oligometastasis

寡转移
  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1368926。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1368926.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:最近的出版物促进了肾上腺寡转移或寡进展患者的立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)。然而,非自适应SBRT后的局部控制(LC)显示出改进的潜力。在线自适应MR引导的SBRT(MRgSBRT)改善了肿瘤覆盖率和危险器官(OAR)。自适应MRgSBRT的长期结果仍然是稀疏的。(2)方法:在0.35TMR-Linac上进行自适应MRgSBRT。LC,总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),总反应率(ORR),和毒性进行了评估。(3)结果:对35例肾上腺转移瘤患者40例进行分析。中位总肿瘤体积为30.6cc。最常见的方案是5Gy的10个分数。中位生物有效剂量(BED10)为75.0Gy。计划适应在所有部分的98%中进行。中位随访时间为7.9个月。16.6个月后发生一次局部故障,估计一年的LC率为100%,两年为90%。ORR为67.5%。中位OS为22.4个月,中位PFS为5.1个月.无毒性>CTCAE2级发生。(4)结论:肾上腺适应性MRgSBRT术后LC和ORR均较好,即使在具有相当大的转移的队列中。与非适应性SBRT相比,75Gy的BED10似乎足以改善LC。
    (1) Background: Recent publications foster stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with adrenal oligometastases or oligoprogression. However, local control (LC) after non-adaptive SBRT shows the potential for improvement. Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) improves tumor coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. Long-term results of adaptive MRgSBRT are still sparse. (2) Methods: Adaptive MRgSBRT was performed on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. LC, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity were assessed. (3) Results: 35 patients with 40 adrenal metastases were analyzed. The median gross tumor volume was 30.6 cc. The most common regimen was 10 fractions at 5 Gy. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) was 75.0 Gy. Plan adaptation was performed in 98% of all fractions. The median follow-up was 7.9 months. One local failure occurred after 16.6 months, resulting in estimated LC rates of 100% at one year and 90% at two years. ORR was 67.5%. The median OS was 22.4 months, and the median PFS was 5.1 months. No toxicity > CTCAE grade 2 occurred. (4) Conclusions: LC and ORR after adrenal adaptive MRgSBRT were excellent, even in a cohort with comparably large metastases. A BED10 of 75 Gy seems sufficient for improved LC in comparison to non-adaptive SBRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对寡转移前列腺癌(OMPC)的兴趣正在增加,和各种临床研究报道了转移定向放射治疗(MDRT)在OMPC中的益处。然而,对通过的定义的承认,评估方法,放射肿瘤学家的治疗方法多种多样。这项研究旨在评估放射肿瘤学家对OMPC问题的共识水平。
    方法:我们为OMPC生成了15个与定义相关的关键问题(KQs),诊断,局部疗法,和端点。此外,代表同步转移性前列腺癌(mPC)的三种临床方案(病例1),异时性mPC伴内脏转移(病例2),并发展了具有去势抵抗和多转移史的异时mPC(病例3)。根据每个场景对15个KQ进行了调整,并转换为23个问题,每个场景6-9个。调查已分发给大韩民国各地的80名放射肿瘤学家。答案选项为0.0-29.9%,30-49.9%,50-69.9%,70-79.9%,80-89.9%,90-100%的协议被认为是否定的,最小,弱,中度,坚强,和近乎完美的协议,分别。
    结果:45名候选人自愿参加了这项研究。在23个问题中,接近完美(n=4),强(n=3),或中等(n=2)协议显示在9个。对于承认为OMPC且协议为93%的案例(案例1),在对整个转移性病变应用确定性放射治疗(RT)方面达成了近乎完美的协议。虽然尚未达成关于转移定向RT(MDRT)最佳剂量分级的≥70%协议,立体定向体RT(SBRT)受到临床容量较高的临床医生的青睐。
    结论:对于公认为OMPC的案例,对于整个转移性病变的最终RT应用,达成了近乎完美的协议。SBRT作为MDRT更受临床量较高的临床医生的青睐。
    BACKGROUND: Interest in the oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is increasing, and various clinical studies have reported the benefits of metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT) in OMPC. However, the recognition regarding the adopted definitions, methodologies of assessment, and therapeutic approaches is diverse among radiation oncologists. This study aims to evaluate the level of agreement for issues in OMPC among radiation oncologists.
    METHODS: We generated 15 key questions (KQs) for OMPC relevant to definition, diagnosis, local therapies, and endpoints. Additionally, three clinical scenarios representing synchronous metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) (case 1), metachronous mPC with visceral metastasis (case 2), and metachronous mPC with castration-resistance and history of polymetastasis (case 3) were developed. The 15 KQs were adapted according to each scenario and transformed into 23 questions with 6-9 per scenario. The survey was distributed to 80 radiation oncologists throughout the Republic of Korea. Answer options with 0.0-29.9%, 30-49.9%, 50-69.9%, 70-79.9%, 80-89.9%, and 90-100% agreements were considered as no, minimal, weak, moderate, strong, and near perfect agreement, respectively.
    RESULTS: Forty-five candidates voluntarily participated in this study. Among 23 questions, near perfect (n = 4), strong (n = 3), or moderate (n = 2) agreements were shown in nine. For the case recognized as OMPC with agreements of 93% (case 1), near perfect agreements on the application of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for whole metastatic lesions were achieved. While ≥70% agreements regarding optimal dose-fractionation for metastasis-directed RT (MDRT) has not been achieved, stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is favored by clinicians with higher clinical volume.
    CONCLUSIONS: For the case recognized as OMPC, near perfect agreement for the application of definitive RT for whole metastatic lesions was reached. SBRT was more favored as a MDRT by clinicians with a higher clinical volume.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在确定与乳腺癌患者脑转移程度相关的因素,以帮助区分脑寡转移(1-4个脑转移)和广泛转移(5个或更多个脑转移)。
    方法:这项回顾性观察研究包括2011年1月至2022年4月在一个机构诊断为乳腺癌脑转移的100名女性患者。在脑寡转移组和广泛转移组之间比较了患者的人口统计学和肿瘤特征。采用多变量logistic回归分析确定独立因素,包括初次诊断时的年龄,初始阶段,乳腺癌亚型,脑转移的检测时间,以及转移性疾病的从头或复发状态。在对脑寡转移患者的亚组分析中,比较了单例和2-4例脑转移患者的人口统计学和肿瘤特征.
    结果:在100名患者中,56人患有脑寡转移酶,44例有广泛的脑转移。多变量logistic回归分析显示,只有转移性乳腺癌的从头/复发状态与脑转移程度显着相关(p=0.023)。在56例脑寡转移患者的亚组分析中,早期诊断的患者更有可能发生单一的脑转移(p=0.008).
    结论:从头转移性乳腺癌患者比复发性转移性乳腺癌患者更容易发生广泛的脑转移。这种见解可能会影响监测和治疗脑转移的量身定制方法的发展,支持对新诊断为IV期乳腺癌的患者进行常规脑部筛查的潜在优势。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify factors associated with the extent of brain metastases in patients with breast cancer to help distinguish brain oligometastases (1-4 brain metastases) from extensive metastases (5 or more brain metastases).
    METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 100 female patients diagnosed with brain metastases from breast cancer at a single institution between January 2011 and April 2022. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were compared between the brain oligometastases group and the extensive metastases group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent factors, including age at initial diagnosis, initial stage, breast cancer subtype, detection time of brain metastases, and de novo or recurrent status of the metastatic disease. In a subgroup analysis of patients with brain oligometastases, demographic and tumor characteristics were compared between patients with single and two-four brain metastases.
    RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 56 had brain oligometastases, while 44 had extensive brain metastases. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that only the de novo/recurrent status of metastatic breast cancer was significantly associated with the extent of brain metastasis (p = 0.023). In the subgroup analysis of 56 patients with brain oligometastases, those diagnosed at an earlier stage were more likely to have a single brain metastasis (p = 0.008).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer are more likely to develop extensive brain metastases than those with recurrent metastatic breast cancer. This insight could influence the development of tailored approaches for monitoring and treating brain metastases, supporting the potential advantages of routine brain screening for patients newly diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目前的放射治疗指南严重依赖影像监测。液体活检监测有望通过提供有关肿瘤的频繁全身信息来补充成像。特别是,无细胞DNA(cfDNA)测序提供了一种与肿瘤无关的方法,这有助于监测癌症患者的异质队列。
    方法:我们在之前的六个时间点收集了寡转移患者(OMD)和头颈部癌症患者(SCCHN)的血浆cfDNA,during,放疗后,并将它们与健康和多转移志愿者的血浆样本进行比较。我们对93个血浆cfDNA样品进行了低通(平均7倍)全基因组测序,并将拷贝数改变和片段长度分布与临床和影像学发现相关联。
    结果:我们观察到4/7多转移癌患者的拷贝数改变,1/7OMD和1/7SCCHN患者,这些患者的影像学表现为放疗后进展。使用无监督学习,我们确定了与基于拷贝数的肿瘤分数估计值具有强相关性的癌症特异性片段长度特征.在4/4HPV阳性SCCHN患者样本中,我们检测到病毒DNA,这使得能够监测非常低的肿瘤分数样本.
    结论:我们的结果表明,肿瘤分数升高与肿瘤侵袭性和全身肿瘤扩散有关。该信息可用于调整治疗策略。Further,我们发现通过检测病毒DNA等特定序列,从无细胞DNA测序数据中检测癌症的灵敏度可以大大提高。
    OBJECTIVE: Current radiotherapy guidelines rely heavily on imaging-based monitoring. Liquid biopsy monitoring promises to complement imaging by providing frequent systemic information about the tumor. In particular, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing offers a tumor-agnostic approach, which lends itself to monitoring heterogeneous cohorts of cancer patients.
    METHODS: We collected plasma cfDNA from oligometastatic patients (OMD) and head-and-neck cancer patients (SCCHN) at six time points before, during, and after radiotherapy, and compared them to the plasma samples of healthy and polymetastatic volunteers. We performed low-pass (on average 7x) whole-genome sequencing on 93 plasma cfDNA samples and correlated copy number alterations and fragment length distributions to clinical and imaging findings.
    RESULTS: We observed copy number alterations in 4/7 polymetastatic cancer patients, 1/7 OMD and 1/7 SCCHN patients, these patients\' imaging showed progression following radiotherapy. Using unsupervised learning, we identified cancer-specific fragment length features that showed a strong correlation with copy number-based tumor fraction estimates. In 4/4 HPV-positive SCCHN patient samples, we detected viral DNA that enabled the monitoring of very low tumor fraction samples.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that an elevated tumor fraction is associated with tumor aggressiveness and systemic tumor spread. This information may be used to adapt treatment strategies. Further, we show that by detecting specific sequences such as viral DNA, the sensitivity of detecting cancer from cell-free DNA sequencing data can be greatly increased.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    立体定向放疗(SBRT)越来越多地用于盆腔淋巴结复发。到目前为止,缺乏CBCT引导下SBRT期间盆腔淋巴结运动的知识,并且不同机构的应用范围不同。这项研究评估了CBCT引导的SBRT期间的盆腔淋巴结运动,并评估了当前应用的3和5mm的PTV边缘。
    总共,包括45个盆腔淋巴结转移。一名观察员在规划CT上描绘了45个GTV,在前部分上有224个GTT,在后部分CBCT上有216个GTT。GTV质心坐标是从所有图像中得出的,用于帧间和帧内运动分析。此外,我们评估了治疗时间和病变位置对病变运动的影响。3-mm和5-mmPTV边缘的预期覆盖率使用GTV的包容性指数在前和后部分CBCT上进行评估。
    对于所有平移方向,在96-97%的部分中,淋巴结间运动限制为5mm,而在97-100%的部分中,淋巴结内损伤运动限制为3mm。与其他骨盆位置相比,直肠旁病变(11%)与明显更大的介入和介入运动有关,并且治疗持续时间与病变运动无关。5毫米PTV边缘的平均(sd)病变包容性指数为99%(5%),3毫米边缘为96%(9%)。
    CBCT引导的立体定向放疗期间盆腔淋巴结的运动在5mm的广泛应用PTV边缘内,为减少盆腔淋巴结SBRT的边缘提供了机会。
    UNASSIGNED: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for pelvic lymph node recurrence. Thus far, knowledge on pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided SBRT is lacking and the applied margins vary between institutions. This study evaluated pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided SBRT and assessed the currently applied PTV margins of 3 and 5 mm.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 45 pelvic lymph node metastases were included. One observer delineated 45 GTVs on planning CT, 224 GTVs on pre-fraction and 216 on post-fraction CBCT. The GTV centroid coordinates were derived from all images for inter- and intrafraction motion analysis. Additionally, we assessed the influence of treatment time and lesion location on lesion motion. The expected coverage of a 3-mm and 5-mm PTV margin was assessed using the inclusiveness index for GTVs on pre- and post-fraction CBCT.
    UNASSIGNED: Lymph node interfraction motion was limited to 5 mm in 96-97 % of fractions for all translational directions and intrafraction lesion motion was limited to 3 mm in 97-100 % of fractions. Para-rectal lesions (11 %) were associated with significantly larger inter- and intrafraction motion compared to other pelvic locations and treatment duration showed no correlation with lesion motion. The mean (sd) lesion inclusiveness index was 99 % (5 %) for the 5-mm PTV margin and 96 % (9 %) for the 3-mm margin.
    UNASSIGNED: Pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided stereotactic radiotherapy was within the widely applied PTV margin of 5 mm, providing an opportunity to reduce this margin for pelvic lymph node SBRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    此病例报告描述了一个罕见的例子,即中年子宫内膜癌(EC)幸存者在无病状态3年后发生孤立的腹壁转移。诱导化疗后,她进行了切缘阴性的腹部肿瘤手术切除。令人惊讶的是,患者在手术后3年以上无病。这强调了解决适合手术切除的单个转移的必要性,以及需要勤奋的监测以更快地发现复发。了解罕见的复发部位,比如腹壁,对于最佳的EC治疗和护理至关重要。本文提供的数据增加了有关非典型表现和复发性EC治疗的现有信息。需要额外的研究来制定循证指导。
    This case report describes a rare example of a solitary abdominal wall metastasis in a middle-aged endometrial cancer (EC) survivor 3 years following disease-free status. Following induction chemotherapy, she had a margin-negative surgical excision of the abdominal tumor. Surprisingly, the patient has been disease-free for more than 3 years after the operation. This emphasizes the necessity of addressing single metastasis amenable to surgical resection, as well as the need for diligent monitoring to discover recurrences sooner. Understanding rare locations of recurrence, such as the abdominal wall, is critical for optimum EC therapy and care. The data given in this article adds to the existing body of information on atypical presentations and recurrent EC therapy. Additional research is required to develop evidence-based guidance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:立体定向全身放疗(SBRT)和/或单次立体定向全身放射外科(SRS)是治疗淋巴结寡转移疾病的有效治疗选择。尽管地方控制率令人鼓舞,无进展生存期仍然不公平,因为复发可能发生在同一地区或其他地点.本研究介绍了寡转移患者淋巴结局部消融RT(laRT)后的复发模式分析。
    方法:在该单一机构中研究了在Destroy-1中招募并接受SBRT或在Destroy-2试验中接受SRS治疗的淋巴结转移患者的失败模式,回顾性分析。记录laRT后的不同复发部位。
    结果:分析了190例患者在269个结节病灶上接受SBRT或SRS的数据。记录了57.2%的复发率(269个结节病变中的154个)。88例(57.4%)患者的失败模式是远处的,66例(42.6%)患者的失败模式是局部的,分别。经历局部区域衰竭的患者中最常见的原发性恶性肿瘤是泌尿生殖系统和妇科癌症。此外,局部区域复发的主要部位(62%)是骨盆区.只有26%的局部复发发生横向相反,74%同侧发生。
    结论:远处淋巴结疾病的复发发生率更高,除了泌尿生殖系统和妇科癌症。的确,局部复发最常见的情况是泌尿生殖系统癌和盆腔部位.此外,复发通常发生在被照射部位附近的结节区域,而在ENI治疗6个月内接受LRT治疗的患者中,复发较少见.
    结论:局部消融放疗是治疗淋巴结寡转移的有效方法。尽管本地控制率很高,无进展生存期仍然令人沮丧,复发可能发生在本地区域或远距离。了解失败的模式可以帮助医生选择最佳的治疗策略。这是第一项报道用laRT治疗的大量结节病变的复发模式的研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and/or single fraction stereotactic body radiosurgery (SRS) are effective treatment options for the treatment of oligometastatic disease of lymph nodes. Despite the encouraging local control rate, progression-free survival remains unfair due to relapses that might occur in the same district or at other sites. The recurrence pattern analysis after nodal local ablative RT (laRT) in oligometastatic patients is presented in this study.
    METHODS: The pattern of failure of patients with nodal metastases who were recruited and treated with SBRT in the Destroy-1 or SRS in the Destroy-2 trials was investigated in this single-institution, retrospective analysis. The different relapsed sites following laRT were recorded.
    RESULTS: Data on 190 patients who received SBRT or SRS on 269 nodal lesions were reviewed. A relapse rate of 57.2% (154 out of 269 nodal lesions) was registered. The pattern of failure was distant in 88 (57.4%) and loco-regional in 66 (42.6%) patients, respectively. The most frequent primary malignancies among patients experiencing loco-regional failure were genitourinary and gynaecological cancers. Furthermore, the predominant site of loco-regional relapse (62%) was the pelvic area. Only 26% of locoregional relapses occurred contra laterally, with 74% occurring ipsilaterally.
    CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rates after laRT for nodal disease were more frequent in distant regions compared to locoregional sites. The most common scenarios for locoregional relapse appear to be genitourinary cancer and the pelvic site. In addition, recurrences often occur in the same nodal station or in a nodal station contiguous to the irradiated nodal site.
    CONCLUSIONS: Local ablative radiotherapy is an effective treatment in managing nodal oligometastasis. Despite the high local control rate, the progression free survival remains dismal with recurrences that can occur both loco-regionally or at distance. To understand the pattern of failure could aid the physicians to choose the best treatment strategy. This is the first study that reports the recurrence pattern of a significant number of nodal lesions treated with laRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估IV期胰腺腺癌及其转移的质子束治疗(PBT),并确定合格标准。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估了组织病理学诊断为胰腺腺癌的患者,已经进展到第四阶段,并在2017年至2022年期间接受了原发性和一些转移性病变的PBT。使用被动散射技术进行PBT。
    结果:16例患者(中位年龄,72年;范围,55-85岁)注册。所有患者在PBT开始时都患有IV期胰腺癌。从IV期诊断到开始PBT的中位持续时间为5.8(范围,0.4-13.5)个月。在转诊到我们医院之前,有三名患者在其他机构被诊断为复发性IV期癌症,因为他们在切除原发肿瘤后有局部复发和远处转移。化疗如下:PBT前,4、7、4和1例患者的0、1、2和3行,分别;与PBT同时,11例和5例患者中的0和1行,分别;PBT后,5和5例患者中的0和1行,分别;和未知,6名患者。有或没有未照射的活动性转移性肿瘤的自IV期诊断之日起的中位生存时间(MST)分别为11.4和20.1个月,分别。单因素分析显示,绩效状态(PS)水平(p<0.01),糖类抗原(CA)19-9肿瘤标志物水平(p<0.01),未接受放射治疗的活动性肿瘤(p=0.02),和有或没有PBT后化疗(p<0.01)是有统计学意义的因素。多因素分析显示,CA19-9肿瘤标志物水平(p=0.04),转移灶的数量(p=0.049),有无未照射的活动性转移性肿瘤(p=0.02)是重要因素。
    结论:当转移灶的数量限制在≤4个病灶,并且所有肿瘤都可以在患者的耐受时间内进行最小数量的照射范围内进行照射时,这是一个主观的持续时间,取决于病人的反应在每个疗程。它可能是寡转移胰腺癌患者的可行治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate proton beam therapy (PBT) for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its metastases and define the criteria for eligibility. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who had a histopathological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, had progressed to stage IV, and underwent PBT for both the primary and some metastatic lesions between 2017 and 2022. PBT was performed using the passive scattering technique.
    RESULTS: Sixteen patients (median age, 72 years; range, 55-85 years) were enrolled. All patients had stage IV pancreatic cancer at the initiation of PBT. The median duration from the date of stage IV diagnosis to the initiation of PBT was 5.8 (range, 0.4-13.5) months. Three patients had been diagnosed as having recurrent stage IV cancer at other institutions before their referral to our hospital because they had local recurrence and distant metastases after the resection of the primary tumor. Chemotherapy was as follows: pre-PBT, 0, 1, 2, and 3 lines in 4, 7, 4, and 1 patients, respectively; concurrent with PBT, 0 and 1 line in 11 and 5 patients, respectively; post-PBT, 0 and 1 line in 5 and 5 patients, respectively; and unknown, 6 patients. The median survival times (MSTs) from the date of stage IV diagnosis for the with or without non-irradiated active metastatic tumor were 11.4 and 20.1 months, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the performance status (PS) levels (p < 0.01), the carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 tumor marker levels (p < 0.01), active tumors not treated with irradiation (p = 0.02), and with or without post-PBT chemotherapy (p < 0.01) were statistically significant factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the CA 19-9 tumor marker levels (p= 0.04), the number of metastatic lesions (p = 0.049), and with or without non-irradiated active metastatic tumors (p = 0.02) were significant factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: PBT is indicated when the number of metastases is limited to ≤ 4 lesions and all tumors can be irradiated within the smallest possible number of irradiation fields that can be performed within the patient\'s tolerable time, which is a subjective duration that depends on the patient\'s reaction during each session. It may be a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于寡转移复发患者的手术干预是否能改善其复发后的预后尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们在术后胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)肝复发患者中引入了寡转移的新概念,我们称之为“寡类肝转移(OLLM)”。“OLLM患者复发后预后较好,因此可以接受手术干预。
    共有121名接受根治性切除术的PDAC患者,最初和单器官转移到肝脏,进行了分析。研究了复发后总生存率(OSAR)的独立预后因素,将所有这些因素的患者定义为OLLM。评估OLLM患者的临床病理特征和复发后预后。此外,使用寡核苷酸分数的详细分析,这是基于预后因素,已执行。
    预后分析显示,短的无复发间隔(RFI)(<6个月),疾病稳定间期短(SDI)(≤3个月),4个或4个以上复发肿瘤是独立的不良预后因素。OLLM患者被定义为具有所有三个条件的患者:长RFI(≥6个月),长期SDI(>3个月),和三个或更少的复发性肿瘤。OLLM患者的OSAR预后明显优于非OLLM患者(HR=0.272,p<0.001)。进一步的分析表明,患者的OSAR可以使用寡评分进行分层,这是根据预后因素计算的。
    我们建议使用OLLM来预测哪些患者在具有治愈性的手术后最有可能经历更好的复发后预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Whether surgical intervention for patients with oligometastatic recurrence can improve their post-recurrent prognosis is unclear. In this study, we introduce a novel concept of oligometastasis in post-surgical pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with hepatic recurrence, which we call \"oligo-like liver metastasis (OLLM).\" Patients with OLLM have better post-recurrence prognosis and could therefore be eligible for surgical intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 121 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection, and who had an initial and single-organ metastasis to the liver, were analyzed. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival after recurrence (OSAR) were examined, and patients with all of these factors were defined as OLLM. The clinicopathological features and post-recurrent prognosis of OLLM patients were evaluated. In addition, a detailed analysis using the oligo-score, which was based on the prognostic factors, was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: The prognostic analysis revealed that short recurrence-free interval (RFI) (<6 months), short stable disease interval (SDI) (≤3 months), and four or more recurrent tumors were independent poor prognostic factors. OLLM patients were defined as those with all three conditions: long RFI (≥6 months), long SDI (>3 months), and three or less recurrent tumors. OLLM patients had a significantly better prognosis for OSAR than non-OLLM patients (HR = 0.272, p < 0.001). Further analysis demonstrated that the OSAR of patients could be stratified using the oligo-score, which was calculated based on the prognostic factors.
    UNASSIGNED: We recommend that OLLM should be used to predict which patients are most likely to experience better post-recurrent prognosis after surgery with curative intent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号