UNASSIGNED: Appropriate dialysis prescription in the transitional setting from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease is still challenging. Conventional thrice-weekly haemodialysis (HD) might be associated with rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and high mortality. The benefits and risks of incremental HD compared with conventional HD were explored in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2023 for studies that compared the impacts of incremental (once- or twice-weekly HD) and conventional thrice-weekly HD on cardiovascular events, RKF, vascular access complications, quality of life, hospitalization and mortality.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 36 articles (138 939 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The mortality rate and cardiovascular events were similar between incremental and conventional HD {odds ratio [OR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.72-1.04 and OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.05], respectively}. However, hospitalization and loss of RKF were significantly lower in patients treated with incremental HD [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.72) and OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25-0.39), respectively]. In a sensitivity analysis that included studies restricted to those with RKF or urine output criteria, incremental HD had significantly lower cardiovascular events [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.63)] and mortality [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.79)]. Vascular access complications, hyperkalaemia and volume overload were not statistically different between groups.
UNASSIGNED: Incremental HD has been shown to be safe and may provide superior benefits in clinical outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these potential advantages.

BACKGROUND: The dialysis dose (Kt/V) and normalized protein catabolic rate (PCRn) are the most useful indices derived from the urea kinetic model (UKM) in haemodialysis (HD) patients. The kidney urea clearance (Kru) is another important UKM parameter which plays a key role in the prescription of incremental HD. Ideally, the three kinetic parameters should be assessed using the complex software Solute Solver based on the double pool UKM. In the clinical setting, however, the three indices are estimated with simplified formulae. The recently introduced software SPEEDY assembles the aforementioned equations in a plain spreadsheet, to produce quite accurate results of Kru, Kt/V and PCRn. Unfortunately, specific equations to compute Kt/V and PCRn for patients on a once-weekly HD regimen (1HD/wk) were not available at the time SPEEDY was built-up. We devised a new version of SPEEDY (SPEEDY-1) and an even simpler variant (SPEEDY-1S), using two recently published equations for the 1HD/wk schedule . Moreover, we also added a published equation to estimate the equivalent renal clearance (EKR) normalized to urea distribution volume (V) of 35 L (EKR35) from Kru and Kt/V . Aim of the present study was to compare the results obtained using the new methods (SPEEDY-1 and SPEEDY-1S) with those provided by the reference method Solute Solver.
METHODS: One hundred historical patients being treated with the once-weekly HD regimen were enrolled. A total of 500 HD sessions associated to the availability of monthly UKM studies were analysed in order to obtain Kru, single pool Kt/V (spKt/V), equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V), V, PCRn and EKR35 values by using Solute Solver, SPEEDY-1 and SPEEDY-1S.
RESULTS: When comparing the paired values of the above UKM parameters, as computed by SPEEDY-1 and Solute Solver, respectively, all differences but one were statistically significant at the one-sample t-test; however, the agreement limits at Bland-Altman analysis showed that all differences were negligible. When comparing the paired values of the above UKM parameters, as computed by SPEEDY-1S and Solute Solver, respectively, all differences were statistically significant; however, the agreement limits showed that the differences were negligible as far as Kru, spKt/V and eKt/V are concerned, though much larger regarding V, PCRn and EKR35.
CONCLUSIONS: We implemented SPEEDY with a new version specific for the once-weekly HD regimen, SPEEDY-1. It provides accurate results and is presently the best alternative to Solute Solver. Using SPEEDY-1S led to a larger difference in PCRn and EKR35, which could be acceptable for clinical practice if SPEEDY-1 is not available.

The haemodialysis (HD) dose, as expressed by Kt/V urea, is currently routinely estimated with the second generation Daugirdas (D2) equation (Daugirdas in J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1205-1213, 1993). This equation, initially devised for a thrice-weekly schedule, was modified to be used for all dialysis schedules (Daugirdas et al. in Nephrol Dial Transplant 28:2156-2160, 2013), by adopting a variable factor that adjusts for the urea generation (GFAC) over the preceding inter-dialysis interval (PIDI, days). This factor was set at 0.008 for the mid-week session of the standard thrice-weekly HD schedule. In theory, by setting PIDI = 7, one could get GFAC = 0.0025, to be used in patients on the once-weekly (1HD/wk) schedule, but actually this has never been tested. Moreover, GFAC was derived not taking into account the residual kidney urea clearance (Kru). Aim of the present study was to provide a specific value of GFAC for patients on  a once-weekly hemodialysis schedule.
The equation to predict GFAC (GFAC-1) in the 1HD/wk schedule was established in a group of 80 historical Italian patients (group 1) and validated in a group of 100 historical Spanish patients (group 2), by comparing the Kt/V computed using GFAC-1 (Kt/VGFAC-1) with the reference Kt/V (Kt/VSS) values, as computed with the web-based Solute-Solver software (SS) (Daugirdas et al. in Am J Kidney Dis 54:798-809, 2009). Three more sets of Kt/V (Kt/V0.008, Kt/V0.0025 and Kt/V0.0035) values were computed using the GFAC of the original D2 equation (0.008), the GFAC predicted by PIDI/7 (0.0025) and the mean observed GFAC-1 (0.0035), respectively. They were compared with the reference Kt/VSS values.
The predicting equation obtained from group 1 was: GFAC-1 = 0.0022 + 0.0105 × Kru/V (R2 = 0.93). Mean Kt/VSS in the group 2 was 1.54 ± 0.29 SD (N = 500 HD sessions). The mean percent differences for Kt/V0.008, Kt/V0.0025, Kt/VGFAC-1, and Kt/V0.0035 were 5.1 ± 1.0%, - 1.4 ± 0.7%, 0.0 ± 0.3%, - 0.3 ± 0.7%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between Kt/V values, except for Kt/V0.008.
A linear relationship was found between GFAC and Kru/V in patients on the 1HD/wk schedule. Such a relationship is able to improve the \"second generation Daugirdas equation\" for an accurate estimate of the single pool Kt/V in this setting. However, a simple replacement in the D2 equation of 0.008 with the mean observed GFAC (0.0035) could suffice in the clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The normalized protein catabolic rate (PCRn) is one of the key indices derived from the urea kinetic model (UKM) in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Ideally, it should be assessed using the double pool UKM (KDOQI clinical practice guidelines, AIKD, 2015), as the web-based software Solute-Solver (SS) does (Daugirdas et al., AJKD, 2009). Simple formulae exist to compute PCRn for patients on thrice- or twice-weekly HD schedule, but not for patients on once-weekly HD schedule (1HD/wk). Aim of the present technical note was to introduce the lacking equation that estimates PCRn in the 1HD/wk regimen.
METHODS: Data of a single HD session associated to monthly UKM studies were retrieved from the electronic database of our dialysis unit for 80 historical patients on 1HD/wk regimen. The UKM parameters, as calculated with SS, were used in a subgroup of 40 randomly selected patients (group 1) to build-up a multiple regression model of PCRn. The latter was used to predict PCRn (PCRnPred) values in the cohort of the remaining 40 patients (group 2). The Bland-Altman plot was used to analyse the agreement between PCRnPred and the paired \"observed\" (PCRnObs) values, as measured with SS.
RESULTS: The following equation was established by means of the multiple regression analysis: PCRn = - 0.46 + 0.01 × C0 + 0.09 × eKt/V + 3.94 × Kru/V, where C0 is pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen concentration, eKt/V is the equilibrated Kt/V, Kru is the residual renal urea clearance and V is the post-dialysis urea distribution volume. The PCRnPred values were 0.99 ± 0.24 g/kg/day; the PCRnObs values were 0.96 ± 0.23 g/kg/day (mean difference 0.03 ± 0.05 g/kg/day). Their difference at the Bland-Altman analysis ranged from - 0.08 to + 0.13 g/kg/day. Finally, a nomogram was drawn: it can be used to estimate not only PCRn from Kru/V and C0, but also C0 as a function of Kru/V and PCRn.
CONCLUSIONS: The equation here introduced allows a simple and accurate estimate of PCRn in patients on once-weekly HD regimen. The availability of the nomogram relating C0 to PCRn and Kru/V could be a further step to make safer and safer the once-weekly HD regimen. The following equation was established by means of the multiple regression analysis [Formula: see text] where PCRn is the normalized protein catabolic rate (PCRn), C0 is pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen concentration (BUN), eKt/V is the equilibrated Kt/V, Kru is the residual renal urea clearance and V is the post-dialysis urea distribution volume. A nomogram relating pre-dialysis BUN to PCRn and Kru/V could be drawn: it can be used to estimate not only PCRn from Kru/V and pre-dialysis BUN, but also pre-dialysis BUN as a function of Kru/V and PCRn.

Most people who make the transition to renal replacement therapy (RRT) are treated with a fixed dose thrice-weekly hemodialysis réegimen, without considering their residual kidney function (RKF). Recent papers inform us that incremental hemodialysis is associated with preservation of RKF, whenever compared with conventional hemodialysis. The objective of the present controlled randomized trial (RCT) is to determine if start HD with one sessions per week (1-Wk/HD), it is associated with better patient survival and other safety parameters.
IHDIP is a multicenter RCT experimental open trial. It is randomized in a 1:1 ratio and controlled through usual clinical practice, with a low intervention level and non-commercial. It includes 152 incident patients older than 18 years, with a RRF of ≥4 ml/min/1.73 m2, measured by renal clearance of urea (KrU). The intervention group includes 76 patients who will start with incremental HD (1-Wk/HD). The control group includes 76 patients who will start with thrice-weekly hemodialysis régimen. The primary outcome is assessing the survival rate, while the secondary outcomes are the morbidity rate, the clinical parameters, the quality of life and the efficiency.
This study will enable to know the number of sessions a patient should receive when starting HD, depending on his RRF. The potentially important clinical and financial implications of incremental hemodialysis warrant this RCT.
U.S. National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov . Number: NCT03239808 , completed 13/04/2017.
Foundation for Training and Research of Health Professionals of Extremadura.

The recent interest in incremental haemodialysis (HD) is hindered by the current prescription based on a fixed target model (FTM) for the total (dialytic + renal) equivalent continuous clearance (ECC). The latter is expressed either as standard Kt/V (stdKt/V), i.e. the pre-dialysis averaged concentration of urea-based ECC, or EKRc, i.e. the time averaged concentration-based ECC, corrected for volume (V) = 40 L. Accordingly, there are two different targets: stdKt/V = 2.3 volumes per week (v/wk) and EKRc = 13 mL/min/40 L. However, fixing the total ECC necessarily implies perfect equivalence of its components-the residual renal urea clearance (Kru) and dialysis clearance (Kd). This assumption is wrong because Kru has much greater clinical weight than Kd. Here we propose that the ECC target varies as an inverse function of Kru, from a maximum value in anuria to a minimum value at Kru levels not yet requiring dialysis. The aim of the present study was to compare the current FTM with the proposed variable target model (VTM).
The double pool urea kinetic model was used to model dialysis sessions for 360 virtual patients and establish equations predicting the ECC as a function of Kd, Kru and the number of sessions per week. An end-dialysis urea distribution V of 35 L (corresponding to a body surface area of 1.73 m 2 ) was used, so that the current EKRc target of 13 mL/min/40 L could be recalculated at an EKRc 35 value of 12 mL/min/35 L equal to 12 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The latter also coincides with the maximum value of the EKRc 35 variable target in anuria. The minimum target value of EKRc 35 was assumed to coincide with Kru corrected for V = 35 L (i.e. Krc 35 = 6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). The corresponding target for stdKt/V was assumed to vary from 2.3 v/wk at Krc 35 = 0 to 1.7 v/wk at Krc 35 = 6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . On this basis, the variable target values can be obtained from the following linear equations: target EKRc 35 = 12 - Krc 35 ; target stdKt/V = 2.3 - 0.1 × Krc 35 . Two versions of stdKt/V were considered: the classic version (stdKt/V Gotch ) with Kru at 70%, and the current version (stdKt/V Daug ) with Kru at 100%.
The VTM with stdKt/V Gotch produces results very close to those using the FTM with stdKt/V Daug . Once-weekly HD is virtually not allowed by the FTM. In contrast, the VTM allows dialysis to start at Krc 35 ∼5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 on a once-weekly HD schedule, at least in relatively healthy patients; this schedule can be maintained until Krc 35 falls below 4 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , at which point the schedule should be changed to a twice-weekly HD schedule, that, in turn, could be maintained until Krc 35 falls below 2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 .
A paradigm shift from the FTM to the VTM in the prescription of incremental HD is proposed, whereby the VTM would allow less frequent treatments at lower Kru, with important clinical and economic implications. This approach is likely to be safe but needs to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.