older RA

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:更新证据基础,以告知2024年JCR临床实践指南(CPGs)用于治疗老年人类风湿性关节炎(RA)。
    方法:评估了关于药物治疗的有效性和安全性的四个临床问题(CQs)。用CQ1寻址甲氨蝶呤(MTX),CQ2生物疾病缓解抗风湿药(bDMARDs),CCD3Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂,和CQ4糖皮质激素(GC)。使用建议分级评估来评估证据的质量,发展,和评价体系。
    结果:观察性研究证实了MTX在老年RA患者治疗中的关键作用。荟萃分析显示,肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂和JAK抑制剂在老年RA患者中明确有效。没有数据表明bDMARDs对老年患者不安全。没有老年患者使用JAK抑制剂的安全性数据。一项随机对照试验表明,低剂量GC的长期治疗会增加GC相关不良事件的风险。对于所有CQ,总体证据的确定性非常低。
    结论:本系统综述为开发2024个JCRCPGs治疗老年RA患者提供了必要的证据。需要继续更新JAK抑制剂和GC的证据。
    OBJECTIVE: To update an evidence base informing the 2024 JCR clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in older adults.
    METHODS: Four clinical questions (CQs) regarding efficacy and safety of drug treatment were evaluated, with CQ1 addressing methotrexate (MTX), CQ2 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), CQ3 Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and CQ4 glucocorticoids (GCs). Quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.
    RESULTS: Observational studies confirmed a pivotal role of MTX in the treatment of older RA patients. The meta-analysis showed that tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and JAK inhibitors were unequivocally effective in older RA patients. No data indicated that bDMARDs were unsafe for older patients. No safety data for JAK inhibitor use in older patients were available. One randomized controlled trial demonstrated that long-term treatment with low-dose GCs increased risks of GC-associated adverse events. The certainty of overall evidence was very low for all CQs.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides the necessary evidence for developing 2024 JCR CPGs for managing older patients with RA. Continued updates on the evidence of JAK inhibitors and GC are desired.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为老年人类风湿性关节炎(RA)的临床治疗指南提供依据。
    方法:PubMed,科克伦图书馆,并在日本CentraRevuoMedicina数据库中搜索了1990年至2019年之间发表的文章。使用建议分级评估来评估证据的质量,开发和评估系统,有一些修改。
    结果:在702篇确定的文章中,有5项随机对照试验和10项观察性研究的事后分析.前者的荟萃分析得出,使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗的vanderHeijde改良的Sharp总评分的平均差为-2.79(95%置信区间[CI]-3.74至-1.84)。美国风湿病学会50%反应率的风险比(RR),严重不良事件为2.83(95CI1.90-4.21)和1.32(95CI0.53-3.31),分别,用于Janus激酶抑制剂。观察性研究的荟萃分析得出,对于接受生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物的老年患者和年轻患者,疾病活动评分-28缓解和严重感染的RR为0.76(95CI0.64-0.91)和1.92(95CI1.31-2.81)。分别。
    结论:本系统综述为发展CPG治疗老年人RA提供了必要的证据。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence base for clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in older adults.
    METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina databases were searched for articles published between 1990 and 2019. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, with some modifications.
    RESULTS: Among 702 identified articles, there were 5 post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies. Meta-analysis of the former yielded a mean difference of the van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score of -2.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.74 to -1.84) for treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The risk ratio (RR) for the American College of Rheumatology 50% response rate, and for serious adverse events was 2.83 (95%CI 1.90-4.21) and 1.32 (95%CI 0.53-3.31), respectively, for Janus kinase inhibitors. Meta-analysis of the observational studies yielded an RR for disease activity score-28 remission and serious infections of 0.76 (95%CI 0.64-0.91) and 1.92 (95%CI 1.31-2.81) for older-versus-younger patients receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides the necessary evidence for developing CPG for the management of RA in older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为老年人类风湿性关节炎(RA)的临床治疗指南提供依据。
    方法:PubMed,科克伦图书馆,并在日本CentraRevuoMedicina数据库中搜索了1990年至2019年之间发表的文章。使用建议分级评估来评估证据的质量,开发和评估系统,有一些修改。
    结果:在702篇确定的文章中,有5项随机对照试验和10项观察性研究的事后分析.前者的荟萃分析得出,使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗的vanderHeijde改良的Sharp总评分的平均差为-2.79(95%置信区间[CI]-3.74至-1.84)。美国风湿病学会50%反应率的风险比(RR),严重不良事件为2.83(95CI1.90-4.21)和1.32(95CI0.53-3.31),分别,用于Janus激酶抑制剂。观察性研究的荟萃分析得出,对于接受生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物的老年患者和年轻患者,疾病活动评分-28缓解和严重感染的RR为0.76(95CI0.64-0.91)和1.92(95CI1.31-2.81)。分别。
    结论:本系统综述为发展CPG治疗老年人RA提供了必要的证据。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence base for clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in older adults.
    METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina databases were searched for articles published between 1990 and 2019. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, with some modifications.
    RESULTS: Among 702 identified articles, there were 5 post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies. Meta-analysis of the former yielded a mean difference of the van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score of -2.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.74 to -1.84) for treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The risk ratio (RR) for the American College of Rheumatology 50% response rate, and for serious adverse events was 2.83 (95%CI 1.90-4.21) and 1.32 (95%CI 0.53-3.31), respectively, for Janus kinase inhibitors. Meta-analysis of the observational studies yielded an RR for disease activity score-28 remission and serious infections of 0.76 (95%CI 0.64-0.91) and 1.92 (95%CI 1.31-2.81) for older-versus-younger patients receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides the necessary evidence for developing CPG for the management of RA in older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号