暂无摘要。

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia stands as a cornerstone for patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS), offering advantages like faster onset and high block density. Levobupivacaine, known for its high potency and long-acting nature, has a slower onset. The safety of intrathecal fentanyl or midazolam is evaluated as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in parturients. This study aims to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by fentanyl or midazolam added to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in elective cesarean sections. Secondary objectives include evaluating the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Identifying the more effective adjuvant will help optimize spinal anesthesia protocols, improve postoperative outcomes, and enhance patient comfort and recovery. Methods This study was conducted at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, India, over six months (May 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A total of 90 patients undergoing elective LSCS received spinal anesthesia in a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Patients were allocated to three groups: Group A received levobupivacaine with fentanyl, Group B received levobupivacaine with midazolam, and Group C received levobupivacaine with normal saline. Block characteristics, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and complications were assessed. Assessments were conducted at specified time points: intraoperatively, every five minutes for the first 30 minutes, every 10 minutes for the next hour, every two hours for six hours, and every four hours up to 24 hours postoperatively. Statistical analysis utilized one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Group B (levobupivacaine with midazolam) exhibited a shorter time to sensory block onset (88 seconds) compared to Groups A and C (both 145 seconds) (p < 0.001). Group A (levobupivacaine with fentanyl) showed a shorter time to maximum motor block (p = 0.045) than Groups B and C. The sensory block duration was significantly longer in Group A (127.5 minutes) compared to Group B (60 minutes) and Group C (69 minutes) (p < 0.001). Motor block duration was also prolonged in Group A (251 minutes) compared to Group B (147 minutes) and Group C (177 minutes) (p = 0.045). The first analgesic requirement was delayed in Group A (248 minutes), whereas Groups B (115 minutes) and C (90 minutes) (p < 0.001) required more frequent analgesia. Group A experienced a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion Midazolam accelerated sensory block onset, while fentanyl prolonged anesthesia duration without significantly affecting motor block. Fentanyl delayed the first analgesic requirement, whereas midazolam reduced postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering.

BACKGROUND: This antenatal screening review will include reproductive screening evidence and approaches for pre-conception and post-conception, using first to third trimester screening opportunities.
METHODS: Focused antenatal screening peer-reviewed publications were evaluated and summarized.
RESULTS: Evidenced-based reproductive antenatal screening elements should be offered and discussed, with the pregnancy planning or pregnant person, during Preconception (genetic carrier screening for reproductive partners, personal and family (including reproductive partner) history review for increased genetic and pregnancy morbidity risks); First Trimester (fetal dating with ultrasound; fetal aneuploidy screening plus consideration for expanded fetal morbidity criteria, if appropriate; pregnant person preeclampsia screening; early fetal anatomy screening; early fetal cardiac screening); Second Trimester for standard fetal anatomy screening (18-22 weeks) including cardiac; pregnant person placental and cord pathology screening; pregnant person preterm birth screening with cervical length measurement); Third Trimester (fetal growth surveillance; continued preterm birth risk surveillance).
CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal reproductive screening has multiple elements, is complex, is time-consuming, and requires the use of pre- and post-testing counselling for most screening elements. The use of preconception and trimesters \'one to three\' requires clear patient understanding and buy-in. Informed consent and knowledge transfer is a main goal for antenatal reproductive screening approaches.

BACKGROUND: Obstetrical fistula is an abnormal opening between the reproductive tract and lower urinary and/or gastrointestinal tract resulting from obstetrical complications, affecting nearly two million women worldwide. It imposes physical, economic, social, and mental consequences on the affected women. Treatment outcomes vary and, mostly, surgical treatment results in improved quality of life and successful subsequent pregnancy for survivors.
OBJECTIVE: The review aimed to chart and examine the treatment outcomes of obstetrical fistula surgical repair in low- and middle-income countries.
METHODS: This is a scoping review study to identify treatment outcomes of obstetrical fistula surgical repair in low- and middle-income countries. The search was conducted from databases (PUBMED, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science), and gray literature (Google Scholar, Google, and conference proceedings).
METHODS: The eligibility criteria were constructed using a participant, concept, and context framework and included study types of primary research, reviews, and reports. Studies without full text and in languages other than English were excluded.
METHODS: The relevant characteristics of the included studies were extracted on an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed to chart treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: The review examined the full text of 57 studies on the treatment outcomes of obstetrical fistula. The findings were grouped into two themes: early and late outcomes. The early outcomes included incontinence, surgical-site infection, urine retention, hemorrhage, and retained catheter. The late outcomes included fistula recurrence, residual incontinence, quality of life, reproductive issues, mental health, family and social support, and financial status.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment outcomes of obstetrical fistula can be grouped into short-term and long-term outcomes. Although this review found adequate studies for the analysis, most study designs were poor. Stronger studies are recommended in the future to guide policy and decision-making. We would like to suggest that researchers conduct systematic reviews and meta-analyses independently for short-term and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Public and patient involvement can provide crucial insights to optimise research by enhancing relevance and appropriateness of studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in an inclusive process to ensure that both technical experts and women had a voice in defining the research gaps and needs to increase or reintroduce the use of assisted vaginal birth (AVB) in settings where this intervention is needed but unavailable or underused.
METHODS: We describe the methods and outcomes of online workshops led by WHO to obtain women representatives\' perspectives about AVB research gaps and needs.
RESULTS: After technical experts created a list of research questions based on various evidence syntheses, WHO organised four online workshops with 31 women\'s representatives from 27 mostly low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. Women rated the importance and priority of the research questions proposed by the technical experts, improving and broadening some of them, added new questions, and voiced their main concerns and views about AVB. Women helped to put the research questions into context in their communities, highlighted neglected factors/dimensions that influence practices and affect women\'s experience during labour and childbirth, underscored less salient consequences of AVB, and highlighted the main concerns of women about research on AVB. The consolidated vision of technical experts and women\'s representatives resulted in a technical brief published by WHO. The technical brief is expected to stimulate global research and action closely aligned with women\'s priorities.
CONCLUSIONS: We describe a successful experience of engaging women, mostly from LMICs, in the identification of research gaps and needs to reintroduce AVB use. This process contributed to better aligning research questions with women\'s views, concerns, and priorities. Given the scarcity of reports about engaging women from LMICs to optimise research, this successful experience can serve as an inspiration for future work.
UNASSIGNED: Women representatives were involved at every stage of the workshops described in full in this manuscript.

The management of intracranial malignancies in pregnancy poses unique challenges to the perioperative team. We describe the successful surgical management of a meningioma in a 28-year-old previously healthy patient, in her third trimester of pregnancy, who first presented with a generalised seizure. Without clear guidelines on the management of intracranial malignancies in pregnancy, a multidisciplinary approach was essential in providing a management plan for the patient\'s seizures and on the timing of her surgical intervention. Hormone-mediated tumour growth was a significant factor in opting for urgent surgical intervention and we discuss the current evidence linking hormones to tumour growth in pregnancy.

UNASSIGNED: Pregnancy presents risks, particularly for women with pre-existing health problems. Pre-anaesthetic consultations can help anticipate these risks and establish a medical management strategy on the delivery day. While teleconsultations gained popularity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, research on pre-anaesthetic teleconsultations during pregnancy is limited. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction and physician perception of teleconsultations for third-trimester pre-anaesthetic consultations.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective observational study included pregnant women who opted for teleconsultations for pre-anaesthetic consultations. Patient satisfaction was assessed using Likert scale questions and the System Use Scale. Anaesthetist satisfaction was evaluated using a Likert scale and by considering changes in anaesthetic techniques and missing clinical data in the pre-anaesthetic assessment. Data analysis utilised SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. encompassing descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing and odds ratio calculations. This approach explored the correlation between patient and anaesthetist satisfaction and pertinent risk factors.
UNASSIGNED: The study enroled 99 patients, with 85% expressing satisfaction and high satisfaction on the Likert scale and 88% finding the teleconsultation acceptable based on the System Use Scale (score ≥ 70). Anaesthetists reported being satisfied with the pre-anaesthetic consultations in 94% of cases.
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine consultations in obstetric anaesthesia, showing high patient and anaesthetist satisfaction rates.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify variation in the association between episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) by maternity care provider in spontaneous and operative vaginal deliveries (SVDs and OVDs).
METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of vaginal, term deliveries among nullipara in Canada (2004-2015). Adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-binomial regression to quantify the associations between episiotomy and OASI, stratified by care provider (obstetrician [OB], family physician [FP], or registered midwife [RM]) while adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: The study included 631 642 deliveries. Episiotomy use varied by provider: among SVDs, the episiotomy rate was 19.6%, 14.4%, and 8.4% in the OB, FP, and RM groups, respectively. The rate of OASI was higher among SVDs with versus without episiotomy (5.8% vs 4.6%). Conversely, OASI occurred less frequently in operative vaginal deliveries with episiotomy (15.3%) compared with those without (16.7%). In all provider groups, the ARR for OASI was increased with episiotomy in SVD and decreased with episiotomy with forceps delivery. No differences in these associations were observed by provider except among vacuum delivery (ARR with episiotomy vs. without, OB: 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92; FP: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, RM: 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.48).
CONCLUSIONS: In nullipara, irrespective of maternity care provider, there is a positive association between episiotomy and OASI among SVDs and an inverse association between episiotomy and deliveries with forceps. The relationship between episiotomy and OASI is modified by maternity care providers among vacuum deliveries.

ESP block (ESPB) and posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block (pQLB) have been proposed as opioid-sparing techniques for the management of pain after abdominal surgery. Between December 2021 and October 2022, we conducted a retrospective comparative study at the delivery suite of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, to compare the efficacy of ESPB and pQLB in preventing postoperative pain after an elective caesarean section (CS). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were time to first opioid request; Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h; vital signs; adverse events. Fifty-two women were included. The total cumulative dose of morphine was not significantly different between the two groups of patients (p = 0.897). Time to first dose of morphine, NPRS values and haemodynamic parameters were not statistically different between the two groups. NPRS values significantly increased (p < 0.001) at the different time intervals considered. The need for rescue doses of morphine was lower in the ESPB group compared to the pQLB group (hazard ratio of 0.51, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.95), p = 0.030). No adverse event was reported. ESPB seems to be as effective as pQLB in providing analgesia after CS.

The study was designed to investigate effects of single intravenous injection of esketamine on the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD) after labor analgesia and explore the potential mechanisms.
A total of 120 women who underwent labor analgesia by epidural analgesia pump were enrolled and divided into two groups randomly. Esketamine at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected after fetal disengagement in the test group and placebo was administered in the control group. The occurrence of PPD and side effects after delivery were recorded. Some indicators related to stress and inflammation were measured before labor analgesia and at 24 h, 1 week, and 6 weeks after delivery in this study. Data were analyzed by independent t-test, repeated measures analysis of variance and Chi-square test in SPSS software (version 25.0). It was considered statistically significant since a p value less than 0.05.
The incidence of PPD was significantly decreased both for one week and six weeks after delivery by using of esketamine (3.4% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.004 and 5.2% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.006, respectively). There were also significant differences between the stress and inflammation-related indicators in different time points in this study, while the side effects for 48 h after delivery were similar between the two groups.
Single intravenous injection of esketamine after delivery in participants underwent labor analgesia can decrease the occurrence of postpartum depression for one week and six weeks after delivery, while the side effects were not increased. The antidepressant effects of esketamine may be related to the reduction of stress response and inflammation.
The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 5/30/2022 (CTRI registration number-ChiCTR2200060387). URL of registry: https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/home .