nonsurgical

非手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文重点介绍了诊断和非手术局部治疗方法的发展,这些方法改变了早期肺癌的管理。这些创新旨在提高诊断准确性,尽量减少侵入性,改善患者预后。液体活检正在成为非侵入性诊断和监测的有希望的工具,能够在不标准化的情况下进行早期干预,也不在指南中。支气管内导航已成为一种创新工具。通过将电磁或类似GPS技术与3D成像和可操纵导管相结合,它可以实现小的精确活检,曾经很难取样的外周病变,气胸发生率很低.关于非手术治疗,立体定向放疗(SBRT)作为早期肺癌的一种非侵入性局部治疗方式,仍然是指南推荐的治疗标准,适用于无法手术的患者和拒绝手术切除风险的患者.低毒性和出色的局部控制使其成为手术的有吸引力的替代方法,即使在更健康的患者中也是如此。利用能量(诸如微波或脉冲场电穿孔)的经皮消融技术是不适合手术或SBRT的患者的选择。支气管镜消融术提供相同的能量,但气胸率非常低,因此也对患有多发和双侧病变的患者开放。
    This paper highlights developments in diagnostic and nonsurgical local treatment modalities that have changed the management of early-stage lung cancer. These innovations aim to enhance diagnostic accuracy, minimize invasiveness, and improve patient outcomes. Liquid biopsies are emerging as promising tools for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring, enabling earlier intervention without being standardized yet as well as not yet anchored in the guidelines. Endobronchial navigation has emerged as an innovative tool. By combining electromagnetic or GPS-like technology with 3D imaging and a steerable catheter, it enables accurate biopsy of small, peripheral lesions that were once challenging to sample, with a very low pneumothorax rate. Regarding nonsurgical treatments, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) continues to shine as a non-invasive local treatment modality for early-stage lung cancer and is the guideline-recommended standard-of-care for inoperable patients and patients refusing the risk of surgical resection. The low toxicity and excellent local control has made it an attractive alternative to surgery even in fitter patients. Percutaneous ablative techniques utilising energies such as microwave or pulse-field electroporation are options for patients who are not candidates for surgery or SBRT. Bronchoscopic ablation delivers the same energies but with a very lower pneumothorax rate and it is therefore also open to patients with multiple and bilateral lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较桡骨远端骨折非手术治疗与手术治疗的临床疗效。
    方法:我们使用多个数据库进行了系统的文献检索,包括Medline,PubMed,还有Cochrane.所有数据库都是从最早的记录中搜索到2023年2月。该研究比较了桡骨远端骨折的非手术和手术治疗,仅包括随机对照试验(RCTS)。
    结果:检索到17项随机对照试验。总共包括1730例患者:非手术组862例,手术组868例。结果显示DASH评分随着手术治疗显著降低(WMD3.98,95%CI(2.00,5.95),P<0.001)。在握力(%)中,结果显示,与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗显着改善(WMD-6.60,95%CI(-11.61,-1.60),P=0.01)。径向倾角有显著差异,径向长度,掌管标题,手腕内旋的范围,手腕旋光的范围。然而,径向偏差无差异,尺位偏差,尺骨方差,观察腕关节伸展范围和腕关节屈曲范围。
    结论:这项荟萃分析的结果表明,一些手术治疗桡骨远端骨折的患者不仅提高了握力(%),降低了DASH得分,与非手术治疗相比,还改善了手腕内旋的范围和手腕外旋的范围。根据目前的荟萃分析,我们认为,一些手术治疗的患者可能更有效的桡骨远端骨折患者。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search by using multiple databases, including Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane. All databases were searched from the earliest records through February 2023. The study compared nonsurgical versus surgical treatment of distal radius fractures and included only randomized controlled trials (RCTS).
    RESULTS: There were seventeen randomized controlled trials retrieved. A total of 1730 patients were included: 862 in the nonsurgical group and 868 in the surgical group. The results showed a significant reduction in DASH score with surgical treatment (WMD 3.98, 95% CI (2.00, 5.95), P < 0.001). And in grip strength (%), the results showed a significant improvement in surgical treatment compared with non-surgical treatment (WMD - 6.60, 95% CI (-11.61, -1.60), P = 0.01). There was significant difference in radial inclination, radial length, volar title, range of wrist pronation, range of wrist supination. However, no difference in radial deviation, ulnar deviation, ulnar variance, range of wrist extension and range of wrist flexion was observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that some patients with surgical treatment of distal radius fractures not only improved the grip strength (%), decreased the DASH score, but also improved the range of wrist pronation and the range of wrist supination compared with nonsurgical treatment. Based on the present meta-analysis, we suggest that some patients with surgical treatment might be more effective in patients with distal radius fracture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:种植体周围炎是一种引起植入物周围组织炎症的感染性疾病。本文献系统综述的目的是评估激光在非手术治疗种植体周围炎的效果,以评估其与常规治疗相比的益处。
    方法:评论方案已在PROSPERO国际预期注册处注册。研究策略是根据PRISMA指南进行的。纳入标准为:体内研究,用英语写的,临床参数的测量,最低随访时间为6个月,非手术对照组,关于光动力疗法的研究,随机临床试验,和临床试验。电子(在Pubmed上,科克伦,LILACS和EPC数据库)和手动搜索(在文章参考中)一直进行到2021年7月。借助CochraneCollaboration的工具,评估了每个参考的偏倚风险。
    结果:共有12项随机临床试验,有大量的证据,在本系统综述中进行了选择和调查。表格总结了从这些文章中提取的数据。看来,通过使用激光,参数得到了有利的改善,但没有任何显著差异。
    结论:根据研究分析,我们的结果表明,在非手术治疗种植体周围炎的临床参数方面,具有特定特征的激光治疗可以在短期和中期内对伤口愈合产生有益的治疗效果.关于其长期有用性,这还没有得到证实。然而,其益处仍然有限,因为结果一致认为激光的效果与使用常规疗法获得的效果相似。
    BACKGROUND: Peri-implantitis is an infectious disease that causes inflammation of the tissue surrounding an implant. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to assess the effect of the use of lasers in the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis in order to estimate its benefits compared to conventional therapies.
    METHODS: the review\'s protocol has been registered on PROSPERO international prospective register. The research strategy was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were: in vivo studies, written in English, measurements of clinical parameters, minimum follow-up at 6 months and with nonsurgical control group, studies about photodynamic therapy, randomized clinical trial, and clinical trial. Electronic (on Pubmed, Cochrane, LILACS and EPC databases) and manual searches (in articles\' referencies) were conducted until July 2021. Risk of bias was assessed for each reference thanks to the Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool.
    RESULTS: A total of 12 randomized clinical trials, with a high level of evidence, were selected and investigated in this systematic review. A table summarizes data extracted from these articles. It appears that the parameters improve favorably by using lasers, but without any significant difference.
    CONCLUSIONS: in accordance with the analysis of studies, our results show that laser therapy with specific characteristics allows to obtain beneficial therapeutic effects on wound healing in the short and the medium-term concerning the clinical parameters in the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Concerning its long-term usefulness, it has yet to be confirmed. However, its benefits remains limited since the results agree that the effects of the laser are similar to those obtained by using conventional therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    根管治疗的主要目的是定位所有根管,清洁,和塑造,和闭塞以获得流体密封,并治愈根尖周病变。
    正确的清洁,shaping,和纸浆室的消毒,以及运河的填充,对根管治疗的疗效至关重要。牙髓治疗牙齿的成功取决于诊断的准确性,消毒,清洁和整形,闭塞,最后,假肢康复管理。根管治疗应提供疱疹性和液体不可穿透的密封,以防止根尖周感染的进展。治疗此类病变有两种方法:手术和非手术方法。如果根管清洁,shaped,并在不使用外科手术的情况下适当和充分地密封,这些病变将在非手术根管治疗期间恢复。该病例系列主要集中在巨大的根尖周病变的非手术治疗上,并提供了证据表明这些病变在不进行手术的情况下反应良好。
    UNASSIGNED: The main objective of root canal therapy is to locate all the canals, cleaning, and shaping, and obturation to obtain fluid tight seal and to heal the periapical lesion if present.
    UNASSIGNED: The proper cleaning, shaping, and disinfection of the pulp chambers, as well as the filling of the canals, are critical to the efficacy of treatment with root canals. The success of an endodontically treated tooth is dependent on the accuracy of the diagnosis, disinfection, cleaning and shaping, obturation, and finally, the prosthetic rehabilitation management. Root canal therapy should provide a hermatic as well as fluid impenetrable seal which prevents the progression of periapical infection. There are two ways to treat such lesions: surgical and nonsurgical methods. If the root canal is cleaned, shaped, and sealed properly and adequately without the use of a surgical procedure, these lesions will recover during nonsurgical root canal therapy. This case series focuses primarily on the nonsurgical treatment of an enormous periapical lesion and provides evidence that these lesions respond well without surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们研究的主要目的是调查西澳大利亚州一个三级手外科单位的骨折,特别是比较手术和非手术结果。
    确定了在2019年至2022年之间在我们的手单位患有甲和/或甲再五腕掌损伤的患者。所有患者都有手臂快速残疾,肩和手(QuickDASH)患者报告的结果测量记录治疗后。手术和非手术治疗的患者使用巴黎石膏和/或热塑性夹板进行夹板固定至少2周。所有患者均接受手治疗。
    本研究纳入了48例哈姆特和/或哈姆特加第五腕掌损伤的患者。13例患者有Milch1型骨折,35例Milch2型骨折。手术治疗了6例Milch1型骨折,七个人接受了非手术治疗。手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为0.38。非手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为0.65。对16例Milch2型骨折进行了手术治疗,19人接受了非手术治疗。手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为1.3。非手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为3.5。
    对于Milch2型骨折,手术组患者报告的结局指标优于非手术组.
    治疗IV。
    UNASSIGNED: The primary purpose of our study was to investigate hamate fractures at a single tertiary hand surgery unit in Western Australia, particularly comparing operative and nonsurgical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with hamate and/or hamate plus fifth carpometacarpal injury at our hand unit between 2019 and 2022 were identified. All patients had Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) patient-reported outcome measures recorded post treatment. Patients managed operatively and nonsurgically had a period of splinting with plaster of Paris and/or thermoplastic splint for a minimum of 2 weeks. All patients underwent hand therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-eight patients with hamate and/or hamate plus fifth carpometacarpal injury were included in this study. Thirteen patients had Milch type 1 fractures, and 35 had Milch type 2 fractures. Six Milch type 1 fractures were managed operatively, and seven were managed nonsurgically. The average QuickDASH score for the operative group was 0.38. The average QuickDASH score for the nonsurgical group was 0.65. Sixteen Milch type 2 fractures were managed operatively, and 19 were managed nonsurgically. The average QuickDASH score for the operative group was 1.3. The average QuickDASH score for the nonsurgical group was 3.5.
    UNASSIGNED: For Milch type 2 fractures, patient-reported outcome measures were better for the operative group compared with the nonsurgical group.
    UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    连续铸造作为治疗早发性脊柱侧凸的应用之一,已被报道有效地改善畸形,但目前还没有关于矫正器治疗先天性早发性脊柱侧凸的疗效以及与进行性特发性早发性脊柱侧凸的比较的报道。对在我们机构接受支架治疗的进行性EOS患者进行了至少4年的随访。根据病因诊断对两组进行分析比较:先天性脊柱侧凸(CS)组和特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)组。比较了成功案例和失败案例。平均主Cobb角为38.19°(20-55)的27例患者在平均年龄为55.7个月(24-108)时接受了初始支撑,平均随访时间为76.19个月(49~117个月)。在IS组中,第一次支撑后,主要Cobb角校正为18.69±12.06°(48.61%);移除支架后,最终Cobb角为23.08±22.15°(38.76%)。在CS组中,第一次支撑后的主要Cobb角校正为33.93±10.31°(17.1%),移除支撑后的主要Cobb角校正为37.93±14.74°(3.53%)。从支撑前到最后一次随访,冠状胸宽和T1-T12高度均显着增加。诊断为IS的患者在主Cobb角校正方面的效果优于CS(P=0.049)。到最后一次随访时,8名患者接受了手术,手术时间推迟68.88±26.43个月。对于进行性早发性脊柱侧凸患者,支撑是铸造的一种有效的非手术替代方法,其中一些可以治愈;如果没有,最终的手术干预可以延迟一段时间,而不限制胸腔。
    Serial casting as one of the applications to treat early-onset scoliosis has been reported efficiently to improve deformity, but no report has focused on the efficacy of braces in the treatment of congenital early-onset scoliosis and comparison with progressive idiopathic early-onset scoliosis. Patients with progressive EOS treated with braces in our institution with a minimum of 4 years follow-up were reviewed. Two groups according to the etiological diagnosis were analyzed and compared: the congenital scoliosis (CS) group and idiopathic scoliosis (IS) group. The success cases and the failure cases were also compared. 27 patients with an average main Cobb angle of 38.19° (20-55) underwent initial bracing at an average age of 55.7 months (24-108), the average follow-up time was 76.19 months (49-117). In IS group the main Cobb angle was corrected to 18.69 ± 12.06° (48.61%) following the first bracing; the final Cobb angle was 23.08 ± 22.15°(38.76%) after brace removal. In CS group the main Cobb angle was corrected to 33.93 ± 10.31°(17.1%) following the first bracing and 37.93 ± 14.74°(3.53%) after brace removal. Both coronal chest width and T1-T12 height increased dramatically from pre-bracing to the last follow-up. Patients diagnosed as IS tended to have a better result in main Cobb angle correction than that of CS (P = 0.049). By the time of last follow-up, 8 patients had undergone surgery, and the operation time was postponed by 68.88 ± 26.43 months. For patients with progressive early-onset scoliosis, bracing is an efficient nonsurgical alternative to casting, and some of them can be cured; if not, eventual surgical intervention can be delayed for a period of time without restrictions on the thoracic cavity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:色素性病变在很大程度上是良性的,可能导致极度痛苦。各种光和激光可用于治疗色素沉着,通常调Q激光器被认为是选择的方法,而强脉冲光(IPL)设备可以提供一个更短的停机时间较少侵入性的治疗。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估窄带IPL模块治疗色素性病变的安全性和有效性。
    方法:回顾性研究20例色素性病变患者接受IPL模块治疗。通过使用0-10的GAIS量表对临床照片进行盲化评估以及通过0-10量表的患者满意度评级来评估治疗。在整个治疗过程中,监测疼痛水平和不良事件.
    结果:平均GAIS评分为7.55±1.15(平均值±SD),患者满意度平均得分为7.3±1.26(平均值±SD)。GAIS和患者满意度评分之间有很强的正相关(r=0.83)。两者无显著性差异(p值=0.516)。治疗次数没有显著影响GAIS和患者满意度评分(p值0.364和0.126)。其他积极的意外结果是改善的皮肤硬度和减少的皱纹。
    结论:研究结果表明,IPL模块在治疗色素性病变方面既安全又有效,并且可能具有刺激胶原蛋白产生的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Pigmented lesions are largely benign and may lead to extreme distress. Various light and lasers may be used to treat pigmentation, often Q-switched lasers are considered the method of choice, while intense pulsed light (IPL) devices may offer a less invasive treatment with a shorter downtime.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a narrowband IPL module for the treatment of pigmented lesions.
    METHODS: A retrospective study of 20 patients with pigmented lesions underwent treatment with an IPL module. Treatment was assessed by blinded evaluation of clinical photographs using a GAIS scale of 0-10, as well as through patient satisfaction ratings on a scale of 0-10. Throughout the treatment, pain levels and adverse events were monitored.
    RESULTS: The mean GAIS score was 7.55 ± 1.15 (mean ± SD), and the mean patient satisfaction score was 7.3 ± 1.26 (mean ± SD). There was a strong positive correlation between GAIS and patient satisfaction scores (r = 0.83), and no significant difference between them (p-value = 0.516). The number of treatments did not significantly affect GAIS and patient satisfaction scores (p-values 0.364 and 0.126). Additional positive unexpected outcomes were improved skin firmness and reduced wrinkles.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study indicate that the IPL module is both safe and effective in treating pigmented lesions and may have the potential to stimulate collagen production.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:IPL装置发射宽范围的波长,这些波长可以被皮肤中的不同发色团吸收。具有最小副作用的特定发色团的选择性破坏由波长控制,脉冲持续时间,和通量。
    目的:本研究旨在评估采用高级荧光技术(AFT)的窄带强脉冲光(IPL)治疗血管和色素性病变,这提供了更有效的每个脉冲能量使用,以提高安全性,改善临床结果。
    方法:回顾性分析100例血管和色素性病变患者的窄带IPL治疗数据。通过整体美学改善量表(GAIS)和患者满意度量表(0-10)测量疗效。通过评估疼痛水平和不良事件来评估安全性。
    结果:血管病变的平均GAIS评分为8.02±0.84,色素性病变的平均GAIS评分为8.14±0.9,组间无显着差异(p=0.49,α=0.05)。患者满意度与GAIS评分相关(相关系数0.8)。没有报告疼痛,两名患者出现暂时和短暂的副作用。
    结论:总体而言,先进的IPL治疗为血管和色素性病变提供了良好的结局.
    BACKGROUND: IPL devices emit a wide range of wavelengths that can be absorbed by different chromophores in the skin. Selective destruction of a specific chromophore with minimal side effects is controlled by wavelength, pulse duration, and fluence.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the treatment of vascular and pigmented lesions using narrow-band Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) with Advanced Fluorescence Technology (AFT), which offers more efficient energy usage per pulse to increase safety, and improve clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 100 patients treated with narrow-band IPL for vascular and pigmented lesions. Efficacy was measured by the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and Patient Satisfaction Scale (0-10). Safety was assessed by evaluating pain levels and adverse events.
    RESULTS: Mean GAIS scores were 8.02 ± 0.84 for vascular and 8.14 ± 0.9 for pigmented lesions with no significant difference between groups (p=0.49, α=0.05). Patient satisfaction correlated with GAIS scores (correlation coefficient 0.8). No pain was reported and two patients experienced temporary and transient side effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the advanced IPL treatments provided favorable outcomes for vascular and pigmented lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:瘢痕疙瘩是良性增生性瘢痕,是由于皮肤损伤后生长和胶原沉积失调而形成的。激光治疗已经成为治疗瘢痕疙瘩的有希望的选择,性能因激光类型和病变特征而异。
    目的:评估连续波和重复分割CO2激光联合治疗瘢痕疙瘩。
    方法:回顾性分析CO2激光联合模式治疗瘢痕疙瘩瘢痕22例。一次连续波,然后是五次分次交付。使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)和温哥华疤痕量表评估疗效。数字评定量表用于评估患者满意度和疼痛。
    结果:大多数患者为女性(77.3%),皮肤类型为IV(72.7%),年龄为24.3±9.3岁,大多数瘢痕疙瘩位于耳垂(56.5%)或手臂或手部(17.4%),尺寸从5到10厘米不等,受伤时间为3个月至35年。未报告严重不良事件。6个月时,与基线相比,所有特征都有显著改善,疤痕颜色(4.8±2.8至1.9±1.1),刚度(5.0±2.8vs.5.4±2.8),厚度(5.4±2.8vs.2.0±1.1),和不规则性(5.9±2.4vs.1.9±0.9)。温哥华的得分也遵循类似的趋势。患者评估的总体改善从基线时的37±17.6到6个月时的16.1±8.5,以及相关疼痛和瘙痒的改善。
    结论:在单个激光平台内两种消融性激光输送模式的组合提供了有效和安全的瘢痕疙瘩管理,并使患者非常满意。
    BACKGROUND: Keloids are benign proliferative scars that form as a result of dysregulated growth and collagen deposition in response to cutaneous injury. Laser therapies have emerged as promising options for the treatment of keloids, with performance varying by laser type and lesion characteristics.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the combined continuous wave and repetitive fractionated CO2 laser treatment of keloids.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 22 cases of keloid scars treated with combined CO2 laser modes. A single session of continuous wave followed by five sessions of fractional delivery. Efficacy was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale was used to assess patient satisfaction and pain.
    RESULTS: Most patients were female (77.3%) with skin type IV (72.7%), age was 24.3 ± 9.3 years, most keloids were located on the earlobe (56.5%) or arm or hand (17.4%), size ranged from 5 to 10 cm, and time since injury ranged from 3 months to 35 years. No serious adverse events were reported. At 6 months, significant improvements from baseline occurred in all characteristics, scar color (4.8 ± 2.8 to 1.9 ± 1.1), rigidity (5.0 ± 2.8 vs. 5.4 ± 2.8), thickness (5.4 ± 2.8 vs. 2.0 ± 1.1), and irregularity (5.9 ± 2.4 vs. 1.9 ± 0.9). The Vancouver scores followed a similar trend. Patient-rated overall improvement from 37 ± 17.6 at baseline to 16.1 ± 8.5 at 6 months, and improvement in associated pain and pruritus.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combination of two ablative laser delivery modes within a single laser platform provided for effective and safe keloid management and left patients highly satisfied.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该病例报告描述了一名80岁的男子,他表现出正在增长的红斑结节并伴有侵蚀,0.6厘米×0.6厘米,在他的右边寺庙。该病变后来被诊断为非典型纤维黄色瘤(AFX)。而不是接受莫氏手术,黄金标准治疗,由于与手术切除和修复相关的财务成本,患者选择了局部治疗方案。这种外用方案包括他扎罗汀乳膏,咪喹莫特奶油,和5-氟尿嘧啶溶液,申请30天。指导患者每周使用该组合5天,持续6周。每种药物的指定剂量是一包咪喹莫特5%乳膏的五分之一,等量的0.1%他扎罗汀乳膏,和一滴2%的5-氟尿嘧啶溶液。将这些组合在绷带上并放置在病变上过夜。治疗后,为期3周的申请后检查显示侵蚀,1.0厘米×0.9厘米,在红斑中.治疗后3周,随后进行组织病理学和CD10和CD99染色的切开活检,和三个穿孔活检组织病理学和染色CD10和CD99,治疗后1年,确认不存在AFX。AFX是多形性真皮肉瘤(PDS)的表面变体,具有组织学相似性,然而AFX/PDS与未分化多形性肉瘤之间的确切关系仍未得到很好的理解.先前的研究表明AFX/PDS和皮肤鳞状细胞癌(cSCC)之间的基因组相似性,这表明cSCC靶向治疗AFX/PDS的潜在疗效。此病例标志着AFX成功局部治疗的第一个记录实例,为可能选择退出外科手术的患者提供替代方案。鼓励继续研究以评估这种方法的更广泛的功效。
    This case report describes an 80-year-old man who presented with a growing erythematous nodule with erosion, measuring 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm, on his right temple. This lesion was later diagnosed as atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX). Instead of undergoing Mohs surgery, the gold standard treatment, the patient opted to pursue a topical treatment regimen because of financial costs associated with surgical removal and repair. This topical regimen consisted of tazarotene cream, imiquimod cream, and 5-fluorouracil solution, applied for 30 days. The patient was directed to use this combination 5 days per week for 6 weeks. The specified dosage for each medication was a fifth of a packet of imiquimod 5% cream, an equivalent amount of tazarotene 0.1% cream, and a single drop of 5-fluorouracil 2% solution. These were combined on a bandage and placed on the lesion overnight. Following the treatment, a 3-week post-application examination revealed an erosion, 1.0 cm × 0.9 cm, amidst erythema. A subsequent incisional biopsy with histopathology and stains for CD10 and CD99, 3 weeks after treatment, and three punch biopsies with histopathology and stains for CD10 and CD99, 1-year post-treatment, confirmed the absence of AFX. AFX is a superficial variant of pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS), which shares histologic similarities, yet the exact relationship between AFX/PDS and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma is still not well understood. Previous studies have indicated a genomic similarity between AFX/PDS and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), which suggests the potential efficacy of cSCC-targeted treatments for AFX/PDS. This case marks the first recorded instance of successful topical medical treatment of AFX, offering an alternative for patients who may opt out of surgical intervention. Continued research to assess the broader efficacy of this approach is encouraged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号