UNASSIGNED: Patients with ventricular thrombus (VT) require anticoagulation therapy and it remains unknown that whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are more effective.
UNASSIGNED: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs with VKAs on the rate of thrombus resolution and clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database and Wanfang Database, were searched up to November 22, 2021. The primary outcome was the rate of thrombus resolution, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding, stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), stroke and all-cause death. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidential intervals (CI) were used for the pooled results.
UNASSIGNED: Eighteen studies with 1755 participants (NOACs, n = 607; VKAs, n = 1148) were included. There were no significant differences in thrombus resolution (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.23, p = 0.558), bleeding (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.54-1.35, p = 0.496), SSE (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41-1.43, p = 0.401), stroke (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.29-1.49, p = 0.312) or all-cause death (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.63-1.67, p = 0.925) between NOACs and VKAs. Subgroup analyses showed a statistics difference in thrombus resolution between NOACs and VKAs among studies which enrolled patients with or without dabigatran (Yes: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.08; No: OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.00-2.19; p = 0.01), while no significances were observed according to baseline characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings showed that NOACs were comparable to VKAs in thrombus resolution as well as clinical outcomes. In studies that enrolled patients without dabigatran, the thrombus resolution seemed to be greater in NOACs group than VKAs group. And in different proportion of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, history of ischemic cardiomyopathy and combination with antiplatelet, the thrombus resolution among the two groups remained similar.

OBJECTIVE: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have shown similar efficacy and lower bleeding rates than vitamin K antagonists for venous thromboembolism. However, this has not been proven in mesenteric vein thrombosis. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.
METHODS: Between January 2014 and July 2022, mesenteric vein thrombosis was diagnosed on computed tomography in 225 patients in a tertiary hospital. Among them, a total of 44 patients who underwent long-term anticoagulation therapy over 3 months were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anticoagulant used: vitamin K antagonists (Group 1, n = 21) and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (Group 2, n = 23). The efficacy outcomes were symptom recurrence and thrombus resolution on follow-up computed tomography, and the safety outcome was bleeding complications.
RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 46-68 years), and 52% were men. The most common risk factors were unprovoked intra-abdominal infections (30%). The median duration of anticoagulation therapy was 13 months (20 months in Group 1 vs 6 months in Group 2; P = .076). Of the 44 patients, 17 (39%) received the standard treatment. The median follow-up period was longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 (57 vs 28 months; P = .048). No recurrence of mesenteric vein thrombosis-related symptoms were observed in either group. The median duration of follow-up computed tomography was 31 months (42 months in Group 1 vs 18 months in Group 2; P = .064). Computed tomography revealed complete thrombus resolution, partial resolution, and no changes in 71%, 19%, and 10%, respectively (P = .075). Regarding bleeding complications, varix bleeding and melena developed in two patients in Group 2, and anticoagulation treatment thereafter ceased.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the short follow-up duration in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, there was no clinically significant difference in the thrombus resolution rate or bleeding complications when compared with the vitamin K antagonists group. Although research on the long-term effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients is limited, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants can be considered an alternative to conventional treatments.

OBJECTIVE: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS: In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest.
RESULTS: The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79-2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40-0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40-1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67-1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76-1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48-1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63-1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79-1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52-1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63-1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14-2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80-1.19).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death.
BACKGROUND: URL: https://www.
RESULTS: gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal low dosages of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are often inappropriately used due to a fear of bleeding, particularly among elderly patients. Such practice is common in Asia, and we aimed to evaluate the use of low-dose NOACs and their impact on clinical outcomes among Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: The Optimal Thromboprophylaxis in Elderly Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (ChiOTEAF) registry was a prospective, multicenter study conducted in China from October 2014 to December 2018. For this report, we included NOAC-treated patients with available data on NOAC dosage and one-year follow-up. Logistic regression analysis assessed the association (adjusted for age, sex, prior ischemic stroke, prior major bleeding, heart failure, coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, current anemia) between the low doses and study outcomes among NOAC-treated patients, as well as comparisons with non-anticoagulated patients.
RESULTS: The eligible cohort included 1310 NOAC-treated patients (mean age of 72.1 ± 10.9; 38.9% female), of whom 341 (26.0%) received a low \"off-label\" dose. The use of low-dose NOACs was independently associated with higher odds of the composite outcome (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.11-5.71) and thromboembolism (OR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.11-20.01). Compared with non-anticoagulated patients, lower rates of the composite outcome (7.3% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.025) and all-cause death (5.3% vs. 9.7%; p = 0.007) were seen in the low-dose group (ORs 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32-0.78, and 0.42; 95% CI: 0.26-0.70, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Low doses of NOACs should not be recommended as a part of standard therapy among Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation as their use was associated with a higher odds ratio of the composite outcome and thromboembolic events compared with standard dose NOAC regimens. Compared to non-treatment, the use of low-dose NOAC may result in a survival benefit (but not thromboembolic reduction) among high-risk patients.

暂无摘要。

Oral anticoagulants prevent thromboembolic events but expose patients to a significant risk of bleeding due to the treatment itself, after trauma, or during surgery. Any physician working in the emergency department or involved in the perioperative care of a patient should be aware of the best reversal approach according to the type of drug and the patient\'s clinical condition. This paper presents a concise review and proposes clinical protocols for the reversal of oral anticoagulants in emergency settings, such as bleeding or surgery.
The authors searched for relevant studies in PubMed, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library database and identified 82 articles published up to September 2020 to generate a review and algorithms as clinical protocols for practical use. Hemodynamic status and the implementation of general supportive measures should be the first approach under emergency conditions. The drug type, dose, time of last intake, and laboratory evaluations of anticoagulant activity and renal function provide an estimation of drug clearance and should be taken into consideration. The reversal agents for vitamin K antagonists are 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K, followed by fresh frozen plasma as a second-line treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants have specific reversal agents, such as andexanet alfa and idarucizumab, but are not widely available. Another possibility in this situation, but with less evidence, is prothrombin complex concentrates.
The present algorithms propose a tool to help healthcare providers in the best decision making for patients under emergency conditions.

UNASSIGNED: Effective stroke prevention with oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces the risk of stroke and death among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For most patients with AF, treatment options include vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). NOACs have been introduced as an alternative to VKAs, and their use has been steadily increasing in the United Kingdom and Europe over a decade. In randomized clinical trials, NOACs had a favorable risk-benefit profile as compared to warfarin. However, there is a concern about their long-term safety in clinical practice, especially in high-risk patients. There have been a number of registries and surveys based on the real-world patients with AF which has been conducted and published, providing data on contemporary AF management.
UNASSIGNED: In this narrative review, the authors discuss current trends in the use of OAC in the United Kingdom and Europe, considering the potential directions for future anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF.
UNASSIGNED: The increasing prevalence of AF and AF-related comorbidities proves the need for comprehensive prevention and management strategies. The challenge is the optimization of therapy for each patient. However, there are still gaps in optimal stroke prevention, and the mortality rates remain high in patients with AF.

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation guideline document is to provide clinically useful evidence-based recommendation on reversal of anticoagulant activity VKA (warfarin, phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol), direct factor II (thrombin) inhibitors (dabigatran etexilat) and factor-Xa-inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) in patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage. The guideline was prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure for a European Stroke Organisation guideline document and according to GRADE methodology. As a basic principle, we defined use of oral anticoagulation pragmatically: oral anticoagulation use is assumed by positive medical history unless relevant anticoagulant activity is regarded unlikely by medical history or has been ruled out by laboratory testing. Overall, we strongly recommend using prothrombin complex over no treatment and fresh-frozen plasma in patients on VKA plus vitamin K. We further strongly recommend using idarucizumab in patients on dabigatran and make a recommendation for andexanet alfa in patients on rivaroxaban and apixaban over no treatment. We make a weak recommendation on using high-dose prothrombin complex concentrate (50 IU/kg) for all patients taking edoxaban and for patients on rivaroxaban or apixaban in case andexanet alfa is not available. We recommend against using tranexamic acid and rFVIIa, outside of trials. The presented treatment recommendations aim to normalise coagulation, there is no or only indirect data on effects on functional outcome or mortality, and only little data from randomised controlled trials.

UNASSIGNED: Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOAC) is effective in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, anticoagulation also poses a major challenge for emergency treatment of patients suffering ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage.
UNASSIGNED: The registry RASUNOA-prime is designed to describe current patterns of emergency management, clinical course and outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation experiencing an acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage under different anticoagulation schemes prior to stroke (NOAC, vitamin K antagonists or no anticoagulation).
UNASSIGNED: RASUNOA-prime (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02533960) is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicentre, observational cohort study aiming to recruit 3000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, and 1000 patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage and atrial fibrillation with different anticoagulation schemes pre-stroke. It is a non-interventional triple-armed study aiming at a balanced inclusion of ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage patients according to the different anticoagulation schemes. Patients will be followed up for clinical course, management and outcome up to three months after the event. Findings in ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage patients on NOAC will be compared with patients taking vitamin K antagonists or no anticoagulant pre-stroke.
UNASSIGNED: Primary endpoint for ischaemic stroke patients: occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, for intracerebral haemorrhage patients: occurrence of secondary haematoma expansion. Secondary endpoints include assessment of coagulation, use of thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy, occurrence of complications, implementation of secondary prevention.
UNASSIGNED: Describing the current patterns of early management as well as outcome of stroke patients with atrial fibrillation will help guide physicians to develop recommendations for emergency treatment of stroke patients under different anticoagulation schemes.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the cornerstone of maintenance medication following elective percutaneous coronary intervention and also after acute coronary syndrome (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris); however, DAPT is not sufficient for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). For SPAF, oral anticoagulation (OAC) with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K-dependent anticoagulants (NOAC) is required. If a patient who is receiving anticoagulants for SPAF, requires a coronary intervention, triple therapy consisting of OAC plus DAPT is given, at least for a limited time following the procedure. This article reviews the current data from studies testing strategies with NOACs plus one or two antiplatelet substances in comparison to triple therapy with VKA.