多。两组的阳性切缘状态和生化复发率均无显着差异。在S-RARP和RS-RARP之后,6例和10例患者有生化复发,5年无生化复发生存率分别为91%和85%,分别。(p=0.21)结论:在这个队列中,接受这两种技术的患者在生化复发方面均无差异.需要进一步的多机构研究,样本量更大,随访时间更长。
    Introduction: Retzius-sparing prostatectomy was promoted with the early continence result. The long-term oncologic outcome is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare the intermediate-term oncologic outcomes of these two approaches in patients\' cohort who were treated as part of a randomized controlled trial. Methods: A total of 120 patients were previously randomized equally to receive Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) vs standard robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (S-RARP) between January 2015 and April 2016. Baseline, surgical, and pathologic characteristics as well as oncologic outcomes were assessed. The analysis was done based on the treatment received. Result: Sixty-three patients underwent S-RARP, whereas 57 patients underwent RS-RARP. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline nor surgical characteristics. The median follow-up was 71.24 (interquartile range: 59.75-75.75) months. There were more pathologic T3 diseases in RS-RARP. There was no significant difference in the positive margin status nor in the biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate among both groups. After S-RARP and RS-RARP, 6 and 10 patients had BCR, and the 5 years BCR-free survival was 91% and 85%, respectively (p = 0.21). Conclusion: In this cohort, there was no difference in BCR in the patients who received either technique. Further multi-institutional studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在通过对现有临床证据的系统评价和荟萃分析,比较质子束治疗(PBT)和碳离子放射治疗(CIRT)的结果。
    方法:进行了系统的文献检索,以确定比较PBT和CIRT临床结局的研究。纳入的研究需要报告肿瘤学结果(局部对照[LC],无进展生存期[PFS],或总生存期[OS])或不良事件。
    结果:分析包括1857例患者(947例接受PBT治疗,910例接受CIRT治疗)的18篇文章。对总体人群进行的汇总分析得出的平均风险比为0.690(95%置信区间(CI),0.493-0.967,p=0.031)对于LC,用于PFS的0.952(95%CI,0.604-1.500,p=0.590),OS为1.183(0.872-1.607,p=0.281),参考CIRT。亚组分析包括在头颈部接受治疗的患者,头部和颈部以外的区域,以及脊索瘤和软骨肉瘤患者。这些分析显示大多数结果没有显着差异,除了在头颈部以外的其他区域接受治疗的患者亚组中的LC。两组的不良事件发生率相当,比值比(OR)为1.097(95%CI,0.744-1.616,p=0.641)。对可能的异质性的荟萃回归分析未显示治疗结果与治疗方式之间的生物学有效剂量比之间存在显着关联。
    结论:本研究强调了PBT和CIRT在肿瘤结局和不良事件方面的可比性。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing clinical evidence.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes of PBT and CIRT. The included studies were required to report oncological outcomes (local control [LC], progression-free survival [PFS], or overall survival [OS]) or adverse events.
    RESULTS: Eighteen articles comprising 1857 patients (947 treated with PBT and 910 treated with CIRT) were included in the analysis. The pooled analysis conducted for the overall population yielded average hazard ratios of 0.690 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.493-0.967, p = 0.031) for LC, 0.952 (95% CI, 0.604-1.500, p = 0.590) for PFS, and 1.183 (0.872-1.607, p = 0.281) for OS with reference to CIRT. The subgroup analyses included patients treated in the head and neck, areas other than the head and neck, and patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas. These analyses revealed no significant differences in most outcomes, except for LC in the subgroup of patients treated in areas other than the head and neck. Adverse event rates were comparable in both groups, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.097 (95% CI, 0.744-1.616, p = 0.641). Meta-regression analysis for possible heterogeneity did not demonstrate a significant association between treatment outcomes and the ratio of biologically effective doses between modalities.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the comparability of PBT and CIRT in terms of oncological outcomes and adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未成熟畸胎瘤是罕见的恶性卵巢生殖细胞肿瘤,通常诊断为年轻女性,保留生育能力的手术是首选治疗方法。辅助化疗在I期疾病中的作用仍存在争议。我们评估了监测与化疗对I期未成熟畸胎瘤复发率的影响。
    我们在圣杰拉尔多医院收集了单中心回顾性系列的I期未成熟畸胎瘤患者,这些患者接受了保留生育功能的手术治疗,蒙扎,意大利,1980年至2019年。通过多因素logistic回归分析复发的潜在危险因素。
    在纳入的74名患者中,12%(9/74)接受化疗,而88%(65/74)接受了监测。中位随访时间为188个月。IA/IB期和IC未成熟畸胎瘤的复发无差异[10%(6/60)与28.6%(4/14)(P=0.087)],1级、2级和3级[7.1%(2/28)与14.3%(4/28)与22.2%(4/18)(p=0.39)],和监测与化疗组[13.9%(9/65)vs.11.1%(1/9))(p=1.00)]。在单变量分析中,术后入路对复发无影响.监测和化疗组的5年无病生存率分别为87%和90%,两组总生存率分别为100%.
    我们的结果支持在I期未成熟畸胎瘤中进行监测的可行性。辅助化疗可保留用于复发。然而,应该讨论化疗的潜在益处,尤其是高危肿瘤。前瞻性系列有必要证实我们的发现。
    到目前为止,对于辅助化疗在I期卵巢未成熟畸胎瘤中的作用尚未达成共识.一些研究表明,只有监测是可以接受的选择。然而,指南在这个主题上没有定论。
    监测组和辅助化疗组之间在复发方面没有观察到差异。所有复发患者均成功治愈,无疾病相关死亡。
    辅助化疗应与患者适当讨论。然而,根据我们的数据,它可能被保留用于复发。
    UNASSIGNED: Immature teratomas are rare malignant ovarian germ cell tumours, typically diagnosed in young women, where fertility-sparing surgery is the treatment of choice. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I disease remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of surveillance versus chemotherapy on the recurrence rate in stage I immature teratomas.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected a single centre retrospective series of patients with stage I immature teratomas treated with fertility-sparing surgery at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy, between 1980 and 2019. Potential risk factors for recurrence were investigated by multivariate logistic regression.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 74 patients included, 12% (9/74) received chemotherapy, while 88% (65/74) underwent surveillance. Median follow-up was 188 months. No difference in recurrence was found in stage IA/IB and IC immature teratomas [10% (6/60) vs. 28.6% (4/14) (P=0.087)], grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 [7.1% (2/28) vs. 14.3% (4/28) vs. 22.2% (4/18) (p=0.39)], and surveillance versus chemotherapy groups [13.9% (9/65) vs. 11.1% (1/9)) (p = 1.00)]. In univariate analysis, the postoperative approach had no impact on recurrence. The 5-year disease-free survival was 87% and 90% in the surveillance and chemotherapy groups, respectively; the overall survival was 100% in both cohorts.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results support the feasibility of surveillance in stage I immature teratomas. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be reserved for relapses. However, the potential benefit of chemotherapy should be discussed, especially for high-risk tumours. Prospective series are warranted to confirm our findings.
    UNASSIGNED: To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I immature teratomas of the ovary. Some studies suggest that only surveillance is an acceptable choice. However, guidelines are not conclusive on this topic.
    UNASSIGNED: No difference in terms of recurrence was observed between the surveillance and the adjuvant chemotherapy group. All patients who relapsed were successfully cured with no disease-related deaths.
    UNASSIGNED: Adjuvant chemotherapy should be appropriately discussed with patients. However, it may be reserved for relapse according to our data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号