older-adult

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了两个基于共识的指南推荐的基于绩效的结果度量(PBOM)的不同聚类的诊断准确性:停止老年人事故,死亡,和受伤(STEADI),以及由美国物理治疗协会和老年物理治疗学会完成的系统评价推荐的那些(APTA-SR,APTA-SR3)。33名社区居住的老年人(25名女性,8名男性)平均79.45±7.64岁参加了这项研究。参与者完成了跌倒史问卷,并通过一系列PBOM进行了评估,以进行比较分析。对每个PBOM聚类的诊断准确性进行回顾性分析(前1年跌倒史)和前瞻性分析(6个月随访)。回顾性分析显示APTA-SR3具有最高的临床实用性和诊断准确性:Sp88.24%(63.56-98.54),锡62.5%(35.43-84.8),LR+2.35(1.22-4.53),LR-0.19(0.05-0.73),准确率70.22%(51.83-84.81)。前瞻性分析显示APTA-SR和APTA-SR3具有相同的诊断准确性:Sn100%(39.76-100),Sp43.75%(19.75-70.12),LR+1.78(1.15-2.74),LR-0(0),准确率60.62%(36.63-81.36)。APTA-SR3簇显示出最高的诊断准确性,并且在本研究中是识别社区居住老年人跌倒风险的最有效和最有效的PBOM组。
    This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of different clusters of performance based outcome measures (PBOMs) recommended by two consensus-based guidelines: Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI), and those recommended by a systematic review completed by the American Physical Therapy Association and Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy (APTA-SR, APTA-SR3). 33 community-dwelling older adults (25 females, 8 males) aged mean 79.45 ± 7.64 years participated in this study. Participants completed a fall history questionnaire and were evaluated via a battery of PBOMs for comparative analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of each PBOM cluster was analyzed retrospectively (previous 1 year fall history) and prospectively (6 month follow up). Retrospective analysis revealed the APTA-SR3 had the highest clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy: Sp 88.24% (63.56-98.54), Sn 62.5% (35.43-84.8), LR+ 2.35 (1.22-4.53), LR- 0.19 (0.05-0.73), accuracy 70.22% (51.83-84.81). Prospective analysis revealed the cluster of the APTA-SR and APTA-SR3 had identical diagnostic accuracy: Sn 100% (39.76-100), Sp 43.75% (19.75-70.12), LR+ 1.78 (1.15-2.74), LR- 0 (0), accuracy 60.62% (36.63-81.36). The APTA-SR 3 cluster demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy and in this study was the most effective and efficient group of PBOMs to identify fall risk in community dwelling older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文研究了参加基于在线photovoice的团体干预计划的老年人如何报告他们的经历。在定性现象学研究中,其中有13名老年人参加,通过半结构化深度访谈收集数据,并通过内容分析进行分析。调查结果指出了三个中心主题:a)挑战-技术困难,很难找到摄影主题,在摄影上投入时间,以及将他们的经验投入摄影的情感-智力努力;b)成长:新知识和技能-获得新知识,获取技能,体验技能,无论年龄,和赋权;c)意义反身性,将情感投射到图像上的能力,与外界的联系,正念,选择的能力,创造力,和批判意识。这些发现分享了使用创造性视觉参与摄影有助于应对各种挑战的方式,并在老年人参与者的过程中获得了各种收益。
    This paper examines how older adults who participated in an online photovoice-based group intervention program reported their experience. In a qualitative-phenomenological study, in which 13 older-adult people participated, data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analyzed through content analysis. The findings point to three central themes: a) Challenges-technical difficulties, difficulties in finding a subject for photography, investing time in photography, and an emotional-intellectual effort to put their experience into photography; b) Growth: New knowledge and skills-acquiring new knowledge, acquiring skills, experiencing skills regardless of age, and empowerment; c) Meaning-reflexivity, the ability to project feelings onto images, connection to the outside world, mindfulness, ability to choose, creativity, and critical consciousness. The findings share the way in which the use of creative visual engagement with photography contributed to coping with various challenges and enabled various gains within the process among the older-adult participants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Governing organisations for health services currently recommend a patient-centred (PC) approach to practice for all health professions, including dietetics. For the vulnerable older malnourished patient, this approach needs to be prioritised to improve outcomes. The paucity of patient experience data likely limits evidence-based, patient-centred care (PCC) from being implemented effectively. The present study aimed to identify quality indicators of dietetic services from the perspectives of older malnourished patients to inform evidence-based PC dietetic care.
    Surveys were completed by a sample of 28 females and 28 males (mean age 81 years) who had been seen by a dietitian for malnutrition assessment. In-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a sub-sample of four females and six males (mean age 81 years). Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of transcripts and open-ended survey responses was conducted to determine patient-identified quality indicators.
    Three structure indicators (continuity of care through regular contact and post-discharge dietetic follow-up; interdisciplinary coordination and collaboration; and high-quality hospital food services), five process indicators (addressing a patient\'s primary medical concern; involving the patient\'s family; providing clear and simple dietetic information; providing expert dietary knowledge; utilising interpersonal communication skills) and three outcome indicators (improvement in health status; improvement or maintenance of independence; weight gain) were identified. The experiences of older malnourished patients with dietetic services, as described in the present study, reinforce the importance of ensuring high-quality and tailored dietetic care as a key element of PC dietetic services.
    The quality indicators of dietetic services identified in the present study may facilitate dietitians to provide evidence-based PCC for older malnourished patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号