An embolized clot that travels to the lungs from the legs or, less commonly, other parts of the body (known as deep vein thrombosis or DVT) causes pulmonary embolism (PE), which is characterized by obstruction of blood flow to the pulmonary artery. As PE has the propensity to masquerade as various illnesses affecting both the cardiovascular (CV) and the respiratory system, it is crucial to identify PE at the earliest. Appropriate diagnosis of PE may lead to earlier treatment and improved patient outcomes. While pulmonary angiography remains the established gold standard for diagnosing PE, the contemporary standard of care for this condition is the computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). Anticoagulation therapy is the fundamental strategy for managing PE, with the forefront of treatment being the use of novel and upcoming oral anticoagulants known as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The NOACs provide a practical single-drug treatment strategy, which does not hinder the patient\'s lifestyle and domestic responsibilities. Although PE may be fatal, early detection may lead to effective management. Despite that, mortality and morbidity associated with PE are very high in India. The awareness among Indian healthcare professionals about PE should be improved, and unified pan-country diagnostic and management guidelines should be formulated to tackle the country\'s PE burden.

Studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The impact of NOACs on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness and safety of NOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with CTEPH. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for relevant studies, encompassing data from inception until November 2023. The data were pooled using a fixed-effects model if the I2 value was less than 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was employed. Overall, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight observational studies involving 4556 patients with CTEPH were included. Patients receiving NOACs exhibited a significantly lower incidence of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.76) and major bleeding (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92) compared to those with VKAs. There were no significant differences in the rate of VTE recurrence (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.72-1.59), total bleeding (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60-1.01), and minor bleeding (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.73-1.69) between the two studied groups. Similar results were found in the subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.This meta-analysis provided evidence that NOACs could be superior to VKAs for the treatment of CTEPH. NOACs might be safe and a convenient alternative to VKAs for thromboprophylaxis in patients with CTEPH.

UNASSIGNED: To describe the characteristics, treatment practices, and clinical outcomes of patients with ventricular mural thrombus (VMT), with emphasis on the comparison of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective cohort study between 2010 and 2019 in Fuwai Hospital, China. Patients with VMT newly treated with either NOACs or VKAs were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of thrombus resolution at 3 months.
UNASSIGNED: We included 196 patients in total-68.9% (n = 135) were treated with VKAs while 31.1% (n = 61) were on NOACs. Patients with a medical history of heart failure (HF) (odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 3.77, p = 0.013) and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.65, p = 0.001) had a higher thrombus resolution. At 3 months, a significant difference was observed in the thrombus resolution between the NOACs and VKAs group with or without adjustment (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.39 to 4.89, p = 0.003; adjusted OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.51 to 5.66, p = 0.001). Further investigation revealed that in the majority of the subgroups, individuals receiving NOAC therapy had a superior thrombus resolution than those receiving VKA therapy.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with a medical history of HF or left ventricular ejection fraction < 30% experienced greater effectiveness in thrombus resolution. Additionally, the resolution of VMT with NOAC treatment was considerably higher than that with VKA therapy at 3 months, with or without adjusting for baseline variables.
UNASSIGNED: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT05006677 on August 4th, 2021.

OBJECTIVE: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after surgical mitral valve repair (MVR) or bioprosthetic valve replacement (BVR) in mitral position remains a controversial topic among the cardiovascular community, in particular in the early postoperative period. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs in the first three months after MVR or mitral BVR compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study with prospectively collected peri-intervention outcomes between 2020 and 2021. Records were retrieved and all participants were contacted by telephone. Patients were divided into groups according to OAC strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, mitral thrombosis, or bleeding during the first three months after surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 65.5±12.2 years, 56.8% male. On discharge, 98 (66.2%) patients were on VKAs and 50 (33.8%) were on DOACs for at least three months. The primary outcome occurred in 22 (22.4%) patients in the VKA group and in three (6%) in the NOAC group (p=0.012), mainly driven by more bleeding events in the former. Independent predictors of the primary outcome were smoking (p=0.028) and OAC with VKAs at discharge, the latter predicting three times more events (p=0.046, OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.02-13.5).
CONCLUSIONS: NOACs were associated with fewer events, supporting their efficacy and safety during the first three months after surgical MVR or mitral BVR.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review assesses the likelihood of developing dementia and cognitive impairment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) as opposed to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA), which encompassed both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The objective was to assess the impact of NOACs and VKAs on the incidence of dementia in individuals diagnosed with AF.
RESULTS: Out of 1914 studies that were screened, 31 studies were included in the final analysis, which consisted of nine RCTs or their subsequent post-hoc analyses, in addition to 22 observational studies. The meta-analysis shows that NOACs were associated with a decreased probability of developing dementia of any cause [Rate Ratio (RR): 0.88; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 0.82-0.94], especially in patients below the age of 75 (RR: 0.78; 95 % CI: 0.73-0.84). Consistent patterns were observed across all forms of dementia and cognitive function decline. The overall evidence indicates notable variability in the outcome with a moderate-to-low degree of certainty. The TSA suggests that the total sample size of the included trials (155,647 patients) was significantly smaller than the required information size of 784,692 patients to discern the true effect of NOAC versus VKA in terms of reducing dementia risk.
CONCLUSIONS: NOACs may reduce the likelihood of developing dementia in patients with AF, particularly in those under the age of 75. This review highlights the urgent necessity for thorough research to determine the efficacy of NOACs in safeguarding cognitive health.

BACKGROUND: The impact of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on platelet function is still unclear. We conducted a comprehensive ex vivo study aimed at assessing the effect of the four currently marketed NOACs on platelet function.
METHODS: We incubated blood samples from healthy donors with concentrations of NOACs (50, 150 and 250 ng/mL), in the range of those achieved in the plasma of patients during therapy. We evaluated generation of thrombin; light transmittance platelet aggregation (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), human γ-thrombin (THR) and tissue factor (TF); generation of thromboxane (TX)B2; and expression of protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and P-selectin on the platelet surface.
RESULTS: All NOACs concentration-dependently reduced thrombin generation compared with control. THR-induced LTA was suppressed by the addition of dabigatran at any concentration, while TF-induced LTA was reduced by factor-Xa inhibitors. ADP- and TRAP-induced LTA was not modified by NOACs. TXB2 generation was reduced by all NOACs, particularly at the highest concentrations. We found a concentration-dependent increase in PAR-1 expression after incubation with dabigatran, mainly at the highest concentrations, but not with FXa inhibitors; P-selectin expression was not changed by any drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the NOACs is associated with measurable ex vivo changes in platelet function, arguing for antiplatelet effects beyond the well-known anticoagulant activities of these drugs. There are differences, however, among the NOACs, especially between dabigatran and the FXa inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) following anticoagulant application has received growing attention as a significant emerging complication of anticoagulation. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of real-world studies to compare the incidence, clinical features, and prognosis of AKI across different anticoagulant regimens.
METHODS: Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used to identify suspected AKI cases after different anticoagulant use within the Food and Drug Administration\'s Adverse Event Reporting System from January 2004 to March 2023. The time to onset, fatality, and hospitalization rates of anticoagulant-associated AKI were also investigated.
RESULTS: We identified 9313 anticoagulant-associated AKIs, which appeared to influence mostly patients over 65 years old (65.37%). Lepirudin displayed a stronger AKI association than others, based on the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR = 6.66, 95% CI = 3.97-11.18), proportional reporting ratio (PRR = 6.08, χ2 = 69.12), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM = 6.08, the lower 90% one-sided CI = 3.95). Warfarin showed the slightest association with AKI in oral anticoagulants, lower than any direct oral anticoagulants excluding apixaban. Edoxaban exhibited the highest potential renal risk among direct oral anticoagulants, with an ROR of 3.32 (95% CI = 2.95-3.72). The median time to AKI onset was 36 (IQR 7-205) days following the initiation of anticoagulation therapy, and most AKI cases occurred within the first month.
CONCLUSIONS: Particular attention should be directed toward monitoring renal function in individuals receiving anticoagulants, including warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants, as well as other anticoagulant agents. This diligence is particularly imperative within the first month after anticoagulant administration for individuals with a tendency for AKI.

Andexanet alfa (AA) is a recombinant inactive analog of human activated factor X (FXa), effectively reversing the effects of its inhibitors - rivaroxaban and apixaban, which are available in Poland. The drug was approved for clinical use registration after the publication of the results of the ANNEXA-4 trial (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of FXa Inhibitors 4), in which its efficacy in restoring hemostasis in life-threatening hemorrhages in patients receiving using the aforementioned anticoagulants was demonstrated. Hence, AA is now recommended for patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban therapy with massive and uncontrollable hemorrhages, including hemorrhagic strokes (HS) and gastrointestinal bleeding. Drug-specific chromogenic anti-Xa assays are generally best suited for estimating rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma levels, aside from direct assessment of their concentrations. The absence of anti-Xa activity, determined using these assays, allows us to rule out the presence of clinically relevant plasma concentrations of any FXa inhibitor. On the other hand, the dose of AA should not be modified based on the results of coagulation tests, as it depends solely on the time that elapsed since the last dose of FXa inhibitor and oon the dose and type of FXa inhibitor. AA is administered as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus, followed by an i.v. infusion of the drug. The maximum reversal of anti-Xa activity occurs within two minutes of the end of the bolus treatment, with the continuation of the continuous i.v. infusion allowing the effect to be maintained for up to two hours afterwards. Because anticoagulant activity can reappear after the infusion is completed, it is currently unclear at what point after AA administration FXa inhibitors or heparin should be re-administered. In Poland AA is starting to become available and its urgent need to administer it to patients with severe bleeding on apixaban or rivaroxaban.

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are essential for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the appropriateness of anticoagulation treatment in locally practice remains unclear. This study evaluated compliance with anticoagulation therapy concerning the guidelines and drug labels in patients with NVAF. Methods: Hospitalized patients diagnosed with NVAF between 1 November 2020, and 31 December 2021, were retrospectively enrolled. The appropriateness of anticoagulation regimens at discharge was evaluated based on a flowchart designed according to atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines and medication labels. Furthermore, we explored factors potentially influencing the \"no-use of OACs\" using binary logistic regression and verified anticoagulation-related issues through a physician questionnaire. Results: A total of 536 patients were enrolled in this study, including 254 patients (47.4%) with inappropriate anticoagulation regimens. 112 patients (20.9%) were categorized as \"underdosing-use of OACs,\" 134 (25%) who needed anticoagulation therapy were \"no-use of OACs\" and eight (1.5%) were \"over-use of OACs.\" The results of a binary logistic regression analysis showed that paroxysmal AF (odds ratio [OR], 7.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.57-13.10), increased blood creatinine levels (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.11-3.16), hospitalized pacemaker implantation (OR, 6.76; 95% CI, 2.67-17.11), percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.44-7.80), and an increased HAS-BLED score (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.11-2.35) were associated with \"no-use of OACs\" in patients with NVAF who had indications for anticoagulation therapy. Conclusion: For patients with NVAF with severe renal dysfunction and paroxysmal AF, anticoagulation therapy was inadequate. The underdosing-use of OACs in patients with NVAF was frequently observed. We recommend an anticoagulation management team to tailor anticoagulation regimens to suit each patient\'s needs.

UNASSIGNED: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are the cornerstone of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but prescribing decisions in older people are complicated. Clinicians must assess the net clinical benefit of OAC in the context of multiple chronic conditions, polypharmacy, frailty and life expectancy. The under-representation of high-risk, older adult sub-populations in clinical trials presents the challenge of choosing the right OAC, where a \'one-size-fits-all\' approach cannot be taken.
UNASSIGNED: This review discusses OAC approaches for stroke prevention in older people with AF and presents a prescribing aid to support clinicians\' decision-making. High-risk older adults with multiple chronic conditions, specifically chronic kidney disease, dementia/cognitive impairment, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack or intracranial hemorrhage, polypharmacy, frailty, low body weight, high falls risk, and those aged ≥75 years are considered.
UNASSIGNED: Non-vitamin K antagonist OACs are the preferred first-line OAC in older adults with AF, including high-risk subpopulations, after individual assessment of stroke and bleeding risk, except those with mechanical heart valves and moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis. Head-to-head comparisons of NOACs are not available, therefore the choice of drug (and dose) should be based on an individual\'s risk (stroke and bleeding) and incorporate their treatment preferences. Treatment decisions must be person-centered and principles of shared decision-making applied.