non-metastatic

非转移性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在开发和评估算法的性能,以识别非转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的实际数据中的放射治疗(RT)治疗意图。使用IPO-波尔图医院(葡萄牙)和真正的肿瘤学数据库(英格兰)的数据,基于可用的RT信息开发了三种算法(#1:RT持续时间,#2:RT持续时间和类型,#3:RT剂量)和测试与参考数据集。研究结果显示,对于接受RT加全身抗癌治疗(SACT)的患者,所有三种算法具有良好的总体准确性(91-100%),并且对于单独接受RT的患者,算法#2和#3也具有良好的准确性(>99%)。这些算法可以帮助在意图信息缺失/不完整的真实世界设置中在接受有或没有SACT的RT的NSCLC患者中对治疗意图进行分类。
    许多现实世界研究的一个目标是评估在常规访问医院或癌症中心期间给予哪些癌症治疗,并评估治疗效果如何。当我们知道癌症治疗的原因(称为治疗意图)时,这个目标更容易实现。但医生通常不记录治疗是为了积极治疗癌症(治愈意图)还是为了减缓癌症的生长或控制癌症患者的症状(姑息意图)。在这篇文章中,我们描述了算法的开发和测试,以确定接受放射治疗(对癌细胞的受控放射治疗)的肺癌患者的治疗意图。这些算法涉及基于三个关键问题的逐步过程:放射治疗多长时间?给予了什么类型的放射治疗?给予了什么剂量的放射治疗?然后根据对放射治疗非常了解的医生提供的参考答案测试答案的真假。我们发现,所有三种算法都能够在接受全身抗癌治疗放疗的十分之九以上的人中确定正确的治疗意图(例如,化疗)和两种算法能够在仅接受放疗的十分之九以上的患者中确定正确的治疗意图。这些算法可能有助于确定接受放射治疗的人在现实世界中治疗肺癌的治疗意图。并可能帮助我们更多地了解真实世界的肺癌治疗。
    This study aimed to develop and evaluate the performance of algorithms for identifying radiotherapy (RT) treatment intent in real-world data from patients with non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using data from IPO-Porto hospital (Portugal) and the REAL-Oncology database (England), three algorithms were developed based on available RT information (#1: RT duration, #2: RT duration and type, #3: RT dose) and tested versus reference datasets. Study results showed that all three algorithms had good overall accuracy (91-100%) for patients receiving RT plus systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) and algorithms #2 and #3 also had good accuracy (>99%) for patients receiving RT alone. These algorithms could help classify treatment intent in patients with NSCLC receiving RT with or without SACT in real-world settings where intent information is missing/incomplete.
    One objective of many real-world studies is to evaluate which cancer treatments are given during routine visits to hospitals or cancer centers and assess how well the treatments work. This objective is easier to achieve when we know the reason for the cancer treatment (known as treatment intent), but doctors often do not record whether the treatment was given to actively treat the cancer (curative intent) or to slow down a cancer\'s growth or control symptoms in people with incurable cancer (palliative intent). In this article, we describe the development and testing of algorithms to determine treatment intent in people with lung cancer given radiotherapy (the controlled application of radiation to cancer cells). These algorithms involve following a step-by-step process based on three key questions: for how long was the radiotherapy given? what type of radiotherapy was given? and what dose of radiotherapy was given? Answers were then tested true or false against reference answers provided by doctors who know a lot about radiotherapy. We found that all three algorithms were able to determine the correct treatment intent in more than nine out of ten people given radiotherapy with systemic anticancer therapy (e.g., chemotherapy) and two algorithms were able to determine the correct treatment intent in more than nine out of ten people given radiotherapy alone. These algorithms may be helpful in determining treatment intent in people given radiotherapy to treat lung cancer in real-world settings, and may help us learn more about real-world lung cancer treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早发性胰腺癌(EOPC;诊断时年龄≤50岁)的发病率正在上升,给个人带来沉重的负担,家庭,和社会。包括手术在内的联合治疗的作用,放射治疗,非转移性EOPC的化疗尚不明确。
    目的:探讨非转移性EOPC患者的治疗模式和生存结局。
    方法:对2017年至2021年在我院接受治疗的277例非转移性EOPC患者进行回顾性调查。总生存期(OS),无病生存,无进展生存期采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行估计.使用Cox比例风险模型的单变量和多变量分析来识别预后因素。
    结果:中位随访时间为34.6个月,1年,2年,整个队列的3年OS率为84.3%,51.5%,和27.6%,分别。单纯手术和辅助治疗(AT)的局部疾病患者的中位OS分别为21.2个月和28.8个月,分别为(P=0.007)。接受基于放疗的联合治疗(RCT)的局部晚期疾病患者的中位OS,新辅助治疗(NAT)后的手术,化疗时间为28.5个月,25.6个月,14.0个月,分别(P=0.002)。区域复发后的中位OS为16.0个月,13.4个月,在RCT中有8.9个月,化疗,和支持治疗小组,分别为(P=0.035)。多变量分析表明,糖类抗原19-9水平,病理分级,T-stage,N级,和切除是非转移性EOPC的独立预后因素。
    结论:AT可改善局部患者的术后生存率。NAT和RCT后的手术是局部晚期EOPC患者的首选治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: The incidence of patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC; age ≤ 50 years at diagnosis) is on the rise, placing a heavy burden on individuals, families, and society. The role of combination therapy including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in non-metastatic EOPC is not well-defined.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic EOPC.
    METHODS: A total of 277 patients with non-metastatic EOPC who were treated at our institution between 2017 and 2021 were investigated retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify prognostic factors.
    RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 34.6 months, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 84.3%, 51.5%, and 27.6%, respectively. The median OS of patients with localized disease who received surgery alone and adjuvant therapy (AT) were 21.2 months and 28.8 months, respectively (P = 0.007). The median OS of patients with locally advanced disease who received radiotherapy-based combination therapy (RCT), surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and chemotherapy were 28.5 months, 25.6 months, and 14.0 months, respectively (P = 0.002). The median OS after regional recurrence were 16.0 months, 13.4 months, and 8.9 months in the RCT, chemotherapy, and supportive therapy groups, respectively (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, pathological grade, T-stage, N-stage, and resection were independent prognostic factors for non-metastatic EOPC.
    CONCLUSIONS: AT improves postoperative survival in localized patients. Surgery after NAT and RCT are the preferred therapeutic options for patients with locally advanced EOPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2011年11月至2018年10月,共有739例患者接受了RARP作为PCa的初始治疗。有关BCR状态的数据,从临床记录中收集临床和病理参数.在排除新辅助和/或辅助治疗的病例后,存在淋巴结或远处转移,和积极的SM,共有537例符合最终分析条件。实验队列的中位随访时间为28.0个月(四分位间:18.0-43.0)。我们确定存在国际泌尿外科病理学会(ISUP-GG)≥4(危险比(HR)3.20,95%置信区间(95%CI)1.70-6.03,P<0.001),淋巴管浸润(HR2.03,95%CI1.00-4.12,P=0.049),神经周浸润(HR10.7,95%CI1.45-79.9,P=0.020),在多因素分析中,最大肿瘤直径(MTD)>20mm(HR1.9,95%CI1.01-3.70,P=0.047)是BCR的重要因素。根据这些因素,我们进一步建立了风险模型。基于这个模型,1年,3年,5年无BCR生存率为100%,98.9%,低危组98.9%;99.1%,94.1%,中等风险组86.5%;93.9%,84.6%,高危人群占58.1%。使用Bootstrap方法的内部验证显示c指数为0.742,乐观校正的c指数水平为0.731。还使用来自3个其他独立机构的综合数据库进行外部验证,包括总共387名患者进行最终分析。外部验证显示c指数为0.655。总之,我们在RARP术后切缘阴性的患者中确定了生化衰竭的危险因素,并利用这些危险因素进一步建立了风险模型.
    A total of 739 patients underwent RARP as initial treatment for PCa from November 2011 to October 2018. Data on BCR status, clinical and pathological parameters were collected from the clinical records. After excluding cases with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies, presence of lymph node or distant metastasis, and positive SM, a total of 537 cases were eligible for the final analysis. The median follow-up of experimental cohort was 28.0 (interquartile: 18.0-43.0) months. We identified the presence of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP-GG) ≥ 4 (Hazard ratio (HR) 3.20, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.70-6.03, P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.00-4.12, P = 0.049), perineural invasion (HR 10.7, 95% CI 1.45-79.9, P = 0.020), and maximum tumor diameter (MTD) > 20 mm (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01-3.70, P = 0.047) as significant factors of BCR in the multivariate analysis. We further developed a risk model according to these factors. Based on this model, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year BCR-free survival were 100%, 98.9%, 98.9% in the low-risk group; 99.1%, 94.1%, 86.5% in the intermediate-risk group; 93.9%, 84.6%, 58.1% in the high-risk group. Internal validation using the bootstrap method showed a c-index of 0.742 and an optimism-corrected c-index level of 0.731. External validation was also carried out using an integrated database derived from 3 other independent institutions including a total of 387 patients for the final analysis. External validation showed a c-index of 0.655. In conclusion, we identified risk factors of biochemical failure in patients showing negative surgical margin after RARP and further developed a risk model using these risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肛门癌是罕见的肿瘤,占全球所有肿瘤的<1%。对于患有非转移性肛门鳞状细胞癌(ASCC)的患者,同步放化疗仍然是护理治疗的标准。
    我们的目的是评估确定性放化疗方法在我们人群非转移性ASCCs患者中的缓解率和2年生存结果。我们对这些患者人群进行了横断面审查,这些患者在过去10年中接受了治疗,然后在我们研究所完成治疗后进行了随访。
    在符合资格标准后,共招募了17名患者。通过磁共振成像或骨盆计算机断层扫描记录了16例患者的反应,在治疗完成3个月时完成。超过80%的患者具有完整的放射学反应。在幸存的参与者中,2年无病生存率超过三分之二.大约20%的研究参与者在治疗完成后的后续临床就诊期间出现疾病复发。
    这篇综述强调了确定性化疗对非转移性ASCCs患者实现放射学和临床反应的影响。此外,根据我们的知识,这是第一次回顾,强调肛门癌的发病率和特点在巴基斯坦。
    UNASSIGNED: Anal cancers are uncommon neoplasms that make up to <1% of all tumours globally. Concurrent chemoradiation remains the standard of care treatment for patients who present with non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCCs).
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to evaluate the response rate and 2-year survival outcome of the definitive chemoradiation approach in patients with non-metastatic ASCCs of our population. We conducted a cross-sectional review of these patient populations who were treated and then followed after completion of treatment at our institute during the last 10 years.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 17 patients were enrolled after fulfillment of the eligibility criteria. The responses were documented in 16 patients through magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography of the pelvis, done at 3 months of treatment completion. More than 80% of the patients had complete radiological responses. Among the surviving participants, the 2-year disease-free survival rate was found to be more than two-thirds. Approximately 20% of the study participants had disease recurrence during the subsequent clinic visits following treatment completion.
    UNASSIGNED: This review emphasises the impact of definitive chemo-radiation in achieving radiological and clinical responses in patients with non-metastatic ASCCs. Moreover, to our knowledge, this is the first review to highlight anal cancer\'s incidence and characteristics in Pakistan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    Tweetableabstract手术治疗的乳头状肾细胞癌显示不同的预后,需要特定的预后模型进行咨询,随访和高危患者识别。我们的目标是总结和比较当前推荐的模型。
    Tweetable abstract Surgically treated papillary renal cell carcinoma shows distinct prognosis and needs specific prognostic models for counseling, follow-up and high-risk patient identification. Our goal is to summarize and compare currently recommended models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:软骨肉瘤是一种常见的骨恶性肿瘤,主要的治疗方法是手术。不同的手术导致不同的生存结果。本研究的目的是构建一种新的临床预测工具,以准确预测接受不同治疗的软骨肉瘤患者的总体生存率(OS)和导致特异性生存率(CSS)。
    方法:招募了2000年1月1日至2016年12月31日登记的620例软骨肉瘤患者作为研究目标。缺少的值由多个填充。两个连续变量,年龄和肿瘤大小,根据Kaplan-Meier曲线分为二元变量。使用单变量和多变量分析来探索预测因子并建立列线图。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析来减少潜在混杂因素的影响,以确定不同的手术方式在亚组中是否有任何生存获益。
    结果:在多元cox回归中,年龄,grade,肿瘤大小,放射治疗,化疗,和手术方法被确定为软骨肉瘤的独立预后因素。要构建1-,3-,以及具有预后因素的OS和CSS的5年列线图,并在内部验证c指数(OS,0.807;CSS,0.847)高于美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)(OS,0.685;CSS,0.732).
    结论:这项研究发现,四肢非转移性软骨肉瘤患者的5年总生存率约为80%。年龄,恶性程度高,大肿瘤,先前的放化疗,手术选择差是独立危险因素。因此,本研究建立的列线图将有助于优化临床医生对患者的个性化决策。
    OBJECTIVE: Chondrosarcoma is a common bone malignancy, and the main treatment method is surgery. Different surgeries lead to different survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to construct a new clinical predictive tool to accurately predict the overall survival (OS) and cause specific survival (CSS) of patients with chondrosarcoma receiving different treatments.
    METHODS: A total of 620 patients with chondrosarcoma registered between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2016 were recruited as study targets. The missing values are filled by multiple imputation. Two continuous variables, age and tumor size, were divided into binary variables based on Kaplan-Meier curve. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore predictors and establish nomograms. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce the impact of potential confounders to determine whether different surgical modalities had any survival benefits in subgroups.
    RESULTS: In a multivariate cox regression, age, grade, tumor size, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgical methods were identified as independent prognostic factors for chondrosarcoma. To construct 1-, 3-, and 5-year nomogram maps of OS and CSS with prognostic factors and verify the c index internally (OS, 0.807; CSS, 0.847) above American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (OS, 0.685; CSS, 0.732).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the 5 year overall survival rate of patients with non-metastatic chondrosarcoma of the extremities was about 80%. Age, high malignancy, large tumor, prior chemoradiotherapy, and poor surgical selection were independent risk factors. Therefore, the nomogram established in this study will help to optimize clinicians\' personalized decision making for patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Toll样受体(TLRs)在调节免疫细胞中起重要作用,并且由于其在炎症微环境调节中的关键作用,在肿瘤发生中至关重要。因为它们促进炎症细胞因子和趋化因子的合成和释放。发现Toll样受体4和TLRs9在乳腺癌中高表达。本研究的目的是探讨可溶性toll样受体4和9(sTLR4和sTLR9)作为乳腺癌诊断和预后的潜在生物标志物及其与乳腺癌临床病理参数的关系。
    方法:在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,招募了186名女性受试者,并将其分为三组。第一组:62名健康对照,第二组:62例诊断为非转移性乳腺癌,和组III:62名被诊断患有转移性乳腺癌的受试者。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)技术定量检测血清中sTLR4和sTLR9的水平。
    结果:与健康对照组相比,非转移组和转移组均显示出血清sTLR4和sTLR9表达水平明显较高。与非转移组相比,转移患者中仅sTLR9显著增加。血清sTLR9和sTLR4水平在多因素logistic回归模型中仍与乳腺癌显著相关(P=<.001)。ROC曲线显示sTLR4和sTLR9均可作为区分正常女性和乳腺癌患者的重要参数。
    结论:可溶性toll样受体4和sTLR9在转移性和非转移性BC患者中过表达高于良性病例。sTLR4和TLR9的表达水平作为肿瘤侵袭性的指标具有临床兴趣,提示为预后生物标志物。Toll样受体可能代表乳腺癌的治疗靶标。
    BACKGROUND: Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play an important role in regulation of immune cells and are vital in tumorigenesis due to its crucial role in inflammatory microenvironment regulation, as they promote the synthesis and release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Toll-like receptors 4 and TLRs 9 were found to be highly expressed in breast cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the soluble toll-like receptors 4 and 9 (sTLR4 and sTLR9) as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer and their association with the clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer.
    METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, 186 female subjects were recruited and divided into three groups, Group I: 62 healthy control, Group II: 62 subjects diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer, and Group III: 62 subjects diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique was used to quantify the levels of sTLR4 and sTLR9 in serum.
    RESULTS: Both non-metastatic and metastatic groups showed significant higher levels of both serum sTLR4 and sTLR9 expression compared to healthy controls. Only sTLR9 was significantly increased among metastatic patients compared to non-metastatic group. Serum levels of sTLR9 and sTLR4 were still significantly associated with breast cancer in a multiple logistic regression model (P = <.001). ROC curves showed that both sTLR4 and sTLR9 can be a significant parameter to discriminate between normal females and breast cancer patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Soluble toll-like receptors 4 and sTLR9 are over-expressed in patients with metastatic and non-metastatic BC than in benign cases. The expression levels of sTLR4 and TLR9 have clinical interest as indicators of tumor aggressiveness suggested to be prognostic biomarkers. Toll-like receptors may represent therapeutic targets in breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:一些术前系统性炎症指标已被证明与非转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的预后相关。然而,这些指标目前不包括在主要的预后模型中,很少有研究比较不同术前全身炎症指标的预后效果。
    方法:本研究回顾性分析四川大学华西医院2011年至2013年诊断为非转移性肾癌并行肾切除术的患者。术前不同的全身炎症指标(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率[NLR],血小板与淋巴细胞比率[PLR],单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率[MLR],全身免疫炎症指数[SII],和全身炎症反应指数[SIRI])进行计算。采用Logistic回归分析探讨全身炎症指标与临床特征的关系,Cox回归分析用于确定总生存期(OS)的独立预后因素。还计算了一致性指数(c指数)。
    结果:共820名患者被纳入研究,中位随访时间为78个月。更高水平的NLR(>3.04),PLR(>147),MLR(>0.32),SII(>700),和SIRI(>1.27)被发现与更晚期的肿瘤分期有关,更高的Furman等级,和更大的肿瘤大小。在多元Cox回归中,NLR,PLR,MLR,SII,和SIRI被确定为独立的预后因素,和SII具有最高和最显着的风险比和最大的c指数。
    结论:结论:研究发现,各种全身性炎症指标与较差的OS相关.其中,SII表现出最高的预测功效,提示其可能作为未来预后模型的组成部分。
    BACKGROUND: Several preoperative systemic inflammation indices have been proven to be correlated with the prognosis of patients diagnosed with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, these indices are currently not included in the main prognostic models, and few studies have compared the prognostic efficacy of different preoperative systemic inflammation indices.
    METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients diagnosed with non-metastatic RCC who underwent nephrectomy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2011 to 2013. Different preoperative systemic inflammation indices (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio [MLR], systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], and systemic inflammation response index [SIRI]) were calculated. Logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between systemic inflammation indices and clinical characteristics, and Cox regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). The concordance index (c-index) was also calculated.
    RESULTS: A total of 820 patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up of 78 months. Higher levels of NLR (> 3.04), PLR (> 147), MLR (> 0.32), SII (> 700), and SIRI (> 1.27) were found to be associated with more advanced tumor stage, higher Furman grade, and larger tumor size. In multivariate Cox regression, NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI were identified as independent prognostic factors, and SII had the highest and most significant hazard ratio and the largest c-index.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, various systemic inflammation indices were found to be associated with poorer OS. Among them, SII exhibited the highest predictive efficacy, suggesting its potential inclusion as a component in future prognostic models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:预后营养指数(PNI),在许多人类恶性肿瘤中,单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)和血小板(PLT)与肿瘤存活相关。然而,没有研究结合PNI-MLR-PLT评分,表明其对非转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)患者预后的预测意义.
    方法:在本研究中,我们回顾性收集了164例非转移性ccRCC患者的临床病理特征和预后数据,旨在确定PNI-MLR-PLT评分对患者术后预后的临床意义.PNI的最佳截止值(PNI>47.40vsPNI<47.40),MLR(MLR>0.31vsMLR<0.31)和PLT(PLT>245vsPLT<245)用相对工作特征(ROC)曲线分析鉴定。通过三个指标的值建立PNI-MLR-PLT评分系统,每个适应症的评分为0分或1分.使用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox回归模型分析总生存期(OS)和无转移生存期(MFS)。
    结果:平均随访时间为85.67个月。8名(5.0%)患者死亡,4例(2.0%)复发,术后发生转移7例(4.0%)。3年OS和MFS率分别为98.2%和97.6%,5年OS和MFS率均为90.2%。我们的结果表明,PNI-MLR-PLT评分与病理T分期和肿瘤分级呈负相关。生存结果显示,较低的PNI-MLR-PLT评分与术后不良OS(P<0.001)和MFS(P<0.001)相关。关于病理T分期的亚组分析,肿瘤分级和手术方式获得了一致的结果。单变量和多变量Cox分析表明,高PNI-MLR-PLT评分是非转移性ccRCC患者肿瘤生存的独立保护因素。
    结论:我们的数据表明,PNI-MLR-PLT评分可以作为非转移性ccRCC患者的一个有希望的独立预后因素。
    BACKGROUND: Prognositic nutritional index (PNI), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and platelet (PLT) are associated with tumor survival in many human malignancies. Whereas, no study combined PNI-MLR-PLT score and indicated its predictive significance on the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
    METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively collected the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic data from 164 cases of non-metastatic ccRCC and aimed to determine the clinical significance of PNI-MLR-PLT score on patients\' outcomes after surgery. The optimal cut-off values of PNI (PNI > 47.40 vs PNI < 47.40), MLR (MLR > 0.31 vs MLR < 0.31) and PLT (PLT > 245 vs PLT < 245) were identified with relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The PNI-MLR-PLT score system was established by the value of three indexes, each indication was assigned a score of 0 or 1. Overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Cox regression models.
    RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 85.67 months. Eight (5.0%) patients died, 4 (2.0%) relapsed, and 7 (4.0%) developed metastasis after surgery. The 3-year OS and MFS rates were 98.2% and 97.6%, and the 5-year OS and MFS rates were both 90.2%. Our results suggested that PNI-MLR-PLT score negatively correlated with pathological T stage and tumor grade. Survival outcomes revealed that lower PNI-MLR-PLT score is associated with inferior OS (P < 0.001) and MFS (P < 0.001) after surgery. Subgroup analysis regarding pathological T stage, tumor grade and surgical modalities obtained consistent results. univariable and multivariable Cox analysis showed that high PNI-MLR-PLT score was the independent protective factor of tumor survival in non-metastatic ccRCC patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that PNI-MLR-PLT score could serve as a promising independent prognostic factor in patients with non-metastatic ccRCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:由法国泌尿外科协会(CC-AFU)前列腺癌委员会进行的叙述性综述的目的是提供PET/CT在治疗非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)男性中的影响的最新证据。
    方法:本综述基于文献中关于nmCRPC分期患者的PET/CT成像数据。2022年3月对数据进行了PubMed搜索和叙述性审查。只考虑了法语或英语的文章。
    结果:目前的指南推荐骨扫描和CT扫描作为nmCRPC患者分期和随访的标准成像方式。近三分之一的假定nmCRPC的无症状患者在常规影像学检查中最终患有转移性疾病。越来越多的报道表明,常规成像在检测nmCRPC患者的转移性疾病方面的准确性有限。导致下一代成像技术的发展。在一项回顾性研究中,18F-胆碱PET/CT在先前常规成像阴性的27/58例高风险nmCRPC患者中检测到远处转移。在分期策略中实施前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET/CT的放射性标记配体已导致45%至98%的在常规成像上推定nmCRPC的患者中检测到转移。转移性CRPC的这种早期诊断可以允许患者转诊进行转移定向治疗(即立体定向放射治疗)。旨在延长全身治疗的疗效并改善临床结局。然而,当前的数据不足以推荐这种策略,必须在临床试验中进行适当评估。的确,如果第二代雄激素受体抑制剂(达鲁柳胺,恩扎鲁他胺,阿帕鲁胺),延长寿命,均未应用于PSA高速患者亚组(PSA倍增时光<10个月)。
    结论:在分期策略中实施PSMA-PET/CT将导致疾病阶段迁移到骨盆外,至少一半的推定nmCRPC患者患有M1疾病。PSMA-PET/CT的前所未有的准确性可能为更个性化的治疗策略铺平道路。然而,目前尚无数据支持该策略适用于所有nmCRPC患者,因为尚未证实早期发现M1疾病或MDT对肿瘤学有益处.©2022ElsevierMassonSAS。保留所有权利。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this narrative review conducted by the Prostate Cancer Committee of the French Association of Urology (CC-AFU) was to provide an update on the current evidence for the impact of PET/CT in the management of men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
    METHODS: This review is based on data available in the literature on PET/CT imaging for staging nmCRPC patients. A PubMed search and narrative review of the data were performed in March 2022. Only articles in French or English were considered.
    RESULTS: Current guidelines recommend bone scan and CT scan as standard imaging modalities for staging and follow-up of patients with nmCRPC. Nearly one-third of asymptomatic patients with presumed nmCRPC ultimately have metastatic disease on conventional imaging. Increasing reports have shown that conventional imaging has limited accuracy in detecting metastatic disease in nmCRPC patients, leading to the development of next-generation imaging techniques. In a retrospective study, 18F-choline PET/CT detected distant metastases in 27/58 high-risk nmCRPC patients with prior negative conventional imaging. The implementation of radiolabeled ligands of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in staging strategy has resulted in metastasis detection in 45% to 98% of patients with presumptive nmCRPC on conventional imaging. Such an early diagnosis of metastatic CRPC may allow patients to be referred for metastasis-directed therapies (i.e. stereotactic body radiotherapy), aimed at prolonging the efficacy of systemic therapies and improving clinical outcomes. However, current data are not strong enough to recommend this strategy, which must be properly evaluated in clinical trials. Indeed, the use of molecular imaging may lead to inappropriate undertreatment if the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (darolutamide, enzalutamide, apalutamide), which prolong life, are not used in the subgroup of patients with high PSA velocity (PSA doubling time <10 months).
    CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of PSMA-PET/CT in the staging strategy would result in a migration of disease stage to extra-pelvic, M1 disease in at least half of presumed nmCRPC patients. The unprecedented accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT may pave the way for a more personalized treatment strategy. However, no data yet support this strategy for all nmCRPC patients as no oncologic benefit of early detection of M1 disease or MDT has been demonstrated. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号