暂无摘要。

We report a case involving a post-menopausal female who experienced a sudden loss of peripheral vision in her right eye seven months after a confirmed COVID-19 infection. MRI scans of the brain and orbit excluded neuritis and multiple sclerosis, leading to the diagnosis of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). It is known that the intense inflammatory condition resulting from acute respiratory distress syndrome triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infections can result in a heightened tendency for blood clot formation. Emerging research underscores the potential link between the likelihood of a thrombotic event in the eye as a consequence of COVID-19 infection and the development of NAION. The connection between NAION and COVID-19, whether it is correlative or coincidental, remains uncertain. However, this case report aims to present evidence for the plausibility of this link and offer insights into potential ophthalmologic complications caused by COVID-19.

UNASSIGNED: The peripapillary choroid shares a blood supply with and is directly apposed to the optic nerve, and therefore may contribute to the pathogenesis of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Prior studies evaluating peripapillary choroidal thickness (PCT) or choroidal vascularity index (CVI; the ratio of the perfused area to total choroid area) have produced mixed results. None investigated the relationship between PCT and CVI or demonstrated functional correlates. We hypothesized that greater PCT and lower CVI would correlate with visual function in patients presenting with NAION.
UNASSIGNED: Seventeen eyes with NAION (9 acute, 8 non-acute) and 6 unaffected \"fellow\" eyes in 13 patients, and 18 eyes in 18 age-matched control subjects were imaged using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) prospectively between 2017-2018. Mean PCT and CVI measurements were compared across groups and with respect to corresponding automated perimetric performance at the same visit.
UNASSIGNED: Analysis of variance showed significantly greater PCT (NAION: 278 ± 65 μm, Fellow: 221 ± 50 μm, Control: 158 ± 27 μm, p<0.001) and lower CVI (NAION: 0.35 ± 0.03, Fellow: 0.35 ± 0.04, Control: 0.38 ± 0.02, p<0.005) in patients with NAION compared to control subjects. Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons showed greater PCT and lower CVI in NAION-affected eyes compared to control eyes (p values<0.008), and no significant differences in PCT or CVI between NAION and fellow eyes (p values>0.06). PCT was negatively correlated with CVI among unaffected fellow eyes (r=-0.8, p<0.05), but not among acute NAION eyes (r=-0.1, p>0.7), non-acute NAION eyes (r=0.1, p>0.7), or controls (r=-0.3, p>0.2). Nasal CVI was positively correlated with mean deviation scores in non-acute NAION (r=0.8, p<0.02), but not among fellow unaffected eyes (r=0.8, p>0.05) or acutely affected NAION eyes (r=-0.3, p>0.4). Mean and temporal PCT correlated with pattern standard deviation scores among unaffected fellow eyes (r=0.8, p<0.04; r=0.9, p<0.03), but not among acute NAION eyes (r=-0.2, p>0.5; r=-0.1, p>0.7) or non-acute NAION eyes (r=0.1, p>0.7; r=0.05, p>0.9).
UNASSIGNED: NAION and unaffected fellow eyes demonstrate increased choroidal thicknesses and reduced vascular density. Perimetric performance is directly associated with vascular density among non-acutely affected eyes with NAION. Ongoing work will provide further insights into these structure-function relationships with pathogenic and pathophysiologic relevance.

UNASSIGNED: The hallmark of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is vascular compromise to the anterior optic nerve and thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and secondary degeneration of the retinal ganglion cell body or thinning of the ganglion cell complex (GCC). This study investigates optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT Angiography (OCTA) changes in chronic NAION and identifies imaging biomarkers that best predict disease.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective case-control study of 24 chronic NAION eyes (18 patients) and 70 control eyes (45 patients) to compare both whole-eye and regional OCT, OCTA, static perimetry measurements. OCT measurements were quantified automatically using commercial software, and OCTA was analyzed using custom MATLAB script with large vessel removal to measure 154 total parameters per eye.
UNASSIGNED: We confirmed that static perimetry mean deviation (MD) was significantly worse in chronic NAION (-13.53 ± 2.36) than control (-0.47 ± 0.72; P < 0.001) eyes, and NAION eyes had 31 μm thinner RNFL (control: 95.9 ± 25.8 μm; NAION: 64.5 ± 18.0, P < 0.001), and 21.8 μm thinner GCC compared with controls (control: 81.5 ± 4.4 μm; NAION: 59.7 ± 10.5, P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis of OCTA parameters reveal that vessel area density (VAD) and flux are highly correlated with visual field MD and OCT measurements. Hierarchical clustering two distinct groups (NAION and control), where standardized measurements of NAION eyes were generally lower than controls. Two-way mixed ANOVAs showed significant interaction between patient status (control and chronic NAION) and structure (optic disk and macula) for annulus VAD and flux values and mean RNFL and GCC thickness. Post-hoc tests showed this effect stems from lower peripapillary values in NAION compared to controls. Separate logistic regression models with LASSO regularization identified VAD and flux are one of the best OCTA parameters for predicting NAION.
UNASSIGNED: Ischemic insult to the optic disk is more severe likely from primary degeneration of the affected peripapillary region while macula is affected by secondary retrograde degeneration and loss of retinal ganglion cells. In addition to OCT measurements, peripapillary and macular vascular parameters such as VAD and flux are good predictors of optic nerve and retinal changes in NAION.

UNASSIGNED: The ophthalmic artery (OA) was first reconstructed using computer software. The structural differences of ophthalmic arteries in non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and normal eyes, in addition to hemodynamic alterations, were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-one NAION eyes, 19 uninvolved eyes with NAION, and a control group of 26 healthy eyes were retrospectively included. Computed tomographic angiography data were recorded, and corresponding three-dimensional OA models were constructed. Initial OA and internal carotid artery (ICA) diameters and the angle between them were analyzed. Three different OA models were used to evaluate hemodynamic performance. The statistical relationships between the initial diameters of the OA and ICA and the angle between the OA and ICA were described.
UNASSIGNED: OA diameters in NAION eyes were significantly smaller than those in both uninvolved and healthy eyes (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between uninvolved and healthy eyes (P=0.31). The initial ICA diameter and the angle between the OA and ICA did not significantly differ among the three groups. In the three models, the blood flow velocity in the initial ophthalmic arteries of uninvolved eyes was higher than that in the NAION eyes. The mass flows of the right and left ophthalmic arteries, accounting for the ipsilateral ICA in the control model, were 0.57%. However, these values in uninvolved and NAION eyes were 1.36% and 0.25%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: NAION is associated with a smaller initial OA diameter, which may be related to hypoperfusion. To our knowledge, this is the first pilot study to analyze hemodynamic alterations using OA models.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of systemic erythropoietin, as well as oral steroids, in the management of recent-onset non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with NAION within 5 days were randomized into group A (systemic erythropoietin), group B (oral steroids), and group C (control). Group A received 10,000 units of erythropoietin twice a day for 3 days. Group B received oral prednisone 75 mg daily tapered off in 6 weeks.
RESULTS: The mean best-corrected visual acuity (± SD) at the time of presentation was 1 ± 0.56, 1.01 ± 0.6, and 0.94 ± 0.47 logMAR in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P = 0.140); corresponding values at 6-month follow-up were 0.70 ± 0.44, 0.73 ± 0.35, and 0.75 ± 0.39 logMAR, respectively (P = 0.597). Fifty-five percent of patients in group A versus 34.3% in group B and 31.2% in group C had an improvement of at least 3 lines in the best-corrected visual acuity values at the 6th month of follow-up visit (P = 0.04). Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layers at presentation were 189 ± 58, 193 ± 64, and 199 ± 62 micrometers, respectively (P = 0.779), which decreased to 88 ± 12, 74 ± 25, and 71 ± 18, respectively at 6-month follow-up (P = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study indicate the beneficial effects of systemic erythropoietin in preserving the function and structure of the optic nerve in recent-onset NAION.
BACKGROUND: Clinical registration number: IR.SBMU.ORC.REC.1397.18.

BACKGROUND: Many patients who suffer unilateral non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) will eventually develop the same condition in their other eye, worrying them about losing vision in both eyes. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether it is possible to predict the visual outcome of the consecutive NAION event based on initial presentation and to compare mean visual loss of firstly versus secondly affected eyes.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between January 1st 1966 and May 31st 2016 reporting on visual acuity and/or visual field loss of both affected eyes, measured either at presentation or follow-up following bilateral NAION.
RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the meta- analysis of visual acuity, including 9 retrospective reports and one randomized clinical trial, and five retrospective studies were included in visual field meta-analysis. A significant correlation exists for visual acuity (R = 0.387, P < 0.001) in both eyes of the same patient following bilateral NAION, and also for visual field loss (R = 0.445, P < 0.001) in the two eyes. The calculated coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.149 for visual acuity, and 0.198 for visual field loss indicates that for any given individual suffering from unilateral NAION only 15% of visual acuity and 20% of visual field loss in the secondly affected eye can be explained by these outcomes in the first eye. In addition, there was no difference in mean visual outcome of the first versus second NAION events (standardized mean differences of visual acuity 0.008, P = 0.890; and visual field loss, -0.019, P = 0.819).
CONCLUSIONS: Even though a weak connection exists between visual outcome in both eyes following bilateral NAION it is still impossible to predict with certainty the visual outcome of a sequential contralateral NAION event based on the severity of visual loss in the first affected eye. Measures often taken after the first event are ineffective in improving the visual outcome of a second event should it occur.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the correlation of structural damage to the axons of the optic nerve and visual outcome following bilateral non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records of 25 patients with bilateral sequential non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy was performed. Outcome measures were peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with the Stratus optical coherence tomography scanner, visual acuity and visual field loss.
RESULTS: Median peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, mean deviation (MD) of visual field, and visual acuity of initially involved NAION eyes (54.00 µm, -17.77 decibels (dB), 0.4, respectively) were comparable to the same parameters measured following development of second NAION event in the other eye (53.70 µm, p = 0.740; -16.83 dB, p = 0.692; 0.4, p = 0.942, respectively). In patients with bilateral NAION, there was a significant correlation of peripapillary RNFL thickness (r = 0.583, p = 0.002) and MD of the visual field (r = 0.457, p = 0.042) for the pairs of affected eyes, whereas a poor correlation was found in visual acuity of these eyes (r = 0.279, p = 0.176). Peripapillary RNFL thickness following NAION was positively correlated with MD of visual field (r = 0.312, p = 0.043) and negatively correlated with logMAR visual acuity (r = -0.365, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who experience bilateral NAION, the magnitude of RNFL loss is similar in each eye. There is a greater similarity in visual field loss than in visual acuity between the two affected eyes with NAION of the same individual.

Optic neuropathy is a frequent cause of vision loss encountered by ophthalmologist. The diagnosis is made on clinical grounds. The history often points to the possible etiology of the optic neuropathy. A rapid onset is typical of demyelinating, inflammatory, ischemic and traumatic causes. A gradual course points to compressive, toxic/nutritional and hereditary causes. The classic clinical signs of optic neuropathy are visual field defect, dyschromatopsia, and abnormal papillary response. There are ancillary investigations that can support the diagnosis of optic neuropathy. Visual field testing by either manual kinetic or automated static perimetry is critical in the diagnosis. Neuro-imaging of the brain and orbit is essential in many optic neuropathies including demyelinating and compressive. Newer technologies in the evaluation of optic neuropathies include multifocal visual evoked potentials and optic coherence tomography.