nonagenarians

Nonagenarians
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项回顾性研究的目的是确定可以预测年龄最大的患者(年龄≥90岁的患者)的出院目的地的因素。关于营养状况的信息,日常生活活动(ADL),基于护理需求程度(NND)的护理需求,康复治疗,出院目的地是从我院收治的90名年龄最大的90岁以上患者的病历中获得的,不包括骨科住院患者和短期(≤5天)住院患者。其中,64人出院,4人在住院期间死亡。超过一半的总淋巴细胞计数中度低(<1200/μL)。家庭出院与与他人生活有关,在进食和入院时站立/站立时几乎不需要帮助。入院时基本运动能力量表(ABMS)的截止值为18分。营养管理和早期动员是老年人临床管理的重要方面。
    The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify factors that could predict the discharge destination of oldest-old patients (patients aged ≥90 years). Information on the nutritional status, activities of daily living (ADL), nursing care needs based on nursing need degree (NND), rehabilitation therapy, and discharge destination was obtained from the medical records of 90 oldest-old patients aged ≥90 years admitted to our hospital, excluding orthopedic inpatients and short-term (≤5 days) inpatients. Of these, 64 were discharged home while 4 died during hospitalization. More than half had moderately low total lymphocyte count (<1200/μL). Home discharge was correlated with living with someone else and little need for assistance during eating and getting/standing-up at admission. The cutoff value for ability for basic movement scale (ABMS) at admission for home discharge was 18 points. Nutritional management and early mobilization are important aspects of clinical management of the oldest-olds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内,≥90岁的人口正在增加,然而,近50%的老年乳腺癌(BC)患者接受了次优治疗,导致较高的BC相关死亡率。我们分析了非先天性BC患者的临床和生存结果,以确定有效的治疗策略。
    方法:这项单机构回顾性队列研究分析了2007年至2018年间诊断为I-III期BC的年龄≥90岁的患者。患者分为三个治疗组:传统手术(TS),根据当地指南进行;现行标准手术(CS),定义为不进行腋窝手术的乳房手术(与2016年选择明智指南一致)和/或腔剃;和非手术治疗(NS)。记录临床病理特征,分析复发率和生存结果。
    结果:我们收集了113名平均年龄为93岁(90-99岁)的非成年患者的数据。在这些患者中,43/113(38.1%)接受TS,34/113(30.1%)接受CS,36/113(31.9%)接受NS。手术患者的总复发率为10.4%,而NS组的疾病进展率为22.2%。与NS患者相比,手术患者的总生存期明显更长(p=0.04)。NS组的BC相关死亡率明显高于TS和CS组(25.0%vs.0%vs.7.1%,分别为;p=0.01)。TS组和CS组之间的总生存期和无病生存期没有显着差异(分别为p=0.6和p=0.8),尽管TS组术后总并发症发生率明显较高(p<0.001)。
    结论:个体化的治疗计划对于非未成熟的BC患者至关重要。手术,只要可行,仍然是选择的治疗方法,CS成为大多数患者的最佳选择。
    BACKGROUND: The population aged ≥90 years is increasing worldwide, yet nearly 50% of elderly breast cancer (BC) patients receive suboptimal treatments, resulting in high rates of BC-related mortality. We analyzed clinical and survival outcomes of nonagenarian BC patients to identify effective treatment strategies.
    METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study analyzed patients aged ≥90 years diagnosed with stage I-III BC between 2007 and 2018. Patients were categorized into three treatment groups: traditional surgery (TS), performed according to local guidelines; current-standard surgery (CS), defined as breast surgery without axillary surgery (in concordance with 2016 Choosing Wisely guidelines) and/or cavity shaving; and non-surgical treatment (NS). Clinicopathological features were recorded and recurrence rates and survival outcomes were analyzed.
    RESULTS: We collected data from 113 nonagenarians with a median age of 93 years (range 90-99). Among these patients, 43/113 (38.1%) underwent TS, 34/113 (30.1%) underwent CS, and 36/113 (31.9%) underwent NS. The overall recurrence rate among surgical patients was 10.4%, while the disease progression rate in the NS group was 22.2%. Overall survival was significantly longer in surgical patients compared with NS patients (p = 0.04). BC-related mortality was significantly higher in the NS group than in the TS and CS groups (25.0% vs. 0% vs. 7.1%, respectively; p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in overall survival and disease-free survival between the TS and CS groups (p = 0.6 and p = 0.8, respectively), although the TS group experienced a significantly higher overall postoperative complication rate (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Individualized treatment planning is essential for nonagenarian BC patients. Surgery, whenever feasible, remains the treatment of choice, with CS emerging as the best option for the majority of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在老龄化社会中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在临床上是常见的.然而,有关该人群的临床特征和结局的数据很少.
    方法:这项多中心观察研究纳入了2011年至2020年间在10家医院接受PCI的90岁以上患者。该研究包括患有急性冠脉综合征(ACS)和慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)的患者。调查了住院期间和出院后全因死亡和心脏死亡的发生情况。
    结果:总计,402名患者(91.9±2.0年,48.3%男性)参与研究,其中77.9%患有ACS。与CCS患者相比,ACS患者的住院死亡率明显更高(15.3%vs.2.2%,p<0.001)。估计全因死亡累积发生率为24.3%,39.5%,在1年、3年和5年时为60.4%,分别。ACS和CCS患者的全因死亡发生率没有显着差异。关于出院后的死亡原因,非心脏死亡占病例的一半以上。
    结论:本研究强调了在真实世界中接受PCI的90岁以上患者的临床特征和长期临床过程。与CCS患者相比,ACS患者的院内死亡率更高。放电后,随着时间的推移,ACS和CCS患者的心源性和非心源性死亡率的发生率都出现了相当大的增加,更全面的管理方法是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: In an aging society, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for super-elderly patients is commonly performed in clinical practice. However, data are scarce regarding the clinical features and outcomes of this population.
    METHODS: This multicenter observational study enrolled patients aged over 90 years who underwent PCI across 10 hospitals between 2011 and 2020. The study included patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). The occurrence of all-cause and cardiac deaths during hospitalization and after discharge was investigated.
    RESULTS: In total, 402 patients (91.9 ± 2.0 years, 48.3 % male) participated in the study, of whom 77.9 % presented with ACS. The rate of in-hospital death was significantly higher in patients with ACS compared to patients with CCS (15.3 % vs. 2.2 %, p < 0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence rates of all-cause death were 24.3 %, 39.5 %, and 60.4 % at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of all-cause death between patients with ACS and CCS. Regarding causes of death after discharge, non-cardiac deaths accounted for just over half of the cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the clinical features and long-term clinical course of patients aged over 90 years who underwent PCI in a real-world setting. Patients presenting with ACS exhibited a higher rate of in-hospital mortality compared to those with CCS. Following discharge, both ACS and CCS patients experienced comparable and substantial increases in the incidence rates of both cardiac and non-cardiac mortality over time, and a more holistic management approach is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者机械血栓切除术(MT)1年随访结果。
    目的:年龄是与AIS的发生和预后较差相关的因素。随着人口老龄化,老年人(90岁及以上)中AIS的患病率预计会上升。MT的长期结果数据,是由大血管闭塞引起的AIS的最佳治疗方法,在非成年人口中很少。
    方法:我们分析了在一个综合卒中中心接受MT治疗的所有AIS患者。我们比较了两个亚组:非肥胖人群(90-99岁的人)和对照组(<90岁)在心血管危险因素方面,中风严重程度,疗程,住院并发症的存在,出院时以及90天和365天随访时的结局(死亡率和良好功能结局定义为改良Rankin量表≤2)。
    结果:非成年患者更常见的是女性,患有心房颤动。他们在住院期间更常发生尿路感染。卒中严重程度,两组间的治疗疗程和院内结局具有可比性.九龄老人的90天和365天死亡率没有显着升高,90天后良好功能结局的比率显着降低(25.0%vs57.7%,p=0.011)和365天(31.5%对61.0%,p=0.020)。
    结论:尽管结果比年轻患者差,25%的非成年患者在MT后三个月在功能上独立,几乎三分之一的人在手术后一年,从而显示了该组治疗的益处。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in nonagenarians suffering from acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) in a 1-year follow-up.
    OBJECTIVE: Age is a factor associated with both the occurrence of AIS and a poorer prognosis. As the population ages, the prevalence of AIS among the very old (90 and older) is expected to rise. Data on long-term outcomes of MT, being the optimal treatment of AIS caused by large vessel occlusions, is scarce in the population of nonagenarians.
    METHODS: We analysed all AIS patients treated with MT in a single Comprehensive Stroke Centre. We compared two subgroups: nonagenarians (people aged 90-99) and controls ( < 90 years) in terms of cardiovascular risk factors profile, stroke severity, treatment course, presence of in-hospital complications, and outcomes (mortality and good functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2) at discharge and at 90- and 365-day follow-ups.
    RESULTS: Nonagenarians were more commonly female and suffering from atrial fibrillation. They more often developed urinary tract infection during hospitalisation. Stroke severity, treatment course and in-hospital outcomes were comparable between the groups. Nonagenarians had non-significantly higher 90-day and 365-day mortality, and a significantly lower rate of good functional outcomes after 90 days (25.0% vs 57.7%, p = 0.011) and 365 days (31.5% vs 61.0%, p = 0.020).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite worse outcomes than in younger patients, 25% of nonagenarians were functionally independent three months after MT, and almost one in three of them were so a year after the procedure, thereby showing the benefits of the treatment in this group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是老年人群死亡的主要原因。关于非冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的数据很少,世代之间长期结果的差异仍不清楚。我们旨在研究接受PCI治疗的非年龄患者的模式和时间趋势。
    方法:2009-2020年间共有14,695名患者接受了PCI。我们确定了2,034(13.8%)八十岁老人(年龄80-89岁),和222名(1.5%)非年龄(90-99岁)。终点包括1年时的死亡率和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。
    结果:在研究期间,接受PCI的非年龄患者的数量大幅增加,从早期时间段(2009-2014)的89例患者到后期时间段(2015-2020)的133例患者。在1年,两种死亡率均显著较高(24.3%vs.14.9%,p<0.01),和MACE(30.6%与22.0%,p<0.01),与八十岁相比。在早期和晚期,八十岁老人的累积生存率更高(分别为p<0.01和p=0.039)。在研究期间,观察到非正常人群MACE发生率显着降低,导致两组在后期的MACE发生率无显著差异。
    结论:接受PCI的非未成熟患者的数量正在增加。虽然他们的临床结果低于年轻年龄组,在后期注意到改善。
    BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death in the elderly population. Data regarding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in nonagenarians are scarce, and differences in long term outcomes between generations remain unclear. We aimed to study the pattern and temporal trends of nonagenarians treated with PCI.
    METHODS: A total of 14,695 patients underwent PCI between 2009-2020. We identified 2,034 (13.8%) octogenarians (age 80-89), and 222 (1.5%) nonagenarians (age 90-99). Endpoints included mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year.
    METHODS: A total of 14,695 patients underwent PCI between 2009-2020. We identified 2,034 (13.8%) octogenarians (age 80-89), and 222 (1.5%) nonagenarians (age 90-99). Endpoints included mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year.
    RESULTS: The number of nonagenarians undergoing PCI has increased substantially during the study time period, from 89 patients in the earlier time period (2009-2014) to 133 patients in the later time period (2015-2020). At 1-year, nonagenarians had significantly higher rates of both death (24.3% vs. 14.9%, p<0.01), and MACE (30.6% vs. 22.0%, p<0.01), as compared to octogenarians. The cumulative survival rate was higher among octogenarians both in the early and late time period (p<0.01 and p=0.039, respectively). A significant reduction in nonagenarian MACE rates were observed during the study time period, resulting in a non-significant difference in MACE rates in the later time period between both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The number of nonagenarians who undergo PCI is on the rise. While their clinical outcomes are inferior as compared to younger age groups, improvement was noted in the late time period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:机械血栓切除术是大血管闭塞背景下急性缺血性卒中的主要治疗手段。然而,尚无临床实践指南定义血栓切除术在极端年龄的作用.在这次范围审查中,我们的目的是总结现有的医学和神经外科文献中有关非未成熟患者的机械血栓切除术。使用以下术语和相关引文对PubMed数据库进行了查询:“非先天性血栓切除术,\“\”90岁的血栓切除术,\“\”非年龄中风,“和”缺血性中风血栓切除术。“共同可衡量的结果,包括死亡率,改良Rankin量表(MRS)评分,和脑梗死溶栓(TICI)量表评分,用于比较结果。
    结论:在纳入分析的所有8项研究中,显示血栓切除术可改善功能结局。仅在两项报告的研究中评估了死亡率,在一项研究中,显示血栓切除术在实现首过再灌注的患者中提供死亡率获益.报道的其他感兴趣的结果包括,与单独接受溶栓治疗的患者相比,接受血栓切除术的非年龄患者在出院时的早期神经功能恢复更高,并且在90天改善了功能结局。基线时具有良好功能状态的非成年患者最有可能获得良好的结果。
    结论:机械血栓切除术可改善因大血管闭塞而出现急性缺血性卒中的非未成熟患者的预后。需要进一步的大规模前瞻性研究来优化患者选择并制定针对这一重要患者人口统计学的临床实践指南。
    BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy represents a mainstay of management for acute ischemic stroke in the setting of large vessel occlusion. However, there are no clinical practice guidelines defining the role of thrombectomy at the extremes of age. In this scoping review, we aimed to summarize the existing medical and neurosurgical literature pertaining to mechanical thrombectomy in nonagenarians. The PubMed database was queried using the following terms and relevant citations assessed: \"thrombectomy nonagenarian,\" \"thrombectomy age 90,\" \"stroke nonagenarian,\" and \"ischemic stroke thrombectomy.\" Common measurable outcomes, including mortality, modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scale score, were utilized to compare results.
    CONCLUSIONS: Thrombectomy was shown to improve functional outcomes in all eight of the studies included in the analysis. Mortality was assessed in only two reported studies, and thrombectomy was shown to provide a mortality benefit in 1 study among patients for whom first-pass reperfusion was achieved. Other outcomes of reported interest included greater early neurologic recovery at discharge and improved functional outcomes at 90 days among nonagenarians who underwent thrombectomy as compared to those who received thrombolytic therapy alone. Nonagenarians with good functional status at baseline were the most likely to have favorable outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy improves outcomes among nonagenarians presenting with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to optimize patient selection and develop clinical practice guidelines specific to this important patient demographic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:寻求胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的老年患者人数有所增加。我们旨在描述诊断为可切除PDAC的非年龄(90-99岁)患者的治疗选择的有效性。
    方法:我们利用国家癌症数据库对2004-2021年非转移性PDAC(I-III期)患者进行鉴定。该研究使用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较了五个治疗类别的中位总生存期(mOS):手术,手术和放化疗,单纯化疗,单纯放疗,和单独的化学放射。Cox比例风险用于多变量分析。
    结果:在459,174名患者中,793名年龄≥90岁患者患有非转移性PDAC。其中,245例(30.9%)患者单独接受化疗,296(37.3%)单纯放疗,162(20.4%)放化疗,58(7.3%)治愈性切除,32例(4.0%)接受了手术联合放化疗。不同治疗方式下单纯手术的mOS为9.5个月(95%CI6.7-14.5),19.1个月(95%CI2.4-64.3)用于手术联合放化疗,仅化疗8.2个月(95%CI7.2-9.2),仅放疗8.4个月(95%CI7.6-9.6),和11.2个月(95%CI8.7-12.9)(P<0.001)的放化疗。在多变量分析中,与单纯化疗患者相比,单纯手术患者的生存几率更高,尽管与接受单纯放疗或单纯放化疗的患者相比,它们没有显着差异。尽管如此,与单纯手术相比,手术联合放化疗与死亡率风险降低相关(HR:0.46[95%CI0.25-0.87],P=0.02)。手术30天死亡率为8.8%,90天死亡率为17.8%。
    结论:与其他疗法相比,手术联合放化疗可改善患有PDAC的非未成熟患者的生存率。然而,25例患者中只有1例接受了所有3种治疗成分.其次,我们的研究强调了非年龄患者的手术死亡率非常高.
    BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the elderly patient population seeking care for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to delineate the effectiveness of therapeutic options in nonagenarians (aged 90-99 years) diagnosed with resectable PDAC.
    METHODS: This study used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with nonmetastatic PDAC (stage I-III) from 2004 to 2021. The study compared median overall survival (mOS) using Kaplan-Meier curves among 5 treatment categories: surgery, surgery along with chemoradiation, chemotherapy alone, radiotherapy alone, and chemoradiation alone. Cox proportional hazards regression was used in multivariate analyses.
    RESULTS: Of 459,174 patients, 793 aged ≥ 90 years had nonmetastatic PDAC. Of 793 patients, 245 (30.9 %) underwent chemotherapy alone, 296 (37.3 %) underwent radiotherapy alone, 162 (20.4 %) underwent chemoradiation alone, 58 (7.3 %) underwent curative-intent resection, and 32 (4.0 %) underwent surgery combined with chemoradiation. The mOS estimates in different treatment modalities were 9.5 months (95 % CI, 6.7-14.5) for surgery alone, 19.1 months (95 % CI, 2.4-64.3) for surgery combined with chemoradiation, 8.2 months (95 % CI, 7.2-9.2) for chemotherapy alone, 8.4 months (95 % CI, 7.6-9.6) for radiotherapy alone, and 11.2 months (95 % CI, 8.7-12.9) for chemoradiation alone (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, the odds of survival were better for patients who underwent surgery alone than for those who underwent chemotherapy alone, although the odds of survival did not significantly differ between patients who underwent radiotherapy alone and those who underwent chemoradiation alone. Nonetheless, surgery combined with chemoradiation was associated with decreased mortality risk compared with surgery alone (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95 % CI, 0.25-0.87; P = .02). Operative 30-day mortality rate was 8.8 %, and 90-day mortality rate was 17.8 %.
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgery combined with chemoradiation improved the survival of nonagenarians with PDAC compared with other therapies. However, only 1 in 25 patients received all 3 treatment components. Moreover, our study highlights a very high operative mortality rate in nonagenarians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:据称到2050年,非成年人口将占美国人口的10%。然而,尚无研究评估该年龄组非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(NVUGIB)的结局.
    方法:使用2016年至2020年的全国住院患者样本数据库,比较NVUGIB在非年龄和八十岁患者中的临床结果,并评估死亡率的预测因素和食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的使用。
    结果:Nonagenarians的住院死亡率高于八十岁老人(4%vs.3%,p<0.001)。EGD利用率(30%与48%,p<0.001)和输血(27%vs.40%,p<0.001)在非成年患者中显着较低。多因素logistic回归分析显示,患有NVUGIB的非未成熟患者死亡率较高(比值比[OR],1.5;95%置信区间[CI],1.3-1.7)和较低的EGD利用率(或,0.86;95%CI,0.83-0.89)比八十岁老人高。
    结论:接受NVUGIB患者的死亡风险高于八十岁患者。EGD在非专业人群中的NVUGIB管理中得到了广泛的应用;然而,它的利用率相对低于八十岁的人。在这个不断增长的人群中,需要更多的研究来评估不良结局的预测因素和EGD的指征。
    OBJECTIVE: Nonagenarians will purportedly account for 10% of the United States population by 2050. However, no studies have assessed the outcomes of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in this age group.
    METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database between 2016 and 2020 was used to compare the clinical outcomes of NVUGIB in nonagenarians and octogenarians and evaluate predictors of mortality and the use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
    RESULTS: Nonagenarians had higher in-hospital mortality than that of octogenarians (4% vs. 3%, p<0.001). EGD utilization (30% vs. 48%, p<0.001) and blood transfusion (27% vs. 40%, p<0.001) was significantly lower in nonagenarians. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that nonagenarians with NVUGIB had higher odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.7) and lower odds of EGD utilization (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89) than those of octogenarians.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nonagenarians admitted with NVUGIB have a higher mortality risk than that of octogenarians. EGD is used significantly in managing NVUGIB among nonagenarians; however, its utilization is comparatively lower than in octogenarians. More studies are needed to assess predictors of poor outcomes and the indications of EGD in this growing population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性缺血性卒中(AIS)带来了重大的医疗负担,老年人口在临床试验中的代表性往往不足。这项系统评价和网络荟萃分析旨在评估由于大血管闭塞(LVO)而患有AIS的八十岁和九岁患者中机械血栓切除术(MT)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:使用PubMed进行了系统搜索,WebofScience,和Scopus数据库。研究结果为改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分0-2分,脑梗死溶栓(TICI)评分2b-3分,90天死亡率,和症状性脑出血(sICH)。该研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。
    结果:分析包括47项研究。与年轻患者(40.2%)相比,非成年患者(17.4%)和八十岁患者(21.3%)的mRS评分0-2显著降低(赔率(OR)=3.30,95%置信区间(CI):2.35-4.65和OR=2.47,95%CI:2.07-2.94)。90天死亡率在非老年患者(38.9%)明显高于八十岁患者(25.4%)和年轻患者(14.0%)(OR=0.58,95%CI:0.41-0.83和OR=0.31,95%CI:0.21-0.44),与年轻患者相比(OR=0.52,95%CI:0.41-0.66)。各组间TICI2b-3和sICH率无显著差异。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在八十岁和九岁以上的人中,由于LVO,MT是AIS的可行治疗选择,尽管有细微差别。具体来说,与九龄老人相比,八十岁老人的90天死亡率较低.这些见解支持了由于LVO导致的AIS老年患者对个性化治疗计划的需求,并强调了在未来的临床试验中纳入这一人口统计学的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) imposes a major healthcare burden, with the elderly population often underrepresented in clinical trials. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) among octogenarians and nonagenarians with AIS due to large vessel occlusion (LVO).
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Outcomes of interest were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score of 2b-3, 90-day mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). The study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 47 studies. Significantly lower rates of mRS score 0-2 were observed in nonagenarians (17.4 %) and octogenarians (21.3 %) compared to younger (40.2 %) patients (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.30, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI):2.35-4.65 and OR = 2.47, 95 % CI: 2.07-2.94). 90-day mortality was significantly higher in nonagenarians (38.9 %) compared to octogenarians (25.4 %) and younger (14.0 %) patients (OR = 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.83 and OR = 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.21-0.44), and in octogenarians compared to younger patients (OR = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.66). No significant differences were observed in TICI 2b-3 and sICH rates across groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that MT is a viable treatment option for AIS due to LVO among octogenarians and nonagenarians, albeit with nuanced differences. Specifically, octogenarians had lower 90-day mortality rates compared to nonagenarians. These insights support the need for individualized treatment plans for elderly patients with AIS due to LVO and highlight the importance of including this demographic in future clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏关于接受机械血栓切除术的90岁或以上患者及其无效再通的预测因素的数据。
    目的:我们试图评估接受机械血栓切除术的大血管闭塞≥90岁患者无效再通的预测因素。
    方法:这项多中心观察性回顾性研究包括1月1日之间在四个有能力的中心接受机械血栓切除术治疗的≥90年的患者,2016年和2023年3月30日。Futille再通定义为大血管闭塞患者尽管在机械血栓切除术后成功再通(mTICI≥2b),但其90天预后较差(mRS3-6)。
    结果:我们的队列包括139例机械血栓切除术治疗前循环大血管闭塞导致的≥90岁急性缺血性卒中患者。分析中纳入了一百三十九岁以上成功再通的患者中的一百一十七人(七十六名女性(64.9%)),其中31人(26.49%)经历了有效的再通,86人(73.51%)经历了徒劳的再通。无效再通患者入院时NIHSS较高(p<0.001);静脉溶栓治疗频率较低(p=0.048)。更常见的全身麻醉(p=0.011),和更长的门腹股沟穿刺延迟(p=0.002)。单变量回归分析显示,使用静脉溶栓(0.29,95%CI0.02-0.79,p=0.034)和闭塞部位远端与近端(0.34,95%CI0.11-0.97,p=0.044)与入院时NIHSS的无效再通概率降低相关(1.29,95%CI1.16-1.45,p<0.001),24小时NIHSS(1.15,95%CI1.07-1.25,p=0.002),使用的麻醉类型(4.18,95%CI1.57-11.08,p=0.004),门至腹股沟穿刺时间(1.02,95%CI1.00-1.05,p=0.005)与无效再通的可能性增加相关。多因素回归分析显示,使用静脉溶栓(0.44,95%CI0.09-0.88,p=0.039)与无效再通的可能性降低相关。
    结论:我们的研究似乎表明,在90岁或以上患者的多中心队列中,静脉溶栓机械取栓与无效再通的概率降低相关。
    BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data regarding patients aged 90 years or older undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and their predictors of futile recanalization.
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the predictors of futile recanalization in patients ≥ 90 years with large vessel occlusion undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.
    METHODS: This multi-center observational retrospective study included patients ≥ 90 years consecutively treated with mechanical thrombectomy in four thrombectomy capable centers between January 1st, 2016 and 30th March 2023. Futile recanalization was defined as large vessel occlusion patients experiencing a 90-day poor outcome (mRS 3-6) despite successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b) after mechanical thrombectomy.
    RESULTS: Our cohort included 139 patients ≥ 90 years with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy. One hundred seventeen of one hundred thirty-nine patients ≥ 90 years who achieved successful recanalization were included in the analysis (seventy-six female (64.9%)), of whom thirty-one (26.49%) experienced effective recanalization and eighty-six (73.51%) experienced futile recanalization. Patients with futile recanalization had higher NIHSS on admission (p < 0.001); they were less frequently treated with intravenous thrombolysis (p = 0.048), had more often general anesthesia (p = 0.011), and longer door to groin puncture delay (p = 0.002). Univariable regression analysis showed that use of intravenous thrombolysis (0.29, 95% CI 0.02-0.79, p = 0.034) and site of occlusion distal vs proximal (0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.97, p = 0.044) were associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization while NIHSS on admission (1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.45, p < 0.001), NIHSS at 24 h (1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.25, p = 0.002), type of anesthesia used (4.18, 95% CI 1.57-11.08, p = 0.004), and door to groin puncture time (1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, p = 0.005) were associated with increased probability of futile recanalization. Multivariable regression analysis showed that use of intravenous thrombolysis (0.44, 95% CI 0.09-0.88, p = 0.039) was associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study seems to suggest that mechanical thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis is associated with reduced probability of futile recanalization in a multi-center cohort of patients aged 90 years or older.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号